Skill audit report
Reduce defensive writing in drafts and revisions by removing unnecessary caveats, disclaimers, hedges, apology-like framing, negative self-limiting statements, and over-explanations while preserving necessary scope, accuracy, safety, legal, ethical, and methodological limits. Use when drafting or revising academic writing, papers, essays, abstracts, introductions, contribution statements, discussions, conclusions, technical explanations, grant writing, product writing, policy writing, professional reports, or any text the user wants to be clearer, stronger, more direct, more concise, more confident, less verbose, less caveated, less apologetic, or less defensive.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score
The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.
GitHub adoption
INFO76
847 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
INFO65
847 stars, 31 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS100
7d since push
License clarity
PASS86
MIT
README/SKILL.md completeness
PASS86
Metadata includes enough usage and workflow context
Dependency/runtime risk
PASS90
no major dependency risk hints in public metadata
Install availability
PASS92
npx skills add Kiterlin/anti-defensive-writing --skill anti-defensive-writing
Install command safety
PASS92
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
PASS100
no high-risk permission surface in public metadata
Repository evidence
PASS86
https://github.com/Kiterlin/anti-defensive-writing/tree/main/skill/anti-defensive-writing
Review status
WARN46
AI review approval is missing
Agent Proven outcomes
INFO54
No agent outcome data yet
Checks
Install path
92
npx skills add Kiterlin/anti-defensive-writing --skill anti-defensive-writing
Repository
88
https://github.com/Kiterlin/anti-defensive-writing/tree/main/skill/anti-defensive-writing
License
86
MIT
Maintenance
100
7d since push
AI review
55
Review approval is missing
README/SKILL.md completeness
86
Warnings
Method
This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.
Compare nearby options
Create or update GitHub pull requests using the repository-required workflow and template compliance. Use when asked to create/open/update a PR so the assistant reads `.github/pull_request_template.md`, fills every template section, preserves markdown structure exactly, and marks missing data as N/A or None instead of skipping sections.
52K Stars · Audit report
Use when a user wants guidance on starting, contributing to, growing, governing, funding, securing, or sustaining an open source project, or asks about contributor onboarding, community health, maintainer burnout, code of conduct, metrics, legal basics, or open source project adoption.
73 Stars · Audit report
Draft, reply to, or analyse a legal notice (rent or service-charge demand, forfeiture or breach notice, statutory notice, letter before action). Every deadline is a calendar date with its arithmetic; every threatened consequence is confirmed and lawfully available; an admitted fact never concedes a legal conclusion. Triggers on "draft a demand", "reply to this notice". Does not fire on a whole-contract review (contract-review) or the output file's integrity (deliverable-integrity).
25 Stars · Audit report
Usable description available
Dependency risk
90
no major dependency risk hints in public metadata
Install command safety
92
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
100
no high-risk permission surface in public metadata
Stars/forks activity
65
847 stars, 31 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Adoption
88
847 GitHub stars
Agent safety v2
This skill should not be selected by an agent without explicit human security review.
Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.
Network access
mediumSkill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.