roadtrip-navigator

Revisar · 67
Indexado en Registry

Generate North American road-trip itineraries as a map-first, offline-friendly single-file HTML page. Plans around daily driving segments, overnight stops, fuel/EV-charging, national-park reservations (Recreation.gov / NPS), seasonal road closures, and timezone/border crossings —

Verified installs0
Estrellas10
Versión1.0.0
Calidad57/100 · Prometedor
Confianza67/100 · Solo sandbox
Auditoría77/100 · Requiere revisión

Perfil del activo

Investigación y trabajo de conocimiento

Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.

Ver categoría

Escenario

Agents de investigación

I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.

Afinidad con Agent

Claude Code + CLI + Codex

Funciona con Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI o Agents personalizados.

Instalar

Listo

npx skills add Waybox-AI/roadtrip-skill --skill roadtrip-navigator

Mantenimiento

Actual

4 días desde el último push

Riesgo

Requiere revisión

Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision

Calidad de GitHub

10

57/100 Calidad · 75/100 Confianza

Etiquetas de cobertura

InvestigaciónAgents de investigaciónautomationagent-skill

Notas de revisión

Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision · Low GitHub adoption signal

Tarjeta de adopción del Agent

Confianza, auditoría y preparación de instalación de un vistazo

Estas puntuaciones combinan metadatos públicos del repositorio, señales de revisión de OpenAgentSkill, actualidad de mantenimiento y preparación de instalación. Sirven para preseleccionar; no sustituyen la revisión humana.

Calidad

Prometedor
57

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

Confianza

Solo sandbox
67

Candidata útil con señales de confianza incompletas o mixtas. Manténgala en un espacio aislado hasta que el ciclo de resultados demuestre el ajuste.

Auditoría

Requiere revisión
77

Revisión legible por máquina de la preparación de instalación, los metadatos de seguridad, el mantenimiento y el riesgo de adopción.

Trust Score de OpenAgentSkill v5

Revisión humana antes de instalar

Ejecute solo en un sandbox y compare alternativas cercanas antes de usarla en trabajo real.

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLI

Estrellas

10 estrellas de GitHub

Actividad del repositorio

10 estrellas y 3 forks

Mantenimiento

4 días desde el último push

Licencia

MIT

Instalar

npx skills add Waybox-AI/roadtrip-skill --skill roadtrip-navigator

Seguridad de instalación

Ruta estándar de paquete o instalación en tiempo de ejecución

Superficie de permisos

filesystem or document access, database access

Resultados del Agent

Aún no hay datos de resultados del Agent

Documentación

Contexto sólido de README/SKILL.md

Resumen de riesgo

Revisar antes de producción

  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • GitHub adoption: 10 GitHub stars

Preparación de instalación

Ruta de instalación disponible

  • La ruta de instalación está disponible
  • La evidencia del repositorio está disponible
  • La licencia está declarada
  • Aún no hay evidencia de resultados Agent-Proven

Metadatos legibles por Agent

Datos de decisión legibles por máquina para este skill.

Usa este bloque o el JSON integrado para decidir si un Agent debe instalar este skill, elegir una alternativa o pedir revisión humana primero.

Abrir JSON

Tareas adecuadas

  • flujos de Local desktop
  • Equipos de Claude Code
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects
  • Navigate local resources

Agents adecuados

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLICLI

Decisión de instalación

Comando
npx skills add Waybox-AI/roadtrip-skill --skill roadtrip-navigator
Política
Revisar
Revisión humana

Confianza y riesgo

Confianza
67/100
Auditoría
77/100
Nivel de riesgo
Requiere revisión

Ciclo de resultados

Endpoint
/api/agent/outcome
ID del evento
resolve
Resultados
5

Comando de instalación

npx skills add Waybox-AI/roadtrip-skill --skill roadtrip-navigator

No usar cuando

  • Equipos que necesitan un SLA con soporte del proveedor
  • production agents without a repository review
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.

Seguridad de Agent v2

57/100 · Revisar antes de instalar

ExperimentalRevisar

Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.

Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.

Resolver con API

Medio

Acceso a red

El skill probablemente consulta páginas remotas, API, repositorios o servicios externos.

Medio

Acceso al sistema de archivos

El skill puede leer o escribir archivos de proyecto, documentos, artefactos generados o estado local.

Medio

Acceso a base de datos

El skill puede inspeccionar esquemas, consultar bases de datos o trabajar con almacenes persistentes.

  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision

Destinos de instalación

Instala este skill en tu flujo de Agent

Usa el endpoint público para obtener el comando, la lista de seguridad, prompts y enlaces canónicos.

skill install

OpenAgentSkill CLI

Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.

$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator

Plan de resolución de Agent

Deja que un Agent valide el ajuste antes de instalar.

La API Resolve devuelve la skill elegida, alternativas, política de seguridad, notas de auditoría, destino de instalación y un prompt listo para usar.

Abrir plan de texto

Agent debe revisar

  • Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
  • Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
  • Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.

Copiar prompt

Task: Use roadtrip-navigator in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20roadtrip-navigator%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator/install
Install command: npx skills add Waybox-AI/roadtrip-skill --skill roadtrip-navigator
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.

Traspaso de Agent

Da al Agent la ruta de instalación, no otro directorio.

Usa el endpoint público para obtener el comando, la lista de seguridad, prompts y enlaces canónicos.

Abrir API de instalación

Prompt de Agent

Use roadtrip-navigator for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator/install, then install with: npx skills add Waybox-AI/roadtrip-skill --skill roadtrip-navigator

Metadatos del Registry

Perfil legible por Agent para seleccionar skills automáticamente.

La API Registry expone señales de decisión, confianza, auditoría, casos de uso e instalación sin raspar la interfaz.

Abrir Manifest

Afinidad con Agent

58/100

Local desktop

Plataformas

Claude Code

Informe de auditoría

Requiere revisión · 77/100

Revisión legible por máquina de la preparación de instalación, los metadatos de seguridad, el mantenimiento y el riesgo de adopción.

Ver informe de auditoríaVer informe de evaluación

Panel de decisión de Agent

Fallback candidate for Local desktop

Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.

58
Preparación
Prototipo
Etapa

Rol en la pila

Candidata de respaldo

Ajuste principal

Local desktop

Etiqueta de confianza

Prototipar primero

Ruta de instalación

Comando listo

Úsalo cuando

  • flujos de Local desktop
  • Equipos de Claude Code
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects

Evidencia

  • recent repository activity
  • install command or GitHub repo available
  • perfil de calidad 57/100
  • 6 eventos de interacción de OpenAgentSkill

revisar primero

  • Low GitHub adoption signal

Ruta de implementación

  1. 1Instálalo en un Agent de sandbox y ejecuta una tarea de Local desktop de principio a fin.
  2. 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
  3. 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.

Perfil de confianza

Solo sandbox

Candidata útil con señales de confianza incompletas o mixtas. Manténgala en un espacio aislado hasta que el ciclo de resultados demuestre el ajuste.

67
Trust Score de OpenAgentSkill

Adopción en GitHub

Corregir

10 estrellas de GitHub

Actividad de stars/forks

Corregir

10 estrellas y 3 forks; la actividad de issues no está disponible en los metadatos actuales

Mantenimiento reciente

Aprobado

4 días desde el último push

Claridad de licencia

Aprobado

MIT

Señales positivas

  • Revisión de IA aprobada
  • La ruta de instalación está disponible
  • La evidencia del repositorio está disponible
  • Repositorio mantenido recientemente
  • El comando de instalación no muestra un patrón de alto riesgo evidente
  • El ciclo de resultados está listo, pero necesita la primera ejecución real de Agent

Revisar antes de instalar

  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • GitHub adoption: 10 GitHub stars
  • Stars/forks activity: 10 stars, 3 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
  • Aún no hay informes reales de resultados del Agent
  • Se requiere revisión humana antes de una instalación desatendida

Acción recomendada

Ejecute solo en un sandbox y compare alternativas cercanas antes de usarla en trabajo real.

Perfil de calidad

Prometedor candidato para flujos de Agent

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

57
Estrellas de GitHub
10
Actualidad
hace 4 días
Listo para instalar
Licencia
MIT
Revisar antes de instalar: Low GitHub adoption signal

Ajuste de flujo

Usa esta skill en estos escenarios

Ajuste de flujo

Añadir a un flujo completo

Lista de alternativas

Compara antes de instalar

Similar skills that may fit this task.

Comparar todo

Resumen

--- name: roadtrip-navigator description: > Generate North American road-trip itineraries as a map-first, offline-friendly single-file HTML page. Plans around daily driving segments, overnight stops, fuel/EV-charging, national-park reservations (Recreation.gov / NPS), seasonal road closures, and timezone/border crossings — for executable, decision-ready trips. Two entry modes: give a start + region/destination + days and it plans the whole route, or hand it an existing route and it verifies, fills gaps, and produces the page. read-when: > road trip, self drive, 自驾, 公路旅行, national park, scenic drive, RV trip, EV road trip, Southwest loop, route 66, drive itinerary, campground, 自驾路线, 租车自驾, 环线, road trip planner, US/Canada drive, park reservation ---

# RoadTrip Navigator

Turn **"start + days"** or **"an existing route"** into a road trip you can actually drive: paced into days, with overnight stops, fuel/charging, park reservations, seasonal road risks, and a map-first single-file HTML page.

North American road trips revolve around the **car**, not flights: *how many hours do we drive today, where do we sleep, will we make it on the fuel/charge we have, and is the road even open.* That focus is what this skill adds on top of a generic "list of attractions."

## When to use

Use this skill whenever the request is about driving a multi-stop trip in the US / Canada / Mexico (see `read-when` triggers). If the user only wants a single city guide or a flight itinerary, this is not the right skill.

## Two entry modes

Detect the mode up front (see `scripts/helper.py` for the heuristic):

- **Light mode (plan it for me):** user gives a start, a rough region or destination, day count, and party/vehicle. → Run the full 7-step workflow, designing the route yourself. - **Heavy mode (verify my route):** user pastes/links/screenshots an existing route. → Skip route invention. Parse their route into the schema, then *verify and fill gaps*: driving segmentation, overnight realism, fuel/charge coverage, reservation countdown, seasonal closures, and produce the page.

When unsure which mode, ask one short question. Otherwise infer and proceed.

## The five things that make this more than a list

These are where pure-model answers fail and where this skill earns its keep:

1. **Daily driving segmentation (the core).** Slice the whole route into days under a sane daily drive limit, place an overnight at each segment end, and *validate* each day: drive ≤ limit, arrive before dark, no stop hits a closed gate, fatigue buffer. This is the road-trip equivalent of connection-checking — most AI itineraries skip it. 2. **Reservation countdown.** Recreation.gov campgrounds often release ~6 months out; popular timed-entry a few days out; in-park lodges up to ~13 months out. From the departure date, work backwards into a "book by" to-do list. 3. **Fuel / charge planning.** Gas: flag long empty stretches ("next fuel in X mi"). EV: plan a charging corridor against the vehicle's range and note whether each leg makes it, charger power, and a backup. 4. **Seasonal road conditions & closures.** Mountain passes that close in winter (Going-to-the-Sun, Tioga Pass, Trail Ridge Rd), wildfire/hurricane/snow season. If the travel date hits one, down-rank or reroute and say so. 5. **Timezones & borders.** Correct arrival times across timezone lines; for border crossings, flag documents / vehicle papers / insurance / wait times.

## Workflow (7 steps)

> Run `scripts/helper.py "<user request>"` first — it parses slots, guesses the > entry mode, picks the trip region (for HTML theming), and prints what's still > missing. Use its output to drive the steps below.

### Step 1 — Collect requirements (slot filling) Required: **start, travel date, days, party makeup, vehicle (gas/EV/RV + range)**. Optional: destination/region, budget, preferences (scenic vs. fast, hike intensity, loop vs. one-way, border crossing). Only ask follow-ups for missing **required** slots; fill the rest with sensible defaults and proceed.

**Validate place names before planning.** Slot presence is not slot truth: a made-up start like "ABC" parses fine and would otherwise flow straight into a fabricated route. Run every user-supplied place — start, destination, named waypoints; in heavy mode each day's from/to towns — through `python3 tools/places_client.py "<name>"` and branch on its verdict: `match` → adopt the returned canonical name + coordinates; `did-you-mean` → confirm the intended place with the user (one short question, same spirit as the required-slot follow-ups); `no-match` → **stop and ask — never plan a route around a place you could not verify**; `unverified` (offline) → use your own judgment and ask about any name you don't recognize. A `match` with `outsideNA: true` is a real place outside US/Canada/Mexico — tell the user it's beyond this skill's coverage instead of calling it fake.

### Step 2 — Route / destination planning (if not given) Decide **loop vs. one-way** first (affects one-way drop fees and pacing). For region-level input ("the Southwest", "Pacific Northwest"): search candidates → seasonal & closure check → shortlist. Compute rough total miles / driving days for the shortlist and drop any "can't be driven in N days" option.

**Present two candidate routes before committing (light mode only).** Once the shortlist is down to viable options, draft **exactly two** genuinely distinct routes yourself — e.g. a faster direct corridor vs. a scenic detour, or two different geographic loops — each with a short label, a one-line summary, and rough total miles/driving days. Show both to the user and ask them to pick (or say "surprise me") before moving to Step 3. This is a single short question, same spirit as the required-slot follow-up in Step 1 — don't draft a full itinerary for either option first. If the conversation is one-shot and no reply is possible, pick the better-rated option yourself, proceed, and note the alternative you didn't take. Skip this entirely in heavy mode (the user already supplied a route) or once the user has already chosen. Carry both options into `scripts/helper.compare_routes()` to populate `routeOptions[]` (Phase-3 module below) so the rendered page shows the comparison table with the chosen route flagged.

### Step 3 — Daily driving segmentation (core; see five-things #1) 1. Split by a **daily drive limit** (default: relaxed adults ≤ 4–5h; with kids/seniors ≤ 3–4h; user-adjustable). 2. Put an **overnight** at each segment end (has lodging, supplies, good for the next morning). 3. Validate: arrive **before dark**, no stop hits a **closed gate**, long legs have a fuel/charge point mid-way. 4. If infeasible: cut miles / add a night / pick a closer overnight town. 5. Surface risks explicitly in the day, e.g. "no fast charger for 180 mi on this leg — charge to full before leaving."

Rule of thumb: **plan by daylight, not by odometer** — a day that ends after dark fails at the trailhead, not on the map.

### Step 4 — Parallel research (sub-agents) Fan out (one concern per sub-agent, run concurrently): weather (per day), lodging/campgrounds (price + booking difficulty), fuel/charging points, attractions & tickets/permits, food, scenic byways & hikes, Reddit real-world gotchas. **Delegation rule: instruct each sub-agent to hit official APIs first (NPS / NWS / Recreation.gov / Open Charge Map) and fall back to web search only on failure.** See `reference.md` for the tool routing table and `tools/`.

### Step 5 — Reservation countdown (see five-things #2) From the departure date, generate a "book by" to-do list: campgrounds (Recreation.gov, ~T-6 months), timed-entry / wilderness permits (per park rule, T-X days), popular in-park lodges (up to ~T-13 months), one-way car/RV rental (lock price early). Render as a ⚠️ checklist at the top of the page + a timeline. Populate `bookingCountdown[]`.

### Step 6 — Budget (with reliability grading) Tag every line **verified / reference(~) / estimate(≈)**. Road-trip specifics: fuel = total miles ÷ MPG × gas price (or EV charging cost); tolls; park entry or the **America the Beautiful** annual pass; one-way drop fee; campground; lodging; food. Force a bottom disclaimer: prices are dynamic, confirm before departure.

### Step 7 — Generate the single-file HTML (map-first) 1. Write the data to **`tripData.json`** first (data/view separation — editable, re-renderable). 2. Render: `python3 assets/generate.py tripData.json -o trip.html` → Leaflet map (numbered stops + ordered polyline) + one-tap mobile nav (Google/Apple deep links) + daily timeline + reservation to-do + budget. Responsive (mobile single-column / desktop multi-column) + print friendly. 3. **Validate before delivering** (plan §9): the generator already does a light schema check and a JSON parse of the injected data. Optionally syntax-check the inline JS, then open/preview. 4. Full-page disclaimer: AI-assembled, may be out of date, verify with official sources.

## Output contract

- Always produce **both** `tripData.json` and the rendered `trip.html`. - Units: miles, °F, MPG, USD by default; switch to km/°C/local currency on Canadian/Mexican legs and note the change. A trip entirely within China prices its budget in CNY (¥) — never converted into USD. - Never invent a precise reservation availability, live charger occupancy, or minute-level traffic — point to the official app / Recreation.gov / nav.

## Honesty boundaries (Phase 1)

Do **not** promise: exact live fuel/electricity prices, live charger occupancy, minute-level traffic, live campground availability, or replacing turn-by-turn navigation. For these, tell the user to confirm via the official app / Recreation.gov / their navigation app in real time. The page's job is to be right the morning you leave, not merely impressive the night it was generated.

## Files

- `reference.md` — tripData schema, reliability grading, tool routing table. - `AGENTS.md` ("Worked examples") — typical prompts and expected outputs. - `assets/generate.py` — `tripData.json` → single-file HTML. - `assets/template.html` — the HTML/JS renderer (Leaflet map + timeline). - `assets/tripData.example.json` / `assets/preview.html` — Southwest 7-day demo. - `assets/tripData.tahoe.json` / `assets/preview-tahoe.html` — Sunnyvale→Tahoe 3-day demo (mountain theme, state-park reservations, Sierra snow risk). - `assets/tripData.pnw.json` / `assets/preview-pnw.html` — Seattle→Vancouver→ Whistler EV cross-border demo (exercises all three Phase-3 modules below).

## Phase-3 modules (implemented)

These render as extra sections when their data is present (see `reference.md`):

- **Multi-route comparison** — `scripts/helper.compare_routes(options, party)` → `routeOptions[]`. Feeds from the Step 2 two-route pick above; it auto-rates drive intensity and renders a comparison table with the chosen route flagged. - **Cross-border** — `tools/border_client.trip_section([("US","CA",rental),...])` → `crossBorder`. Per-crossing documents / insurance / customs / unit-switch checklist for US↔CA↔MX. Note the key asymmetry it encodes: US insurance is usually valid in **Canada** but **never in Mexico** (buy Mexican insurance). - **Duty-free exemption** — `tools/customs_client.personal_exemption(residence, hours_abroad, used_within_30_days=False)` → the per-person allowance quoted in `crossBorder` customs notes. Encodes the 24h/48h tiers (US: USD 800 at 48h+, once per 30 days, else USD 200; CA: 0 / CAD 200 / CAD 800; MX land: USD 300) with EN + 中文 note strings — quote the tool, never recall these amounts. - **EV charging corridor** — `tools/charging_client.corridor(legs, usableRange, winter_derate=...)` → `evPlan`. Simulates state-of-charge leg by leg, sets a recommended charge-to at each stop, and flags legs that won't make the buffer. Pass `winter_derate` (e.g. 0.25) for cold-weather r

Detalles técnicos

Versión
1.0.0
Licencia
MIT
Última actualización
19 ago 2026
Publicado
19 ago 2026

Resumen de decisión

Candidata de respaldo

58
Listo
Prototipo
Etapa

recent repository activity

Auditoría

Revisión de instalación

Revisión de instalación y adopción

77
Requiere revisión
Seguridad
85/100
Mantenimiento
100/100
Instalar
92/100
Abrir auditoría completaVer informe de evaluación

Evidencia probada por Agent

Evidencia probada por Agent

Informes de resultados tras resolver, revisar, instalar y una ejecución limitada.

0
Probado
Needs first agent runAuto-instalación: revisar primeroÚltimo: Desconocido
Tasa de éxito
Fallo reciente
Resultados
0
Calidad de salida
Fallidos
0
No relevante
0
Instalaciones
0
Bloqueado por riesgo
0
Configuración necesaria
0
Producción
0

Aún no hay datos de resultados de Agent. La primera ejecución puede informar éxito, configuración necesaria, bloqueos de riesgo, fallo o irrelevancia mediante /api/agent/outcome.

Instalar

Añadir al flujo de Agent

Gratis y de código abierto. Revisa el informe antes de instalar en Agents de producción.

Bucle de crecimiento

Kit para compartir

X

Borrador basado en un caso para roadtrip-navigator, listo para publicar manualmente en X.

Nota del curador
A practical pick for a web workflow:

roadtrip-navigator: Generate North American road-trip itineraries as a map-first, offline-friendly single-file HTML page. Plans around daily dr...

10 stars

https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator?ref=x
Abrir borrador de X
Respuesta opcional con comando de instalación
Listing + install path for roadtrip-navigator:
https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator?ref=x

Install: npx skills add Waybox-AI/roadtrip-skill --skill roadtrip-navigator

Fuente de la ficha

Indexado por Registry

Reclamable

Esta ficha se indexó desde fuentes públicas y no está marcada como oficial hasta que se apruebe una reclamación de mantenedor.

Creador
Waybox-AI
Indexado por
Índice comunitario de OpenAgentSkill

La atribución enlaza al repositorio público o al perfil del creador. Los creadores pueden reclamar la ficha para actualizar las señales de propiedad.

Reclamar este skill

Reclamación del propietario

Reclamar esta ficha de skill

Esta ficha Indexado por Registry se atribuye a Waybox-AI, pero aún no está marcada como oficial. Reclámala para añadir una señal de propietario verificado y hacer más fiables futuras actualizaciones de lanzamiento, instalación y auditoría.

Kit de enlaces para creadores

Añade las insignias de evidencia a tu README

Muestra la ficha canónica, las señales actuales de confianza y auditoría, y evidencia real de Agent-Proven donde los desarrolladores evalúan el repositorio.

[![Listed on OpenAgentSkill](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator?metric=listed&label=Listed)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator)
[![OpenAgentSkill Trust](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator?metric=trust&label=Trust)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator)
[![OpenAgentSkill Audit](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator?metric=audit&label=Audit)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator/audit)
[![Agent Proven](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator?metric=proven&label=Agent%20Proven)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/waybox-ai-roadtrip-navigator)

Autor

W

Waybox-AI

@waybox-ai

Etiquetas

Afinidad con plataforma

Señales de salud

Estrellas de GitHub
10
Puntuación de calidad
31/100
Último push de GitHub
19 ago 2026
Pistas del framework
Desconocido
Vistas de OpenAgentSkill
6
Copias de instalación
0
Clics externos
0

Señal de comunidad

Comparte si este skill resulta útil para tu flujo de Agent. Los comentarios agregados mejoran la clasificación con el tiempo.

Confianza y seguridad

Solo sandbox

67
  • Adopción en GitHub10 estrellas de GitHubCorregir
  • Actividad de stars/forks10 estrellas y 3 forks; la actividad de issues no está disponible en los metadatos actualesCorregir
  • Mantenimiento reciente4 días desde el último pushAprobado
  • Claridad de licenciaMITAprobado
  • Completitud de README/SKILL.mdLos metadatos incluyen suficiente contexto de uso y flujo de trabajoAprobado
  • Riesgo de dependencias/runtimeNo hay indicios importantes de riesgo de dependencias en los metadatos públicosAprobado