Skill audit report

ko-tech-writer Audit report.

Writes or revises Korean technical prose across three registers — reader-facing documents (tech-blog posts, technical docs), spoken scripts, and derived compressed assets (teasers, summaries) — through a fixed pipeline: register detection, real-sample calibration of the target venue, a translationese-removal pass, honesty-level layering (reader information vs internal audit vocabulary), a number/claim gate, and a rendition + perceptual QA pass. Triggers: "기술문서 써줘", "테크블로그 초안 잡아줘", "이 문서 번역투 고쳐줘", "블로그체로 다듬어줘", "이 글 회사 기술블로그에 올릴 수 있게 다듬어줘".

EXPERIMENTAL · REVIEWNeeds reviewGenerated Nov 7, 2026Heuristic metadata audit
69
Audit
61
Trust
55
Quality
74
Security
88
Maintain
92
Install

OpenAgentSkill Trust Score

61
Manual review

OpenAgentSkill Trust Score

The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.

GitHub adoption

FAIL

30

14 GitHub stars

Stars/forks activity

FAIL

32

14 stars, 2 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata

Recent maintenance

PASS

88

2mo since push

License clarity

PASS

86

MIT

README/SKILL.md completeness

PASS

86

Metadata includes enough usage and workflow context

Dependency/runtime risk

INFO

64

command execution surface, network or browser surface

Install availability

PASS

92

npx skills add chrono-meta/forge-harness --skill ko-tech-writer

Install command safety

PASS

92

standard package or runtime install path

Permission surface

WARN

48

shell or command execution, filesystem or document access

Repository evidence

PASS

86

https://github.com/chrono-meta/forge-harness/tree/main/plugins/fh-commons/skills/ko-tech-writer

Review status

INFO

66

AI review data available

Agent Proven outcomes

INFO

54

No agent outcome data yet

Checks

Install and adoption review

6 Passed · 15 Needs review

Install path

92

PASS

npx skills add chrono-meta/forge-harness --skill ko-tech-writer

Repository

88

PASS

https://github.com/chrono-meta/forge-harness/tree/main/plugins/fh-commons/skills/ko-tech-writer

License

86

PASS

MIT

Maintenance

88

PASS

2mo since push

AI review

55

CHECK

The provided SKILL.md excerpt stops in the middle of Step 4, and the promised Step 5 perceptual QA pass plus the full label set for the number/claim gate are not visible. If the repository file is equally truncated, the skill does not match its own description.

README/SKILL.md completeness

86

PASS

Usable description available

Dependency risk

64

CHECK

command execution surface, network or browser surface

Install command safety

92

PASS

standard package or runtime install path

Permission surface

48

FIX

shell or command execution, filesystem or document access

Stars/forks activity

32

FIX

14 stars, 2 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata

Adoption

42

CHECK

14 GitHub stars

Warnings

  • Permission surface may require sandboxing
  • The provided SKILL.md excerpt stops in the middle of Step 4, and the promised Step 5 perceptual QA pass plus the full label set for the number/claim gate are not visible. If the repository file is equally truncated, the skill does not match its own description.
  • The skill permits WebFetch but does not explicitly state that fetched venue samples must be treated as untrusted data, leaving room for prompt injection from adversarial web pages.
  • The skill's fixtures include a known-positive file that intentionally contains translationese; the workflow does not state that fixture files must be excluded from document scans or never rewritten.
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
  • GitHub adoption: 14 GitHub stars
  • Stars/forks activity: 14 stars, 2 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
  • Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access

Method

This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.

Compare nearby options

Related skills to audit next