Skill audit report

medical-imaging-review Audit report.

Write comprehensive literature reviews for medical imaging AI research. Use when writing survey papers, systematic reviews, or literature analyses on topics like segmentation, detection, classification in CT, MRI, X-ray, ultrasound, or pathology imaging. Triggers on requests for "review paper", "survey", "literature review", "综述", "systematic review", or mentions of writing academic reviews on deep learning for medical imaging.

EXPERIMENTAL · REVIEWNeeds reviewGenerated Oct 21, 2026Heuristic metadata audit
75
Audit
69
Trust
71
Quality
78
Security
76
Maintain
92
Install

OpenAgentSkill Trust Score

69
Manual review

OpenAgentSkill Trust Score

The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.

GitHub adoption

INFO

76

867 GitHub stars

Stars/forks activity

INFO

71

867 stars, 75 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata

Recent maintenance

INFO

76

3mo since push

License clarity

PASS

86

MIT

README/SKILL.md completeness

INFO

76

Public metadata needs stronger README/SKILL.md context

Dependency/runtime risk

INFO

72

command execution surface

Install availability

PASS

92

npx skills add LeonChaoX/qinyan-academic-skills --skill medical-imaging-review

Install command safety

PASS

92

standard package or runtime install path

Permission surface

INFO

62

shell or command execution, filesystem or document access

Repository evidence

PASS

86

https://github.com/LeonChaoX/qinyan-academic-skills/tree/main/skills/02-科学写作与学术交流/medical-imaging-review

Review status

INFO

66

AI review data available

Agent Proven outcomes

INFO

54

No agent outcome data yet

Checks

Install and adoption review

6 Passed · 8 Needs review

Install path

92

PASS

npx skills add LeonChaoX/qinyan-academic-skills --skill medical-imaging-review

Repository

88

PASS

https://github.com/LeonChaoX/qinyan-academic-skills/tree/main/skills/02-科学写作与学术交流/medical-imaging-review

License

86

PASS

MIT

Maintenance

76

CHECK

3mo since push

AI review

55

CHECK

The skill relies on external MCP servers (ArXiv, PubMed, Zotero) which may not be available in all environments; no fallback strategy is described.

README/SKILL.md completeness

84

PASS

Usable description available

Dependency risk

72

CHECK

command execution surface

Install command safety

92

PASS

standard package or runtime install path

Permission surface

62

CHECK

shell or command execution, filesystem or document access

Stars/forks activity

71

CHECK

867 stars, 75 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata

Adoption

88

PASS

867 GitHub stars

Warnings

  • The skill relies on external MCP servers (ArXiv, PubMed, Zotero) which may not be available in all environments; no fallback strategy is described.
  • The SKILL.md references 'CLAUDE.md' which is Claude-specific, but the skill is intended for general agent use; this could be clarified.
  • Quality score needs review

Method

This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.

Compare nearby options

Related skills to audit next