Directorio de skills

Descubre skills reutilizables para AI agents.

Busca skills reales de GitHub por tarea y revisa stars, confianza, auditoría, categoría y ruta de instalación antes de utilizarlos.

Cada recomendación conserva un vínculo claro con su repositorio, auditoría y ruta de instalación.

Resultados de búsqueda: reason

Directorio en inglés

Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.

18K
Stars
87/100
Confianza
Categoría: design-creativeAuditoría

28 eval-informed mental models and critical-thinking skills for Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Cursor, and other Agent Skills-compatible tools

941
Stars
84/100
Confianza
Categoría: utilityAuditoría

Vendor-agnostic orchestration for training, inference and agentic workloads across NVIDIA, AMD, TPU, and Tenstorrent on clouds, Kubernetes, and bare metal.

2.2K
Stars
85/100
Confianza
Categoría: agent-skillsAuditoría

🚀 MassGen is an open-source multi-agent scaling system that runs in your terminal, autonomously orchestrating frontier models and agents to collaborate, reason, and produce high-quality results. | Join us on Discord: discord.massgen.ai

1.1K
Stars
73/100
Confianza
Categoría: agent-frameworksAuditoría

Open Source Deep Research Alternative to Reason and Search on Private Data. Written in Python.

7.9K
Stars
83/100
Confianza
Categoría: dataAuditoría

This repository is a Challenge for the DevOps Community to get stronger in DevOps.The reason for making this Public is so that others can learn from the community and help each other grow.

1.3K
Stars
77/100
Confianza
Categoría: devopsAuditoría

Autonomously improve a real artifact (code, training recipe, agent harness, data pipeline, prompt) against an objective and an evaluator, using Hypothesis Tree Refinement (HTR) from the Arbor paper. Use this whenever someone wants to iteratively optimize something over many experiments without overfitting — e.g. "get my model's eval score up", "improve this agent/harness", "tune this pipeline", "beat the baseline on this benchmark", "run a search over approaches and keep the best", "do an MLE-bench / Kaggle-style optimization", or any long-horizon "make this artifact better and don't just memorize the dev set" task. Trigger it even when the user doesn't say "Arbor" or "hypothesis tree" but describes repeated experiment-and-evaluate loops, branching exploration of competing ideas, or worries about a dev/test gap. Runs Claude itself as the coordinator with subagent executors in isolated git worktrees; for the standalone `arbor` CLI tool see references/arbor-upstream.md.

34K
Stars
77/100
Confianza
Categoría: researchAuditoría

Turn any domain folder of skills into a bounded agentic loop: compile a goal into a verifiable task plan, execute tasks with the domain's own tools, verify every task with machine-run checks, retry with caps, escalate to a human when budgets exhaust, and refuse to close until everything is verified or explicitly waived. Use when you want an agent or subagent to pick up a goal and drive it to a verified close across one of this repo's 18 domains ('run this goal through the engineering harness', 'set up an agentic loop for marketing work', 'make the finance domain self-verifying'). NOT for authoring Claude Code Workflow-tool .js scripts (workflow-builder), N-agent tournaments on one task (agenthub), single-file metric optimization (autoresearch-agent), or discovering published loop recipes (loop-library).

25K
Stars
72/100
Confianza
Categoría: researchAuditoría

Mint a tamper-evident, post-quantum-signed receipt for a consequential agent action (deploy, delete, pay, grant-access, model decision) so it can be verified later from the certificate alone. Use when an autonomous agent takes a side-effecting action that may need to be proven later, or when satisfying EU AI Act Article 12 record-keeping. Three decisions: whether an action needs a receipt, minting it, verifying it. Signing is delegated to the open-source OpenAgentOntology package. Not after-the-fact log analysis; not a hosted notary; not a legal opinion.

25K
Stars
73/100
Confianza
Categoría: researchAuditoría

Mandatory iPolloWork code-change gate for modern, minimal, performant, reuse-first implementation and clean repository ownership. Use whenever AI creates, edits, deletes, or refactors application code, server code, packages, scripts, tests, dependencies, schemas, routes, UI, or generated-file workflows. Reuse existing code before creating files, keep one source of truth, prevent parallel implementations and junk directories, justify every new file or dependency, and audit the current change before completion.

4.5K
Stars
67/100
Confianza
Categoría: securityAuditoría

Plug-in vision for text-only models. Hard rule: when a file path or URL with an image extension (.png, .jpg, .jpeg, .webp, .gif, .heic, .heif) appears anywhere in the conversation (typed by the user, injected as a `[Image: source: <path>]` line, or inside a tag) and you cannot see that image's content, run this skill on it before any other approach: no self-built OCR, no PIL, no tesseract. Also triggers on pasted-image placeholders such as `[Image #1]` and `[Unsupported Image]`. If you can actually see the image, do not use this skill. When unsure, run `modlens guard` before the first read of a session: a deny verdict means the active model has native vision and must read the image itself. Runs the modlens CLI to convert the image into structured JSON evidence: every word transcribed, layout regions, semantics, visual clues. Also use when the user asks how to install, configure, or switch modlens providers (Gemini API key, OpenAI-compatible endpoints, Claude API or Claude Code CLI).

3.3K
Stars
59/100
Confianza
Categoría: researchAuditoría