gen-changesets
Use when generating changesets in the kimi-code repository, including package bump selection, internal package and CLI bundle handling, bump levels, major confirmation, and English changelog wording.
Profil de l’actif
Agents de code et de développement
Code review, repo analysis, testing, CI, GitHub, DevOps, and developer workflow skills.
Scénario
GitHub automation
I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.
Adéquation Agent
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Compatible avec Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI ou des Agents personnalisés.
Installer
Prêt
npx skills add wangyuahn/nori-code --skill gen-changesets
Maintenance
À jour
Mis à jour aujourd’hui
Risque
Revue nécessaire
Dependency or permission surface needs review
Qualité GitHub
13
58/100 Qualité · 67/100 Confiance
Tags de couverture
Notes de revue
Dependency or permission surface needs review · Permission surface may require sandboxing
Carte d’adoption Agent
Confiance, audit et préparation à l’installation en un coup d’œil
Ces scores combinent les métadonnées publiques du dépôt, les signaux de revue OpenAgentSkill, la fraîcheur de maintenance et la préparation à l’installation. Ils servent à présélectionner et ne remplacent pas la revue humaine.
Qualité
PrometteurUseful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Confiance
Do not auto-installTrust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Audit
Revue nécessaireRevue lisible par machine de la préparation à l’installation, des métadonnées de sécurité, de la maintenance et du risque d’adoption.
Trust Score OpenAgentSkill v5
Revue humaine avant installation
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Stars
13 stars GitHub
Activité du dépôt
13 stars et 0 forks
Maintenance
Mis à jour aujourd’hui
Licence
MIT
Installer
npx skills add wangyuahn/nori-code --skill gen-changesets
Sécurité d’installation
Chemin d’installation standard de package ou runtime
Surface de permissions
secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
Résultats Agent
Pas encore de données de résultats Agent
Documentation
Contexte README/SKILL.md solide
Résumé des risques
Revoir avant production
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
- GitHub adoption: 13 GitHub stars
Préparation à l’installation
Chemin d’installation disponible
- Le chemin d’installation est disponible
- La preuve du dépôt est disponible
- La licence est déclarée
- Pas encore de preuve de résultat Agent-Proven
Métadonnées lisibles par Agent
Données de décision lisibles par machine pour ce skill.
Utilisez ce bloc ou le JSON intégré pour décider si un Agent doit installer ce skill, choisir une alternative ou demander d’abord une revue humaine.
Tâches adaptées
- workflows GitHub automation
- Équipes Claude Code
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
- Inspect repository metadata
Agents adaptés
Décision d’installation
- Commande
- npx skills add wangyuahn/nori-code --skill gen-changesets
- Politique
- Bloquer
- Revue humaine
- Oui
Confiance et risque
- Confiance
- 59/100
- Audit
- 73/100
- Niveau de risque
- Revue nécessaire
Boucle de résultat
- Endpoint
- /api/agent/outcome
- ID d’événement
- resolve
- Résultats
- 5
Commande d’installation
npx skills add wangyuahn/nori-code --skill gen-changesetsNe pas utiliser quand
- Équipes qui nécessitent un SLA soutenu par le fournisseur
- production agents without a repository review
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet
- Indices de permissions à haut risque : Shell or command execution, Secrets or environment access
Skill alternatif
Opencode
200.7K Stars
npx skills add anomalyco/opencode
Skill alternatif
Code Review
168.6K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill code-review
Skill alternatif
Grill With Docs
164.7K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill grill-with-docs
Skill alternatif
To Spec
164.7K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill to-spec
Sécurité Agent v2
29/100 · Éviter l’installation automatique
This skill should not be selected by an agent without explicit human security review.
Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.
Élevé
Exécution shell ou de commande
Les métadonnées de la skill font référence à des workflows de terminal, CLI, shell, sous-processus ou exécution de commande.
Moyen
Accès réseau
La skill récupère probablement des pages distantes, API, dépôts ou services externes.
Moyen
Accès au système de fichiers
La skill peut lire ou écrire des fichiers de projet, documents, artefacts générés ou l’état local de l’espace de travail.
Élevé
Secrets or environment access
Skill metadata references credentials, tokens, environment variables, or secret-bearing workflows.
- Indices de permissions à haut risque : Shell or command execution, Secrets or environment access
- Dependency or permission surface needs review
Cibles d’installation
Installer ce skill dans votre workflow Agent
Utilisez le point de terminaison public pour récupérer la commande, la checklist, les prompts et les liens canoniques.
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install wangyuahn-gen-changesetsPlan de résolution Agent
Laissez un Agent vérifier la pertinence avant l’installation.
L’API Resolve renvoie la skill sélectionnée, des alternatives, la politique de sécurité, les notes d’audit, la cible d’installation et un prompt prêt à l’emploi.
Ouvrir JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20gen-changesets%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Texte Resolve
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20gen-changesets%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Relais d’installation
/api/skills/wangyuahn-gen-changesets/install
L’Agent doit vérifier
- Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
- Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
- Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.
Copier le prompt
Task: Use gen-changesets in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20gen-changesets%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/wangyuahn-gen-changesets/install
Install command: npx skills add wangyuahn/nori-code --skill gen-changesets
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Relais Agent
Donnez à l’Agent le chemin d’installation, pas un autre annuaire.
Utilisez le point de terminaison public pour récupérer la commande, la checklist, les prompts et les liens canoniques.
Relais d’installation
/api/skills/wangyuahn-gen-changesets/install
Format texte LLM
/api/skills/wangyuahn-gen-changesets/install?format=text
Trouver des alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=gen-changesets&limit=3
Prompt Agent
Use gen-changesets for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/wangyuahn-gen-changesets/install, then install with: npx skills add wangyuahn/nori-code --skill gen-changesetsMétadonnées Registry
Profil lisible par Agent pour la sélection automatique de skills.
L’API Registry fournit les signaux de décision, confiance, audit, cas d’usage et installation sans analyser l’interface.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/wangyuahn-gen-changesets
Texte LLM
/api/registry/manifest/wangyuahn-gen-changesets?format=text
Alias d’installation
/api/registry/install/wangyuahn-gen-changesets
Recommander
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20gen-changesets%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Adéquation Agent
GitHub automation
Tags de cas d’usage
Plateformes
Claude Code
Rapport d’audit
Revue nécessaire · 73/100
Revue lisible par machine de la préparation à l’installation, des métadonnées de sécurité, de la maintenance et du risque d’adoption.
Panneau de décision Agent
Needs validation for GitHub automation
Do a manual repository review before adding this to an agent workflow.
Rôle dans la pile
Validation nécessaire
Pertinence principale
GitHub automation
Libellé de confiance
Revue manuelle nécessaire
Chemin d’installation
Commande prête
À utiliser lorsque
- workflows GitHub automation
- Équipes Claude Code
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Preuves
- recent repository activity
- install command or GitHub repo available
- profil qualité 58/100
revoir d’abord
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet
Chemin d’implémentation
- 1Installez-le dans un Agent en sandbox et exécutez une tâche de GitHub automation de bout en bout.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
Profil de confiance
Do not auto-install
Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Adoption GitHub
Corriger13 stars GitHub
Activité stars/forks
Corriger13 stars et 0 forks; l’activité des issues n’est pas disponible dans les métadonnées actuelles
Maintenance récente
ValidéMis à jour aujourd’hui
Clarté de licence
ValidéMIT
Signaux positifs
- Revue IA approuvée
- Le chemin d’installation est disponible
- La preuve du dépôt est disponible
- Dépôt maintenu récemment
- La commande d’installation ne présente aucun motif de haut risque évident
- La boucle de résultats est prête mais nécessite la première exécution réelle de l’Agent
Réviser avant installation
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
- GitHub adoption: 13 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 13 stars, 0 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- Dependency/runtime risk: command execution surface, credential or environment access
- Permission surface: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
- Pas encore de rapports de résultats Agent réels
- Une revue humaine est requise avant une installation sans surveillance
Action recommandée
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Profil qualité
Prometteur candidat pour les workflows Agent
Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Adéquation au workflow
Utilisez cette skill dans ces scénarios
Manage repositories
GitHub automation
I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.
Build and ship code
Coding agents
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Operate web apps
Browser automation
I need my agent to control a browser, fill forms, and verify web app workflows.
Adéquation au workflow
Ajouter à un workflow complet
Operate and verify web apps
Browser QA agent
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Design, build, test, and ship interfaces
Frontend and UI
A practical workflow for agents that turn product briefs or Figma designs into polished frontend code, review the result, test it in a browser, and prepare a safe deployment.
Inspect, patch, and verify code
Coding review agent
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
Liste d’alternatives
Comparer avant installation
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Opencode
The open source coding agent.
Code Review
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
Grill With Docs
A relentless interview that pressure-tests a plan against the codebase, sharpens domain language, and updates CONTEXT.md and ADRs when decisions become durable.
To Spec
Turn the current conversation and codebase context into a structured implementation spec, then publish it to the configured project issue tracker.
Vue d’ensemble
--- name: gen-changesets description: Use when generating changesets in the kimi-code repository, including package bump selection, internal package and CLI bundle handling, bump levels, major confirmation, and English changelog wording. ---
# Generate Changesets
`kimi-code` uses changesets to manage versions and changelogs. The current user-facing published package is:
- `@moonshot-ai/nori-code`: the CLI
All other `@moonshot-ai/*` packages are treated as internal packages, including `@moonshot-ai/nori-code-sdk`, `agent-core`, `kosong`, `kaos`, `kimi-code-oauth`, `kimi-telemetry`, and `migration-legacy`.
`@moonshot-ai/pi-tui` is a special internal package: it is a private fork (`private: true`) that is never published, but it keeps its own changelog through changesets. It is an exception to Core Rule 4 — see the dedicated section below.
## Core Rules
1. **Inspect the actual changes first.** Use `git status` / `git diff --name-only` to identify which packages were actually changed. 2. **List packages that changesets can release.** If a changed package is ignored in `.changeset/config.json`, do not put that ignored package in frontmatter together with a non-ignored package; changesets rejects mixed ignored/non-ignored frontmatter. 3. **Map ignored internal changes to the affected released package.** If an ignored internal package changes CLI output or behavior, list `@moonshot-ai/nori-code` and describe the actual user-visible or release-artifact change in the changelog text. 4. **Internal package source changes that enter the CLI bundle must manually list the CLI.** `@moonshot-ai/nori-code` inline-bundles `@moonshot-ai/*` source, but those internal packages are devDependencies from the CLI's perspective, so changesets will not automatically propagate bumps. If a change enters the CLI output, list `@moonshot-ai/nori-code`. - **Web app (`@moonshot-ai/kimi-web`) changes always enter the CLI bundle.** `@moonshot-ai/kimi-web` is ignored by changesets (see `.changeset/config.json`) and cannot be mixed with `@moonshot-ai/nori-code` in one changeset frontmatter. Describe the web change in the changelog text, but list `@moonshot-ai/nori-code` so the CLI release carries the bundled `dist-web` output. 5. **Docs-only and tests-only changes usually do not need a changeset.** README, internal docs, and `test/` changes that do not enter package output do not trigger a CLI bump. 6. `@moonshot-ai/vis` / `vis-server` / `vis-web` are ignored by changesets and should not be handled.
## Workflow
1. List the changed packages and check whether each one is ignored by `.changeset/config.json`. 2. Choose a bump level for each package. 3. If an ignored internal package change enters the CLI bundle, put `@moonshot-ai/nori-code` in frontmatter instead of mixing the ignored package into the same changeset. 4. Create a short kebab-case file under `.changeset/`. 5. Split unrelated changes into separate changesets; keep one logical change in one file.
Format:
```markdown --- "<package A>": patch "<package B>": minor ---
<English changelog entry> ```
## Bump Levels
| Level | When to use | |---|---| | `patch` | Bug fixes; build/package fixes; internal refactors that do not change behavior; wording tweaks; small dependency upgrades; small improvements to existing features with limited user-facing impact (e.g. a new keyboard shortcut, a flag alias, a minor UX tweak) | | `minor` | A substantial new user-facing feature, such as a new slash command, a new built-in tool, or a new mode | | `major` | Breaking changes: incompatible config changes, renamed or removed commands/arguments, behavior semantics changes, and similar |
When in doubt between `patch` and `minor`: if the change improves an existing feature and the user-facing impact is small, choose `patch` even when the change is technically "new". Reserve `minor` for a substantial new capability that introduces something users could not do before.
### Major Rule
Never write `major` on your own.
If you believe a change qualifies as major, stop first, explain why, and ask the user for confirmation. Only write `major` after the user explicitly agrees. If the user does not reply, replies ambiguously, or disagrees, fall back to `minor`; if `minor` is also unclear, fall back to `patch`.
## Wording Rules
- Changelog entries **must be written in English**. - **Keep the whole entry concise.** Aim for one short sentence that states what was done; at most a short sentence plus a one-line usage hint. Do not write a paragraph, do not pile on technical detail, and do not enumerate every sub-change. - **For new user-facing features, append a brief usage hint** so users know how to try it. Keep it to a single short line — a command name, a subcommand, a flag, or a one-line "how to use". Do not explain design rationale or list edge cases. Skip the hint for bug fixes, internal changes, and refactors. - Slash command: `Add the /foo slash command to list active sessions. Run /foo to see them.` - CLI subcommand: `Add the kimi web subcommand to open the web UI. Run kimi web to launch it.` - Flag: `Add a --bar flag to skip confirmation prompts. Pass --bar to skip.` - Too long: `Add the /foo command to list active sessions. It accepts an optional --all flag to include background sessions, supports filtering by name with /foo <name>, and writes the result to the transcript...` - User-facing CLI wording should only be used when CLI users can perceive the change. - Internal changes that do not affect CLI users can still share a changeset with the CLI, but the wording must describe the real change honestly and must not present it as a user-facing feature. - Do not mention file names, class names, function names, PR numbers, or commit hashes. - Do not include real internal endpoints, key names, account names, or service names. If an example is needed, use neutral placeholders such as `example.com`, `example.test`, or `YOUR_API_KEY`. - Avoid vague words such as `refactor`, `optimize`, and `improve`. Describe the actual change, or use more specific wording.
## When You Are Unsure About a Change
Generate the changeset from what the diff clearly shows. If part of a change is unclear and you cannot confidently describe what it does for users, do not guess or pad the entry with vague wording.
1. Finish the changeset for the parts that are clear. 2. Then ask the user once, in a short list: name the specific change(s) you do not understand, and ask whether you may dig into the repository (read related source, tests, or call sites) to describe it more accurately. 3. Only read more code after the user agrees. If the user says no or does not reply, keep the concise wording you already have and do not invent detail.
## Common Examples
An internal package fixes a bug visible to CLI users:
```markdown --- "@moonshot-ai/nori-code": patch ---
Fix occasional loss of tool call results in long conversations. ```
A new user-facing slash command (note the short usage hint):
```markdown --- "@moonshot-ai/nori-code": minor ---
Add the /foo slash command to list active sessions. Run /foo to see them. ```
A new CLI subcommand:
```markdown --- "@moonshot-ai/nori-code": minor ---
Add the kimi web subcommand to open the web UI. Run kimi web to launch it. ```
A new flag on an existing command:
```markdown --- "@moonshot-ai/nori-code": patch ---
Add a --bar flag to skip confirmation prompts. Pass --bar to skip. ```
An internal package has an internal-only change, but it enters the CLI bundle:
```markdown --- "@moonshot-ai/nori-code": patch ---
Unify tool execution metadata handling. ```
Only SDK source changed, and the CLI does not use it:
```markdown --- "@moonshot-ai/nori-code-sdk": patch ---
Clarify session status typing for internal SDK callers. ```
## Web app changes
`@moonshot-ai/kimi-web` is ignored by changesets and must **never** appear in a changeset frontmatter. Because the web app is bundled into the CLI release artifact, any web change that ships must list `@moonshot-ai/nori-code` instead and describe the actual web-facing change in the text.
- If a PR contains both web UI changes and server API changes, split them into separate changesets so each entry has a focused description. - Do not enumerate every micro-tweak; keep it to one sentence that captures what the web user gets.
Web-only fix:
```markdown --- "@moonshot-ai/nori-code": patch ---
Fix the web chat not scrolling to the bottom after sending a message. ```
Web UI plus server APIs in the same PR (split into two changesets):
```markdown --- "@moonshot-ai/nori-code": minor ---
Add the server-hosted web UI, including chat layout and session list behaviors. ```
```markdown --- "@moonshot-ai/nori-code": minor ---
Add the server REST and WebSocket APIs that power the web UI. ```
## `@moonshot-ai/pi-tui` changes
`@moonshot-ai/pi-tui` is a vendored fork that lives in `packages/pi-tui`. It is `private: true` and is never published, but it is **not** ignored by changesets: changesets versions it and writes `packages/pi-tui/CHANGELOG.md` so the fork keeps its own history. Because it is bundled into the CLI like other internal packages, it is an exception to Core Rule 4 — do **not** list `@moonshot-ai/nori-code` for a change that only touches pi-tui.
- Changes that only affect pi-tui (build, package, strict-mode cleanup, renderer fixes): list `@moonshot-ai/pi-tui` only. No CLI changeset. - If the same change is also user-visible in the CLI (for example a terminal rendering fix that CLI users can see), add a **separate** changeset that lists `@moonshot-ai/nori-code` with CLI-focused wording, in addition to the pi-tui changeset. Do not mix both packages in one frontmatter — the two changelogs need different wording.
pi-tui-only change:
```markdown --- "@moonshot-ai/pi-tui": patch ---
Export the package manifest so the bundled binary can locate its native assets. ```
pi-tui change that is also visible in the CLI (two separate changesets):
```markdown --- "@moonshot-ai/pi-tui": patch ---
Clamp the differential render to the visible viewport so scrolling up during streaming no longer jumps to the top. ```
```markdown --- "@moonshot-ai/nori-code": patch ---
Fix the transcript jumping to the top when scrolling up through history during streaming output. ```
## Red Flags
- You are about to write `major` without asking the user. - A new user-facing feature entry has no usage hint, or the hint runs to multiple lines and explains design rationale. - You guessed wording for a change you do not understand instead of asking the user whether you may dig into the repo. - Internal package source enters the CLI bundle, but `@moonshot-ai/nori-code` is missing. - A changeset frontmatter mixes ignored internal packages with non-ignored packages. - `packages/node-sdk` was not changed, but `@moonshot-ai/nori-code-sdk` was listed for "internal package sync". - The changelog entry is in Chinese. - The wording claims more than the diff actually did. - The CLI wording mentions internal package names, class names, or PR numbers. - The entry includes real internal identifiers instead of neutral placeholders. - A change that only touches `@moonshot-ai/pi-tui` lists `@moonshot-ai/nori-code` instead of `@moonshot-ai/pi-tui`, or mixes both packages in one frontmatter.
Détails techniques
- Version
- 1.0.0
- Licence
- MIT
- Dernière mise à jour
- 23 août 2026
- Publié
- 22 août 2026
Instantané de décision
Validation nécessaire
recent repository activity
Audit
Revue d’installation
Revue d’installation et d’adoption
- Sécurité
- 73/100
- Maintenance
- 100/100
- Installer
- 92/100
Preuves validées par Agent
Preuves validées par Agent
Rapports après resolve, revue, installation et une exécution limitée.
- Taux de réussite
- —
- Échec récent
- —
- Résultats
- 0
- Qualité de sortie
- —
- Échecs
- 0
- Non pertinent
- 0
- Installations
- 0
- Bloqué par le risque
- 0
- Configuration requise
- 0
- Production
- 0
Aucune donnée de résultat Agent pour l’instant. La première exécution peut signaler succès, besoin de configuration, blocage de risque, échec ou non-pertinence via /api/agent/outcome.
Installer
Ajouter au workflow Agent
Gratuit et open source. Examinez le rapport avant l’installation dans des Agents de production.
Boucle de croissance
Kit de partage
Brouillon guidé par scénario pour gen-changesets, prêt pour une publication manuelle sur X.
gen-changesets: Use when generating changesets in the kimi-code repository, including package bump selection,... 13 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/wangyuahn-gen-changesets?ref=x
Réponse facultative avec commande d’installation
Listing + install path for gen-changesets: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/wangyuahn-gen-changesets?ref=x Install: npx skills add wangyuahn/nori-code --skill gen-changesets
Source de la fiche
Indexé par Registry
Cette fiche a été indexée à partir de sources publiques et n’est pas marquée officielle tant qu’une revendication de mainteneur n’est pas approuvée.
- Créateur
- wangyuahn
- Source
- wangyuahn/nori-code
- Indexé par
- Index communautaire OpenAgentSkill
L’attribution renvoie au dépôt public ou au profil du créateur. Les créateurs peuvent revendiquer la fiche pour mettre à jour les signaux de propriété.
Revendiquer ce skillRevendication du propriétaire
Revendiquer cette fiche de skill
Cette fiche Indexé par Registry est attribuée à wangyuahn, mais n’est pas encore marquée officielle. Revendiquez-la pour ajouter un signal de propriétaire vérifié et rendre les futures mises à jour de lancement, d’installation et d’audit plus fiables.
Kit de backlinks créateur
Ajoutez les badges de preuve à votre README
Affichez la fiche canonique, les signaux actuels de confiance et d’audit, ainsi que de vraies preuves Agent-Proven là où les développeurs évaluent le dépôt.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/wangyuahn-gen-changesets)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/wangyuahn-gen-changesets)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/wangyuahn-gen-changesets/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/wangyuahn-gen-changesets)Auteur
wangyuahn
@wangyuahn
Tags
Adéquation plateforme
Signaux de santé
- Stars GitHub
- 13
- Score de qualité
- 32/100
- Dernier push GitHub
- 23 août 2026
- Indications de framework
- Inconnu
- Vues OpenAgentSkill
- 0
- Copies d’installation
- 0
- Clics sortants
- 0
Signal de communauté
Indiquez si ce skill semble utile à votre workflow Agent. Les retours agrégés améliorent le classement au fil du temps.
Confiance et sécurité
Do not auto-install
- Adoption GitHub13 stars GitHubCorriger
- Activité stars/forks13 stars et 0 forks; l’activité des issues n’est pas disponible dans les métadonnées actuellesCorriger
- Maintenance récenteMis à jour aujourd’huiValidé
- Clarté de licenceMITValidé
- Complétude README/SKILL.mdLes métadonnées incluent suffisamment de contexte d’usage et de workflowValidé
- Risque dépendances/runtimecommand execution surface, credential or environment accessCorriger
Skills associés
Opencode
The open source coding agent.
200.7K StarsCode Review
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
168.6K StarsGrill With Docs
A relentless interview that pressure-tests a plan against the codebase, sharpens domain language, and updates CONTEXT.md and ADRs when decisions become durable.
164.7K StarsTo Spec
Turn the current conversation and codebase context into a structured implementation spec, then publish it to the configured project issue tracker.
164.7K Stars