kendex-issues

Revisar · 66
Indexado en Registry

Steward the vanillagreencom/kendex issue queue (Linear team KEN is the poll surface; GitHub stays the PR/code surface) on a self-paced loop: watch open PRs, poll, triage (dedupe; close non-kendex issues and repost project-local ones to their owning repo; fix genuine defects in ke

Verified installs0
Estrellas63
Versión1.0.0
Calidad65/100 · Prometedor
Confianza66/100 · Solo sandbox
Auditoría78/100 · Requiere revisión

Perfil del activo

Investigación y trabajo de conocimiento

Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.

Ver categoría

Escenario

Agents de investigación

I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.

Afinidad con Agent

Claude Code + CLI + Codex

Funciona con Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI o Agents personalizados.

Instalar

Listo

npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues

Mantenimiento

Actual

Actualizado hoy

Riesgo

Requiere revisión

Permission surface may require sandboxing

Calidad de GitHub

63

65/100 Calidad · 74/100 Confianza

Etiquetas de cobertura

InvestigaciónAgents de investigaciónagent-skill

Notas de revisión

Permission surface may require sandboxing · Quality score needs review

Tarjeta de adopción del Agent

Confianza, auditoría y preparación de instalación de un vistazo

Estas puntuaciones combinan metadatos públicos del repositorio, señales de revisión de OpenAgentSkill, actualidad de mantenimiento y preparación de instalación. Sirven para preseleccionar; no sustituyen la revisión humana.

Calidad

Prometedor
65

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

Confianza

Solo sandbox
66

Candidata útil con señales de confianza incompletas o mixtas. Manténgala en un espacio aislado hasta que el ciclo de resultados demuestre el ajuste.

Auditoría

Requiere revisión
78

Revisión legible por máquina de la preparación de instalación, los metadatos de seguridad, el mantenimiento y el riesgo de adopción.

Trust Score de OpenAgentSkill v5

Revisión humana antes de instalar

Ejecute solo en un sandbox y compare alternativas cercanas antes de usarla en trabajo real.

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLI

Estrellas

63 estrellas de GitHub

Actividad del repositorio

63 estrellas y 23 forks

Mantenimiento

Actualizado hoy

Licencia

MIT

Instalar

npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues

Seguridad de instalación

Ruta estándar de paquete o instalación en tiempo de ejecución

Superficie de permisos

shell or command execution, filesystem or document access

Resultados del Agent

Aún no hay datos de resultados del Agent

Documentación

Contexto sólido de README/SKILL.md

Resumen de riesgo

Revisar antes de producción

  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
  • GitHub adoption: 63 GitHub stars
  • Stars/forks activity: 63 stars, 23 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata

Preparación de instalación

Ruta de instalación disponible

  • La ruta de instalación está disponible
  • La evidencia del repositorio está disponible
  • La licencia está declarada
  • Aún no hay evidencia de resultados Agent-Proven

Metadatos legibles por Agent

Datos de decisión legibles por máquina para este skill.

Usa este bloque o el JSON integrado para decidir si un Agent debe instalar este skill, elegir una alternativa o pedir revisión humana primero.

Abrir JSON

Tareas adecuadas

  • flujos de Automatización de flujos
  • Equipos de Claude Code
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects
  • Move data between tools

Agents adecuados

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLICLI

Decisión de instalación

Comando
npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues
Política
Revisar
Revisión humana

Confianza y riesgo

Confianza
66/100
Auditoría
78/100
Nivel de riesgo
Requiere revisión

Ciclo de resultados

Endpoint
/api/agent/outcome
ID del evento
resolve
Resultados
5

Comando de instalación

npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues

No usar cuando

  • Equipos que necesitan un SLA con soporte del proveedor
  • Entornos de alta conformidad sin revisión interna de seguridad
  • No major risk signals from current metadata
  • Indicios de permisos de alto riesgo: ejecución de shell o comandos
  • Permission surface may require sandboxing

Seguridad de Agent v2

50/100 · Evitar instalación automática

ExperimentalRevisar

Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.

Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.

Resolver con API

Alto

Ejecución de shell o comandos

Los metadatos del skill hacen referencia a terminal, CLI, shell, subprocesos o flujos de ejecución de comandos.

Medio

Acceso a red

El skill probablemente consulta páginas remotas, API, repositorios o servicios externos.

Medio

Acceso al sistema de archivos

El skill puede leer o escribir archivos de proyecto, documentos, artefactos generados o estado local.

  • Indicios de permisos de alto riesgo: ejecución de shell o comandos
  • Permission surface may require sandboxing

Destinos de instalación

Instala este skill en tu flujo de Agent

Usa el endpoint público para obtener el comando, la lista de seguridad, prompts y enlaces canónicos.

skill install

OpenAgentSkill CLI

Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.

$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install vanillagreencom-kendex-issues

Plan de resolución de Agent

Deja que un Agent valide el ajuste antes de instalar.

La API Resolve devuelve la skill elegida, alternativas, política de seguridad, notas de auditoría, destino de instalación y un prompt listo para usar.

Abrir plan de texto

Agent debe revisar

  • Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
  • Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
  • Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.

Copiar prompt

Task: Use kendex-issues in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20kendex-issues%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/install
Install command: npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.

Traspaso de Agent

Da al Agent la ruta de instalación, no otro directorio.

Usa el endpoint público para obtener el comando, la lista de seguridad, prompts y enlaces canónicos.

Abrir API de instalación

Prompt de Agent

Use kendex-issues for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/install, then install with: npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues

Metadatos del Registry

Perfil legible por Agent para seleccionar skills automáticamente.

La API Registry expone señales de decisión, confianza, auditoría, casos de uso e instalación sin raspar la interfaz.

Abrir Manifest

Afinidad con Agent

64/100

Automatización de flujos

Plataformas

Claude Code

Informe de auditoría

Requiere revisión · 78/100

Revisión legible por máquina de la preparación de instalación, los metadatos de seguridad, el mantenimiento y el riesgo de adopción.

Ver informe de auditoríaVer informe de evaluación

Panel de decisión de Agent

Fallback candidate for Workflow automation

Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.

64
Preparación
Prototipo
Etapa

Rol en la pila

Candidata de respaldo

Ajuste principal

Automatización de flujos

Etiqueta de confianza

Prototipar primero

Ruta de instalación

Comando listo

Úsalo cuando

  • flujos de Automatización de flujos
  • Equipos de Claude Code
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects

Evidencia

  • recent repository activity
  • install command or GitHub repo available
  • perfil de calidad 65/100
  • 1 eventos de interacción de OpenAgentSkill

revisar primero

  • No major risk signals from current metadata

Ruta de implementación

  1. 1Instálalo en un Agent de sandbox y ejecuta una tarea de Automatización de flujos de principio a fin.
  2. 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
  3. 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.

Perfil de confianza

Solo sandbox

Candidata útil con señales de confianza incompletas o mixtas. Manténgala en un espacio aislado hasta que el ciclo de resultados demuestre el ajuste.

66
Trust Score de OpenAgentSkill

Adopción en GitHub

Revisar

63 estrellas de GitHub

Actividad de stars/forks

Revisar

63 estrellas y 23 forks; la actividad de issues no está disponible en los metadatos actuales

Mantenimiento reciente

Aprobado

Actualizado hoy

Claridad de licencia

Aprobado

MIT

Señales positivas

  • Revisión de IA aprobada
  • La ruta de instalación está disponible
  • La evidencia del repositorio está disponible
  • Repositorio mantenido recientemente
  • El comando de instalación no muestra un patrón de alto riesgo evidente
  • El ciclo de resultados está listo, pero necesita la primera ejecución real de Agent

Revisar antes de instalar

  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
  • GitHub adoption: 63 GitHub stars
  • Stars/forks activity: 63 stars, 23 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
  • Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
  • Aún no hay informes reales de resultados del Agent
  • Se requiere revisión humana antes de una instalación desatendida

Acción recomendada

Ejecute solo en un sandbox y compare alternativas cercanas antes de usarla en trabajo real.

Perfil de calidad

Prometedor candidato para flujos de Agent

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

65
Estrellas de GitHub
63
Actualidad
Hoy
Listo para instalar
Licencia
MIT

Ajuste de flujo

Usa esta skill en estos escenarios

Ajuste de flujo

Añadir a un flujo completo

Lista de alternativas

Compara antes de instalar

Similar skills that may fit this task.

Comparar todo

Resumen

--- name: kendex-issues description: > Steward the vanillagreencom/kendex issue queue (Linear team KEN is the poll surface; GitHub stays the PR/code surface) on a self-paced loop: watch open PRs, poll, triage (dedupe; close non-kendex issues and repost project-local ones to their owning repo; fix genuine defects in kendex's skills/agents/hooks/pi-extensions or the Rust CLI), run each fix through the orch skill, merge, propagate via kendex refresh, then reschedule. A thin wrapper: fix cycles belong to orch, PR mechanics to the github skill, PR monitoring to review-gate's pr-watch, Linear ops to the linear skill — this skill carries only the kendex-specific stewardship knowledge. Use when asked to monitor kendex's issues continuously or to run one fix-and-propagate cycle. ---

> **Never edit this file directly.** To make additions or modifications, edit the appropriate section in the managing project's kendex config — `kendex.toml` at the kendex project root, or `kendex-local.toml` in a source-catalog checkout. Then run `kendex refresh`.

# kendex Issue Steward

Keep the vanillagreencom/kendex issue queue clean and its consumers in sync: watch → poll → triage → fix → merge → propagate → repeat. One cycle per turn, then reschedule.

**This skill is a thin wrapper.** The mechanics live in four owning skills, and every cycle uses them instead of hand-rolling:

| Concern | Owning skill | Load when | |---------|--------------|-----------| | Fix cycle (prepare → delegate → review → submit → merge) | **orch** | every fix, before creating the worktree | | PR threads / replies / reviews / merges / CI logs | **github** | any PR mutation or read | | Watching open PRs across the loop | **review-gate** (`pr-watch.sh`) | first action, every cycle | | Linear reads and writes | **linear** | any Linear operation |

A session driven by this skill should load those naturally at each step and produce zero hand-rolled PR mechanics (raw `gh api` GraphQL where a `github.sh` command exists is the failure smell).

## Loop (one turn)

1. **PR watch first** — `GH_REPO=vanillagreencom/kendex .agents/skills/review-gate/scripts/pr-watch.sh`. Silence + exit 0 means no open PR needs you. Attention lines (threads-open, changes-requested, gate-stale, disarmed, awaiting-stale) → act through the github skill. NEVER hand-roll a PR monitor: pr-watch is the monitoring primitive for every open-PR concern except queue ejection, which it cannot see — after any gate-green, additionally check `isInMergeQueue` + `autoMergeRequest` (GraphQL; `gh pr view --json` lacks queue membership). Ejection is SILENT and discards the auto-merge arm: re-arm once; a second ejection means a flaky required suite — quarantine/escalate rather than re-arm loops. 2. **Poll Linear** — creation sync is ONE-WAY GitHub→Linear (owner reverted the 2026-08-09 two-way experiment), so Linear (team KEN) is the only complete queue: Linear-native issues never appear in `gh issue list`. Refresh the cache first, then read open issues: `linear.sh sync --reconcile`, then `linear.sh cache issues list --state "Triage,Backlog,Todo,In Progress" --max`. GH-synced issues arrive in **Triage** — omitting it hides the entire synced queue (bit the 2026-08-03 campaign: 14 pending issues invisible). Then cross-check GitHub: `gh issue list --repo vanillagreencom/kendex --state open` — cheap, and history earned it (2026-08-09: nine stray open GH issues over eight "empty" cycles while both a generate-on-merge automation and two-way creation sync were briefly on; both are off now, but pre-revert GH copies of Linear issues still exist and can stick open). An open GH issue whose Linear mirror is DONE is residue — close it with the diagnosis. An open GH issue with NO Linear mirror means the GH→Linear sync broke — triage it from GitHub directly and flag the sync. Zero attention lines and zero open on both surfaces → reschedule, stop. 3. **Triage** each issue; run the **Fix cycle** for each valid defect. Mutate on the issue's home surface: a GH-mirrored issue (its Linear body links the GitHub issue) is closed/commented on GitHub and sync updates Linear; a Linear-native issue (no GH link) is updated with the linear skill (`issues update` / `comments create` / `issues complete`). PRs, branches, and CI stay on GitHub either way. The PR body carries BOTH references when the issue has a GitHub mirror — `Closes KEN-<n>` for the tracker and `Closes #<n>` for the mirror — so GitHub links the PR on the issue and closes it with that reference at merge; a Linear-native issue gets `Closes KEN-<n>` alone. Never close a mirror by hand without naming the PR in the closing comment. 4. After any merge, **Propagate + Sync**. 5. **Schedule the next wakeup** (see Cadence). Stop only if the user asked.

## Triage (per issue)

Read body + comments, then classify:

- **Duplicate** → close, referencing the canonical issue. - **Not a kendex asset** → verify by grepping the kendex repo; ownership comes from the asset's own SKILL.md frontmatter (`source: kendex`), never from its install location. Close with a specific rationale. Project-local assets: repost to the owning repo, cross-link both ways, and notify that repo's overseer (tmux tab 1: `memsira:1`, `drovr:1`, `hyprtrade:1`) that the fix is theirs. The steward never fixes a consuming repo's own defect, however easy it looks. - **Speculative / one-project architecture** → close with reasoning; offer a scoped proposal only if it generalizes. - **Genuine kendex defect** (skills/, agents/, hooks/, pi-extensions/, cli/) → Fix cycle. A guidance gap is fixable even when the root trigger is a harness limitation; note the harness part upstream. - **Unfindable references** → check history (`git log -S '<name>' --all`) before assuming a rename or regression. A name that never existed in any version is a recorded typo: close with that evidence; never ship a compatibility shim for it. - **Empty-body issues** → don't guess the defect from the title. Comment asking for the concrete repro, note what your sweep found, leave open.

## Fix cycle (per valid defect) — load orch

The whole cycle is orch's domain: prepare → delegate → review → submit → merge. Load the orch skill and follow its workflows; do not re-implement any step here. kendex-specific parameters orch can't know:

- **Agent fit for delegation**: `generalist` (shell/docs/skills), `rust` (cli/), `iced` (iced-rs). Require tests and the relevant suite green (`bash skills/orch/tests/run-all.sh`, per-skill `tests/*.test.sh`, or `cd cli && cargo test`). - **Fix direction rides in every delegation** when the issue touches skills or tooling: determinism and tooling first — a deletion, a short-circuit, or a tool; added prose is the last resort. Skills are instructions, not explanations (AGENTS.md § Rules, "Engineer over patch"). - **Review the diff yourself** before submit — confirm the actual root cause, not a plausible guess. If a delegate stalls, inspect its worktree and nudge once. - A clearly-coupled real defect found along the way → file a tracking issue and fix it too. - Disjoint files → run issues in parallel; same file → sequence or bundle. - A flaked required check reporting "cannot be rerun" gets a fresh head (`git commit --amend --no-edit` + `push --force-with-lease` — only on never-shared heads; never amend a pushed commit others may have seen), never a force-merge past red.

PR reads and mutations inside the cycle (threads, replies, resolution, merge, CI logs) go through the github skill: `pr-data --actionable`, `post-reply`, `resolve-thread`, `pr-merge`, `ci-logs`, `await-mergeable`.

## Propagate + Sync

**BATCH trains (owner directive 2026-08-12): before opening consumer refresh PRs, scan the open queue (Todo/Triage/in-flight PRs) for items that touch VENDORED assets — if any would force another re-vendor soon, HOLD propagation until those land, then run ONE train carrying everything.** Per-merge trains cost a review round in every consumer each time; the fail-closed direction of vendored fixes makes the wait safe (consumers sit at most one train behind, failing loud, never open). Exceptions worth an immediate train anyway: a fix for a fail-OPEN defect in a consumer-enforced gate, or an owner ask.

**Only after the upstream change is MERGED and on `origin/main`.** A PR that is approved, queued, or mid-merge-queue has not propagated anything: merges can take a while, and refreshing a consumer from an unmerged or mid-queue state vendors bytes main may never contain. Before any consumer refresh, verify the source being read (the cache, or the recorded remote clone) sits at the `origin/main` tip that contains the merge commit — never propagate from a feature branch, a local unpushed main, or a stale cache.

After merges:

1. Sync local main (`checkout main && pull --ff-only`) and fast-forward the cache (`git -C ~/.kendex/cache/vanillagreencom_kendex pull --ff-only`) — some consumers source from the cache, and a stale one silently no-ops their refresh. Confirm the cache tip equals `origin/main` tip before refreshing any consumer. 2. Skill/agent/hook changes → `kendex refresh` (default all scopes) + `kendex verify` in each consumer that vendors the asset. Never narrow to `--scope project`: Pi packages install at global scope, so a project-scoped refresh leaves them drifted and only `kendex verify` catches it (bit the 2026-08-09 batch: pi-task-panel stayed at the old version through a project-scoped refresh in all five consumers). CLI-only changes need a binary rebuild instead, not a skill refresh. 3. Committing in a consumer: - Probe first: `git check-ignore -q <refreshed path>` → ignored means a local-only install mirror with nothing to commit. The probe is authoritative over any remembered per-repo list. - Stage only kendex paths (scoped `git add`, never `-A`). Revert no-op `.kendex-refreshed` churn and template-default churn on tracked `kendex.settings.toml`/`kendex.toml` unless a key change is the payload. - Merge-queue repos: branch → PR → `gh pr merge --auto` (no strategy flag). Force-merge (`--admin --squash`) is pre-authorized only for kendex-only refresh PRs with `kendex verify` green and the required CI check green or unaffected; it cannot override a failing required check — there, arm `--auto` and let the normal flow merge. Reply to and resolve any bot threads either way. - Confirm each push landed and the commit contains only kendex files. - **While propagation PRs are open, sweep each consumer with `GH_REPO=vanillagreencom/<repo> pr-watch.sh --heal` every cycle** — the writer's event triggers occasionally miss a bot review (observed 2026-08-11: hyprtrade-io#43 sat gate-pending ~10 min on a delivered review until the cron floor), and `--heal` converges a stale gate in seconds instead of waiting out the */15 cron (which itself can slip to ~25 min). Same sweep surfaces thread and disarm states on YOUR propagation PRs; other PRs' findings route to that repo's overseer. 4. **New skills don't propagate via refresh** — refresh reinstalls only locked items. A new skill needs a one-time `kendex add --skill <name> -y` per consumer (always `-y`; the interactive prompt dies in non-interactive shells), and the `kendex.toml` entry it writes committed through the repo's queue where that file is tracked. 5. **Review-bot findings on propagation PRs**: a real defect in vendored content is fixed upstream first — issue → fix → merge → refresh on the PR branch → resolve threads citing the fix. Stale-doc nits on the PR's own payload may be fixed directly on the branch. 6. **Capability changes need repo-side wiring.** A change consumers must recognize in their own CI or branch protection

Detalles técnicos

Versión
1.0.0
Licencia
MIT
Última actualización
23 ago 2026
Publicado
23 ago 2026

Resumen de decisión

Candidata de respaldo

64
Listo
Prototipo
Etapa

recent repository activity

Auditoría

Revisión de instalación

Revisión de instalación y adopción

78
Requiere revisión
Seguridad
80/100
Mantenimiento
100/100
Instalar
92/100
Abrir auditoría completaVer informe de evaluación

Evidencia probada por Agent

Evidencia probada por Agent

Informes de resultados tras resolver, revisar, instalar y una ejecución limitada.

0
Probado
Needs first agent runAuto-instalación: revisar primeroÚltimo: Desconocido
Tasa de éxito
Fallo reciente
Resultados
0
Calidad de salida
Fallidos
0
No relevante
0
Instalaciones
0
Bloqueado por riesgo
0
Configuración necesaria
0
Producción
0

Aún no hay datos de resultados de Agent. La primera ejecución puede informar éxito, configuración necesaria, bloqueos de riesgo, fallo o irrelevancia mediante /api/agent/outcome.

Instalar

Añadir al flujo de Agent

Gratis y de código abierto. Revisa el informe antes de instalar en Agents de producción.

Bucle de crecimiento

Kit para compartir

X

Borrador basado en un caso para kendex-issues, listo para publicar manualmente en X.

Nota del curador
kendex-issues: Steward the vanillagreencom/kendex issue queue (Linear team KEN is the poll surface; GitHub s...

63 stars

https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues?ref=x
Abrir borrador de X
Respuesta opcional con comando de instalación
Listing + install path for kendex-issues:
https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues?ref=x

Install: npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues

Fuente de la ficha

Indexado por Registry

Reclamable

Esta ficha se indexó desde fuentes públicas y no está marcada como oficial hasta que se apruebe una reclamación de mantenedor.

Indexado por
Índice comunitario de OpenAgentSkill

La atribución enlaza al repositorio público o al perfil del creador. Los creadores pueden reclamar la ficha para actualizar las señales de propiedad.

Reclamar este skill

Reclamación del propietario

Reclamar esta ficha de skill

Esta ficha Indexado por Registry se atribuye a vanillagreencom, pero aún no está marcada como oficial. Reclámala para añadir una señal de propietario verificado y hacer más fiables futuras actualizaciones de lanzamiento, instalación y auditoría.

Kit de enlaces para creadores

Añade las insignias de evidencia a tu README

Muestra la ficha canónica, las señales actuales de confianza y auditoría, y evidencia real de Agent-Proven donde los desarrolladores evalúan el repositorio.

[![Listed on OpenAgentSkill](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues?metric=listed&label=Listed)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues)
[![OpenAgentSkill Trust](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues?metric=trust&label=Trust)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues)
[![OpenAgentSkill Audit](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues?metric=audit&label=Audit)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/audit)
[![Agent Proven](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues?metric=proven&label=Agent%20Proven)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues)

Autor

V

vanillagreencom

@vanillagreencom

Etiquetas

Afinidad con plataforma

Señales de salud

Estrellas de GitHub
63
Puntuación de calidad
36/100
Último push de GitHub
23 ago 2026
Pistas del framework
Desconocido
Vistas de OpenAgentSkill
1
Copias de instalación
0
Clics externos
0

Señal de comunidad

Comparte si este skill resulta útil para tu flujo de Agent. Los comentarios agregados mejoran la clasificación con el tiempo.

Confianza y seguridad

Solo sandbox

66
  • Adopción en GitHub63 estrellas de GitHubRevisar
  • Actividad de stars/forks63 estrellas y 23 forks; la actividad de issues no está disponible en los metadatos actualesRevisar
  • Mantenimiento recienteActualizado hoyAprobado
  • Claridad de licenciaMITAprobado
  • Completitud de README/SKILL.mdLos metadatos incluyen suficiente contexto de uso y flujo de trabajoAprobado
  • Riesgo de dependencias/runtimecommand execution surface, network or browser surfaceInfo