forward-implementation-first Rapport d’audit.

Avertissements

• Permission surface may require sandboxing
• The skill's instruction to 'remove or downgrade administrative-only gates' could be misapplied if an agent misclassifies a substantive safety check as administrative. The skill does define administrative bookkeeping, but the boundary could be clearer.
• The concept of 'dependency cone' is mentioned but not precisely defined. Agents may need more concrete guidance on how to determine which stages are affected by a change.
• The skill assumes the agent can reliably distinguish between 'administrative' and 'substantive' metadata. In practice, some hashes or locks may serve dual purposes, and the skill could benefit from explicit examples of ambiguous cases.
• Quality score needs review
• Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
• Stars/forks activity: 163 stars, 4 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
• Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access

Méthode

This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.