delivery-discipline

Prüfen · 59
Im Registry indexiert

Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, skill file, wave spec, README section, summary document, CHANGELOG entry, or any markdown file declaring completion or pass/fail status). Applies before the write happens, not after. Without

Verified installs0
Stars16
Version1.0.0
Qualität59/100 · Vielversprechend
Vertrauen59/100 · Do not auto-install
Audit74/100 · Prüfung nötig

Asset-Profil

Recherche und Wissensarbeit

Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.

Bereich ansehen

Szenario

Recherche-Agents

I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.

Agent-Fit

Claude Code + CLI + Codex

Geeignet für Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI oder benutzerdefinierte Agents.

Installieren

Bereit

npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline

Wartung

Aktuell

3 Tage seit dem letzten Push

Risiko

Prüfung nötig

Permission surface may require sandboxing

GitHub-Qualität

16

59/100 Qualität · 67/100 Vertrauen

Abdeckungs-Tags

RechercheRecherche-Agentsagent-skill

Review-Notizen

Permission surface may require sandboxing · The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.

Agent-Adoptionskarte

Vertrauen, Audit und Installationsbereitschaft auf einen Blick

Diese Werte kombinieren öffentliche Repository-Metadaten, OpenAgentSkill-Reviewsignale, Wartungsaktualität und Installationsbereitschaft. Sie helfen bei der Vorauswahl, ersetzen aber keine menschliche Prüfung.

Qualität

Vielversprechend
59

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

Vertrauen

Do not auto-install
59

Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.

Audit

Prüfung nötig
74

Maschinenlesbare Prüfung von Installationsbereitschaft, Sicherheitsmetadaten, Wartung und Akzeptanzrisiko.

OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5

Menschliche Prüfung vor Installation

Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLI

Stars

16 GitHub-Stars

Repository-Aktivität

16 Stars und 0 Forks

Wartung

3 Tage seit dem letzten Push

Lizenz

Apache-2.0

Installieren

npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline

Installationssicherheit

Standard-Paket- oder Laufzeit-Installationspfad

Berechtigungsfläche

filesystem or document access, network or browser access

Agent-Ergebnisse

Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten

Dokumentation

Starker README/SKILL.md-Kontext

Risikoübersicht

Vor Produktion prüfen

  • The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: filesystem or document access, network or browser access

Installationsbereitschaft

Installationspfad verfügbar

  • Installationspfad ist verfügbar
  • Repository-Belege sind verfügbar
  • Lizenz ist angegeben
  • Noch keine Agent-Proven-Ergebnisbelege

Agent-lesbare Metadaten

Maschinenlesbare Entscheidungsdaten für diesen Skill.

Nutze diesen Block oder das eingebettete JSON, um zu entscheiden, ob ein Agent diesen Skill installieren, eine Alternative wählen oder zuerst menschliche Prüfung anfordern soll.

JSON öffnen

Geeignete Aufgaben

  • Research-Agent-Workflows
  • Claude-Code-Teams
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects
  • Suchquellen

Geeignete Agents

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLICLI

Installationsentscheidung

Befehl
npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
Richtlinie
Prüfen
Menschliche Prüfung
Ja

Vertrauen und Risiko

Vertrauen
59/100
Audit
74/100
Risikoebene
Prüfung nötig

Ergebnis-Loop

Endpoint
/api/agent/outcome
Event-ID
resolve
Ergebnisse
5

Installationsbefehl

npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline

Nicht verwenden, wenn

  • Teams, die ein vom Anbieter unterstütztes SLA benötigen
  • production agents without a repository review
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
  • No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet

Agent-Sicherheit v2

50/100 · Automatische Installation vermeiden

ExperimentellPrüfen

Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.

Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.

Per API auflösen

Mittel

Browser automation

Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.

Mittel

Netzwerkzugriff

Die Skill ruft wahrscheinlich Remote-Seiten, APIs, Repositories oder externe Dienste ab.

Mittel

Dateisystemzugriff

Die Skill kann Projektdateien, Dokumente, generierte Artefakte oder den lokalen Arbeitsbereich lesen oder schreiben.

Mittel

Datenbankzugriff

Die Skill kann Schemata prüfen, Datenbanken abfragen oder mit persistenten Speichern arbeiten.

  • Permission surface may require sandboxing

Installationsziele

Diesen Skill im Agent-Workflow installieren

Über den öffentlichen Endpunkt erhältst du Befehl, Sicherheitscheckliste, Ziel-Prompts und kanonische Links.

skill install

OpenAgentSkill CLI

Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.

$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline

Agent-Auflösungsplan

Lass einen Agent die Eignung vor der Installation prüfen.

Die Resolve API liefert die beste Skill, Alternativen, Sicherheitsrichtlinien, Auditnotizen, Installationsziel und einen direkt nutzbaren Prompt.

Textplan öffnen

Agent sollte prüfen

  • Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
  • Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
  • Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.

Prompt kopieren

Task: Use delivery-discipline in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20delivery-discipline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install
Install command: npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.

Agent-Übergabe

Gib dem Agent den Installationspfad, nicht noch ein Verzeichnis.

Über den öffentlichen Endpunkt erhältst du Befehl, Sicherheitscheckliste, Ziel-Prompts und kanonische Links.

Installations-API öffnen

Agent-Prompt

Use delivery-discipline for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install, then install with: npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline

Registry-Metadaten

Agent-lesbares Profil für die automatische Skill-Auswahl.

Die Registry API stellt Entscheidungs-, Vertrauens-, Audit-, Use-Case- und Installationssignale ohne UI-Scraping bereit.

Manifest öffnen

Agent-Fit

58/100

Recherche-Agents

Plattformen

Claude Code

Audit-Bericht

Prüfung nötig · 74/100

Maschinenlesbare Prüfung von Installationsbereitschaft, Sicherheitsmetadaten, Wartung und Akzeptanzrisiko.

Audit-Bericht ansehenEval-Bericht ansehen

Agent-Entscheidungspanel

Fallback candidate for Research agents

Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.

58
Bereitschaft
Prototyp
Phase

Rolle im Stack

Fallback-Kandidat

Primäre Eignung

Recherche-Agents

Vertrauenslabel

Zuerst prototypisieren

Installationspfad

Befehl bereit

Verwenden wenn

  • Research-Agent-Workflows
  • Claude-Code-Teams
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects

Evidenz

  • recent repository activity
  • install command or GitHub repo available
  • Qualitätsprofil 59/100

zuerst prüfen

  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
  • No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet

Implementierungspfad

  1. 1Installieren Sie es in einem Sandbox-Agent und führen Sie eine Recherche-Agents-Aufgabe vollständig aus.
  2. 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
  3. 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.

Vertrauensprofil

Do not auto-install

Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.

59
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score

GitHub-Akzeptanz

Beheben

16 GitHub-Stars

Star-/Fork-Aktivität

Beheben

16 Stars und 0 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbar

Aktuelle Wartung

Bestanden

3 Tage seit dem letzten Push

Lizenzklarheit

Bestanden

Apache-2.0

Positive Signale

  • KI-Prüfung genehmigt
  • Installationspfad ist verfügbar
  • Repository-Belege sind verfügbar
  • Kürzlich gewartetes Repository
  • Der Installationsbefehl weist kein offensichtliches Hochrisikomuster auf
  • Ergebniszyklus ist bereit, benötigt aber den ersten echten Agent-Lauf

Vor Installation prüfen

  • The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: filesystem or document access, network or browser access
  • GitHub adoption: 16 GitHub stars
  • Stars/forks activity: 16 stars, 0 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
  • Permission surface: filesystem or document access, network or browser access
  • Noch keine echten Agent-Ergebnisberichte
  • Vor unbeaufsichtigter Installation ist menschliche Prüfung erforderlich

Empfohlene Aktion

Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.

Qualitätsprofil

Vielversprechend Kandidat für Agent-Workflows

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

59
GitHub-Stars
16
Aktualität
vor 3 Tagen
Installationsbereit
Ja
Lizenz
Apache-2.0
Vor Installation prüfen: Low GitHub adoption signal · The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.

Workflow-Eignung

Diese Skill in diesen Szenarien nutzen

Workflow-Eignung

Zum vollständigen Workflow hinzufügen

Alternativen-Shortlist

Vor Installation vergleichen

Similar skills that may fit this task.

Alle vergleichen

Übersicht

--- name: delivery-discipline description: Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, skill file, wave spec, README section, summary document, CHANGELOG entry, or any markdown file declaring completion or pass/fail status). Applies before the write happens, not after. Without this discipline, agents ship 60% deliverables and declare closure prematurely. ---

<!-- delivery-discipline: exempt --> <!-- This file DEFINES the delivery-discipline. It is documentation about the discipline, not a closeout declaration subject to it. The exemption is legitimate and is logged as `delivery_discipline_exemption_used` by Wave 4 so exemption usage remains auditable. Do not remove this comment unless you are replacing SKILL.md with a proper attestation block. -->

# Delivery Discipline

## Overview

**Agents trained to optimize for completion will ship 60% of what's needed and declare the work closed.** The pattern is reproducible. Scientific truth is protected by the existing hooks (confounder harness, R2 review gate, Salvagente Rule). **Delivery completeness is not.** This skill closes that gap.

You (the agent) must apply the 4 rules below BEFORE writing any deliverable that will declare anything CLOSED, PASS, DONE, SHIPPED, COMPLETE, FINALIZED, or READY in a commit-relevant markdown file. A PreToolUse hook will block your write if you skip the attestation block defined below. A CI validator will catch bypasses.

## When To Use

**Activate before writing:** - Any `*closeout*.md`, `*status*.md`, `*summary*.md`, `*verdict*.md` - Any `phase*-*.md`, `wave*-*.md`, `sprint*-*.md` - Any `skill*.md`, SKILL.md updates - Any `README.md` or `CHANGELOG.md` entry that declares a version/release/completion - Any document declaring a gate PASS, a phase CLOSED, a release SHIPPED

**Do NOT activate for:** - Normal prose that mentions "done" in casual context ("I closed the file") - Code files (`.js`, `.py`, etc.) — the skill governs deliverables, not source - Exploratory notes that do NOT declare closure

## The 4 Non-Negotiable Rules

### Rule 1 — Surface mapping before writing

Before you write a deliverable that will declare anything CLOSED / PASS / DONE / SHIPPED / COMPLETE, you MUST have a mechanical inventory of what should be covered.

- If the inventory was produced by a subagent (Explore, general-purpose, etc.), you **verify at least the critical claims directly** before trusting it. Read the actual files the subagent describes. API signatures, file paths, function exports get verified first-hand, not assumed. - Optimistic sampling is failure. "I covered the main cases" means you haven't looked at the edge cases.

### Rule 2 — Explicit scope cuts

Every deliverable MUST declare, in its own body, what was LEFT OUT and why.

- A scope-cut list of 0 items is suspicious by default. If your solution covers "everything", you probably haven't looked hard enough. - Force yourself to name at least one cut. If you genuinely cannot find one, state that explicitly and pass self-review (Rule 4) first.

### Rule 3 — Completeness proof by enumeration

When you declare closure, list the concrete items verified. Not "all tests pass" but "26 items in the surface map, 22 verified directly with Read tool, 4 delegated to subagent report and cross-checked". Enumeration beats summary.

### Rule 4 — Adversarial self-review before closure

Before you write "CLOSED" / "PASS" / "DONE", ask yourself: **"What would a skeptical reviewer attack?"** List at least 3 findings. If you find 0, assume you haven't looked hard enough and go back to Rule 1.

## The Attestation Block (MUST appear in every deliverable declaring closure)

Format: a `## Delivery Attestation` section (case-insensitive, `##` or `###`) containing a fenced `json` block. The hook extracts the first fenced json block under that heading and validates it against `skills/vibe/assets/schemas/delivery-attestation.schema.json`.

````markdown ## Delivery Attestation

```json { "covered": [ "Concrete item 1 verified (not a summary)", "Concrete item 2 verified", "..." ], "scope_cuts": [ { "item": "Thing left out of this deliverable", "reason": "Why it is outside this deliverable (not 'no time')" } ], "self_review_findings": [ "Adversarial finding 1 (a skeptical reviewer would attack X because...)", "Adversarial finding 2", "Adversarial finding 3" ], "external_review_status": "pending" } ``` ````

**Field semantics:** - `covered`: array of strings, ≥1 item, each ≥3 chars. Concrete items, not summaries. - `scope_cuts`: array of `{item, reason}` objects. Empty array allowed but suspicious. - `self_review_findings`: array of strings, **≥3 items required**, each ≥20 chars. - `external_review_status`: enum `"pending" | "cleared" | "blocked"`.

## Quick Reference

| Intent | Action | |--------|--------| | Writing a phase closeout | Include the `## Delivery Attestation` section with filled JSON block | | Writing a skill file | Include attestation even if short skill — the skill itself is a deliverable | | Updating CHANGELOG | Attestation required when declaring a release / version | | Updating README status section | Attestation required when declaring pass/fail or coverage | | Exempting a file legitimately | Add `<!-- delivery-discipline: exempt -->` comment near the top. Wave 4 will log this as a `delivery_discipline_exemption_used` governance event; frequent use becomes an audit target at that point. |

## Rationalization Table — DO NOT fall for these

| Excuse | Counter | |--------|---------| | "This is just a small doc, discipline is overkill" | Small docs are where premature closure starts. The attestation takes 60 seconds. | | "I don't have time for scope cuts" | The cut list takes 30 seconds. Skipping it costs 30 minutes when user pushes back. | | "Self-review feels self-indulgent" | It's the cheap version of R2. Skip it and you pay in R2 corrections later. | | "The block only triggers on 'CLOSED' — I'll say 'finalized' instead" | The regex covers synonyms: CLOSED, DONE, PASS/PASSED, SHIPPED, COMPLETE/COMPLETED, FINALIZED, READY, and the failure/partial forms FAIL/FAILED, BLOCKED, PARTIAL, FALSE-POSITIVE, and the review-verdict forms ACCEPTED, REJECTED. Wave 4 will log attempted evasions as governance events; until then, the block itself is the sanction. | | "I'll put my closure claim below the legacy-boundary marker in CHANGELOG/README" | The legacy-boundary marker grandfathers pre-Phase-8 content ONLY while its `hash=<sha256-hex>` attribute matches the LF-normalized below-marker content. Appending any new closure below the marker changes the hash, the boundary becomes invalid, and the whole file is re-subjected to enforcement. To legitimately re-bless the legacy region you must update the hash in a reviewed commit (git diff shows both the new content and the hash change side-by-side). Bare markers without `hash=` are rejected outright. | | "I verified with a subagent, that's enough" | Subagents sample too. Spot-check critical items with Read tool before trusting. | | "External review status: cleared" (without actually running review) | Lying about `external_review_status` is still traceable — when R2 / R3 runs later, it produces `external-review-record` entries that do NOT match, and the inconsistency surfaces at the next audit. The Wave 3 CI validator checks schema shape (enum + required fields); full governance-event cross-referencing is Phase 8.1 scope, not Wave 3. Don't rely on "nobody will notice" — the record trail is public. | | "I'll add the attestation at the end, after writing everything" | Writing the attestation FORCES you to enumerate. Skipping that step defeats the whole point. Write it as you go, not as an afterthought. |

## Red Flags — STOP and apply the skill

- About to write a deliverable containing "CLOSED", "PASS", "DONE", "SHIPPED", "COMPLETE", or synonyms in declarative context - About to mark a TodoWrite task `completed` after a large deliverable - About to stop the session with a "here's what I did" summary - About to commit a markdown file whose name matches `*closeout*`, `*status*`, `*summary*`, `*verdict*`, `*phase*`, `*wave*`, `*skill*`, `readme`, `changelog` - About to declare a release or version bump

**All of these mean: stop, map the surface, declare scope cuts, write the attestation block, then continue.**

## Common Mistakes

- **Fake attestation**: filling fields with generic strings ("looked at everything"). Wave 2 hook enforces minLength + minItems on the attestation block at write time. Wave 3 CI validator will re-enforce schema shape on tracked markdown at commit time. Full audit-log cross-reference (checking whether `external_review_status: "cleared"` matches a real R2/R3 review record in `governance_events`) is Phase 8.1 scope, not Wave 3. Don't assume the current enforcement catches semantic lies — it catches structural ones. - **Skipping scope_cuts because "nothing was cut"**: if you genuinely cut nothing, you probably didn't look hard enough. Use the self-review step to find a scope cut. - **Putting attestation in a comment or footer**: it must be in a `## Delivery Attestation` section with a fenced json block. Other placements won't be parsed. - **Writing attestation as YAML or markdown list**: must be fenced `json` block. Other formats fail schema validation. - **Adding exemption comment to bypass**: exemptions ARE allowed and don't block. Wave 4 will log each use as a `delivery_discipline_exemption_used` governance event; frequent use becomes an audit target once that logging is live. Strict mode (`VIBE_SCIENCE_STRICT=1`) additionally refuses to allow any bypass path (including exemption) when the governance DB cannot be opened or when the `governance_events` table is missing — i.e. when the Wave 4 audit trail would silently drop records. The strict-mode probe actually opens the DB and checks the schema, not just whether the module imports.

## Why This Exists

vibe-science v7.0 protects scientific truth (confounder harness, R2 gate, Salvagente Rule). It did NOT protect delivery completeness — agents could still ship 60% skills, declare phases closed prematurely, sample the surface optimistically.

The pattern was observed repeatedly: Phase 6.1 "closed" but re-retracted when fresh-eyes review found P1s. Phase 7 Wave 1 shipped at 60%. The initial Phase 8 skill was missing 40% of the surface.

This skill (Wave 1) + the PreToolUse hook (Wave 2) + the CI validator (Wave 3) + the governance event log (Wave 4) **together force the same discipline on delivery that the existing hooks force on scientific claims**. Wave 2 enforcement is active today: a hook that blocks the write, not a review that catches the failure after the fact. Waves 3-4 add CI-time scanning and audit-trail logging so bypass attempts become tracked events rather than silent drift.

## When in Doubt

Apply the rules. The cost is 60-120 seconds per deliverable. The cost of skipping is the "user pushes back → retract → patch" cycle we've seen multiple times.

Default: write the attestation. It's cheaper than the correction loop.

Technische Details

Version
1.0.0
Lizenz
Apache-2.0
Letzte Aktualisierung
20. Aug. 2026
Veröffentlicht
20. Aug. 2026

Entscheidungsübersicht

Fallback-Kandidat

58
Bereit
Prototyp
Phase

recent repository activity

Audit

Installationsprüfung

Installations- und Adoptionsprüfung

74
Prüfung nötig
Sicherheit
77/100
Wartung
100/100
Installieren
92/100
Vollständiges Audit öffnenEval-Bericht ansehen

Von Agent belegte Evidenz

Von Agent belegte Evidenz

Ergebnisberichte nach Resolve, Prüfung, Installation und einem begrenzten Lauf.

0
Belegt
Needs first agent runAuto-Installation: zuerst prüfenLetzter: Unbekannt
Erfolgsrate
Letzter Fehler
Ergebnisse
0
Ausgabequalität
Fehlgeschlagen
0
Nicht relevant
0
Installationen
0
Durch Risiko blockiert
0
Einrichtung erforderlich
0
Produktion
0

Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten. Der erste Lauf kann Erfolg, Einrichtungsbedarf, Risikoblockaden, Fehler oder Irrelevanz über /api/agent/outcome melden.

Installieren

Zum Agent-Workflow hinzufügen

Kostenlos und Open Source. Bericht vor der Installation in Produktions-Agents prüfen.

Wachstums-Loop

Share-Kit

X

Szenariobasierter Entwurf für delivery-discipline, bereit für einen manuellen X-Post.

Kuratorenhinweis
delivery-discipline: Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, ski...

16 stars

https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?ref=x
X-Entwurf öffnen
Optionale Antwort mit Installationsbefehl
Listing + install path for delivery-discipline:
https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?ref=x

Install: npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
Antwortentwurf öffnen

Quelle des Eintrags

Registry-indexiert

Beanspruchbar

Dieser Eintrag wurde aus öffentlichen Quellen indexiert und ist erst nach Genehmigung eines Maintainer-Anspruchs offiziell.

Ersteller
th3vib3coder
Indexiert von
OpenAgentSkill Community-Index

Die Zuordnung verlinkt auf das öffentliche Repository oder Creator-Profil. Creator können den Eintrag beanspruchen, um Eigentümersignale zu aktualisieren.

Diesen Skill beanspruchen

Eigentümeranspruch

Diesen Skill-Eintrag beanspruchen

Dieser Registry-indexiert-Eintrag wird th3vib3coder zugeschrieben, ist aber noch nicht offiziell markiert. Beanspruche ihn, um ein verifiziertes Eigentümersignal hinzuzufügen und künftige Launch-, Installations- und Audit-Updates vertrauenswürdiger zu machen.

Creator-Backlink-Kit

Evidenz-Badges in deine README einfügen

Zeige den kanonischen Eintrag, aktuelle Vertrauens- und Audit-Signale sowie echte Agent-Proven-Evidenz dort, wo Entwickler das Repository bewerten.

[![Listed on OpenAgentSkill](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?metric=listed&label=Listed)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline)
[![OpenAgentSkill Trust](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?metric=trust&label=Trust)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline)
[![OpenAgentSkill Audit](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?metric=audit&label=Audit)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/audit)
[![Agent Proven](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?metric=proven&label=Agent%20Proven)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline)

Autor

T

th3vib3coder

@th3vib3coder

Plattform-Fit

Gesundheitssignale

GitHub-Stars
16
Qualitätswert
32/100
Letzter GitHub-Push
19. Aug. 2026
Framework-Hinweise
Unbekannt
OpenAgentSkill-Aufrufe
0
Installationskopien
0
Externe Klicks
0

Community-Signal

Teile mit, ob dieser Skill für deinen Agent-Workflow nützlich ist. Zusammengefasstes Feedback verbessert das Ranking im Laufe der Zeit.

Vertrauen & Sicherheit

Do not auto-install

59
  • GitHub-Akzeptanz16 GitHub-StarsBeheben
  • Star-/Fork-Aktivität16 Stars und 0 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbarBeheben
  • Aktuelle Wartung3 Tage seit dem letzten PushBestanden
  • LizenzklarheitApache-2.0Bestanden
  • README/SKILL.md-VollständigkeitMetadaten enthalten ausreichend Nutzungs- und Workflow-KontextBestanden
  • Abhängigkeits-/Laufzeitrisikonetwork or browser surfaceBestanden