--- name: medical-imaging-review description: > Write comprehensive literature reviews for medical imaging AI research. Use when writing survey papers, systematic reviews, or literature analyses on topics like segmentation, detection, classification in CT, MRI, X-ray, ultrasound, or pathology imaging. Triggers on requests for "review paper", "survey", "literature review", "综述", "systematic review", or mentions of writing academic reviews on deep learning for medical imaging. metadata: author: user version: "2.0.0" allowed-tools: - Read - Write - Edit - Glob - Grep - Bash - WebSearch - WebFetch - Task - mcp__arxiv-mcp-server__search_papers - mcp__arxiv-mcp-server__download_paper - mcp__arxiv-mcp-server__read_paper - mcp__pubmed-mcp-server__pubmed_search_articles - mcp__zotero__zotero_search_items - mcp__zotero__zotero_get_item_fulltext ---

# Medical Imaging AI Literature Review Skill

Write comprehensive literature reviews following a systematic 7-phase workflow.

## Quick Start

1. **Initialize project** with three core files: - `CLAUDE.md` - Writing guidelines and terminology - `IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md` - Staged execution plan - `manuscript_draft.md` - Main manuscript

2. **Follow the 7-phase workflow** (see [references/WORKFLOW.md](references/WORKFLOW.md))

3. **Use domain-specific templates** (see [references/DOMAINS.md](references/DOMAINS.md))

---

## Core Principles

### Writing Style - **Hedging language**: "may", "suggests", "appears to", "has shown promising results" - **Avoid absolutes**: Never say "X is the best method" - **Citation support**: Every claim needs reference - **Limitations**: Each method section needs a Limitations paragraph

### Required Elements - **Key Points box** (3-5 bullets) after title - **Comparison table** for each major section - **Performance metrics**: Dice (0.XXX), HD95 (X.XX mm) - **Figure placeholders** with detailed captions - **References**: 80-120 typical, organized by topic

### Paragraph Structure ``` Topic sentence (main claim) → Supporting evidence (citations + data) → Analysis (critical evaluation) → Transition to next paragraph ```

---

## Literature Sources

Use multi-source strategy for comprehensive coverage:

| Source | Best For | Tools | |--------|----------|-------| | ArXiv | Latest DL methods, preprints | `search_papers`, `read_paper` | | PubMed | Clinical validation, peer-reviewed | `pubmed_search_articles` | | Zotero | Existing library, organized refs | `zotero_search_items` |

For MCP configuration details, see [references/MCP_SETUP.md](references/MCP_SETUP.md).

---

## Standard Review Structure

```markdown # [Title]: State of the Art and Future Directions

## Key Points - [3-5 bullets summarizing main findings]

## Abstract

## 1. Introduction ### 1.1 Clinical Background ### 1.2 Technical Challenges ### 1.3 Scope and Contributions

## 2. Datasets and Evaluation Metrics ### 2.1 Public Datasets (Table 1) ### 2.2 Evaluation Metrics

## 3. Deep Learning Methods ### 3.1 [Category 1] ### 3.2 [Category 2] (Table 2: Method Comparison)

## 4. Downstream Applications

## 5. Commercial Products & Clinical Translation (Table 3)

## 6. Discussion ### 6.1 Current Limitations ### 6.2 Future Directions

## 7. Conclusion

## References ```

---

## Method Description Template

```markdown ### 3.X [Method Category]

[1-2 paragraph introduction with motivation]

**[Method Name]:** [Author] et al. [ref] proposed [method], which [innovation]: - [Key component 1] - [Key component 2] Achieves Dice of X.XX on [dataset].

**Limitations:** Despite advantages, [category] methods face: (1) [limit 1]; (2) [limit 2]. ```

---

## Citation Patterns

```markdown # Data citation "...achieved Dice of 0.89 [23]"

# Method citation "Gu et al. [45] proposed..."

# Multi-citation "Several studies demonstrated... [12, 15, 23]"

# Comparative "While [12] focused on..., [15] addressed..." ```

---

## Reference Files

| File | Purpose | |------|---------| | [references/WORKFLOW.md](references/WORKFLOW.md) | Detailed 7-phase workflow | | [references/TEMPLATES.md](references/TEMPLATES.md) | CLAUDE.md and IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md templates | | [references/DOMAINS.md](references/DOMAINS.md) | Domain-specific method categories | | [references/MCP_SETUP.md](references/MCP_SETUP.md) | MCP server configuration | | [references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md](references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md) | Pre-submission quality checklist |

--- name: medical-imaging-review description: > Write comprehensive literature reviews for medical imaging AI research. Use when writing survey papers, systematic reviews, or literature analyses on topics like segmentation, detection, classification in CT, MRI, X-ray, ultrasound, or pathology imaging. Triggers on requests for "review paper", "survey", "literature review", "综述", "systematic review", or mentions of writing academic reviews on deep learning for medical imaging. metadata: author: user version: "2.0.0" allowed-tools: - Read - Write - Edit - Glob - Grep - Bash - WebSearch - WebFetch - Task - mcp__arxiv-mcp-server__search_papers - mcp__arxiv-mcp-server__download_paper - mcp__arxiv-mcp-server__read_paper - mcp__pubmed-mcp-server__pubmed_search_articles - mcp__zotero__zotero_search_items - mcp__zotero__zotero_get_item_fulltext ---

# Medical Imaging AI Literature Review Skill

Write comprehensive literature reviews following a systematic 7-phase workflow.

## Quick Start

1. **Initialize project** with three core files: - `CLAUDE.md` - Writing guidelines and terminology - `IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md` - Staged execution plan - `manuscript_draft.md` - Main manuscript

2. **Follow the 7-phase workflow** (see [references/WORKFLOW.md](references/WORKFLOW.md))

3. **Use domain-specific templates** (see [references/DOMAINS.md](references/DOMAINS.md))

---

## Core Principles

### Writing Style - **Hedging language**: "may", "suggests", "appears to", "has shown promising results" - **Avoid absolutes**: Never say "X is the best method" - **Citation support**: Every claim needs reference - **Limitations**: Each method section needs a Limitations paragraph

### Required Elements - **Key Points box** (3-5 bullets) after title - **Comparison table** for each major section - **Performance metrics**: Dice (0.XXX), HD95 (X.XX mm) - **Figure placeholders** with detailed captions - **References**: 80-120 typical, organized by topic

### Paragraph Structure ``` Topic sentence (main claim) → Supporting evidence (citations + data) → Analysis (critical evaluation) → Transition to next paragraph ```

---

## Literature Sources

Use multi-source strategy for comprehensive coverage:

| Source | Best For | Tools | |--------|----------|-------| | ArXiv | Latest DL methods, preprints | `search_papers`, `read_paper` | | PubMed | Clinical validation, peer-reviewed | `pubmed_search_articles` | | Zotero | Existing library, organized refs | `zotero_search_items` |

For MCP configuration details, see [references/MCP_SETUP.md](references/MCP_SETUP.md).

---

## Standard Review Structure

```markdown # [Title]: State of the Art and Future Directions

## Key Points - [3-5 bullets summarizing main findings]

## Abstract

## 1. Introduction ### 1.1 Clinical Background ### 1.2 Technical Challenges ### 1.3 Scope and Contributions

## 2. Datasets and Evaluation Metrics ### 2.1 Public Datasets (Table 1) ### 2.2 Evaluation Metrics

## 3. Deep Learning Methods ### 3.1 [Category 1] ### 3.2 [Category 2] (Table 2: Method Comparison)

## 4. Downstream Applications

## 5. Commercial Products & Clinical Translation (Table 3)

## 6. Discussion ### 6.1 Current Limitations ### 6.2 Future Directions

## 7. Conclusion

## References ```

---

## Method Description Template

```markdown ### 3.X [Method Category]

[1-2 paragraph introduction with motivation]

**[Method Name]:** [Author] et al. [ref] proposed [method], which [innovation]: - [Key component 1] - [Key component 2] Achieves Dice of X.XX on [dataset].

**Limitations:** Despite advantages, [category] methods face: (1) [limit 1]; (2) [limit 2]. ```

---

## Citation Patterns

```markdown # Data citation "...achieved Dice of 0.89 [23]"

# Method citation "Gu et al. [45] proposed..."

# Multi-citation "Several studies demonstrated... [12, 15, 23]"

# Comparative "While [12] focused on..., [15] addressed..." ```

---

## Reference Files

| File | Purpose | |------|---------| | [references/WORKFLOW.md](references/WORKFLOW.md) | Detailed 7-phase workflow | | [references/TEMPLATES.md](references/TEMPLATES.md) | CLAUDE.md and IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md templates | | [references/DOMAINS.md](references/DOMAINS.md) | Domain-specific method categories | | [references/MCP_SETUP.md](references/MCP_SETUP.md) | MCP server configuration | | [references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md](references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md) | Pre-submission quality checklist |

--- name: medical-imaging-review description: > Write comprehensive literature reviews for medical imaging AI research. Use when writing survey papers, systematic reviews, or literature analyses on topics like segmentation, detection, classification in CT, MRI, X-ray, ultrasound, or pathology imaging. Triggers on requests for "review paper", "survey", "literature review", "综述", "systematic review", or mentions of writing academic reviews on deep learning for medical imaging. metadata: author: user version: "2.0.0" allowed-tools: - Read - Write - Edit - Glob - Grep - Bash - WebSearch - WebFetch - Task - mcp__arxiv-mcp-server__search_papers - mcp__arxiv-mcp-server__download_paper - mcp__arxiv-mcp-server__read_paper - mcp__pubmed-mcp-server__pubmed_search_articles - mcp__zotero__zotero_search_items - mcp__zotero__zotero_get_item_fulltext ---

# Medical Imaging AI Literature Review Skill

Write comprehensive literature reviews following a systematic 7-phase workflow.

## Quick Start

1. **Initialize project** with three core files: - `CLAUDE.md` - Writing guidelines and terminology - `IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md` - Staged execution plan - `manuscript_draft.md` - Main manuscript

2. **Follow the 7-phase workflow** (see [references/WORKFLOW.md](references/WORKFLOW.md))

3. **Use domain-specific templates** (see [references/DOMAINS.md](references/DOMAINS.md))

---

## Core Principles

### Writing Style - **Hedging language**: "may", "suggests", "appears to", "has shown promising results" - **Avoid absolutes**: Never say "X is the best method" - **Citation support**: Every claim needs reference - **Limitations**: Each method section needs a Limitations paragraph

### Required Elements - **Key Points box** (3-5 bullets) after title - **Comparison table** for each major section - **Performance metrics**: Dice (0.XXX), HD95 (X.XX mm) - **Figure placeholders** with detailed captions - **References**: 80-120 typical, organized by topic

### Paragraph Structure ``` Topic sentence (main claim) → Supporting evidence (citations + data) → Analysis (critical evaluation) → Transition to next paragraph ```

---

## Literature Sources

Use multi-source strategy for comprehensive coverage:

| Source | Best For | Tools | |--------|----------|-------| | ArXiv | Latest DL methods, preprints | `search_papers`, `read_paper` | | PubMed | Clinical validation, peer-reviewed | `pubmed_search_articles` | | Zotero | Existing library, organized refs | `zotero_search_items` |

For MCP configuration details, see [references/MCP_SETUP.md](references/MCP_SETUP.md).

---

## Standard Review Structure

```markdown # [Title]: State of the Art and Future Directions

## Key Points - [3-5 bullets summarizing main findings]

## Abstract

## 1. Introduction ### 1.1 Clinical Background ### 1.2 Technical Challenges ### 1.3 Scope and Contributions

## 2. Datasets and Evaluation Metrics ### 2.1 Public Datasets (Table 1) ### 2.2 Evaluation Metrics

## 3. Deep Learning Methods ### 3.1 [Category 1] ### 3.2 [Category 2] (Table 2: Method Comparison)

## 4. Downstream Applications

## 5. Commercial Products & Clinical Translation (Table 3)

## 6. Discussion ### 6.1 Current Limitations ### 6.2 Future Directions

## 7. Conclusion

## References ```

---

## Method Description Template

```markdown ### 3.X [Method Category]

[1-2 paragraph introduction with motivation]

**[Method Name]:** [Author] et al. [ref] proposed [method], which [innovation]: - [Key component 1] - [Key component 2] Achieves Dice of X.XX on [dataset].

**Limitations:** Despite advantages, [category] methods face: (1) [limit 1]; (2) [limit 2]. ```

---

## Citation Patterns

```markdown # Data citation "...achieved Dice of 0.89 [23]"

# Method citation "Gu et al. [45] proposed..."

# Multi-citation "Several studies demonstrated... [12, 15, 23]"

# Comparative "While [12] focused on..., [15] addressed..." ```

---

## Reference Files

| File | Purpose | |------|---------| | [references/WORKFLOW.md](references/WORKFLOW.md) | Detailed 7-phase workflow | | [references/TEMPLATES.md](references/TEMPLATES.md) | CLAUDE.md and IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md templates | | [references/DOMAINS.md](references/DOMAINS.md) | Domain-specific method categories | | [references/MCP_SETUP.md](references/MCP_SETUP.md) | MCP server configuration | | [references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md](references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md) | Pre-submission quality checklist |

--- name: medical-imaging-review description: > Write comprehensive literature reviews for medical imaging AI research. Use when writing survey papers, systematic reviews, or literature analyses on topics like segmentation, detection, classification in CT, MRI, X-ray, ultrasound, or pathology imaging. Triggers on requests for "review paper", "survey", "literature review", "综述", "systematic review", or mentions of writing academic reviews on deep learning for medical imaging. metadata: author: user version: "2.0.0" allowed-tools: - Read - Write - Edit - Glob - Grep - Bash - WebSearch - WebFetch - Task - mcp__arxiv-mcp-server__search_papers - mcp__arxiv-mcp-server__download_paper - mcp__arxiv-mcp-server__read_paper - mcp__pubmed-mcp-server__pubmed_search_articles - mcp__zotero__zotero_search_items - mcp__zotero__zotero_get_item_fulltext ---

# Medical Imaging AI Literature Review Skill

Write comprehensive literature reviews following a systematic 7-phase workflow.

## Quick Start

1. **Initialize project** with three core files: - `CLAUDE.md` - Writing guidelines and terminology - `IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md` - Staged execution plan - `manuscript_draft.md` - Main manuscript

2. **Follow the 7-phase workflow** (see [references/WORKFLOW.md](references/WORKFLOW.md))

3. **Use domain-specific templates** (see [references/DOMAINS.md](references/DOMAINS.md))

---

## Core Principles

### Writing Style - **Hedging language**: "may", "suggests", "appears to", "has shown promising results" - **Avoid absolutes**: Never say "X is the best method" - **Citation support**: Every claim needs reference - **Limitations**: Each method section needs a Limitations paragraph

### Required Elements - **Key Points box** (3-5 bullets) after title - **Comparison table** for each major section - **Performance metrics**: Dice (0.XXX), HD95 (X.XX mm) - **Figure placeholders** with detailed captions - **References**: 80-120 typical, organized by topic

### Paragraph Structure ``` Topic sentence (main claim) → Supporting evidence (citations + data) → Analysis (critical evaluation) → Transition to next paragraph ```

---

## Literature Sources

Use multi-source strategy for comprehensive coverage:

| Source | Best For | Tools | |--------|----------|-------| | ArXiv | Latest DL methods, preprints | `search_papers`, `read_paper` | | PubMed | Clinical validation, peer-reviewed | `pubmed_search_articles` | | Zotero | Existing library, organized refs | `zotero_search_items` |

For MCP configuration details, see [references/MCP_SETUP.md](references/MCP_SETUP.md).

---

## Standard Review Structure

```markdown # [Title]: State of the Art and Future Directions

## Key Points - [3-5 bullets summarizing main findings]

## Abstract

## 1. Introduction ### 1.1 Clinical Background ### 1.2 Technical Challenges ### 1.3 Scope and Contributions

## 2. Datasets and Evaluation Metrics ### 2.1 Public Datasets (Table 1) ### 2.2 Evaluation Metrics

## 3. Deep Learning Methods ### 3.1 [Category 1] ### 3.2 [Category 2] (Table 2: Method Comparison)

## 4. Downstream Applications

## 5. Commercial Products & Clinical Translation (Table 3)

## 6. Discussion ### 6.1 Current Limitations ### 6.2 Future Directions

## 7. Conclusion

## References ```

---

## Method Description Template

```markdown ### 3.X [Method Category]

[1-2 paragraph introduction with motivation]

**[Method Name]:** [Author] et al. [ref] proposed [method], which [innovation]: - [Key component 1] - [Key component 2] Achieves Dice of X.XX on [dataset].

**Limitations:** Despite advantages, [category] methods face: (1) [limit 1]; (2) [limit 2]. ```

---

## Citation Patterns

```markdown # Data citation "...achieved Dice of 0.89 [23]"

# Method citation "Gu et al. [45] proposed..."

# Multi-citation "Several studies demonstrated... [12, 15, 23]"

# Comparative "While [12] focused on..., [15] addressed..." ```

---

## Reference Files

| File | Purpose | |------|---------| | [references/WORKFLOW.md](references/WORKFLOW.md) | Detailed 7-phase workflow | | [references/TEMPLATES.md](references/TEMPLATES.md) | CLAUDE.md and IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md templates | | [references/DOMAINS.md](references/DOMAINS.md) | Domain-specific method categories | | [references/MCP_SETUP.md](references/MCP_SETUP.md) | MCP server configuration | | [references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md](references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md) | Pre-submission quality checklist |