goat-qa
blundergoat
Use when evaluating test coverage gaps, planning test strategy, or assessing testing risk for code changes.
OPENAGENTSKILL / DIRECTORY
Find a skill for your next task. Explore tools for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor and more.
Find a skill for your next task. Preview examples where available.
Page 287 · 16 shown · 4,935 public entries
Results: 4935
blundergoat
Use when evaluating test coverage gaps, planning test strategy, or assessing testing risk for code changes.
blundergoat
Use when reviewing a diff, PR, or set of code changes, or auditing a codebase area for quality issues. Triggers: 'review this', 'code review', 'audit X', 'look at these…
mingdui
QA 流程倒数第二步的独立审查环节。在 qa-test-runner 执行完成后,以独立视角审查代码本身——检查架构、安全、并发正确性、数据一致性、 回归风险、测试覆盖缺口——不受执行方结论的影响。产出 code-review.json(含 severity 分级发现和 readiness 约束), 和 assert-code-revi…
PolicyEngine
Use when the user invokes $fix-pr or asks Codex or Claude Code to apply fixes to a PolicyEngine PR based on $review-program findings, GitHub review comments, CI failures…
PolicyEngine
PolicyEngine coding standards, environment setup, formatters, changelog, and CI requirements across every repo — what makes a PR pass and merge cleanly. Covers uv + .ven…
PolicyEngine
Load before writing PolicyEngine-UK code — UK household calculations, income tax (incl. Scottish and Welsh variations), National Insurance, Universal Credit and other be…
timharris707
When asked to grill, stress-test, or pressure-test an idea, or before a decision map or spec rests on an untested conversation, interview the decision maker in small rou…
timharris707
For a build brief, implementing a spec or tracked item, or mid-build discoveries tempting scope expansion, build thin verified slices with test-first checks at named bou…
vinvcn
执行多维度代码审查。用于合并任何变更之前;用于审查自己、其他 agent 或人类编写的代码;用于在代码进入主分支前从多个维度评估代码质量。
vinvcn
为清晰度简化代码。用于在不改变行为的前提下重构代码以提升清晰度;用于代码能运行但比应有状态更难阅读、维护或扩展时;用于审查已累积不必要复杂度的代码时。
vinvcn
挖掘用户真正想要的东西,而不是他们觉得自己“应该”要的东西。实现方式是一次一问的访谈,直到对底层意图达到约 95% 的置信度。当一个请求信息不全时("build me X" 却没说 "for whom" 或 "why now")、当用户明确发出邀请("interview me"、"grill me"、"are we sure?"、"st…
girijashankarj
Systematic workflow for identifying coverage gaps and writing missing tests. Use when coverage is below target or the user asks to improve coverage.
SimpleEve
缺陷修复方法论唯一入口:口喷 bug 定位直修;implement-test-review 循环内的反馈修复也走本 skill(循环内分支,原 impl worker 执行)。触发:修 bug / 有个 bug / 报错了 / 行为不对 / fix / /eo-fix。 NOT FOR: 明确的业务变更(走 /eo-change)。
SimpleEve
按 change.md 的 TODO 分批落地代码,批末自验对应 AC。触发:实现 / 写代码 / implement / /eo-implement。 NOT FOR: bug 与反馈修复(口喷 bug 与 test/review/acceptance 循环内反馈一律走 /eo-fix);变更起草(走 /eo-change)。
SimpleEve
eo 流程总控:按用户意图圈一段(入口节点 → 出口节点 → 收敛标准),把 eo-change / eo-implement / eo-archive 及可选闸门(eo-change-review / eo-test / eo-review)派发到可插拔执行基底上推进至收敛,窗口化汇报进度。触发:eo-loop / 串起来跑 / 循环…
SimpleEve
按需独立测试视角:风险信号命中或用户点名时,对已实现 change 做测试审计、补缺与重验证,产简版 test.md。严禁修改业务代码。触发:找双新眼睛跑测试 / 独立验证 / 给这个 change 补测试 / /eo-test。 NOT FOR: 与 change 无关的日常跑测试或补单测(直接做即可,不产报告);默认主路的自验(归…