AI Agent Skills

Performs structured pre-release security and quality review of SAP ABAP programs across 9 dimensions (SEC, AUTH, DATA, PERF, STD, INTERFACE, CHANGE, COMP, FUNC), produci…

Pre-release code review that converges - parallel review agents sized to the diff, findings validated against evidence in a run ledger, fixes on approval, then re-review…

Integrate structured review panel findings into an implementation plan document. Takes output from agent-review-panel (or any structured review with severity-rated findi…

Perform thorough code reviews on files or pull requests, checking for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and style violations.

Use this skill when conducting a code review, from a focused diff to a deep maintainability audit. Activates on mentions of review this PR, pull request review, review m…

Use when reviewing a diff, PR, or set of code changes, or auditing a codebase area for quality issues. Triggers: 'review this', 'code review', 'audit X', 'look at these…

QA 流程倒数第二步的独立审查环节。在 qa-test-runner 执行完成后，以独立视角审查代码本身——检查架构、安全、并发正确性、数据一致性、 回归风险、测试覆盖缺口——不受执行方结论的影响。产出 code-review.json（含 severity 分级发现和 readiness 约束）， 和 assert-code-revi…

执行多维度代码审查。用于合并任何变更之前；用于审查自己、其他 agent 或人类编写的代码；用于在代码进入主分支前从多个维度评估代码质量。

Code review checklist, what to look for, how to give feedback, PR review flow. Use when reviewing a pull request, or when preparing code for review.

WHEN deciding whether a PR, branch, diff, or current code satisfies an authoritative issue, specification, or decision contract; NOT for reconstructing meetings, tracing…

WHEN rendering pseudocode of how code composes—module boundaries, types, signatures, arguments, and execution flow—for code that exists or a change about to be built; NO…

Use only for reviewing completed Biome PRs, branches, commit ranges, diffs, or working trees against business logic and requirements. Excludes broad code-quality and pro…

Review changed code for high-confidence bugs, behavior regressions, project-rule violations, and meaningful side effects. Use when the user asks to review, audit, re-che…

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and…

Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

Conduct multi-axis code review. Use before merging code written by an agent or human, when assessing diffs for correctness, maintainability, security, tests, observabili…