技能目录

为 AI Agent 发现可复用技能。

按任务搜索真实的 GitHub 技能,并在使用前查看 Stars、信任、审计、分类和安装路径。

每个推荐都保留与其仓库、审计和安装路径的明确关联。

搜索结果: rna-seq

英文目录

A comprehensive collection of ready-to-use scientific and research skills for AI agents.

31K
Stars
78/100
信任
分类: utility审计

A python library for multi omics included bulk, single cell and spatial RNA-seq analysis.

1.0K
Stars
84/100
信任
分类: geo-science审计

Data structure for annotated matrices in single-cell analysis. Use when working with .h5ad files or integrating with the scverse ecosystem. This is the data format skill—for analysis workflows use scanpy; for probabilistic models use scvi-tools; for population-scale queries use cellxgene-census.

34K
Stars
77/100
信任
分类: data-analysis审计

Infer gene regulatory networks (GRNs) from gene expression data using scalable algorithms (GRNBoost2, GENIE3). Use when analyzing transcriptomics data (bulk RNA-seq, single-cell RNA-seq) to identify transcription factor-target gene relationships and regulatory interactions. Supports distributed computation for large-scale datasets.

34K
Stars
77/100
信任
分类: data-analysis审计

An overview of algorithms for estimating pseudotime in single-cell RNA-seq data

444
Stars
70/100
信任
分类: geo-science审计

🐟 🍣 🍱 Highly-accurate & wicked fast transcript-level quantification from RNA-seq reads using selective alignment

893
Stars
73/100
信任
分类: geo-science审计

A Python implementation of the DESeq2 pipeline for bulk RNA-seq DEA.

753
Stars
71/100
信任
分类: geo-science审计

Cell type annotation for single-cell RNA-seq using multi-LLM consensus

646
Stars
71/100
信任
分类: geo-science审计

197 bioinformatics & life science skills for Claude Code and AI agents — BixBench 92.0% accuracy. RNA-seq, single-cell, drug discovery, proteomics, and more. Powers OmicsHorizon.

208
Stars
67/100
信任
分类: geo-science审计

Multi-agent LLM driven cell type annotation for single-cell RNA-Seq data

132
Stars
64/100
信任
分类: agent-frameworks审计

Scientific research engine with adversarial review, tree search, and serendipity detection. Use when: exploring hypotheses, validating findings against literature, running computational experiments with quality gates, or hunting for unexpected discoveries. Do NOT use for simple Q&A, code editing, or non-research tasks.

16
Stars
58/100
信任
分类: research审计