delivery-discipline
Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, skill file, wave spec, README section, summary document, CHANGELOG entry, or any markdown file declaring completion or pass/fail status). Applies before the write happens, not after. Without
Asset-Profil
Recherche und Wissensarbeit
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Szenario
Recherche-Agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Agent-Fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Geeignet für Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI oder benutzerdefinierte Agents.
Installieren
Bereit
npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
Wartung
Aktuell
3 Tage seit dem letzten Push
Risiko
Prüfung nötig
Permission surface may require sandboxing
GitHub-Qualität
16
59/100 Qualität · 67/100 Vertrauen
Abdeckungs-Tags
Review-Notizen
Permission surface may require sandboxing · The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
Agent-Adoptionskarte
Vertrauen, Audit und Installationsbereitschaft auf einen Blick
Diese Werte kombinieren öffentliche Repository-Metadaten, OpenAgentSkill-Reviewsignale, Wartungsaktualität und Installationsbereitschaft. Sie helfen bei der Vorauswahl, ersetzen aber keine menschliche Prüfung.
Qualität
VielversprechendUseful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Vertrauen
Do not auto-installTrust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Audit
Prüfung nötigMaschinenlesbare Prüfung von Installationsbereitschaft, Sicherheitsmetadaten, Wartung und Akzeptanzrisiko.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Menschliche Prüfung vor Installation
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Stars
16 GitHub-Stars
Repository-Aktivität
16 Stars und 0 Forks
Wartung
3 Tage seit dem letzten Push
Lizenz
Apache-2.0
Installieren
npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
Installationssicherheit
Standard-Paket- oder Laufzeit-Installationspfad
Berechtigungsfläche
filesystem or document access, network or browser access
Agent-Ergebnisse
Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten
Dokumentation
Starker README/SKILL.md-Kontext
Risikoübersicht
Vor Produktion prüfen
- The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: filesystem or document access, network or browser access
Installationsbereitschaft
Installationspfad verfügbar
- Installationspfad ist verfügbar
- Repository-Belege sind verfügbar
- Lizenz ist angegeben
- Noch keine Agent-Proven-Ergebnisbelege
Agent-lesbare Metadaten
Maschinenlesbare Entscheidungsdaten für diesen Skill.
Nutze diesen Block oder das eingebettete JSON, um zu entscheiden, ob ein Agent diesen Skill installieren, eine Alternative wählen oder zuerst menschliche Prüfung anfordern soll.
Geeignete Aufgaben
- Research-Agent-Workflows
- Claude-Code-Teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
- Suchquellen
Geeignete Agents
Installationsentscheidung
- Befehl
- npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
- Richtlinie
- Prüfen
- Menschliche Prüfung
- Ja
Vertrauen und Risiko
- Vertrauen
- 59/100
- Audit
- 74/100
- Risikoebene
- Prüfung nötig
Ergebnis-Loop
- Endpoint
- /api/agent/outcome
- Event-ID
- resolve
- Ergebnisse
- 5
Installationsbefehl
npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-disciplineNicht verwenden, wenn
- Teams, die ein vom Anbieter unterstütztes SLA benötigen
- production agents without a repository review
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
- No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet
Alternative
Last30days Skill
53.5K Stars
npx skills add mvanhorn/last30days-skill -g
Alternative
Academic Research Skills
38.4K Stars
npx skills add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Alternative
GPT Researcher
28.0K Stars
npx skills add assafelovic/gpt-researcher
Alternative
DeepResearch
19.8K Stars
npx skills add Alibaba-NLP/DeepResearch
Agent-Sicherheit v2
50/100 · Automatische Installation vermeiden
Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
Mittel
Browser automation
Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.
Mittel
Netzwerkzugriff
Die Skill ruft wahrscheinlich Remote-Seiten, APIs, Repositories oder externe Dienste ab.
Mittel
Dateisystemzugriff
Die Skill kann Projektdateien, Dokumente, generierte Artefakte oder den lokalen Arbeitsbereich lesen oder schreiben.
Mittel
Datenbankzugriff
Die Skill kann Schemata prüfen, Datenbanken abfragen oder mit persistenten Speichern arbeiten.
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
Installationsziele
Diesen Skill im Agent-Workflow installieren
Über den öffentlichen Endpunkt erhältst du Befehl, Sicherheitscheckliste, Ziel-Prompts und kanonische Links.
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install th3vib3coder-delivery-disciplineAgent-Auflösungsplan
Lass einen Agent die Eignung vor der Installation prüfen.
Die Resolve API liefert die beste Skill, Alternativen, Sicherheitsrichtlinien, Auditnotizen, Installationsziel und einen direkt nutzbaren Prompt.
JSON öffnen
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20delivery-discipline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve-Text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20delivery-discipline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Installationsübergabe
/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install
Agent sollte prüfen
- Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
- Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
- Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.
Prompt kopieren
Task: Use delivery-discipline in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20delivery-discipline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install
Install command: npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent-Übergabe
Gib dem Agent den Installationspfad, nicht noch ein Verzeichnis.
Über den öffentlichen Endpunkt erhältst du Befehl, Sicherheitscheckliste, Ziel-Prompts und kanonische Links.
Installationsübergabe
/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install
LLM-Textformat
/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install?format=text
Alternativen finden
/api/skills/search?q=delivery-discipline&limit=3
Agent-Prompt
Use delivery-discipline for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install, then install with: npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-disciplineRegistry-Metadaten
Agent-lesbares Profil für die automatische Skill-Auswahl.
Die Registry API stellt Entscheidungs-, Vertrauens-, Audit-, Use-Case- und Installationssignale ohne UI-Scraping bereit.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline
LLM-Text
/api/registry/manifest/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?format=text
Installationsalias
/api/registry/install/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline
Empfehlen
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20delivery-discipline%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent-Fit
Recherche-Agents
Use-Case-Tags
Plattformen
Claude Code
Audit-Bericht
Prüfung nötig · 74/100
Maschinenlesbare Prüfung von Installationsbereitschaft, Sicherheitsmetadaten, Wartung und Akzeptanzrisiko.
Agent-Entscheidungspanel
Fallback candidate for Research agents
Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.
Rolle im Stack
Fallback-Kandidat
Primäre Eignung
Recherche-Agents
Vertrauenslabel
Zuerst prototypisieren
Installationspfad
Befehl bereit
Verwenden wenn
- Research-Agent-Workflows
- Claude-Code-Teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Evidenz
- recent repository activity
- install command or GitHub repo available
- Qualitätsprofil 59/100
zuerst prüfen
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
- No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet
Implementierungspfad
- 1Installieren Sie es in einem Sandbox-Agent und führen Sie eine Recherche-Agents-Aufgabe vollständig aus.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
Vertrauensprofil
Do not auto-install
Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
GitHub-Akzeptanz
Beheben16 GitHub-Stars
Star-/Fork-Aktivität
Beheben16 Stars und 0 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbar
Aktuelle Wartung
Bestanden3 Tage seit dem letzten Push
Lizenzklarheit
BestandenApache-2.0
Positive Signale
- KI-Prüfung genehmigt
- Installationspfad ist verfügbar
- Repository-Belege sind verfügbar
- Kürzlich gewartetes Repository
- Der Installationsbefehl weist kein offensichtliches Hochrisikomuster auf
- Ergebniszyklus ist bereit, benötigt aber den ersten echten Agent-Lauf
Vor Installation prüfen
- The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: filesystem or document access, network or browser access
- GitHub adoption: 16 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 16 stars, 0 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- Permission surface: filesystem or document access, network or browser access
- Noch keine echten Agent-Ergebnisberichte
- Vor unbeaufsichtigter Installation ist menschliche Prüfung erforderlich
Empfohlene Aktion
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Qualitätsprofil
Vielversprechend Kandidat für Agent-Workflows
Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Workflow-Eignung
Diese Skill in diesen Szenarien nutzen
Investigate faster
Research agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Parse messy files
Document processing
I need my agent to read PDFs, extract tables, and turn documents into structured data.
Manage repositories
GitHub automation
I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.
Workflow-Eignung
Zum vollständigen Workflow hinzufügen
Find, compare, and synthesize
Research report agent
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Ingest, retrieve, and cite
RAG knowledge base
A workflow for document-heavy agents that ingest files, create searchable knowledge, retrieve relevant context, and answer with grounded sources.
Operate and verify web apps
Browser QA agent
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Alternativen-Shortlist
Vor Installation vergleichen
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
Academic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
GPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
DeepResearch
Tongyi Deep Research, the Leading Open-source Deep Research Agent
Übersicht
--- name: delivery-discipline description: Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, skill file, wave spec, README section, summary document, CHANGELOG entry, or any markdown file declaring completion or pass/fail status). Applies before the write happens, not after. Without this discipline, agents ship 60% deliverables and declare closure prematurely. ---
<!-- delivery-discipline: exempt --> <!-- This file DEFINES the delivery-discipline. It is documentation about the discipline, not a closeout declaration subject to it. The exemption is legitimate and is logged as `delivery_discipline_exemption_used` by Wave 4 so exemption usage remains auditable. Do not remove this comment unless you are replacing SKILL.md with a proper attestation block. -->
# Delivery Discipline
## Overview
**Agents trained to optimize for completion will ship 60% of what's needed and declare the work closed.** The pattern is reproducible. Scientific truth is protected by the existing hooks (confounder harness, R2 review gate, Salvagente Rule). **Delivery completeness is not.** This skill closes that gap.
You (the agent) must apply the 4 rules below BEFORE writing any deliverable that will declare anything CLOSED, PASS, DONE, SHIPPED, COMPLETE, FINALIZED, or READY in a commit-relevant markdown file. A PreToolUse hook will block your write if you skip the attestation block defined below. A CI validator will catch bypasses.
## When To Use
**Activate before writing:** - Any `*closeout*.md`, `*status*.md`, `*summary*.md`, `*verdict*.md` - Any `phase*-*.md`, `wave*-*.md`, `sprint*-*.md` - Any `skill*.md`, SKILL.md updates - Any `README.md` or `CHANGELOG.md` entry that declares a version/release/completion - Any document declaring a gate PASS, a phase CLOSED, a release SHIPPED
**Do NOT activate for:** - Normal prose that mentions "done" in casual context ("I closed the file") - Code files (`.js`, `.py`, etc.) — the skill governs deliverables, not source - Exploratory notes that do NOT declare closure
## The 4 Non-Negotiable Rules
### Rule 1 — Surface mapping before writing
Before you write a deliverable that will declare anything CLOSED / PASS / DONE / SHIPPED / COMPLETE, you MUST have a mechanical inventory of what should be covered.
- If the inventory was produced by a subagent (Explore, general-purpose, etc.), you **verify at least the critical claims directly** before trusting it. Read the actual files the subagent describes. API signatures, file paths, function exports get verified first-hand, not assumed. - Optimistic sampling is failure. "I covered the main cases" means you haven't looked at the edge cases.
### Rule 2 — Explicit scope cuts
Every deliverable MUST declare, in its own body, what was LEFT OUT and why.
- A scope-cut list of 0 items is suspicious by default. If your solution covers "everything", you probably haven't looked hard enough. - Force yourself to name at least one cut. If you genuinely cannot find one, state that explicitly and pass self-review (Rule 4) first.
### Rule 3 — Completeness proof by enumeration
When you declare closure, list the concrete items verified. Not "all tests pass" but "26 items in the surface map, 22 verified directly with Read tool, 4 delegated to subagent report and cross-checked". Enumeration beats summary.
### Rule 4 — Adversarial self-review before closure
Before you write "CLOSED" / "PASS" / "DONE", ask yourself: **"What would a skeptical reviewer attack?"** List at least 3 findings. If you find 0, assume you haven't looked hard enough and go back to Rule 1.
## The Attestation Block (MUST appear in every deliverable declaring closure)
Format: a `## Delivery Attestation` section (case-insensitive, `##` or `###`) containing a fenced `json` block. The hook extracts the first fenced json block under that heading and validates it against `skills/vibe/assets/schemas/delivery-attestation.schema.json`.
````markdown ## Delivery Attestation
```json { "covered": [ "Concrete item 1 verified (not a summary)", "Concrete item 2 verified", "..." ], "scope_cuts": [ { "item": "Thing left out of this deliverable", "reason": "Why it is outside this deliverable (not 'no time')" } ], "self_review_findings": [ "Adversarial finding 1 (a skeptical reviewer would attack X because...)", "Adversarial finding 2", "Adversarial finding 3" ], "external_review_status": "pending" } ``` ````
**Field semantics:** - `covered`: array of strings, ≥1 item, each ≥3 chars. Concrete items, not summaries. - `scope_cuts`: array of `{item, reason}` objects. Empty array allowed but suspicious. - `self_review_findings`: array of strings, **≥3 items required**, each ≥20 chars. - `external_review_status`: enum `"pending" | "cleared" | "blocked"`.
## Quick Reference
| Intent | Action | |--------|--------| | Writing a phase closeout | Include the `## Delivery Attestation` section with filled JSON block | | Writing a skill file | Include attestation even if short skill — the skill itself is a deliverable | | Updating CHANGELOG | Attestation required when declaring a release / version | | Updating README status section | Attestation required when declaring pass/fail or coverage | | Exempting a file legitimately | Add `<!-- delivery-discipline: exempt -->` comment near the top. Wave 4 will log this as a `delivery_discipline_exemption_used` governance event; frequent use becomes an audit target at that point. |
## Rationalization Table — DO NOT fall for these
| Excuse | Counter | |--------|---------| | "This is just a small doc, discipline is overkill" | Small docs are where premature closure starts. The attestation takes 60 seconds. | | "I don't have time for scope cuts" | The cut list takes 30 seconds. Skipping it costs 30 minutes when user pushes back. | | "Self-review feels self-indulgent" | It's the cheap version of R2. Skip it and you pay in R2 corrections later. | | "The block only triggers on 'CLOSED' — I'll say 'finalized' instead" | The regex covers synonyms: CLOSED, DONE, PASS/PASSED, SHIPPED, COMPLETE/COMPLETED, FINALIZED, READY, and the failure/partial forms FAIL/FAILED, BLOCKED, PARTIAL, FALSE-POSITIVE, and the review-verdict forms ACCEPTED, REJECTED. Wave 4 will log attempted evasions as governance events; until then, the block itself is the sanction. | | "I'll put my closure claim below the legacy-boundary marker in CHANGELOG/README" | The legacy-boundary marker grandfathers pre-Phase-8 content ONLY while its `hash=<sha256-hex>` attribute matches the LF-normalized below-marker content. Appending any new closure below the marker changes the hash, the boundary becomes invalid, and the whole file is re-subjected to enforcement. To legitimately re-bless the legacy region you must update the hash in a reviewed commit (git diff shows both the new content and the hash change side-by-side). Bare markers without `hash=` are rejected outright. | | "I verified with a subagent, that's enough" | Subagents sample too. Spot-check critical items with Read tool before trusting. | | "External review status: cleared" (without actually running review) | Lying about `external_review_status` is still traceable — when R2 / R3 runs later, it produces `external-review-record` entries that do NOT match, and the inconsistency surfaces at the next audit. The Wave 3 CI validator checks schema shape (enum + required fields); full governance-event cross-referencing is Phase 8.1 scope, not Wave 3. Don't rely on "nobody will notice" — the record trail is public. | | "I'll add the attestation at the end, after writing everything" | Writing the attestation FORCES you to enumerate. Skipping that step defeats the whole point. Write it as you go, not as an afterthought. |
## Red Flags — STOP and apply the skill
- About to write a deliverable containing "CLOSED", "PASS", "DONE", "SHIPPED", "COMPLETE", or synonyms in declarative context - About to mark a TodoWrite task `completed` after a large deliverable - About to stop the session with a "here's what I did" summary - About to commit a markdown file whose name matches `*closeout*`, `*status*`, `*summary*`, `*verdict*`, `*phase*`, `*wave*`, `*skill*`, `readme`, `changelog` - About to declare a release or version bump
**All of these mean: stop, map the surface, declare scope cuts, write the attestation block, then continue.**
## Common Mistakes
- **Fake attestation**: filling fields with generic strings ("looked at everything"). Wave 2 hook enforces minLength + minItems on the attestation block at write time. Wave 3 CI validator will re-enforce schema shape on tracked markdown at commit time. Full audit-log cross-reference (checking whether `external_review_status: "cleared"` matches a real R2/R3 review record in `governance_events`) is Phase 8.1 scope, not Wave 3. Don't assume the current enforcement catches semantic lies — it catches structural ones. - **Skipping scope_cuts because "nothing was cut"**: if you genuinely cut nothing, you probably didn't look hard enough. Use the self-review step to find a scope cut. - **Putting attestation in a comment or footer**: it must be in a `## Delivery Attestation` section with a fenced json block. Other placements won't be parsed. - **Writing attestation as YAML or markdown list**: must be fenced `json` block. Other formats fail schema validation. - **Adding exemption comment to bypass**: exemptions ARE allowed and don't block. Wave 4 will log each use as a `delivery_discipline_exemption_used` governance event; frequent use becomes an audit target once that logging is live. Strict mode (`VIBE_SCIENCE_STRICT=1`) additionally refuses to allow any bypass path (including exemption) when the governance DB cannot be opened or when the `governance_events` table is missing — i.e. when the Wave 4 audit trail would silently drop records. The strict-mode probe actually opens the DB and checks the schema, not just whether the module imports.
## Why This Exists
vibe-science v7.0 protects scientific truth (confounder harness, R2 gate, Salvagente Rule). It did NOT protect delivery completeness — agents could still ship 60% skills, declare phases closed prematurely, sample the surface optimistically.
The pattern was observed repeatedly: Phase 6.1 "closed" but re-retracted when fresh-eyes review found P1s. Phase 7 Wave 1 shipped at 60%. The initial Phase 8 skill was missing 40% of the surface.
This skill (Wave 1) + the PreToolUse hook (Wave 2) + the CI validator (Wave 3) + the governance event log (Wave 4) **together force the same discipline on delivery that the existing hooks force on scientific claims**. Wave 2 enforcement is active today: a hook that blocks the write, not a review that catches the failure after the fact. Waves 3-4 add CI-time scanning and audit-trail logging so bypass attempts become tracked events rather than silent drift.
## When in Doubt
Apply the rules. The cost is 60-120 seconds per deliverable. The cost of skipping is the "user pushes back → retract → patch" cycle we've seen multiple times.
Default: write the attestation. It's cheaper than the correction loop.
Technische Details
- Version
- 1.0.0
- Lizenz
- Apache-2.0
- Letzte Aktualisierung
- 20. Aug. 2026
- Veröffentlicht
- 20. Aug. 2026
Entscheidungsübersicht
Fallback-Kandidat
recent repository activity
Audit
Installationsprüfung
Installations- und Adoptionsprüfung
- Sicherheit
- 77/100
- Wartung
- 100/100
- Installieren
- 92/100
Von Agent belegte Evidenz
Von Agent belegte Evidenz
Ergebnisberichte nach Resolve, Prüfung, Installation und einem begrenzten Lauf.
- Erfolgsrate
- —
- Letzter Fehler
- —
- Ergebnisse
- 0
- Ausgabequalität
- —
- Fehlgeschlagen
- 0
- Nicht relevant
- 0
- Installationen
- 0
- Durch Risiko blockiert
- 0
- Einrichtung erforderlich
- 0
- Produktion
- 0
Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten. Der erste Lauf kann Erfolg, Einrichtungsbedarf, Risikoblockaden, Fehler oder Irrelevanz über /api/agent/outcome melden.
Installieren
Zum Agent-Workflow hinzufügen
Kostenlos und Open Source. Bericht vor der Installation in Produktions-Agents prüfen.
Wachstums-Loop
Share-Kit
Szenariobasierter Entwurf für delivery-discipline, bereit für einen manuellen X-Post.
delivery-discipline: Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, ski... 16 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?ref=x
Optionale Antwort mit Installationsbefehl
Listing + install path for delivery-discipline: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?ref=x Install: npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
Quelle des Eintrags
Registry-indexiert
Dieser Eintrag wurde aus öffentlichen Quellen indexiert und ist erst nach Genehmigung eines Maintainer-Anspruchs offiziell.
- Ersteller
- th3vib3coder
- Indexiert von
- OpenAgentSkill Community-Index
Die Zuordnung verlinkt auf das öffentliche Repository oder Creator-Profil. Creator können den Eintrag beanspruchen, um Eigentümersignale zu aktualisieren.
Diesen Skill beanspruchenEigentümeranspruch
Diesen Skill-Eintrag beanspruchen
Dieser Registry-indexiert-Eintrag wird th3vib3coder zugeschrieben, ist aber noch nicht offiziell markiert. Beanspruche ihn, um ein verifiziertes Eigentümersignal hinzuzufügen und künftige Launch-, Installations- und Audit-Updates vertrauenswürdiger zu machen.
Creator-Backlink-Kit
Evidenz-Badges in deine README einfügen
Zeige den kanonischen Eintrag, aktuelle Vertrauens- und Audit-Signale sowie echte Agent-Proven-Evidenz dort, wo Entwickler das Repository bewerten.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline)Autor
th3vib3coder
@th3vib3coder
Tags
Plattform-Fit
Gesundheitssignale
- GitHub-Stars
- 16
- Qualitätswert
- 32/100
- Letzter GitHub-Push
- 19. Aug. 2026
- Framework-Hinweise
- Unbekannt
- OpenAgentSkill-Aufrufe
- 0
- Installationskopien
- 0
- Externe Klicks
- 0
Community-Signal
Teile mit, ob dieser Skill für deinen Agent-Workflow nützlich ist. Zusammengefasstes Feedback verbessert das Ranking im Laufe der Zeit.
Vertrauen & Sicherheit
Do not auto-install
- GitHub-Akzeptanz16 GitHub-StarsBeheben
- Star-/Fork-Aktivität16 Stars und 0 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbarBeheben
- Aktuelle Wartung3 Tage seit dem letzten PushBestanden
- LizenzklarheitApache-2.0Bestanden
- README/SKILL.md-VollständigkeitMetadaten enthalten ausreichend Nutzungs- und Workflow-KontextBestanden
- Abhängigkeits-/Laufzeitrisikonetwork or browser surfaceBestanden
Ähnliche Skills
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
53.5K StarsAcademic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
38.4K StarsGPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
28.0K StarsDeepResearch
Tongyi Deep Research, the Leading Open-source Deep Research Agent
19.8K Stars