Agent fit
Find skills for the agent you actually use.
Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Copilot, Windsurf, Gemini, Cline, AMP, and Antigravity each have different workflow needs. These pages rank skills by agent fit plus quality, trust, adoption, and freshness.
Anthropic workflows
Claude Code
Skills that help Claude Code handle repository work, procedural knowledge, documents, design, and repeatable engineering tasks.
Leading picks
OpenAI coding agents
Codex
Skills for Codex-style coding agents that need repository context, browser checks, GitHub workflows, and precise implementation guidance.
Leading picks
IDE agents
Cursor
Skills for Cursor users who want better code generation, UI design, testing, architecture review, and project-specific workflows.
Leading picks
GitHub-native agents
GitHub Copilot
Skills that fit GitHub Copilot workflows around issues, pull requests, Actions, releases, repository automation, and code review.
Leading picks
Codeium workflows
Windsurf
Skills for Windsurf-style coding agents that need frontend taste, full-stack implementation, test coverage, and local project context.
Leading picks
Google agent workflows
Gemini
Skills for Gemini agents across research, multimodal analysis, Google ecosystem work, coding, and browser-assisted tasks.
Leading picks
VS Code agents
Cline
Skills for Cline users who rely on terminal commands, browser automation, local file operations, debugging, and repository edits.
Leading picks
Engineering agents
AMP
Skills for AMP-style engineering agents focused on codebase understanding, implementation planning, reviews, and systematic debugging.
Leading picks
Agentic IDE workflows
Antigravity
Skills that fit Antigravity-style workflows for coding, browser use, research, UI building, and agent-to-agent task execution.
Leading picks