Skill comparison
Use this as a shortlist, then open the skill detail page before adopting.
Decision summary
Strongest overall
ko-tech-writer
Do a manual repository review before adding this to an agent workflow.
Fastest prototype
ko-tech-writer
Best first install candidate based on install readiness and adoption.
Freshest repo
ko-tech-writer
Most recent maintenance signal among this shortlist.
| Signal | ko-tech-writer Writes or revises Korean technical prose across three registers — reader-facing documents (tech-blog posts, technical docs), spoken scripts, and derived compressed assets (teasers, summaries) — through a fixed pipeline: register detection, real-sample calibration of the target venue, a translationese-removal pass, honesty-level layering (reader information vs internal audit vocabulary), a number/claim gate, and a rendition + perceptual QA pass. Triggers: "기술문서 써줘", "테크블로그 초안 잡아줘", "이 문서 번역투 고쳐줘", "블로그체로 다듬어줘", "이 글 회사 기술블로그에 올릴 수 있게 다듬어줘". |
|---|---|
| Quality | 58/100 Promising |
| Decision verdict | 57/100 Needs manual review Do a manual repository review before adding this to an agent workflow. |
| Adoption | 14 stars Verified outcomes are shown on each skill page |
| Freshness | Aug 29, 2026 |
| Use-case fit | |
| Workflow fit | |
| Platform hints | Claude Code |
| Warnings | Low GitHub adoption signal · The provided SKILL.md excerpt stops in the middle of Step 4, and the promised Step 5 perceptual QA pass plus the full label set for the number/claim gate are not visible. If the repository file is equally truncated, the skill does not match its own description. · No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet |
Skill comparison
Use this as a shortlist, then open the skill detail page before adopting.
Decision summary
Strongest overall
ko-tech-writer
Do a manual repository review before adding this to an agent workflow.
Fastest prototype
ko-tech-writer
Best first install candidate based on install readiness and adoption.
Freshest repo
ko-tech-writer
Most recent maintenance signal among this shortlist.
| Signal | ko-tech-writer Writes or revises Korean technical prose across three registers — reader-facing documents (tech-blog posts, technical docs), spoken scripts, and derived compressed assets (teasers, summaries) — through a fixed pipeline: register detection, real-sample calibration of the target venue, a translationese-removal pass, honesty-level layering (reader information vs internal audit vocabulary), a number/claim gate, and a rendition + perceptual QA pass. Triggers: "기술문서 써줘", "테크블로그 초안 잡아줘", "이 문서 번역투 고쳐줘", "블로그체로 다듬어줘", "이 글 회사 기술블로그에 올릴 수 있게 다듬어줘". |
|---|---|
| Quality | 58/100 Promising |
| Decision verdict | 57/100 Needs manual review Do a manual repository review before adding this to an agent workflow. |
| Adoption | 14 stars Verified outcomes are shown on each skill page |
| Freshness | Aug 29, 2026 |
| Use-case fit | |
| Workflow fit | |
| Platform hints | Claude Code |
| Warnings | Low GitHub adoption signal · The provided SKILL.md excerpt stops in the middle of Step 4, and the promised Step 5 perceptual QA pass plus the full label set for the number/claim gate are not visible. If the repository file is equally truncated, the skill does not match its own description. · No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet |
| Best for | Document processing workflows · Claude Code teams · builders willing to evaluate younger projects |
| Not ideal for | teams that need a vendor-supported SLA · production agents without a repository review |
| OpenAgentSkill engagement | 0 views 0 install copies |
| Install | $ npx skills add chrono-meta/forge-harness --skill ko-tech-writer |
| Best for | Document processing workflows · Claude Code teams · builders willing to evaluate younger projects |
| Not ideal for | teams that need a vendor-supported SLA · production agents without a repository review |
| OpenAgentSkill engagement | 0 views 0 install copies |
| Install | $ npx skills add chrono-meta/forge-harness --skill ko-tech-writer |