delivery-discipline
Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, skill file, wave spec, README section, summary document, CHANGELOG entry, or any markdown file declaring completion or pass/fail status). Applies before the write happens, not after. Without
Profil de l’actif
Recherche et travail de connaissance
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Scénario
Agents de recherche
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Adéquation Agent
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Compatible avec Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI ou des Agents personnalisés.
Installer
Prêt
npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
Maintenance
À jour
3 jours depuis le dernier push
Risque
Revue nécessaire
Permission surface may require sandboxing
Qualité GitHub
16
59/100 Qualité · 67/100 Confiance
Tags de couverture
Notes de revue
Permission surface may require sandboxing · The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
Carte d’adoption Agent
Confiance, audit et préparation à l’installation en un coup d’œil
Ces scores combinent les métadonnées publiques du dépôt, les signaux de revue OpenAgentSkill, la fraîcheur de maintenance et la préparation à l’installation. Ils servent à présélectionner et ne remplacent pas la revue humaine.
Qualité
PrometteurUseful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Confiance
Do not auto-installTrust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Audit
Revue nécessaireRevue lisible par machine de la préparation à l’installation, des métadonnées de sécurité, de la maintenance et du risque d’adoption.
Trust Score OpenAgentSkill v5
Revue humaine avant installation
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Stars
16 stars GitHub
Activité du dépôt
16 stars et 0 forks
Maintenance
3 jours depuis le dernier push
Licence
Apache-2.0
Installer
npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
Sécurité d’installation
Chemin d’installation standard de package ou runtime
Surface de permissions
filesystem or document access, network or browser access
Résultats Agent
Pas encore de données de résultats Agent
Documentation
Contexte README/SKILL.md solide
Résumé des risques
Revoir avant production
- The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: filesystem or document access, network or browser access
Préparation à l’installation
Chemin d’installation disponible
- Le chemin d’installation est disponible
- La preuve du dépôt est disponible
- La licence est déclarée
- Pas encore de preuve de résultat Agent-Proven
Métadonnées lisibles par Agent
Données de décision lisibles par machine pour ce skill.
Utilisez ce bloc ou le JSON intégré pour décider si un Agent doit installer ce skill, choisir une alternative ou demander d’abord une revue humaine.
Tâches adaptées
- Workflows d’Agents de recherche
- Équipes Claude Code
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
- Sources de recherche
Agents adaptés
Décision d’installation
- Commande
- npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
- Politique
- Revoir
- Revue humaine
- Oui
Confiance et risque
- Confiance
- 59/100
- Audit
- 74/100
- Niveau de risque
- Revue nécessaire
Boucle de résultat
- Endpoint
- /api/agent/outcome
- ID d’événement
- resolve
- Résultats
- 5
Commande d’installation
npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-disciplineNe pas utiliser quand
- Équipes qui nécessitent un SLA soutenu par le fournisseur
- production agents without a repository review
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
- No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet
Skill alternatif
Last30days Skill
53.5K Stars
npx skills add mvanhorn/last30days-skill -g
Skill alternatif
Academic Research Skills
38.4K Stars
npx skills add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Skill alternatif
GPT Researcher
28.0K Stars
npx skills add assafelovic/gpt-researcher
Skill alternatif
DeepResearch
19.8K Stars
npx skills add Alibaba-NLP/DeepResearch
Sécurité Agent v2
50/100 · Éviter l’installation automatique
Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
Moyen
Browser automation
Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.
Moyen
Accès réseau
La skill récupère probablement des pages distantes, API, dépôts ou services externes.
Moyen
Accès au système de fichiers
La skill peut lire ou écrire des fichiers de projet, documents, artefacts générés ou l’état local de l’espace de travail.
Moyen
Accès à la base de données
La skill peut inspecter des schémas, interroger des bases de données ou travailler avec des stockages persistants.
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
Cibles d’installation
Installer ce skill dans votre workflow Agent
Utilisez le point de terminaison public pour récupérer la commande, la checklist, les prompts et les liens canoniques.
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install th3vib3coder-delivery-disciplinePlan de résolution Agent
Laissez un Agent vérifier la pertinence avant l’installation.
L’API Resolve renvoie la skill sélectionnée, des alternatives, la politique de sécurité, les notes d’audit, la cible d’installation et un prompt prêt à l’emploi.
Ouvrir JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20delivery-discipline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Texte Resolve
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20delivery-discipline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Relais d’installation
/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install
L’Agent doit vérifier
- Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
- Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
- Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.
Copier le prompt
Task: Use delivery-discipline in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20delivery-discipline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install
Install command: npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Relais Agent
Donnez à l’Agent le chemin d’installation, pas un autre annuaire.
Utilisez le point de terminaison public pour récupérer la commande, la checklist, les prompts et les liens canoniques.
Relais d’installation
/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install
Format texte LLM
/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install?format=text
Trouver des alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=delivery-discipline&limit=3
Prompt Agent
Use delivery-discipline for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install, then install with: npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-disciplineMétadonnées Registry
Profil lisible par Agent pour la sélection automatique de skills.
L’API Registry fournit les signaux de décision, confiance, audit, cas d’usage et installation sans analyser l’interface.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline
Texte LLM
/api/registry/manifest/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?format=text
Alias d’installation
/api/registry/install/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline
Recommander
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20delivery-discipline%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Adéquation Agent
Agents de recherche
Tags de cas d’usage
Plateformes
Claude Code
Rapport d’audit
Revue nécessaire · 74/100
Revue lisible par machine de la préparation à l’installation, des métadonnées de sécurité, de la maintenance et du risque d’adoption.
Panneau de décision Agent
Fallback candidate for Research agents
Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.
Rôle dans la pile
Candidate de secours
Pertinence principale
Agents de recherche
Libellé de confiance
Prototyper d’abord
Chemin d’installation
Commande prête
À utiliser lorsque
- Workflows d’Agents de recherche
- Équipes Claude Code
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Preuves
- recent repository activity
- install command or GitHub repo available
- profil qualité 59/100
revoir d’abord
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
- No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet
Chemin d’implémentation
- 1Installez-le dans un Agent en sandbox et exécutez une tâche de Agents de recherche de bout en bout.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
Profil de confiance
Do not auto-install
Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Adoption GitHub
Corriger16 stars GitHub
Activité stars/forks
Corriger16 stars et 0 forks; l’activité des issues n’est pas disponible dans les métadonnées actuelles
Maintenance récente
Validé3 jours depuis le dernier push
Clarté de licence
ValidéApache-2.0
Signaux positifs
- Revue IA approuvée
- Le chemin d’installation est disponible
- La preuve du dépôt est disponible
- Dépôt maintenu récemment
- La commande d’installation ne présente aucun motif de haut risque évident
- La boucle de résultats est prête mais nécessite la première exécution réelle de l’Agent
Réviser avant installation
- The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: filesystem or document access, network or browser access
- GitHub adoption: 16 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 16 stars, 0 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- Permission surface: filesystem or document access, network or browser access
- Pas encore de rapports de résultats Agent réels
- Une revue humaine est requise avant une installation sans surveillance
Action recommandée
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Profil qualité
Prometteur candidat pour les workflows Agent
Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Adéquation au workflow
Utilisez cette skill dans ces scénarios
Investigate faster
Research agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Parse messy files
Document processing
I need my agent to read PDFs, extract tables, and turn documents into structured data.
Manage repositories
GitHub automation
I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.
Adéquation au workflow
Ajouter à un workflow complet
Find, compare, and synthesize
Research report agent
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Ingest, retrieve, and cite
RAG knowledge base
A workflow for document-heavy agents that ingest files, create searchable knowledge, retrieve relevant context, and answer with grounded sources.
Operate and verify web apps
Browser QA agent
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Liste d’alternatives
Comparer avant installation
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
Academic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
GPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
DeepResearch
Tongyi Deep Research, the Leading Open-source Deep Research Agent
Vue d’ensemble
--- name: delivery-discipline description: Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, skill file, wave spec, README section, summary document, CHANGELOG entry, or any markdown file declaring completion or pass/fail status). Applies before the write happens, not after. Without this discipline, agents ship 60% deliverables and declare closure prematurely. ---
<!-- delivery-discipline: exempt --> <!-- This file DEFINES the delivery-discipline. It is documentation about the discipline, not a closeout declaration subject to it. The exemption is legitimate and is logged as `delivery_discipline_exemption_used` by Wave 4 so exemption usage remains auditable. Do not remove this comment unless you are replacing SKILL.md with a proper attestation block. -->
# Delivery Discipline
## Overview
**Agents trained to optimize for completion will ship 60% of what's needed and declare the work closed.** The pattern is reproducible. Scientific truth is protected by the existing hooks (confounder harness, R2 review gate, Salvagente Rule). **Delivery completeness is not.** This skill closes that gap.
You (the agent) must apply the 4 rules below BEFORE writing any deliverable that will declare anything CLOSED, PASS, DONE, SHIPPED, COMPLETE, FINALIZED, or READY in a commit-relevant markdown file. A PreToolUse hook will block your write if you skip the attestation block defined below. A CI validator will catch bypasses.
## When To Use
**Activate before writing:** - Any `*closeout*.md`, `*status*.md`, `*summary*.md`, `*verdict*.md` - Any `phase*-*.md`, `wave*-*.md`, `sprint*-*.md` - Any `skill*.md`, SKILL.md updates - Any `README.md` or `CHANGELOG.md` entry that declares a version/release/completion - Any document declaring a gate PASS, a phase CLOSED, a release SHIPPED
**Do NOT activate for:** - Normal prose that mentions "done" in casual context ("I closed the file") - Code files (`.js`, `.py`, etc.) — the skill governs deliverables, not source - Exploratory notes that do NOT declare closure
## The 4 Non-Negotiable Rules
### Rule 1 — Surface mapping before writing
Before you write a deliverable that will declare anything CLOSED / PASS / DONE / SHIPPED / COMPLETE, you MUST have a mechanical inventory of what should be covered.
- If the inventory was produced by a subagent (Explore, general-purpose, etc.), you **verify at least the critical claims directly** before trusting it. Read the actual files the subagent describes. API signatures, file paths, function exports get verified first-hand, not assumed. - Optimistic sampling is failure. "I covered the main cases" means you haven't looked at the edge cases.
### Rule 2 — Explicit scope cuts
Every deliverable MUST declare, in its own body, what was LEFT OUT and why.
- A scope-cut list of 0 items is suspicious by default. If your solution covers "everything", you probably haven't looked hard enough. - Force yourself to name at least one cut. If you genuinely cannot find one, state that explicitly and pass self-review (Rule 4) first.
### Rule 3 — Completeness proof by enumeration
When you declare closure, list the concrete items verified. Not "all tests pass" but "26 items in the surface map, 22 verified directly with Read tool, 4 delegated to subagent report and cross-checked". Enumeration beats summary.
### Rule 4 — Adversarial self-review before closure
Before you write "CLOSED" / "PASS" / "DONE", ask yourself: **"What would a skeptical reviewer attack?"** List at least 3 findings. If you find 0, assume you haven't looked hard enough and go back to Rule 1.
## The Attestation Block (MUST appear in every deliverable declaring closure)
Format: a `## Delivery Attestation` section (case-insensitive, `##` or `###`) containing a fenced `json` block. The hook extracts the first fenced json block under that heading and validates it against `skills/vibe/assets/schemas/delivery-attestation.schema.json`.
````markdown ## Delivery Attestation
```json { "covered": [ "Concrete item 1 verified (not a summary)", "Concrete item 2 verified", "..." ], "scope_cuts": [ { "item": "Thing left out of this deliverable", "reason": "Why it is outside this deliverable (not 'no time')" } ], "self_review_findings": [ "Adversarial finding 1 (a skeptical reviewer would attack X because...)", "Adversarial finding 2", "Adversarial finding 3" ], "external_review_status": "pending" } ``` ````
**Field semantics:** - `covered`: array of strings, ≥1 item, each ≥3 chars. Concrete items, not summaries. - `scope_cuts`: array of `{item, reason}` objects. Empty array allowed but suspicious. - `self_review_findings`: array of strings, **≥3 items required**, each ≥20 chars. - `external_review_status`: enum `"pending" | "cleared" | "blocked"`.
## Quick Reference
| Intent | Action | |--------|--------| | Writing a phase closeout | Include the `## Delivery Attestation` section with filled JSON block | | Writing a skill file | Include attestation even if short skill — the skill itself is a deliverable | | Updating CHANGELOG | Attestation required when declaring a release / version | | Updating README status section | Attestation required when declaring pass/fail or coverage | | Exempting a file legitimately | Add `<!-- delivery-discipline: exempt -->` comment near the top. Wave 4 will log this as a `delivery_discipline_exemption_used` governance event; frequent use becomes an audit target at that point. |
## Rationalization Table — DO NOT fall for these
| Excuse | Counter | |--------|---------| | "This is just a small doc, discipline is overkill" | Small docs are where premature closure starts. The attestation takes 60 seconds. | | "I don't have time for scope cuts" | The cut list takes 30 seconds. Skipping it costs 30 minutes when user pushes back. | | "Self-review feels self-indulgent" | It's the cheap version of R2. Skip it and you pay in R2 corrections later. | | "The block only triggers on 'CLOSED' — I'll say 'finalized' instead" | The regex covers synonyms: CLOSED, DONE, PASS/PASSED, SHIPPED, COMPLETE/COMPLETED, FINALIZED, READY, and the failure/partial forms FAIL/FAILED, BLOCKED, PARTIAL, FALSE-POSITIVE, and the review-verdict forms ACCEPTED, REJECTED. Wave 4 will log attempted evasions as governance events; until then, the block itself is the sanction. | | "I'll put my closure claim below the legacy-boundary marker in CHANGELOG/README" | The legacy-boundary marker grandfathers pre-Phase-8 content ONLY while its `hash=<sha256-hex>` attribute matches the LF-normalized below-marker content. Appending any new closure below the marker changes the hash, the boundary becomes invalid, and the whole file is re-subjected to enforcement. To legitimately re-bless the legacy region you must update the hash in a reviewed commit (git diff shows both the new content and the hash change side-by-side). Bare markers without `hash=` are rejected outright. | | "I verified with a subagent, that's enough" | Subagents sample too. Spot-check critical items with Read tool before trusting. | | "External review status: cleared" (without actually running review) | Lying about `external_review_status` is still traceable — when R2 / R3 runs later, it produces `external-review-record` entries that do NOT match, and the inconsistency surfaces at the next audit. The Wave 3 CI validator checks schema shape (enum + required fields); full governance-event cross-referencing is Phase 8.1 scope, not Wave 3. Don't rely on "nobody will notice" — the record trail is public. | | "I'll add the attestation at the end, after writing everything" | Writing the attestation FORCES you to enumerate. Skipping that step defeats the whole point. Write it as you go, not as an afterthought. |
## Red Flags — STOP and apply the skill
- About to write a deliverable containing "CLOSED", "PASS", "DONE", "SHIPPED", "COMPLETE", or synonyms in declarative context - About to mark a TodoWrite task `completed` after a large deliverable - About to stop the session with a "here's what I did" summary - About to commit a markdown file whose name matches `*closeout*`, `*status*`, `*summary*`, `*verdict*`, `*phase*`, `*wave*`, `*skill*`, `readme`, `changelog` - About to declare a release or version bump
**All of these mean: stop, map the surface, declare scope cuts, write the attestation block, then continue.**
## Common Mistakes
- **Fake attestation**: filling fields with generic strings ("looked at everything"). Wave 2 hook enforces minLength + minItems on the attestation block at write time. Wave 3 CI validator will re-enforce schema shape on tracked markdown at commit time. Full audit-log cross-reference (checking whether `external_review_status: "cleared"` matches a real R2/R3 review record in `governance_events`) is Phase 8.1 scope, not Wave 3. Don't assume the current enforcement catches semantic lies — it catches structural ones. - **Skipping scope_cuts because "nothing was cut"**: if you genuinely cut nothing, you probably didn't look hard enough. Use the self-review step to find a scope cut. - **Putting attestation in a comment or footer**: it must be in a `## Delivery Attestation` section with a fenced json block. Other placements won't be parsed. - **Writing attestation as YAML or markdown list**: must be fenced `json` block. Other formats fail schema validation. - **Adding exemption comment to bypass**: exemptions ARE allowed and don't block. Wave 4 will log each use as a `delivery_discipline_exemption_used` governance event; frequent use becomes an audit target once that logging is live. Strict mode (`VIBE_SCIENCE_STRICT=1`) additionally refuses to allow any bypass path (including exemption) when the governance DB cannot be opened or when the `governance_events` table is missing — i.e. when the Wave 4 audit trail would silently drop records. The strict-mode probe actually opens the DB and checks the schema, not just whether the module imports.
## Why This Exists
vibe-science v7.0 protects scientific truth (confounder harness, R2 gate, Salvagente Rule). It did NOT protect delivery completeness — agents could still ship 60% skills, declare phases closed prematurely, sample the surface optimistically.
The pattern was observed repeatedly: Phase 6.1 "closed" but re-retracted when fresh-eyes review found P1s. Phase 7 Wave 1 shipped at 60%. The initial Phase 8 skill was missing 40% of the surface.
This skill (Wave 1) + the PreToolUse hook (Wave 2) + the CI validator (Wave 3) + the governance event log (Wave 4) **together force the same discipline on delivery that the existing hooks force on scientific claims**. Wave 2 enforcement is active today: a hook that blocks the write, not a review that catches the failure after the fact. Waves 3-4 add CI-time scanning and audit-trail logging so bypass attempts become tracked events rather than silent drift.
## When in Doubt
Apply the rules. The cost is 60-120 seconds per deliverable. The cost of skipping is the "user pushes back → retract → patch" cycle we've seen multiple times.
Default: write the attestation. It's cheaper than the correction loop.
Détails techniques
- Version
- 1.0.0
- Licence
- Apache-2.0
- Dernière mise à jour
- 20 août 2026
- Publié
- 20 août 2026
Instantané de décision
Candidate de secours
recent repository activity
Audit
Revue d’installation
Revue d’installation et d’adoption
- Sécurité
- 77/100
- Maintenance
- 100/100
- Installer
- 92/100
Preuves validées par Agent
Preuves validées par Agent
Rapports après resolve, revue, installation et une exécution limitée.
- Taux de réussite
- —
- Échec récent
- —
- Résultats
- 0
- Qualité de sortie
- —
- Échecs
- 0
- Non pertinent
- 0
- Installations
- 0
- Bloqué par le risque
- 0
- Configuration requise
- 0
- Production
- 0
Aucune donnée de résultat Agent pour l’instant. La première exécution peut signaler succès, besoin de configuration, blocage de risque, échec ou non-pertinence via /api/agent/outcome.
Installer
Ajouter au workflow Agent
Gratuit et open source. Examinez le rapport avant l’installation dans des Agents de production.
Boucle de croissance
Kit de partage
Brouillon guidé par scénario pour delivery-discipline, prêt pour une publication manuelle sur X.
delivery-discipline: Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, ski... 16 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?ref=x
Réponse facultative avec commande d’installation
Listing + install path for delivery-discipline: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?ref=x Install: npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
Source de la fiche
Indexé par Registry
Cette fiche a été indexée à partir de sources publiques et n’est pas marquée officielle tant qu’une revendication de mainteneur n’est pas approuvée.
- Créateur
- th3vib3coder
- Indexé par
- Index communautaire OpenAgentSkill
L’attribution renvoie au dépôt public ou au profil du créateur. Les créateurs peuvent revendiquer la fiche pour mettre à jour les signaux de propriété.
Revendiquer ce skillRevendication du propriétaire
Revendiquer cette fiche de skill
Cette fiche Indexé par Registry est attribuée à th3vib3coder, mais n’est pas encore marquée officielle. Revendiquez-la pour ajouter un signal de propriétaire vérifié et rendre les futures mises à jour de lancement, d’installation et d’audit plus fiables.
Kit de backlinks créateur
Ajoutez les badges de preuve à votre README
Affichez la fiche canonique, les signaux actuels de confiance et d’audit, ainsi que de vraies preuves Agent-Proven là où les développeurs évaluent le dépôt.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline)Auteur
th3vib3coder
@th3vib3coder
Tags
Adéquation plateforme
Signaux de santé
- Stars GitHub
- 16
- Score de qualité
- 32/100
- Dernier push GitHub
- 19 août 2026
- Indications de framework
- Inconnu
- Vues OpenAgentSkill
- 0
- Copies d’installation
- 0
- Clics sortants
- 0
Signal de communauté
Indiquez si ce skill semble utile à votre workflow Agent. Les retours agrégés améliorent le classement au fil du temps.
Confiance et sécurité
Do not auto-install
- Adoption GitHub16 stars GitHubCorriger
- Activité stars/forks16 stars et 0 forks; l’activité des issues n’est pas disponible dans les métadonnées actuellesCorriger
- Maintenance récente3 jours depuis le dernier pushValidé
- Clarté de licenceApache-2.0Validé
- Complétude README/SKILL.mdLes métadonnées incluent suffisamment de contexte d’usage et de workflowValidé
- Risque dépendances/runtimenetwork or browser surfaceValidé
Skills associés
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
53.5K StarsAcademic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
38.4K StarsGPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
28.0K StarsDeepResearch
Tongyi Deep Research, the Leading Open-source Deep Research Agent
19.8K Stars