Directorio de skills

Descubre skills reutilizables para AI agents.

Busca skills reales de GitHub por tarea y revisa stars, confianza, auditoría, categoría y ruta de instalación antes de utilizarlos.

Cada recomendación conserva un vínculo claro con su repositorio, auditoría y ruta de instalación.

Resultados de búsqueda: defects

Directorio en inglés

A Codex skill for generating minimal zine-style editorial poster prompts and images.

6.3K
Stars
83/100
Confianza
Categoría: design-creativeAuditoría

Agent-first screenshots — an agent drives the real app via CDP and produces clean, defect-free product screenshots (newsletters, landing pages, social, decks, PR). Dual-channel verification (DOM + pixels + vision) in a capture loop. Use for any "take/redo screenshots of the app" task.

4.5K
Stars
67/100
Confianza
Categoría: coding-agentsAuditoría

Whole-repo audits in eight modes. Codebase — merged structural + correctness audit, should this exist AND does it do what it promises. Triggers "nuclear review", "code judo", "whole codebase review", "should this exist", "adversarial audit", "fable audit", "correctness audit", "expectation gaps". Docs/Process — doc drift, walkable journeys. Triggers "audit the docs", "doc drift", "process audit", "walk the journeys". Performance — measured-only perf audit; no finding without a number. Triggers "perf audit", "performance audit", "why is it slow", "bundle audit", "build is slow". Threat-model — abuse paths. Triggers "threat model", "STRIDE", "attack surface". Motion — animation audit. Triggers "motion audit", "audit the animations". SEO — discoverability + AEO. Triggers "seo audit", "aeo", "answer engine", "llms.txt", "rank better". Debt — `SHORTCUT:` ledger. Triggers "debt ledger", "shortcut ledger". Owns bare "audit the codebase"; single-page CWV fix loops go to /lighthouse.

42
Stars
60/100
Confianza
Categoría: securityAuditoría

Rewrite existing text under the EW anti-AI rules and the writer's voice profile, then show a structured before/after with specific failure analysis. Use when the user pastes a draft and asks to fix, tighten, de-slop, humanize, critique, or improve it.

28
Stars
64/100
Confianza
Categoría: securityAuditoría

Searches code specifically for potential bugs, edge cases, race conditions, and incorrect assumptions rather than general style/quality. Use when the goal is finding what's broken, not improving what already works.

21
Stars
65/100
Confianza
Categoría: researchAuditoría

Audit or edit Sero Markdown documentation and other product prose to remove AI-writing patterns while preserving technical meaning, product terminology, links, examples, and the repository voice. Use when the user asks to humanize, de-slop, tighten, simplify, rewrite, or audit Sero documentation, README text, UI copy, release notes, plans, or specifications for AI tells. Also use when prose needs ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English. Do not use for code review or for creative and promotional writing.

19
Stars
61/100
Confianza
Categoría: securityAuditoría

Review a PR, a branch, or a diff in the Sero monorepo and post the findings. Use when the user asks to review code, review a PR, re-review after new commits, check a branch before merge, or double-check an earlier review. Trigger on phrases like "review this PR", "review the delta", "check the changes", "double check it", or any request that ends in review findings. Use this in place of the built-in code-review skill.

19
Stars
61/100
Confianza
Categoría: design-creativeAuditoría

Review changes on current branch and output a structured review. Optionally post to PR with --pr flag, or apply non-blocking follow-ups inline with --apply-followups.

11
Stars
61/100
Confianza
Categoría: coding-agentsAuditoría