Skill audit report
Create or update GitHub pull requests using the repository-required workflow and template compliance. Use when asked to create/open/update a PR so the assistant reads `.github/pull_request_template.md`, fills every template section, preserves markdown structure exactly, and marks missing data as N/A or None instead of skipping sections.
The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.
GitHub adoption
PASS100
52K GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
PASS100
52K stars, 5.0K forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS100
4d since push
License clarity
PASS86
AGPL-3.0
README/SKILL.md completeness
PASS86
Metadata includes enough usage and workflow context
Dependency/runtime risk
INFO72
command execution surface
Install availability
PASS92
npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-pr
Install command safety
PASS92
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
INFO62
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Repository evidence
PASS86
https://github.com/CherryHQ/cherry-studio/tree/main/.agents/skills/gh-create-pr
Review status
WARN51.03
AI review approval is missing
Agent Proven outcomes
INFO54
No agent outcome data yet
Checks
Install path
92
npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-pr
Repository
88
https://github.com/CherryHQ/cherry-studio/tree/main/.agents/skills/gh-create-pr
License
86
AGPL-3.0
Maintenance
100
4d since push
AI review
55
Review approval is missing
README/SKILL.md completeness
86
Usable description available
Dependency risk
72
command execution surface
Install command safety
92
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
62
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Stars/forks activity
100
52K stars, 5.0K forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Adoption
88
52K GitHub stars
Warnings
Method
This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.
Compare nearby options
Review a contract or lease for one named party, grading each risk against the exact clause it rests on. Every finding quotes its clause; caps, indemnities and exits are graded only with their interacting clauses; statutory points go to a verification list unless retrieved this session. Triggers on "review this lease from the tenant's side" or a contract audit. Does not fire on a neutral summary, an obligations extraction on its own, drafting from scratch, version comparison, or a notice (legal-notice-handling).
25 Stars · Audit report
Draft, reply to, or analyse a legal notice (rent or service-charge demand, forfeiture or breach notice, statutory notice, letter before action). Every deadline is a calendar date with its arithmetic; every threatened consequence is confirmed and lawfully available; an admitted fact never concedes a legal conclusion. Triggers on "draft a demand", "reply to this notice". Does not fire on a whole-contract review (contract-review) or the output file's integrity (deliverable-integrity).
25 Stars · Audit report
Create or update Claude Code skills following Anthropic's official skill standard. Use when user says "create a skill", "new skill", "write a skill", "update a skill", "skill standard", or any time a new SKILL.md file needs to be created. Also use when reviewing existing skills for standards compliance.
20 Stars · Audit report