kendex-issues
Steward the vanillagreencom/kendex issue queue (Linear team KEN is the poll surface; GitHub stays the PR/code surface) on a self-paced loop: watch open PRs, poll, triage (dedupe; close non-kendex issues and repost project-local ones to their owning repo; fix genuine defects in ke
Profil de l’actif
Recherche et travail de connaissance
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Scénario
Agents de recherche
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Adéquation Agent
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Compatible avec Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI ou des Agents personnalisés.
Installer
Prêt
npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues
Maintenance
À jour
Mis à jour aujourd’hui
Risque
Revue nécessaire
Permission surface may require sandboxing
Qualité GitHub
63
65/100 Qualité · 74/100 Confiance
Tags de couverture
Notes de revue
Permission surface may require sandboxing · Quality score needs review
Carte d’adoption Agent
Confiance, audit et préparation à l’installation en un coup d’œil
Ces scores combinent les métadonnées publiques du dépôt, les signaux de revue OpenAgentSkill, la fraîcheur de maintenance et la préparation à l’installation. Ils servent à présélectionner et ne remplacent pas la revue humaine.
Qualité
PrometteurUseful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Confiance
Sandbox uniquementCandidate utile avec des signaux de confiance incomplets ou mixtes. Gardez-la dans un espace isolé jusqu’à ce que la boucle de résultats confirme son adéquation.
Audit
Revue nécessaireRevue lisible par machine de la préparation à l’installation, des métadonnées de sécurité, de la maintenance et du risque d’adoption.
Trust Score OpenAgentSkill v5
Revue humaine avant installation
Exécutez uniquement dans un sandbox et comparez les alternatives proches avant usage réel.
Stars
63 stars GitHub
Activité du dépôt
63 stars et 23 forks
Maintenance
Mis à jour aujourd’hui
Licence
MIT
Installer
npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues
Sécurité d’installation
Chemin d’installation standard de package ou runtime
Surface de permissions
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Résultats Agent
Pas encore de données de résultats Agent
Documentation
Contexte README/SKILL.md solide
Résumé des risques
Revoir avant production
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- GitHub adoption: 63 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 63 stars, 23 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Préparation à l’installation
Chemin d’installation disponible
- Le chemin d’installation est disponible
- La preuve du dépôt est disponible
- La licence est déclarée
- Pas encore de preuve de résultat Agent-Proven
Métadonnées lisibles par Agent
Données de décision lisibles par machine pour ce skill.
Utilisez ce bloc ou le JSON intégré pour décider si un Agent doit installer ce skill, choisir une alternative ou demander d’abord une revue humaine.
Tâches adaptées
- workflows Automatisation de workflow
- Équipes Claude Code
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
- Move data between tools
Agents adaptés
Décision d’installation
- Commande
- npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues
- Politique
- Revoir
- Revue humaine
- Oui
Confiance et risque
- Confiance
- 66/100
- Audit
- 78/100
- Niveau de risque
- Revue nécessaire
Boucle de résultat
- Endpoint
- /api/agent/outcome
- ID d’événement
- resolve
- Résultats
- 5
Commande d’installation
npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issuesNe pas utiliser quand
- Équipes qui nécessitent un SLA soutenu par le fournisseur
- Environnements fortement conformes sans revue interne de sécurité
- No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet
- Indices de permissions à haut risque : exécution shell ou de commande
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
Skill alternatif
Last30days Skill
53.5K Stars
npx skills add mvanhorn/last30days-skill -g
Skill alternatif
Academic Research Skills
38.4K Stars
npx skills add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Skill alternatif
GPT Researcher
28.0K Stars
npx skills add assafelovic/gpt-researcher
Skill alternatif
DeepResearch
19.8K Stars
npx skills add Alibaba-NLP/DeepResearch
Sécurité Agent v2
50/100 · Éviter l’installation automatique
Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
Élevé
Exécution shell ou de commande
Les métadonnées de la skill font référence à des workflows de terminal, CLI, shell, sous-processus ou exécution de commande.
Moyen
Accès réseau
La skill récupère probablement des pages distantes, API, dépôts ou services externes.
Moyen
Accès au système de fichiers
La skill peut lire ou écrire des fichiers de projet, documents, artefacts générés ou l’état local de l’espace de travail.
- Indices de permissions à haut risque : exécution shell ou de commande
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
Cibles d’installation
Installer ce skill dans votre workflow Agent
Utilisez le point de terminaison public pour récupérer la commande, la checklist, les prompts et les liens canoniques.
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install vanillagreencom-kendex-issuesPlan de résolution Agent
Laissez un Agent vérifier la pertinence avant l’installation.
L’API Resolve renvoie la skill sélectionnée, des alternatives, la politique de sécurité, les notes d’audit, la cible d’installation et un prompt prêt à l’emploi.
Ouvrir JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20kendex-issues%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Texte Resolve
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20kendex-issues%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Relais d’installation
/api/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/install
L’Agent doit vérifier
- Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
- Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
- Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.
Copier le prompt
Task: Use kendex-issues in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20kendex-issues%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/install
Install command: npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Relais Agent
Donnez à l’Agent le chemin d’installation, pas un autre annuaire.
Utilisez le point de terminaison public pour récupérer la commande, la checklist, les prompts et les liens canoniques.
Relais d’installation
/api/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/install
Format texte LLM
/api/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/install?format=text
Trouver des alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=kendex-issues&limit=3
Prompt Agent
Use kendex-issues for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/install, then install with: npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issuesMétadonnées Registry
Profil lisible par Agent pour la sélection automatique de skills.
L’API Registry fournit les signaux de décision, confiance, audit, cas d’usage et installation sans analyser l’interface.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues
Texte LLM
/api/registry/manifest/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues?format=text
Alias d’installation
/api/registry/install/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues
Recommander
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20kendex-issues%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Adéquation Agent
Automatisation de workflow
Tags de cas d’usage
Plateformes
Claude Code
Rapport d’audit
Revue nécessaire · 78/100
Revue lisible par machine de la préparation à l’installation, des métadonnées de sécurité, de la maintenance et du risque d’adoption.
Panneau de décision Agent
Fallback candidate for Workflow automation
Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.
Rôle dans la pile
Candidate de secours
Pertinence principale
Automatisation de workflow
Libellé de confiance
Prototyper d’abord
Chemin d’installation
Commande prête
À utiliser lorsque
- workflows Automatisation de workflow
- Équipes Claude Code
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Preuves
- recent repository activity
- install command or GitHub repo available
- profil qualité 65/100
revoir d’abord
- No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet
Chemin d’implémentation
- 1Installez-le dans un Agent en sandbox et exécutez une tâche de Automatisation de workflow de bout en bout.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
Profil de confiance
Sandbox uniquement
Candidate utile avec des signaux de confiance incomplets ou mixtes. Gardez-la dans un espace isolé jusqu’à ce que la boucle de résultats confirme son adéquation.
Adoption GitHub
Vérifier63 stars GitHub
Activité stars/forks
Vérifier63 stars et 23 forks; l’activité des issues n’est pas disponible dans les métadonnées actuelles
Maintenance récente
ValidéMis à jour aujourd’hui
Clarté de licence
ValidéMIT
Signaux positifs
- Revue IA approuvée
- Le chemin d’installation est disponible
- La preuve du dépôt est disponible
- Dépôt maintenu récemment
- La commande d’installation ne présente aucun motif de haut risque évident
- La boucle de résultats est prête mais nécessite la première exécution réelle de l’Agent
Réviser avant installation
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- GitHub adoption: 63 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 63 stars, 23 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- Pas encore de rapports de résultats Agent réels
- Une revue humaine est requise avant une installation sans surveillance
Action recommandée
Exécutez uniquement dans un sandbox et comparez les alternatives proches avant usage réel.
Profil qualité
Prometteur candidat pour les workflows Agent
Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Adéquation au workflow
Utilisez cette skill dans ces scénarios
Automate repeated work
Workflow automation
I need my agent to automate a repeated workflow across tools and files.
Manage repositories
GitHub automation
I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.
Operate local tools
Local desktop
I need my agent to operate local files and desktop apps in a repeatable workflow.
Adéquation au workflow
Ajouter à un workflow complet
Turn skills into distribution
Content growth agent
A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.
Find, compare, and synthesize
Research report agent
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Inspect, patch, and verify code
Coding review agent
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
Liste d’alternatives
Comparer avant installation
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
Academic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
GPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
DeepResearch
Tongyi Deep Research, the Leading Open-source Deep Research Agent
Vue d’ensemble
--- name: kendex-issues description: > Steward the vanillagreencom/kendex issue queue (Linear team KEN is the poll surface; GitHub stays the PR/code surface) on a self-paced loop: watch open PRs, poll, triage (dedupe; close non-kendex issues and repost project-local ones to their owning repo; fix genuine defects in kendex's skills/agents/hooks/pi-extensions or the Rust CLI), run each fix through the orch skill, merge, propagate via kendex refresh, then reschedule. A thin wrapper: fix cycles belong to orch, PR mechanics to the github skill, PR monitoring to review-gate's pr-watch, Linear ops to the linear skill — this skill carries only the kendex-specific stewardship knowledge. Use when asked to monitor kendex's issues continuously or to run one fix-and-propagate cycle. ---
> **Never edit this file directly.** To make additions or modifications, edit the appropriate section in the managing project's kendex config — `kendex.toml` at the kendex project root, or `kendex-local.toml` in a source-catalog checkout. Then run `kendex refresh`.
# kendex Issue Steward
Keep the vanillagreencom/kendex issue queue clean and its consumers in sync: watch → poll → triage → fix → merge → propagate → repeat. One cycle per turn, then reschedule.
**This skill is a thin wrapper.** The mechanics live in four owning skills, and every cycle uses them instead of hand-rolling:
| Concern | Owning skill | Load when | |---------|--------------|-----------| | Fix cycle (prepare → delegate → review → submit → merge) | **orch** | every fix, before creating the worktree | | PR threads / replies / reviews / merges / CI logs | **github** | any PR mutation or read | | Watching open PRs across the loop | **review-gate** (`pr-watch.sh`) | first action, every cycle | | Linear reads and writes | **linear** | any Linear operation |
A session driven by this skill should load those naturally at each step and produce zero hand-rolled PR mechanics (raw `gh api` GraphQL where a `github.sh` command exists is the failure smell).
## Loop (one turn)
1. **PR watch first** — `GH_REPO=vanillagreencom/kendex .agents/skills/review-gate/scripts/pr-watch.sh`. Silence + exit 0 means no open PR needs you. Attention lines (threads-open, changes-requested, gate-stale, disarmed, awaiting-stale) → act through the github skill. NEVER hand-roll a PR monitor: pr-watch is the monitoring primitive for every open-PR concern except queue ejection, which it cannot see — after any gate-green, additionally check `isInMergeQueue` + `autoMergeRequest` (GraphQL; `gh pr view --json` lacks queue membership). Ejection is SILENT and discards the auto-merge arm: re-arm once; a second ejection means a flaky required suite — quarantine/escalate rather than re-arm loops. 2. **Poll Linear** — creation sync is ONE-WAY GitHub→Linear (owner reverted the 2026-08-09 two-way experiment), so Linear (team KEN) is the only complete queue: Linear-native issues never appear in `gh issue list`. Refresh the cache first, then read open issues: `linear.sh sync --reconcile`, then `linear.sh cache issues list --state "Triage,Backlog,Todo,In Progress" --max`. GH-synced issues arrive in **Triage** — omitting it hides the entire synced queue (bit the 2026-08-03 campaign: 14 pending issues invisible). Then cross-check GitHub: `gh issue list --repo vanillagreencom/kendex --state open` — cheap, and history earned it (2026-08-09: nine stray open GH issues over eight "empty" cycles while both a generate-on-merge automation and two-way creation sync were briefly on; both are off now, but pre-revert GH copies of Linear issues still exist and can stick open). An open GH issue whose Linear mirror is DONE is residue — close it with the diagnosis. An open GH issue with NO Linear mirror means the GH→Linear sync broke — triage it from GitHub directly and flag the sync. Zero attention lines and zero open on both surfaces → reschedule, stop. 3. **Triage** each issue; run the **Fix cycle** for each valid defect. Mutate on the issue's home surface: a GH-mirrored issue (its Linear body links the GitHub issue) is closed/commented on GitHub and sync updates Linear; a Linear-native issue (no GH link) is updated with the linear skill (`issues update` / `comments create` / `issues complete`). PRs, branches, and CI stay on GitHub either way. The PR body carries BOTH references when the issue has a GitHub mirror — `Closes KEN-<n>` for the tracker and `Closes #<n>` for the mirror — so GitHub links the PR on the issue and closes it with that reference at merge; a Linear-native issue gets `Closes KEN-<n>` alone. Never close a mirror by hand without naming the PR in the closing comment. 4. After any merge, **Propagate + Sync**. 5. **Schedule the next wakeup** (see Cadence). Stop only if the user asked.
## Triage (per issue)
Read body + comments, then classify:
- **Duplicate** → close, referencing the canonical issue. - **Not a kendex asset** → verify by grepping the kendex repo; ownership comes from the asset's own SKILL.md frontmatter (`source: kendex`), never from its install location. Close with a specific rationale. Project-local assets: repost to the owning repo, cross-link both ways, and notify that repo's overseer (tmux tab 1: `memsira:1`, `drovr:1`, `hyprtrade:1`) that the fix is theirs. The steward never fixes a consuming repo's own defect, however easy it looks. - **Speculative / one-project architecture** → close with reasoning; offer a scoped proposal only if it generalizes. - **Genuine kendex defect** (skills/, agents/, hooks/, pi-extensions/, cli/) → Fix cycle. A guidance gap is fixable even when the root trigger is a harness limitation; note the harness part upstream. - **Unfindable references** → check history (`git log -S '<name>' --all`) before assuming a rename or regression. A name that never existed in any version is a recorded typo: close with that evidence; never ship a compatibility shim for it. - **Empty-body issues** → don't guess the defect from the title. Comment asking for the concrete repro, note what your sweep found, leave open.
## Fix cycle (per valid defect) — load orch
The whole cycle is orch's domain: prepare → delegate → review → submit → merge. Load the orch skill and follow its workflows; do not re-implement any step here. kendex-specific parameters orch can't know:
- **Agent fit for delegation**: `generalist` (shell/docs/skills), `rust` (cli/), `iced` (iced-rs). Require tests and the relevant suite green (`bash skills/orch/tests/run-all.sh`, per-skill `tests/*.test.sh`, or `cd cli && cargo test`). - **Fix direction rides in every delegation** when the issue touches skills or tooling: determinism and tooling first — a deletion, a short-circuit, or a tool; added prose is the last resort. Skills are instructions, not explanations (AGENTS.md § Rules, "Engineer over patch"). - **Review the diff yourself** before submit — confirm the actual root cause, not a plausible guess. If a delegate stalls, inspect its worktree and nudge once. - A clearly-coupled real defect found along the way → file a tracking issue and fix it too. - Disjoint files → run issues in parallel; same file → sequence or bundle. - A flaked required check reporting "cannot be rerun" gets a fresh head (`git commit --amend --no-edit` + `push --force-with-lease` — only on never-shared heads; never amend a pushed commit others may have seen), never a force-merge past red.
PR reads and mutations inside the cycle (threads, replies, resolution, merge, CI logs) go through the github skill: `pr-data --actionable`, `post-reply`, `resolve-thread`, `pr-merge`, `ci-logs`, `await-mergeable`.
## Propagate + Sync
**BATCH trains (owner directive 2026-08-12): before opening consumer refresh PRs, scan the open queue (Todo/Triage/in-flight PRs) for items that touch VENDORED assets — if any would force another re-vendor soon, HOLD propagation until those land, then run ONE train carrying everything.** Per-merge trains cost a review round in every consumer each time; the fail-closed direction of vendored fixes makes the wait safe (consumers sit at most one train behind, failing loud, never open). Exceptions worth an immediate train anyway: a fix for a fail-OPEN defect in a consumer-enforced gate, or an owner ask.
**Only after the upstream change is MERGED and on `origin/main`.** A PR that is approved, queued, or mid-merge-queue has not propagated anything: merges can take a while, and refreshing a consumer from an unmerged or mid-queue state vendors bytes main may never contain. Before any consumer refresh, verify the source being read (the cache, or the recorded remote clone) sits at the `origin/main` tip that contains the merge commit — never propagate from a feature branch, a local unpushed main, or a stale cache.
After merges:
1. Sync local main (`checkout main && pull --ff-only`) and fast-forward the cache (`git -C ~/.kendex/cache/vanillagreencom_kendex pull --ff-only`) — some consumers source from the cache, and a stale one silently no-ops their refresh. Confirm the cache tip equals `origin/main` tip before refreshing any consumer. 2. Skill/agent/hook changes → `kendex refresh` (default all scopes) + `kendex verify` in each consumer that vendors the asset. Never narrow to `--scope project`: Pi packages install at global scope, so a project-scoped refresh leaves them drifted and only `kendex verify` catches it (bit the 2026-08-09 batch: pi-task-panel stayed at the old version through a project-scoped refresh in all five consumers). CLI-only changes need a binary rebuild instead, not a skill refresh. 3. Committing in a consumer: - Probe first: `git check-ignore -q <refreshed path>` → ignored means a local-only install mirror with nothing to commit. The probe is authoritative over any remembered per-repo list. - Stage only kendex paths (scoped `git add`, never `-A`). Revert no-op `.kendex-refreshed` churn and template-default churn on tracked `kendex.settings.toml`/`kendex.toml` unless a key change is the payload. - Merge-queue repos: branch → PR → `gh pr merge --auto` (no strategy flag). Force-merge (`--admin --squash`) is pre-authorized only for kendex-only refresh PRs with `kendex verify` green and the required CI check green or unaffected; it cannot override a failing required check — there, arm `--auto` and let the normal flow merge. Reply to and resolve any bot threads either way. - Confirm each push landed and the commit contains only kendex files. - **While propagation PRs are open, sweep each consumer with `GH_REPO=vanillagreencom/<repo> pr-watch.sh --heal` every cycle** — the writer's event triggers occasionally miss a bot review (observed 2026-08-11: hyprtrade-io#43 sat gate-pending ~10 min on a delivered review until the cron floor), and `--heal` converges a stale gate in seconds instead of waiting out the */15 cron (which itself can slip to ~25 min). Same sweep surfaces thread and disarm states on YOUR propagation PRs; other PRs' findings route to that repo's overseer. 4. **New skills don't propagate via refresh** — refresh reinstalls only locked items. A new skill needs a one-time `kendex add --skill <name> -y` per consumer (always `-y`; the interactive prompt dies in non-interactive shells), and the `kendex.toml` entry it writes committed through the repo's queue where that file is tracked. 5. **Review-bot findings on propagation PRs**: a real defect in vendored content is fixed upstream first — issue → fix → merge → refresh on the PR branch → resolve threads citing the fix. Stale-doc nits on the PR's own payload may be fixed directly on the branch. 6. **Capability changes need repo-side wiring.** A change consumers must recognize in their own CI or branch protection
Détails techniques
- Version
- 1.0.0
- Licence
- MIT
- Dernière mise à jour
- 23 août 2026
- Publié
- 23 août 2026
Instantané de décision
Candidate de secours
recent repository activity
Audit
Revue d’installation
Revue d’installation et d’adoption
- Sécurité
- 80/100
- Maintenance
- 100/100
- Installer
- 92/100
Preuves validées par Agent
Preuves validées par Agent
Rapports après resolve, revue, installation et une exécution limitée.
- Taux de réussite
- —
- Échec récent
- —
- Résultats
- 0
- Qualité de sortie
- —
- Échecs
- 0
- Non pertinent
- 0
- Installations
- 0
- Bloqué par le risque
- 0
- Configuration requise
- 0
- Production
- 0
Aucune donnée de résultat Agent pour l’instant. La première exécution peut signaler succès, besoin de configuration, blocage de risque, échec ou non-pertinence via /api/agent/outcome.
Installer
Ajouter au workflow Agent
Gratuit et open source. Examinez le rapport avant l’installation dans des Agents de production.
Boucle de croissance
Kit de partage
Brouillon guidé par scénario pour kendex-issues, prêt pour une publication manuelle sur X.
kendex-issues: Steward the vanillagreencom/kendex issue queue (Linear team KEN is the poll surface; GitHub s... 63 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues?ref=x
Réponse facultative avec commande d’installation
Listing + install path for kendex-issues: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues?ref=x Install: npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues
Source de la fiche
Indexé par Registry
Cette fiche a été indexée à partir de sources publiques et n’est pas marquée officielle tant qu’une revendication de mainteneur n’est pas approuvée.
- Créateur
- vanillagreencom
- Source
- vanillagreencom/kendex
- Indexé par
- Index communautaire OpenAgentSkill
L’attribution renvoie au dépôt public ou au profil du créateur. Les créateurs peuvent revendiquer la fiche pour mettre à jour les signaux de propriété.
Revendiquer ce skillRevendication du propriétaire
Revendiquer cette fiche de skill
Cette fiche Indexé par Registry est attribuée à vanillagreencom, mais n’est pas encore marquée officielle. Revendiquez-la pour ajouter un signal de propriétaire vérifié et rendre les futures mises à jour de lancement, d’installation et d’audit plus fiables.
Kit de backlinks créateur
Ajoutez les badges de preuve à votre README
Affichez la fiche canonique, les signaux actuels de confiance et d’audit, ainsi que de vraies preuves Agent-Proven là où les développeurs évaluent le dépôt.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues)Auteur
vanillagreencom
@vanillagreencom
Tags
Adéquation plateforme
Signaux de santé
- Stars GitHub
- 63
- Score de qualité
- 36/100
- Dernier push GitHub
- 23 août 2026
- Indications de framework
- Inconnu
- Vues OpenAgentSkill
- 0
- Copies d’installation
- 0
- Clics sortants
- 0
Signal de communauté
Indiquez si ce skill semble utile à votre workflow Agent. Les retours agrégés améliorent le classement au fil du temps.
Confiance et sécurité
Sandbox uniquement
- Adoption GitHub63 stars GitHubVérifier
- Activité stars/forks63 stars et 23 forks; l’activité des issues n’est pas disponible dans les métadonnées actuellesVérifier
- Maintenance récenteMis à jour aujourd’huiValidé
- Clarté de licenceMITValidé
- Complétude README/SKILL.mdLes métadonnées incluent suffisamment de contexte d’usage et de workflowValidé
- Risque dépendances/runtimecommand execution surface, network or browser surfaceInfo
Skills associés
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
53.5K StarsAcademic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
38.4K StarsGPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
28.0K StarsDeepResearch
Tongyi Deep Research, the Leading Open-source Deep Research Agent
19.8K Stars