ai-assist-git-pr
Adaptive GitHub PR lifecycle skill — create PRs, write/update descriptions, investigate review comments (Copilot + human) with research and batch approval, and check merge readiness. Triggers on: create PR, open PR, describe PR, update description, PR body, check comments, copilo
Asset-Profil
Recherche und Wissensarbeit
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Szenario
Recherche-Agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Agent-Fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Geeignet für Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI oder benutzerdefinierte Agents.
Installieren
Bereit
npx skills add jparkerweb/ai-assist-skills --skill ai-assist-git-pr
Wartung
Aktuell
1 Tage seit dem letzten Push
Risiko
Prüfung nötig
Lizenz ist unklar
GitHub-Qualität
88
61/100 Qualität · 63/100 Vertrauen
Abdeckungs-Tags
Review-Notizen
Lizenz ist unklar · Dependency or permission surface needs review
Agent-Adoptionskarte
Vertrauen, Audit und Installationsbereitschaft auf einen Blick
Diese Werte kombinieren öffentliche Repository-Metadaten, OpenAgentSkill-Reviewsignale, Wartungsaktualität und Installationsbereitschaft. Sie helfen bei der Vorauswahl, ersetzen aber keine menschliche Prüfung.
Qualität
VielversprechendUseful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Vertrauen
Do not auto-installTrust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Audit
Prüfung nötigMaschinenlesbare Prüfung von Installationsbereitschaft, Sicherheitsmetadaten, Wartung und Akzeptanzrisiko.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Menschliche Prüfung vor Installation
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Stars
88 GitHub-Stars
Repository-Aktivität
88 Stars und 12 Forks
Wartung
1 Tage seit dem letzten Push
Lizenz
Unbekannt
Installieren
npx skills add jparkerweb/ai-assist-skills --skill ai-assist-git-pr
Installationssicherheit
Standard-Paket- oder Laufzeit-Installationspfad
Berechtigungsfläche
secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
Agent-Ergebnisse
Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten
Dokumentation
Starker README/SKILL.md-Kontext
Risikoübersicht
Vor Produktion prüfen
- Repository license is unknown; the skill lacks explicit licensing terms, which may hinder reuse and attribution.
- Lizenz ist unklar
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
Installationsbereitschaft
Installationspfad verfügbar
- Installationspfad ist verfügbar
- Repository-Belege sind verfügbar
- Lizenz ist unklar
- Noch keine Agent-Proven-Ergebnisbelege
Agent-lesbare Metadaten
Maschinenlesbare Entscheidungsdaten für diesen Skill.
Nutze diesen Block oder das eingebettete JSON, um zu entscheiden, ob ein Agent diesen Skill installieren, eine Alternative wählen oder zuerst menschliche Prüfung anfordern soll.
Geeignete Aufgaben
- Research-Agent-Workflows
- Claude-Code-Teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
- Suchquellen
Geeignete Agents
Installationsentscheidung
- Befehl
- npx skills add jparkerweb/ai-assist-skills --skill ai-assist-git-pr
- Richtlinie
- Blockieren
- Menschliche Prüfung
- Ja
Vertrauen und Risiko
- Vertrauen
- 55/100
- Audit
- 71/100
- Risikoebene
- Prüfung nötig
Ergebnis-Loop
- Endpoint
- /api/agent/outcome
- Event-ID
- resolve
- Ergebnisse
- 5
Installationsbefehl
npx skills add jparkerweb/ai-assist-skills --skill ai-assist-git-prNicht verwenden, wenn
- Teams, die ein vom Anbieter unterstütztes SLA benötigen
- production agents without a repository review
- Repository license is unknown; the skill lacks explicit licensing terms, which may hinder reuse and attribution.
- Hinweise auf Hochrisiko-Berechtigungen: Shell or command execution, Secrets or environment access
- Lizenz ist unklar
Alternative
Last30days Skill
53.5K Stars
npx skills add mvanhorn/last30days-skill -g
Alternative
Academic Research Skills
38.4K Stars
npx skills add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Alternative
GPT Researcher
28.0K Stars
npx skills add assafelovic/gpt-researcher
Alternative
DeepResearch
19.8K Stars
npx skills add Alibaba-NLP/DeepResearch
Agent-Sicherheit v2
27/100 · Automatische Installation vermeiden
This skill should not be selected by an agent without explicit human security review.
Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.
Hoch
Shell- oder Befehlsausführung
Die Skill-Metadaten verweisen auf Terminal-, CLI-, Shell-, Subprozess- oder Befehlsausführungs-Workflows.
Mittel
Browser automation
Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.
Mittel
Netzwerkzugriff
Die Skill ruft wahrscheinlich Remote-Seiten, APIs, Repositories oder externe Dienste ab.
Mittel
Dateisystemzugriff
Die Skill kann Projektdateien, Dokumente, generierte Artefakte oder den lokalen Arbeitsbereich lesen oder schreiben.
- Hinweise auf Hochrisiko-Berechtigungen: Shell or command execution, Secrets or environment access
- Lizenz ist unklar
Installationsziele
Diesen Skill im Agent-Workflow installieren
Über den öffentlichen Endpunkt erhältst du Befehl, Sicherheitscheckliste, Ziel-Prompts und kanonische Links.
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-prAgent-Auflösungsplan
Lass einen Agent die Eignung vor der Installation prüfen.
Die Resolve API liefert die beste Skill, Alternativen, Sicherheitsrichtlinien, Auditnotizen, Installationsziel und einen direkt nutzbaren Prompt.
JSON öffnen
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20ai-assist-git-pr%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve-Text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20ai-assist-git-pr%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Installationsübergabe
/api/skills/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr/install
Agent sollte prüfen
- Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
- Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
- Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.
Prompt kopieren
Task: Use ai-assist-git-pr in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20ai-assist-git-pr%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr/install
Install command: npx skills add jparkerweb/ai-assist-skills --skill ai-assist-git-pr
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent-Übergabe
Gib dem Agent den Installationspfad, nicht noch ein Verzeichnis.
Über den öffentlichen Endpunkt erhältst du Befehl, Sicherheitscheckliste, Ziel-Prompts und kanonische Links.
Installationsübergabe
/api/skills/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr/install
LLM-Textformat
/api/skills/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr/install?format=text
Alternativen finden
/api/skills/search?q=ai-assist-git-pr&limit=3
Agent-Prompt
Use ai-assist-git-pr for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr/install, then install with: npx skills add jparkerweb/ai-assist-skills --skill ai-assist-git-prRegistry-Metadaten
Agent-lesbares Profil für die automatische Skill-Auswahl.
Die Registry API stellt Entscheidungs-, Vertrauens-, Audit-, Use-Case- und Installationssignale ohne UI-Scraping bereit.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr
LLM-Text
/api/registry/manifest/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr?format=text
Installationsalias
/api/registry/install/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr
Empfehlen
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20ai-assist-git-pr%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent-Fit
Recherche-Agents
Use-Case-Tags
Plattformen
Claude Code
Audit-Bericht
Prüfung nötig · 71/100
Maschinenlesbare Prüfung von Installationsbereitschaft, Sicherheitsmetadaten, Wartung und Akzeptanzrisiko.
Agent-Entscheidungspanel
Fallback candidate for Research agents
Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.
Rolle im Stack
Fallback-Kandidat
Primäre Eignung
Recherche-Agents
Vertrauenslabel
Zuerst prototypisieren
Installationspfad
Befehl bereit
Verwenden wenn
- Research-Agent-Workflows
- Claude-Code-Teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Evidenz
- recent repository activity
- install command or GitHub repo available
- Qualitätsprofil 61/100
- 7 OpenAgentSkill-Interaktionen
zuerst prüfen
- Repository license is unknown; the skill lacks explicit licensing terms, which may hinder reuse and attribution.
Implementierungspfad
- 1Installieren Sie es in einem Sandbox-Agent und führen Sie eine Recherche-Agents-Aufgabe vollständig aus.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
Vertrauensprofil
Do not auto-install
Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
GitHub-Akzeptanz
Prüfen88 GitHub-Stars
Star-/Fork-Aktivität
Prüfen88 Stars und 12 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbar
Aktuelle Wartung
Bestanden1 Tage seit dem letzten Push
Lizenzklarheit
PrüfenUnbekannt
Positive Signale
- KI-Prüfung genehmigt
- Installationspfad ist verfügbar
- Repository-Belege sind verfügbar
- Kürzlich gewartetes Repository
- Der Installationsbefehl weist kein offensichtliches Hochrisikomuster auf
- Ergebniszyklus ist bereit, benötigt aber den ersten echten Agent-Lauf
Vor Installation prüfen
- Repository license is unknown; the skill lacks explicit licensing terms, which may hinder reuse and attribution.
- Lizenz ist unklar
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
- GitHub adoption: 88 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 88 stars, 12 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- License clarity: Unknown
- Dependency/runtime risk: command execution surface, credential or environment access
- Permission surface: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
- Noch keine echten Agent-Ergebnisberichte
- Vor unbeaufsichtigter Installation ist menschliche Prüfung erforderlich
Empfohlene Aktion
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Qualitätsprofil
Vielversprechend Kandidat für Agent-Workflows
Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Workflow-Eignung
Diese Skill in diesen Szenarien nutzen
Investigate faster
Research agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Manage repositories
GitHub automation
I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.
Build and ship code
Coding agents
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Workflow-Eignung
Zum vollständigen Workflow hinzufügen
Find, compare, and synthesize
Research report agent
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Inspect, patch, and verify code
Coding review agent
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
Operate and verify web apps
Browser QA agent
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Alternativen-Shortlist
Vor Installation vergleichen
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
Academic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
GPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
DeepResearch
Tongyi Deep Research, the Leading Open-source Deep Research Agent
Übersicht
--- name: ai-assist-git-pr description: "Adaptive GitHub PR lifecycle skill — create PRs, write/update descriptions, investigate review comments (Copilot + human) with research and batch approval, and check merge readiness. Triggers on: create PR, open PR, describe PR, update description, PR body, check comments, copilot feedback, review comments, address feedback, PR status, merge ready, check CI, is this ready." argument-hint: "[action or PR number] — e.g. 'create', 'describe', 'comments', 'status', 'describe #42', 'address copilot feedback'" ---
# GITHUB PR
**Objective:** Manage the full PR lifecycle (create → describe → comment investigation → merge readiness) via `gh` CLI. Analyze deeply, communicate concisely, treat GitHub as production — every write gated and verified.
**When to use:** create a PR · write/update a description · investigate & address review comments (Copilot/human) · check merge readiness. Modes detailed in Step 1.
Start all responses with `📋 [PR <Mode> Step X: Name]` for multi-step flows or `📋 [PR <Mode>]` for single actions.
## Role
Senior engineer writing for senior engineers. Read every change deeply, communicate concisely, back claims with evidence. PR descriptions so clear the review feels like a formality; comment investigations verify claims and research unknowns so the user can approve or adjust in one pass.
## Context
> **Shell portability (read before running ANY command in this skill, starting with the gh CLI check and branch detection below):** run every `git`/`gh` command as its own separate tool call, each fully self-contained. **Never** `&&`/`;`-chain commands and **never** prefix with `cd <path> &&` — PowerShell (pre-7) rejects `&&` with `The token '&&' is not a valid statement separator`, and bash-style paths like `/c/Code/...` are invalid on Windows. **Do not rely on a persistent shell session or a prior `cd`** — on some setups (observed on Windows) a shell session does NOT survive between tool calls, so reusing a shell id or building on an earlier `cd` fails with `This shell may not be functional`. Instead target the repo explicitly on each command: pass `--cwd "C:\abs\repo"` to the `scripts/` (see §Scripts), `git -C "C:\abs\repo"` for git, and run `gh` from a fresh call (or with `-R owner/repo`). Use native paths (`C:\Code\...`). Full rule: §Scripts Portability rule below.
**AGENTS.md check:** if `./AGENTS.md` or `.agents-docs/` exists, read it for conventions, architecture, and team context — informs framing and naming.
**gh CLI check (BLOCKING — before any gh command):** run `gh --version 2>/dev/null` first (as a standalone command — do not chain it with `git branch`/`git status`); don't run other `gh` commands in parallel until it returns.
- **Not installed** → `references/github-cli-setup.md` (guided setup); no `gh` until verified. - **Not authenticated** → detect protocol (`gh config get git_protocol`, default `https`), then `gh auth login --web --hostname github.com --git-protocol <detected>` (fallback `! gh auth login`); verify `gh auth status`.
**Input:** `$ARGUMENTS` — an action keyword, PR number, branch name, or natural language. If ambiguous, detect from git context.
**Source-of-truth:** code diff + commit history are authoritative; AGENTS.md/docs second; ticket context is a starting point only. Full table + rationale: `references/github-pr-operations.md` §Source-of-Truth Hierarchy.
**Branch detection:**
1. Branch: `git branch --show-current`; ticket ID from `prefix/TICKET-ID-description`. 2. Base branch: `gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef` → cache `$base`; `git fetch origin $base`. 3. PR state: `node "<SKILL_ROOT>/scripts/pr-context.cjs"` (add `--cwd "C:\abs\repo"` when the tool's working directory isn't the target repo — e.g. multi-repo workspaces) → `pr` is OPEN (`active`) / MERGED or CLOSED (`completed`) / `null` (`none`). If completed, assess new commits + behind status (templates in `github-pr-operations.md`).
## Scripts
Mechanical `gh`/`git` operations run through Node scripts in `scripts/`, never as hand-written shell. Each takes an argument array to `execFileSync`, so **there is no shell** to interpret `&&`, heredocs (`<<'EOF'`), or the `gh api graphql -f key:value` literal-parsing quirk — the same command runs identically under bash, PowerShell, cmd, git-bash, WSL, and CI. **No shell detection, no per-OS branching.** Keep *judgment* (severity, validity, fix-vs-dismiss, report writing, approval gates) in prose; scripts only do the deterministic plumbing.
| Script | Access | Purpose | |--------|--------|---------| | `pr-context.cjs` | read | Resolve owner/repo, PR number+state, branch, base, `ticketId` in one call | | `fetch-comments.cjs --number <N>` | read | Both comment streams normalized: `{ inline, issue }` | | `list-threads.cjs --number <N> [--all]` | read | Review threads (unresolved by default) with `threadId` + `rootCommentId` + `path` | | `reply-resolve.cjs --file <payload.json> [--dry-run]` | **write / gated** | Post reply batch + resolve threads; run ONLY after the batch-reply approval gate |
> **`<SKILL_ROOT>`** = the directory containing this `SKILL.md` (its install location). Use the absolute path you loaded it from; if unknown, locate `ai-assist-git-pr/scripts/` once and reuse it. Never run a literal `<SKILL_ROOT>`. Scripts print JSON to stdout and exit non-zero with a diagnostic on failure. Full arg/payload reference: `scripts/README.md`.
> **Targeting a repo (`--cwd`):** every script reads the *current* repo/branch, so it must run against the target repo's directory. Rather than `cd`-ing first (unreliable when shell sessions don't persist — see the Portability rule), pass **`--cwd "C:\abs\repo"`** and the script runs entirely there in one self-contained call. Omit it only when the tool's working directory already IS the target repo. Example: `node "<SKILL_ROOT>/scripts/pr-context.cjs" --cwd "C:\Code\tap-ct"`.
**Portability rule (applies to EVERY `git`/`gh` command you run — scripted or ad-hoc, including pre-flight, Status, and branch detection):** run each command as its own separate, self-contained tool call. **Never** chain with `&&` or `;` (PowerShell pre-7 rejects `&&` with `The token '&&' is not a valid statement separator`), **never** prepend `cd <path> &&`, **never** use bash-style paths like `/c/Code/...` (use native `C:\Code\...` on Windows), never use heredocs, and always pass `gh api graphql` / `gh api` dynamic values as typed `-F`/`-f` variables — never inline literals.
**Do not depend on a persistent shell session.** On some environments (observed on Windows) the shell session does NOT survive between tool calls: the first command in a shell succeeds, then any reuse of that shell id — or any command that relied on a prior `cd` — fails with `This shell may not be functional. Please try again using a new shell id`. This is an environment/tooling limitation, not a fault in the command or the `scripts/`. Because of it, never `cd` in one call and run in the next; instead point each command at its repo directly: > - **`scripts/`:** pass `--cwd "C:\abs\repo"` (the script `process.chdir`s once; every gh/git inside inherits it). > - **git:** use `git -C "C:\abs\repo" <args>`. > - **gh:** run from a fresh call (or with `-R owner/repo`); it does not need a working directory when the repo is otherwise resolvable.
Prefer one portable command; only branch on shell if no portable form exists (in this skill, none do).
## Reference Loading
Load references per Step within Mode. Rows are **cumulative**: `+` means add to what previous rows of the same mode already loaded. Paths relative to `references/`.
| Mode | Step | Load (cumulative) | |------|------|-------------------| | Create | Pre-flight | `github-pr-create.md` §Pre-flight | | Create | Context+Analysis | `+ github-pr-describe.md` §Change Analysis Framework | | Create | Draft | `+ github-pr-templates.md` §Create PR Template | | Create | Write+Verify | `+ github-pr-operations.md` §Write Verification | | Describe | Body fetch | `github-pr-describe.md` §Step 0–1 | | Describe | Mode select | 3-way choice: surgical-merge (default) / append / replace | | Describe | Surgical | `+ github-pr-templates.md` §Surgical Edit Patterns | | Describe | Write+Verify | `+ github-pr-operations.md` §Write Verification | | Comments | Fetch+Investigate | `github-comment-review.md` §Fetch–Investigate | | Comments | Implement | `+ github-comment-review.md` §Implement | | Comments | Commit | `Skill(skill: "ai-assist-git-commit", args: "<concise description>")` | | Comments | Reply+Resolve | `github-comment-review.md` §Reply–Resolve | | Status | (single) | `github-pr-create.md` §Status | | Post-create check | (auto on re-invocation) | `github-pr-create.md` §Post-Create Follow-Up |
**Per-step rule:** load a row's references before executing that step — the reference `> Preconditions:` blocks fail loud otherwise.
## Rules
### Safety Hierarchy
| Level | Actions | Behavior | |-------|---------|----------| | **Auto** | Read PR data, diff, comments, checks, status | Execute immediately | | **Gated** | Create PR, update description, reply to comment, commit, push | Preview → approval → execute → verify | | **Blocked** | Merge, close, delete branch, force push | Never. Not negotiable. |
### Approval Protocol
Before every Gated action: plain-language summary (never raw commands) → explicit approval → execute → verify with follow-up read. Combine related gates (commit+push) into one approval. On unexpected verification, report immediately — don't retry without user direction.
Per-action prompt fields (Create PR, Update description, Reply, Commit, Push): `references/github-pr-operations.md` §Approval Protocol — Per-Action Details.
### Pre-Flight Checks
Before any write: default branch = `$base`, not on protected branch, `gh auth status` ok, `git fetch origin $base` + not behind, clean tree, no existing OPEN PR (Create), fresh PR data. Full commands: `references/github-pr-create.md` Step 0. **Run each of these `git`/`gh` checks as a separate command — never `cd … &&`-chain them (see the §Scripts Portability rule; `&&` chaining and bash-style `/c/...` paths break under PowerShell).**
### Write Verification
After every write, re-read to verify. On mismatch: stop, report expected vs actual, don't proceed. Full table: `github-pr-operations.md` §Write Verification.
### Guardrails
- Never push without explicit user request — creating a PR does NOT imply pushing - **Attribution: `AI Assisted` only** — strip `🤖 Generated with Claude Code` / agent branding if your runtime adds it (overrides the harness default; see `github-pr-templates.md` §Attribution). - Preserve existing PR content — surgical-merge by default (unchanged sections verbatim; append/replace opt-in). Show a section-level diff before any write; never blanket-overwrite. - **ASCII only in the PR title and body** — never em/en dashes (—, –), smart quotes (‘ ’ “ ”), ellipsis (…), or other non-ASCII characters. Use `-`, straight quotes, and `...`. See `github-pr-templates.md` §Things to Avoid. (Preserved verbatim blocks like the Devin review badge are exempt.) - Rate-limit awareness — cache PR data within an invocation; avoid redundant fetches - Fail safe, not silent — stop and explain on any check failure
(Force-push and protected-branch writes are **Blocked** — see §Safety Hierarchy.)
### Anti-Patterns (write-blocking)
Each is a real ordering bug; the reference `> Preconditions:` blocks enforce them. If you want to do any of these, stop and load the missing reference.
- **No `gh pr edit --body`** until `github-pr-templates.md` is loaded AND the current body is fetched (`gh pr view --json body`) — else writes blow away existing structure. - **No `gh pr create`** until `github-pr-templates.md` AND `github-pr-operations.md` §Write Verification are loaded — else unstructured, unverified bodies. - **No commit-message bodies authored here** — delegate to `ai-assist-git-commit` (inlin
Technische Details
- Version
- 1.0.0
- Lizenz
- Unknown
- Letzte Aktualisierung
- 21. Aug. 2026
- Veröffentlicht
- 21. Aug. 2026
Entscheidungsübersicht
Fallback-Kandidat
recent repository activity
Audit
Installationsprüfung
Installations- und Adoptionsprüfung
- Sicherheit
- 64/100
- Wartung
- 100/100
- Installieren
- 92/100
Von Agent belegte Evidenz
Von Agent belegte Evidenz
Ergebnisberichte nach Resolve, Prüfung, Installation und einem begrenzten Lauf.
- Erfolgsrate
- —
- Letzter Fehler
- —
- Ergebnisse
- 0
- Ausgabequalität
- —
- Fehlgeschlagen
- 0
- Nicht relevant
- 0
- Installationen
- 0
- Durch Risiko blockiert
- 0
- Einrichtung erforderlich
- 0
- Produktion
- 0
Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten. Der erste Lauf kann Erfolg, Einrichtungsbedarf, Risikoblockaden, Fehler oder Irrelevanz über /api/agent/outcome melden.
Installieren
Zum Agent-Workflow hinzufügen
Kostenlos und Open Source. Bericht vor der Installation in Produktions-Agents prüfen.
Wachstums-Loop
Share-Kit
Szenariobasierter Entwurf für ai-assist-git-pr, bereit für einen manuellen X-Post.
ai-assist-git-pr: Adaptive GitHub PR lifecycle skill — create PRs, write/update descriptions, investigate revie... 88 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr?ref=x
Optionale Antwort mit Installationsbefehl
Listing + install path for ai-assist-git-pr: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr?ref=x Install: npx skills add jparkerweb/ai-assist-skills --skill ai-assist-git-pr
Quelle des Eintrags
Registry-indexiert
Dieser Eintrag wurde aus öffentlichen Quellen indexiert und ist erst nach Genehmigung eines Maintainer-Anspruchs offiziell.
- Ersteller
- jparkerweb
- Indexiert von
- OpenAgentSkill Community-Index
Die Zuordnung verlinkt auf das öffentliche Repository oder Creator-Profil. Creator können den Eintrag beanspruchen, um Eigentümersignale zu aktualisieren.
Diesen Skill beanspruchenEigentümeranspruch
Diesen Skill-Eintrag beanspruchen
Dieser Registry-indexiert-Eintrag wird jparkerweb zugeschrieben, ist aber noch nicht offiziell markiert. Beanspruche ihn, um ein verifiziertes Eigentümersignal hinzuzufügen und künftige Launch-, Installations- und Audit-Updates vertrauenswürdiger zu machen.
Creator-Backlink-Kit
Evidenz-Badges in deine README einfügen
Zeige den kanonischen Eintrag, aktuelle Vertrauens- und Audit-Signale sowie echte Agent-Proven-Evidenz dort, wo Entwickler das Repository bewerten.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jparkerweb-ai-assist-git-pr)Autor
jparkerweb
@jparkerweb
Tags
Plattform-Fit
Gesundheitssignale
- GitHub-Stars
- 88
- Qualitätswert
- 37/100
- Letzter GitHub-Push
- 20. Aug. 2026
- Framework-Hinweise
- Unbekannt
- OpenAgentSkill-Aufrufe
- 7
- Installationskopien
- 0
- Externe Klicks
- 0
Community-Signal
Teile mit, ob dieser Skill für deinen Agent-Workflow nützlich ist. Zusammengefasstes Feedback verbessert das Ranking im Laufe der Zeit.
Vertrauen & Sicherheit
Do not auto-install
- GitHub-Akzeptanz88 GitHub-StarsPrüfen
- Star-/Fork-Aktivität88 Stars und 12 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbarPrüfen
- Aktuelle Wartung1 Tage seit dem letzten PushBestanden
- LizenzklarheitUnbekanntPrüfen
- README/SKILL.md-VollständigkeitMetadaten enthalten ausreichend Nutzungs- und Workflow-KontextBestanden
- Abhängigkeits-/Laufzeitrisikocommand execution surface, credential or environment accessPrüfen
Ähnliche Skills
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
53.5K StarsAcademic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
38.4K StarsGPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
28.0K StarsDeepResearch
Tongyi Deep Research, the Leading Open-source Deep Research Agent
19.8K Stars