delivery-discipline

Revoir · 59
Indexé dans Registry

Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, skill file, wave spec, README section, summary document, CHANGELOG entry, or any markdown file declaring completion or pass/fail status). Applies before the write happens, not after. Without

Verified installs0
Stars16
Version1.0.0
Qualité59/100 · Prometteur
Confiance59/100 · Do not auto-install
Audit74/100 · Revue nécessaire

Profil de l’actif

Recherche et travail de connaissance

Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.

Voir la catégorie

Scénario

Agents de recherche

I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.

Adéquation Agent

Claude Code + CLI + Codex

Compatible avec Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI ou des Agents personnalisés.

Installer

Prêt

npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline

Maintenance

À jour

3 jours depuis le dernier push

Risque

Revue nécessaire

Permission surface may require sandboxing

Qualité GitHub

16

59/100 Qualité · 67/100 Confiance

Tags de couverture

RechercheAgents de rechercheagent-skill

Notes de revue

Permission surface may require sandboxing · The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.

Carte d’adoption Agent

Confiance, audit et préparation à l’installation en un coup d’œil

Ces scores combinent les métadonnées publiques du dépôt, les signaux de revue OpenAgentSkill, la fraîcheur de maintenance et la préparation à l’installation. Ils servent à présélectionner et ne remplacent pas la revue humaine.

Qualité

Prometteur
59

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

Confiance

Do not auto-install
59

Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.

Audit

Revue nécessaire
74

Revue lisible par machine de la préparation à l’installation, des métadonnées de sécurité, de la maintenance et du risque d’adoption.

Trust Score OpenAgentSkill v5

Revue humaine avant installation

Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLI

Stars

16 stars GitHub

Activité du dépôt

16 stars et 0 forks

Maintenance

3 jours depuis le dernier push

Licence

Apache-2.0

Installer

npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline

Sécurité d’installation

Chemin d’installation standard de package ou runtime

Surface de permissions

filesystem or document access, network or browser access

Résultats Agent

Pas encore de données de résultats Agent

Documentation

Contexte README/SKILL.md solide

Résumé des risques

Revoir avant production

  • The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: filesystem or document access, network or browser access

Préparation à l’installation

Chemin d’installation disponible

  • Le chemin d’installation est disponible
  • La preuve du dépôt est disponible
  • La licence est déclarée
  • Pas encore de preuve de résultat Agent-Proven

Métadonnées lisibles par Agent

Données de décision lisibles par machine pour ce skill.

Utilisez ce bloc ou le JSON intégré pour décider si un Agent doit installer ce skill, choisir une alternative ou demander d’abord une revue humaine.

Ouvrir JSON

Tâches adaptées

  • Workflows d’Agents de recherche
  • Équipes Claude Code
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects
  • Sources de recherche

Agents adaptés

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLICLI

Décision d’installation

Commande
npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
Politique
Revoir
Revue humaine
Oui

Confiance et risque

Confiance
59/100
Audit
74/100
Niveau de risque
Revue nécessaire

Boucle de résultat

Endpoint
/api/agent/outcome
ID d’événement
resolve
Résultats
5

Commande d’installation

npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline

Ne pas utiliser quand

  • Équipes qui nécessitent un SLA soutenu par le fournisseur
  • production agents without a repository review
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
  • No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet

Sécurité Agent v2

50/100 · Éviter l’installation automatique

ExpérimentalRevoir

Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.

Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.

Résoudre via API

Moyen

Browser automation

Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.

Moyen

Accès réseau

La skill récupère probablement des pages distantes, API, dépôts ou services externes.

Moyen

Accès au système de fichiers

La skill peut lire ou écrire des fichiers de projet, documents, artefacts générés ou l’état local de l’espace de travail.

Moyen

Accès à la base de données

La skill peut inspecter des schémas, interroger des bases de données ou travailler avec des stockages persistants.

  • Permission surface may require sandboxing

Cibles d’installation

Installer ce skill dans votre workflow Agent

Utilisez le point de terminaison public pour récupérer la commande, la checklist, les prompts et les liens canoniques.

skill install

OpenAgentSkill CLI

Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.

$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline

Plan de résolution Agent

Laissez un Agent vérifier la pertinence avant l’installation.

L’API Resolve renvoie la skill sélectionnée, des alternatives, la politique de sécurité, les notes d’audit, la cible d’installation et un prompt prêt à l’emploi.

Ouvrir le plan texte

L’Agent doit vérifier

  • Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
  • Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
  • Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.

Copier le prompt

Task: Use delivery-discipline in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20delivery-discipline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install
Install command: npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.

Relais Agent

Donnez à l’Agent le chemin d’installation, pas un autre annuaire.

Utilisez le point de terminaison public pour récupérer la commande, la checklist, les prompts et les liens canoniques.

Ouvrir l’API d’installation

Prompt Agent

Use delivery-discipline for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install, then install with: npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline

Métadonnées Registry

Profil lisible par Agent pour la sélection automatique de skills.

L’API Registry fournit les signaux de décision, confiance, audit, cas d’usage et installation sans analyser l’interface.

Ouvrir Manifest

Adéquation Agent

58/100

Agents de recherche

Plateformes

Claude Code

Rapport d’audit

Revue nécessaire · 74/100

Revue lisible par machine de la préparation à l’installation, des métadonnées de sécurité, de la maintenance et du risque d’adoption.

Voir le rapport d’auditVoir le rapport d’évaluation

Panneau de décision Agent

Fallback candidate for Research agents

Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.

58
Préparation
Prototype
Étape

Rôle dans la pile

Candidate de secours

Pertinence principale

Agents de recherche

Libellé de confiance

Prototyper d’abord

Chemin d’installation

Commande prête

À utiliser lorsque

  • Workflows d’Agents de recherche
  • Équipes Claude Code
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects

Preuves

  • recent repository activity
  • install command or GitHub repo available
  • profil qualité 59/100

revoir d’abord

  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
  • No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet

Chemin d’implémentation

  1. 1Installez-le dans un Agent en sandbox et exécutez une tâche de Agents de recherche de bout en bout.
  2. 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
  3. 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.

Profil de confiance

Do not auto-install

Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.

59
Trust Score OpenAgentSkill

Adoption GitHub

Corriger

16 stars GitHub

Activité stars/forks

Corriger

16 stars et 0 forks; l’activité des issues n’est pas disponible dans les métadonnées actuelles

Maintenance récente

Validé

3 jours depuis le dernier push

Clarté de licence

Validé

Apache-2.0

Signaux positifs

  • Revue IA approuvée
  • Le chemin d’installation est disponible
  • La preuve du dépôt est disponible
  • Dépôt maintenu récemment
  • La commande d’installation ne présente aucun motif de haut risque évident
  • La boucle de résultats est prête mais nécessite la première exécution réelle de l’Agent

Réviser avant installation

  • The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: filesystem or document access, network or browser access
  • GitHub adoption: 16 GitHub stars
  • Stars/forks activity: 16 stars, 0 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
  • Permission surface: filesystem or document access, network or browser access
  • Pas encore de rapports de résultats Agent réels
  • Une revue humaine est requise avant une installation sans surveillance

Action recommandée

Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.

Profil qualité

Prometteur candidat pour les workflows Agent

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

59
Stars GitHub
16
Actualité
il y a 3 jours
Prêt à installer
Oui
Licence
Apache-2.0
Réviser avant installation: Low GitHub adoption signal · The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.

Adéquation au workflow

Utilisez cette skill dans ces scénarios

Adéquation au workflow

Ajouter à un workflow complet

Liste d’alternatives

Comparer avant installation

Similar skills that may fit this task.

Tout comparer

Vue d’ensemble

--- name: delivery-discipline description: Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, skill file, wave spec, README section, summary document, CHANGELOG entry, or any markdown file declaring completion or pass/fail status). Applies before the write happens, not after. Without this discipline, agents ship 60% deliverables and declare closure prematurely. ---

<!-- delivery-discipline: exempt --> <!-- This file DEFINES the delivery-discipline. It is documentation about the discipline, not a closeout declaration subject to it. The exemption is legitimate and is logged as `delivery_discipline_exemption_used` by Wave 4 so exemption usage remains auditable. Do not remove this comment unless you are replacing SKILL.md with a proper attestation block. -->

# Delivery Discipline

## Overview

**Agents trained to optimize for completion will ship 60% of what's needed and declare the work closed.** The pattern is reproducible. Scientific truth is protected by the existing hooks (confounder harness, R2 review gate, Salvagente Rule). **Delivery completeness is not.** This skill closes that gap.

You (the agent) must apply the 4 rules below BEFORE writing any deliverable that will declare anything CLOSED, PASS, DONE, SHIPPED, COMPLETE, FINALIZED, or READY in a commit-relevant markdown file. A PreToolUse hook will block your write if you skip the attestation block defined below. A CI validator will catch bypasses.

## When To Use

**Activate before writing:** - Any `*closeout*.md`, `*status*.md`, `*summary*.md`, `*verdict*.md` - Any `phase*-*.md`, `wave*-*.md`, `sprint*-*.md` - Any `skill*.md`, SKILL.md updates - Any `README.md` or `CHANGELOG.md` entry that declares a version/release/completion - Any document declaring a gate PASS, a phase CLOSED, a release SHIPPED

**Do NOT activate for:** - Normal prose that mentions "done" in casual context ("I closed the file") - Code files (`.js`, `.py`, etc.) — the skill governs deliverables, not source - Exploratory notes that do NOT declare closure

## The 4 Non-Negotiable Rules

### Rule 1 — Surface mapping before writing

Before you write a deliverable that will declare anything CLOSED / PASS / DONE / SHIPPED / COMPLETE, you MUST have a mechanical inventory of what should be covered.

- If the inventory was produced by a subagent (Explore, general-purpose, etc.), you **verify at least the critical claims directly** before trusting it. Read the actual files the subagent describes. API signatures, file paths, function exports get verified first-hand, not assumed. - Optimistic sampling is failure. "I covered the main cases" means you haven't looked at the edge cases.

### Rule 2 — Explicit scope cuts

Every deliverable MUST declare, in its own body, what was LEFT OUT and why.

- A scope-cut list of 0 items is suspicious by default. If your solution covers "everything", you probably haven't looked hard enough. - Force yourself to name at least one cut. If you genuinely cannot find one, state that explicitly and pass self-review (Rule 4) first.

### Rule 3 — Completeness proof by enumeration

When you declare closure, list the concrete items verified. Not "all tests pass" but "26 items in the surface map, 22 verified directly with Read tool, 4 delegated to subagent report and cross-checked". Enumeration beats summary.

### Rule 4 — Adversarial self-review before closure

Before you write "CLOSED" / "PASS" / "DONE", ask yourself: **"What would a skeptical reviewer attack?"** List at least 3 findings. If you find 0, assume you haven't looked hard enough and go back to Rule 1.

## The Attestation Block (MUST appear in every deliverable declaring closure)

Format: a `## Delivery Attestation` section (case-insensitive, `##` or `###`) containing a fenced `json` block. The hook extracts the first fenced json block under that heading and validates it against `skills/vibe/assets/schemas/delivery-attestation.schema.json`.

````markdown ## Delivery Attestation

```json { "covered": [ "Concrete item 1 verified (not a summary)", "Concrete item 2 verified", "..." ], "scope_cuts": [ { "item": "Thing left out of this deliverable", "reason": "Why it is outside this deliverable (not 'no time')" } ], "self_review_findings": [ "Adversarial finding 1 (a skeptical reviewer would attack X because...)", "Adversarial finding 2", "Adversarial finding 3" ], "external_review_status": "pending" } ``` ````

**Field semantics:** - `covered`: array of strings, ≥1 item, each ≥3 chars. Concrete items, not summaries. - `scope_cuts`: array of `{item, reason}` objects. Empty array allowed but suspicious. - `self_review_findings`: array of strings, **≥3 items required**, each ≥20 chars. - `external_review_status`: enum `"pending" | "cleared" | "blocked"`.

## Quick Reference

| Intent | Action | |--------|--------| | Writing a phase closeout | Include the `## Delivery Attestation` section with filled JSON block | | Writing a skill file | Include attestation even if short skill — the skill itself is a deliverable | | Updating CHANGELOG | Attestation required when declaring a release / version | | Updating README status section | Attestation required when declaring pass/fail or coverage | | Exempting a file legitimately | Add `<!-- delivery-discipline: exempt -->` comment near the top. Wave 4 will log this as a `delivery_discipline_exemption_used` governance event; frequent use becomes an audit target at that point. |

## Rationalization Table — DO NOT fall for these

| Excuse | Counter | |--------|---------| | "This is just a small doc, discipline is overkill" | Small docs are where premature closure starts. The attestation takes 60 seconds. | | "I don't have time for scope cuts" | The cut list takes 30 seconds. Skipping it costs 30 minutes when user pushes back. | | "Self-review feels self-indulgent" | It's the cheap version of R2. Skip it and you pay in R2 corrections later. | | "The block only triggers on 'CLOSED' — I'll say 'finalized' instead" | The regex covers synonyms: CLOSED, DONE, PASS/PASSED, SHIPPED, COMPLETE/COMPLETED, FINALIZED, READY, and the failure/partial forms FAIL/FAILED, BLOCKED, PARTIAL, FALSE-POSITIVE, and the review-verdict forms ACCEPTED, REJECTED. Wave 4 will log attempted evasions as governance events; until then, the block itself is the sanction. | | "I'll put my closure claim below the legacy-boundary marker in CHANGELOG/README" | The legacy-boundary marker grandfathers pre-Phase-8 content ONLY while its `hash=<sha256-hex>` attribute matches the LF-normalized below-marker content. Appending any new closure below the marker changes the hash, the boundary becomes invalid, and the whole file is re-subjected to enforcement. To legitimately re-bless the legacy region you must update the hash in a reviewed commit (git diff shows both the new content and the hash change side-by-side). Bare markers without `hash=` are rejected outright. | | "I verified with a subagent, that's enough" | Subagents sample too. Spot-check critical items with Read tool before trusting. | | "External review status: cleared" (without actually running review) | Lying about `external_review_status` is still traceable — when R2 / R3 runs later, it produces `external-review-record` entries that do NOT match, and the inconsistency surfaces at the next audit. The Wave 3 CI validator checks schema shape (enum + required fields); full governance-event cross-referencing is Phase 8.1 scope, not Wave 3. Don't rely on "nobody will notice" — the record trail is public. | | "I'll add the attestation at the end, after writing everything" | Writing the attestation FORCES you to enumerate. Skipping that step defeats the whole point. Write it as you go, not as an afterthought. |

## Red Flags — STOP and apply the skill

- About to write a deliverable containing "CLOSED", "PASS", "DONE", "SHIPPED", "COMPLETE", or synonyms in declarative context - About to mark a TodoWrite task `completed` after a large deliverable - About to stop the session with a "here's what I did" summary - About to commit a markdown file whose name matches `*closeout*`, `*status*`, `*summary*`, `*verdict*`, `*phase*`, `*wave*`, `*skill*`, `readme`, `changelog` - About to declare a release or version bump

**All of these mean: stop, map the surface, declare scope cuts, write the attestation block, then continue.**

## Common Mistakes

- **Fake attestation**: filling fields with generic strings ("looked at everything"). Wave 2 hook enforces minLength + minItems on the attestation block at write time. Wave 3 CI validator will re-enforce schema shape on tracked markdown at commit time. Full audit-log cross-reference (checking whether `external_review_status: "cleared"` matches a real R2/R3 review record in `governance_events`) is Phase 8.1 scope, not Wave 3. Don't assume the current enforcement catches semantic lies — it catches structural ones. - **Skipping scope_cuts because "nothing was cut"**: if you genuinely cut nothing, you probably didn't look hard enough. Use the self-review step to find a scope cut. - **Putting attestation in a comment or footer**: it must be in a `## Delivery Attestation` section with a fenced json block. Other placements won't be parsed. - **Writing attestation as YAML or markdown list**: must be fenced `json` block. Other formats fail schema validation. - **Adding exemption comment to bypass**: exemptions ARE allowed and don't block. Wave 4 will log each use as a `delivery_discipline_exemption_used` governance event; frequent use becomes an audit target once that logging is live. Strict mode (`VIBE_SCIENCE_STRICT=1`) additionally refuses to allow any bypass path (including exemption) when the governance DB cannot be opened or when the `governance_events` table is missing — i.e. when the Wave 4 audit trail would silently drop records. The strict-mode probe actually opens the DB and checks the schema, not just whether the module imports.

## Why This Exists

vibe-science v7.0 protects scientific truth (confounder harness, R2 gate, Salvagente Rule). It did NOT protect delivery completeness — agents could still ship 60% skills, declare phases closed prematurely, sample the surface optimistically.

The pattern was observed repeatedly: Phase 6.1 "closed" but re-retracted when fresh-eyes review found P1s. Phase 7 Wave 1 shipped at 60%. The initial Phase 8 skill was missing 40% of the surface.

This skill (Wave 1) + the PreToolUse hook (Wave 2) + the CI validator (Wave 3) + the governance event log (Wave 4) **together force the same discipline on delivery that the existing hooks force on scientific claims**. Wave 2 enforcement is active today: a hook that blocks the write, not a review that catches the failure after the fact. Waves 3-4 add CI-time scanning and audit-trail logging so bypass attempts become tracked events rather than silent drift.

## When in Doubt

Apply the rules. The cost is 60-120 seconds per deliverable. The cost of skipping is the "user pushes back → retract → patch" cycle we've seen multiple times.

Default: write the attestation. It's cheaper than the correction loop.

Détails techniques

Version
1.0.0
Licence
Apache-2.0
Dernière mise à jour
20 août 2026
Publié
20 août 2026

Instantané de décision

Candidate de secours

58
Prêt
Prototype
Étape

recent repository activity

Audit

Revue d’installation

Revue d’installation et d’adoption

74
Revue nécessaire
Sécurité
77/100
Maintenance
100/100
Installer
92/100
Ouvrir l’audit completVoir le rapport d’évaluation

Preuves validées par Agent

Preuves validées par Agent

Rapports après resolve, revue, installation et une exécution limitée.

0
Validé
Needs first agent runAuto-installation: revoir d’abordDernier: Inconnu
Taux de réussite
Échec récent
Résultats
0
Qualité de sortie
Échecs
0
Non pertinent
0
Installations
0
Bloqué par le risque
0
Configuration requise
0
Production
0

Aucune donnée de résultat Agent pour l’instant. La première exécution peut signaler succès, besoin de configuration, blocage de risque, échec ou non-pertinence via /api/agent/outcome.

Installer

Ajouter au workflow Agent

Gratuit et open source. Examinez le rapport avant l’installation dans des Agents de production.

Boucle de croissance

Kit de partage

X

Brouillon guidé par scénario pour delivery-discipline, prêt pour une publication manuelle sur X.

Note du curateur
delivery-discipline: Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, ski...

16 stars

https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?ref=x
Ouvrir le brouillon X
Réponse facultative avec commande d’installation
Listing + install path for delivery-discipline:
https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?ref=x

Install: npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline

Source de la fiche

Indexé par Registry

Revendiable

Cette fiche a été indexée à partir de sources publiques et n’est pas marquée officielle tant qu’une revendication de mainteneur n’est pas approuvée.

Créateur
th3vib3coder
Indexé par
Index communautaire OpenAgentSkill

L’attribution renvoie au dépôt public ou au profil du créateur. Les créateurs peuvent revendiquer la fiche pour mettre à jour les signaux de propriété.

Revendiquer ce skill

Revendication du propriétaire

Revendiquer cette fiche de skill

Cette fiche Indexé par Registry est attribuée à th3vib3coder, mais n’est pas encore marquée officielle. Revendiquez-la pour ajouter un signal de propriétaire vérifié et rendre les futures mises à jour de lancement, d’installation et d’audit plus fiables.

Kit de backlinks créateur

Ajoutez les badges de preuve à votre README

Affichez la fiche canonique, les signaux actuels de confiance et d’audit, ainsi que de vraies preuves Agent-Proven là où les développeurs évaluent le dépôt.

[![Listed on OpenAgentSkill](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?metric=listed&label=Listed)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline)
[![OpenAgentSkill Trust](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?metric=trust&label=Trust)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline)
[![OpenAgentSkill Audit](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?metric=audit&label=Audit)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/audit)
[![Agent Proven](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?metric=proven&label=Agent%20Proven)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline)

Auteur

T

th3vib3coder

@th3vib3coder

Adéquation plateforme

Signaux de santé

Stars GitHub
16
Score de qualité
32/100
Dernier push GitHub
19 août 2026
Indications de framework
Inconnu
Vues OpenAgentSkill
0
Copies d’installation
0
Clics sortants
0

Signal de communauté

Indiquez si ce skill semble utile à votre workflow Agent. Les retours agrégés améliorent le classement au fil du temps.

Confiance et sécurité

Do not auto-install

59
  • Adoption GitHub16 stars GitHubCorriger
  • Activité stars/forks16 stars et 0 forks; l’activité des issues n’est pas disponible dans les métadonnées actuellesCorriger
  • Maintenance récente3 jours depuis le dernier pushValidé
  • Clarté de licenceApache-2.0Validé
  • Complétude README/SKILL.mdLes métadonnées incluent suffisamment de contexte d’usage et de workflowValidé
  • Risque dépendances/runtimenetwork or browser surfaceValidé