kendex-issues
Steward the vanillagreencom/kendex issue queue (Linear team KEN is the poll surface; GitHub stays the PR/code surface) on a self-paced loop: watch open PRs, poll, triage (dedupe; close non-kendex issues and repost project-local ones to their owning repo; fix genuine defects in ke
Asset-Profil
Recherche und Wissensarbeit
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Szenario
Recherche-Agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Agent-Fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Geeignet für Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI oder benutzerdefinierte Agents.
Installieren
Bereit
npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues
Wartung
Aktuell
Heute gepusht
Risiko
Prüfung nötig
Permission surface may require sandboxing
GitHub-Qualität
63
65/100 Qualität · 74/100 Vertrauen
Abdeckungs-Tags
Review-Notizen
Permission surface may require sandboxing · Quality score needs review
Agent-Adoptionskarte
Vertrauen, Audit und Installationsbereitschaft auf einen Blick
Diese Werte kombinieren öffentliche Repository-Metadaten, OpenAgentSkill-Reviewsignale, Wartungsaktualität und Installationsbereitschaft. Sie helfen bei der Vorauswahl, ersetzen aber keine menschliche Prüfung.
Qualität
VielversprechendUseful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Vertrauen
Nur SandboxNützlicher Kandidat mit fehlenden oder gemischten Vertrauenssignalen. Bis der Ergebniszyklus die Passung belegt, in einem isolierten Arbeitsbereich verwenden.
Audit
Prüfung nötigMaschinenlesbare Prüfung von Installationsbereitschaft, Sicherheitsmetadaten, Wartung und Akzeptanzrisiko.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Menschliche Prüfung vor Installation
Nur in einer Sandbox ausführen und nahe Alternativen vergleichen, bevor sie produktiv eingesetzt wird.
Stars
63 GitHub-Stars
Repository-Aktivität
63 Stars und 23 Forks
Wartung
Heute gepusht
Lizenz
MIT
Installieren
npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues
Installationssicherheit
Standard-Paket- oder Laufzeit-Installationspfad
Berechtigungsfläche
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Agent-Ergebnisse
Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten
Dokumentation
Starker README/SKILL.md-Kontext
Risikoübersicht
Vor Produktion prüfen
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- GitHub adoption: 63 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 63 stars, 23 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Installationsbereitschaft
Installationspfad verfügbar
- Installationspfad ist verfügbar
- Repository-Belege sind verfügbar
- Lizenz ist angegeben
- Noch keine Agent-Proven-Ergebnisbelege
Agent-lesbare Metadaten
Maschinenlesbare Entscheidungsdaten für diesen Skill.
Nutze diesen Block oder das eingebettete JSON, um zu entscheiden, ob ein Agent diesen Skill installieren, eine Alternative wählen oder zuerst menschliche Prüfung anfordern soll.
Geeignete Aufgaben
- Workflow-Automatisierung-Workflows
- Claude-Code-Teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
- Move data between tools
Geeignete Agents
Installationsentscheidung
- Befehl
- npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues
- Richtlinie
- Prüfen
- Menschliche Prüfung
- Ja
Vertrauen und Risiko
- Vertrauen
- 66/100
- Audit
- 78/100
- Risikoebene
- Prüfung nötig
Ergebnis-Loop
- Endpoint
- /api/agent/outcome
- Event-ID
- resolve
- Ergebnisse
- 5
Installationsbefehl
npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issuesNicht verwenden, wenn
- Teams, die ein vom Anbieter unterstütztes SLA benötigen
- Hochregulierte Umgebungen ohne interne Sicherheitsprüfung
- No major risk signals from current metadata
- Hinweise auf Hochrisiko-Berechtigungen: Shell- oder Befehlsausführung
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
Alternative
Last30days Skill
53.5K Stars
npx skills add mvanhorn/last30days-skill -g
Alternative
Academic Research Skills
38.4K Stars
npx skills add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Alternative
GPT Researcher
28.0K Stars
npx skills add assafelovic/gpt-researcher
Alternative
DeepResearch
19.8K Stars
npx skills add Alibaba-NLP/DeepResearch
Agent-Sicherheit v2
50/100 · Automatische Installation vermeiden
Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
Hoch
Shell- oder Befehlsausführung
Die Skill-Metadaten verweisen auf Terminal-, CLI-, Shell-, Subprozess- oder Befehlsausführungs-Workflows.
Mittel
Netzwerkzugriff
Die Skill ruft wahrscheinlich Remote-Seiten, APIs, Repositories oder externe Dienste ab.
Mittel
Dateisystemzugriff
Die Skill kann Projektdateien, Dokumente, generierte Artefakte oder den lokalen Arbeitsbereich lesen oder schreiben.
- Hinweise auf Hochrisiko-Berechtigungen: Shell- oder Befehlsausführung
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
Installationsziele
Diesen Skill im Agent-Workflow installieren
Über den öffentlichen Endpunkt erhältst du Befehl, Sicherheitscheckliste, Ziel-Prompts und kanonische Links.
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install vanillagreencom-kendex-issuesAgent-Auflösungsplan
Lass einen Agent die Eignung vor der Installation prüfen.
Die Resolve API liefert die beste Skill, Alternativen, Sicherheitsrichtlinien, Auditnotizen, Installationsziel und einen direkt nutzbaren Prompt.
JSON öffnen
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20kendex-issues%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve-Text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20kendex-issues%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Installationsübergabe
/api/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/install
Agent sollte prüfen
- Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
- Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
- Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.
Prompt kopieren
Task: Use kendex-issues in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20kendex-issues%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/install
Install command: npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent-Übergabe
Gib dem Agent den Installationspfad, nicht noch ein Verzeichnis.
Über den öffentlichen Endpunkt erhältst du Befehl, Sicherheitscheckliste, Ziel-Prompts und kanonische Links.
Installationsübergabe
/api/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/install
LLM-Textformat
/api/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/install?format=text
Alternativen finden
/api/skills/search?q=kendex-issues&limit=3
Agent-Prompt
Use kendex-issues for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/install, then install with: npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issuesRegistry-Metadaten
Agent-lesbares Profil für die automatische Skill-Auswahl.
Die Registry API stellt Entscheidungs-, Vertrauens-, Audit-, Use-Case- und Installationssignale ohne UI-Scraping bereit.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues
LLM-Text
/api/registry/manifest/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues?format=text
Installationsalias
/api/registry/install/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues
Empfehlen
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20kendex-issues%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent-Fit
Workflow-Automatisierung
Plattformen
Claude Code
Audit-Bericht
Prüfung nötig · 78/100
Maschinenlesbare Prüfung von Installationsbereitschaft, Sicherheitsmetadaten, Wartung und Akzeptanzrisiko.
Agent-Entscheidungspanel
Fallback candidate for Workflow automation
Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.
Rolle im Stack
Fallback-Kandidat
Primäre Eignung
Workflow-Automatisierung
Vertrauenslabel
Zuerst prototypisieren
Installationspfad
Befehl bereit
Verwenden wenn
- Workflow-Automatisierung-Workflows
- Claude-Code-Teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Evidenz
- recent repository activity
- install command or GitHub repo available
- Qualitätsprofil 65/100
- 1 OpenAgentSkill-Interaktionen
zuerst prüfen
- No major risk signals from current metadata
Implementierungspfad
- 1Installieren Sie es in einem Sandbox-Agent und führen Sie eine Workflow-Automatisierung-Aufgabe vollständig aus.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
Vertrauensprofil
Nur Sandbox
Nützlicher Kandidat mit fehlenden oder gemischten Vertrauenssignalen. Bis der Ergebniszyklus die Passung belegt, in einem isolierten Arbeitsbereich verwenden.
GitHub-Akzeptanz
Prüfen63 GitHub-Stars
Star-/Fork-Aktivität
Prüfen63 Stars und 23 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbar
Aktuelle Wartung
BestandenHeute gepusht
Lizenzklarheit
BestandenMIT
Positive Signale
- KI-Prüfung genehmigt
- Installationspfad ist verfügbar
- Repository-Belege sind verfügbar
- Kürzlich gewartetes Repository
- Der Installationsbefehl weist kein offensichtliches Hochrisikomuster auf
- Ergebniszyklus ist bereit, benötigt aber den ersten echten Agent-Lauf
Vor Installation prüfen
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- GitHub adoption: 63 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 63 stars, 23 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- Noch keine echten Agent-Ergebnisberichte
- Vor unbeaufsichtigter Installation ist menschliche Prüfung erforderlich
Empfohlene Aktion
Nur in einer Sandbox ausführen und nahe Alternativen vergleichen, bevor sie produktiv eingesetzt wird.
Qualitätsprofil
Vielversprechend Kandidat für Agent-Workflows
Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Workflow-Eignung
Diese Skill in diesen Szenarien nutzen
Automate repeated work
Workflow automation
I need my agent to automate a repeated workflow across tools and files.
Manage repositories
GitHub automation
I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.
Operate local tools
Local desktop
I need my agent to operate local files and desktop apps in a repeatable workflow.
Workflow-Eignung
Zum vollständigen Workflow hinzufügen
Turn skills into distribution
Content growth agent
A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.
Find, compare, and synthesize
Research report agent
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Inspect, patch, and verify code
Coding review agent
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
Alternativen-Shortlist
Vor Installation vergleichen
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
Academic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
GPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
DeepResearch
Tongyi Deep Research, the Leading Open-source Deep Research Agent
Übersicht
--- name: kendex-issues description: > Steward the vanillagreencom/kendex issue queue (Linear team KEN is the poll surface; GitHub stays the PR/code surface) on a self-paced loop: watch open PRs, poll, triage (dedupe; close non-kendex issues and repost project-local ones to their owning repo; fix genuine defects in kendex's skills/agents/hooks/pi-extensions or the Rust CLI), run each fix through the orch skill, merge, propagate via kendex refresh, then reschedule. A thin wrapper: fix cycles belong to orch, PR mechanics to the github skill, PR monitoring to review-gate's pr-watch, Linear ops to the linear skill — this skill carries only the kendex-specific stewardship knowledge. Use when asked to monitor kendex's issues continuously or to run one fix-and-propagate cycle. ---
> **Never edit this file directly.** To make additions or modifications, edit the appropriate section in the managing project's kendex config — `kendex.toml` at the kendex project root, or `kendex-local.toml` in a source-catalog checkout. Then run `kendex refresh`.
# kendex Issue Steward
Keep the vanillagreencom/kendex issue queue clean and its consumers in sync: watch → poll → triage → fix → merge → propagate → repeat. One cycle per turn, then reschedule.
**This skill is a thin wrapper.** The mechanics live in four owning skills, and every cycle uses them instead of hand-rolling:
| Concern | Owning skill | Load when | |---------|--------------|-----------| | Fix cycle (prepare → delegate → review → submit → merge) | **orch** | every fix, before creating the worktree | | PR threads / replies / reviews / merges / CI logs | **github** | any PR mutation or read | | Watching open PRs across the loop | **review-gate** (`pr-watch.sh`) | first action, every cycle | | Linear reads and writes | **linear** | any Linear operation |
A session driven by this skill should load those naturally at each step and produce zero hand-rolled PR mechanics (raw `gh api` GraphQL where a `github.sh` command exists is the failure smell).
## Loop (one turn)
1. **PR watch first** — `GH_REPO=vanillagreencom/kendex .agents/skills/review-gate/scripts/pr-watch.sh`. Silence + exit 0 means no open PR needs you. Attention lines (threads-open, changes-requested, gate-stale, disarmed, awaiting-stale) → act through the github skill. NEVER hand-roll a PR monitor: pr-watch is the monitoring primitive for every open-PR concern except queue ejection, which it cannot see — after any gate-green, additionally check `isInMergeQueue` + `autoMergeRequest` (GraphQL; `gh pr view --json` lacks queue membership). Ejection is SILENT and discards the auto-merge arm: re-arm once; a second ejection means a flaky required suite — quarantine/escalate rather than re-arm loops. 2. **Poll Linear** — creation sync is ONE-WAY GitHub→Linear (owner reverted the 2026-08-09 two-way experiment), so Linear (team KEN) is the only complete queue: Linear-native issues never appear in `gh issue list`. Refresh the cache first, then read open issues: `linear.sh sync --reconcile`, then `linear.sh cache issues list --state "Triage,Backlog,Todo,In Progress" --max`. GH-synced issues arrive in **Triage** — omitting it hides the entire synced queue (bit the 2026-08-03 campaign: 14 pending issues invisible). Then cross-check GitHub: `gh issue list --repo vanillagreencom/kendex --state open` — cheap, and history earned it (2026-08-09: nine stray open GH issues over eight "empty" cycles while both a generate-on-merge automation and two-way creation sync were briefly on; both are off now, but pre-revert GH copies of Linear issues still exist and can stick open). An open GH issue whose Linear mirror is DONE is residue — close it with the diagnosis. An open GH issue with NO Linear mirror means the GH→Linear sync broke — triage it from GitHub directly and flag the sync. Zero attention lines and zero open on both surfaces → reschedule, stop. 3. **Triage** each issue; run the **Fix cycle** for each valid defect. Mutate on the issue's home surface: a GH-mirrored issue (its Linear body links the GitHub issue) is closed/commented on GitHub and sync updates Linear; a Linear-native issue (no GH link) is updated with the linear skill (`issues update` / `comments create` / `issues complete`). PRs, branches, and CI stay on GitHub either way. The PR body carries BOTH references when the issue has a GitHub mirror — `Closes KEN-<n>` for the tracker and `Closes #<n>` for the mirror — so GitHub links the PR on the issue and closes it with that reference at merge; a Linear-native issue gets `Closes KEN-<n>` alone. Never close a mirror by hand without naming the PR in the closing comment. 4. After any merge, **Propagate + Sync**. 5. **Schedule the next wakeup** (see Cadence). Stop only if the user asked.
## Triage (per issue)
Read body + comments, then classify:
- **Duplicate** → close, referencing the canonical issue. - **Not a kendex asset** → verify by grepping the kendex repo; ownership comes from the asset's own SKILL.md frontmatter (`source: kendex`), never from its install location. Close with a specific rationale. Project-local assets: repost to the owning repo, cross-link both ways, and notify that repo's overseer (tmux tab 1: `memsira:1`, `drovr:1`, `hyprtrade:1`) that the fix is theirs. The steward never fixes a consuming repo's own defect, however easy it looks. - **Speculative / one-project architecture** → close with reasoning; offer a scoped proposal only if it generalizes. - **Genuine kendex defect** (skills/, agents/, hooks/, pi-extensions/, cli/) → Fix cycle. A guidance gap is fixable even when the root trigger is a harness limitation; note the harness part upstream. - **Unfindable references** → check history (`git log -S '<name>' --all`) before assuming a rename or regression. A name that never existed in any version is a recorded typo: close with that evidence; never ship a compatibility shim for it. - **Empty-body issues** → don't guess the defect from the title. Comment asking for the concrete repro, note what your sweep found, leave open.
## Fix cycle (per valid defect) — load orch
The whole cycle is orch's domain: prepare → delegate → review → submit → merge. Load the orch skill and follow its workflows; do not re-implement any step here. kendex-specific parameters orch can't know:
- **Agent fit for delegation**: `generalist` (shell/docs/skills), `rust` (cli/), `iced` (iced-rs). Require tests and the relevant suite green (`bash skills/orch/tests/run-all.sh`, per-skill `tests/*.test.sh`, or `cd cli && cargo test`). - **Fix direction rides in every delegation** when the issue touches skills or tooling: determinism and tooling first — a deletion, a short-circuit, or a tool; added prose is the last resort. Skills are instructions, not explanations (AGENTS.md § Rules, "Engineer over patch"). - **Review the diff yourself** before submit — confirm the actual root cause, not a plausible guess. If a delegate stalls, inspect its worktree and nudge once. - A clearly-coupled real defect found along the way → file a tracking issue and fix it too. - Disjoint files → run issues in parallel; same file → sequence or bundle. - A flaked required check reporting "cannot be rerun" gets a fresh head (`git commit --amend --no-edit` + `push --force-with-lease` — only on never-shared heads; never amend a pushed commit others may have seen), never a force-merge past red.
PR reads and mutations inside the cycle (threads, replies, resolution, merge, CI logs) go through the github skill: `pr-data --actionable`, `post-reply`, `resolve-thread`, `pr-merge`, `ci-logs`, `await-mergeable`.
## Propagate + Sync
**BATCH trains (owner directive 2026-08-12): before opening consumer refresh PRs, scan the open queue (Todo/Triage/in-flight PRs) for items that touch VENDORED assets — if any would force another re-vendor soon, HOLD propagation until those land, then run ONE train carrying everything.** Per-merge trains cost a review round in every consumer each time; the fail-closed direction of vendored fixes makes the wait safe (consumers sit at most one train behind, failing loud, never open). Exceptions worth an immediate train anyway: a fix for a fail-OPEN defect in a consumer-enforced gate, or an owner ask.
**Only after the upstream change is MERGED and on `origin/main`.** A PR that is approved, queued, or mid-merge-queue has not propagated anything: merges can take a while, and refreshing a consumer from an unmerged or mid-queue state vendors bytes main may never contain. Before any consumer refresh, verify the source being read (the cache, or the recorded remote clone) sits at the `origin/main` tip that contains the merge commit — never propagate from a feature branch, a local unpushed main, or a stale cache.
After merges:
1. Sync local main (`checkout main && pull --ff-only`) and fast-forward the cache (`git -C ~/.kendex/cache/vanillagreencom_kendex pull --ff-only`) — some consumers source from the cache, and a stale one silently no-ops their refresh. Confirm the cache tip equals `origin/main` tip before refreshing any consumer. 2. Skill/agent/hook changes → `kendex refresh` (default all scopes) + `kendex verify` in each consumer that vendors the asset. Never narrow to `--scope project`: Pi packages install at global scope, so a project-scoped refresh leaves them drifted and only `kendex verify` catches it (bit the 2026-08-09 batch: pi-task-panel stayed at the old version through a project-scoped refresh in all five consumers). CLI-only changes need a binary rebuild instead, not a skill refresh. 3. Committing in a consumer: - Probe first: `git check-ignore -q <refreshed path>` → ignored means a local-only install mirror with nothing to commit. The probe is authoritative over any remembered per-repo list. - Stage only kendex paths (scoped `git add`, never `-A`). Revert no-op `.kendex-refreshed` churn and template-default churn on tracked `kendex.settings.toml`/`kendex.toml` unless a key change is the payload. - Merge-queue repos: branch → PR → `gh pr merge --auto` (no strategy flag). Force-merge (`--admin --squash`) is pre-authorized only for kendex-only refresh PRs with `kendex verify` green and the required CI check green or unaffected; it cannot override a failing required check — there, arm `--auto` and let the normal flow merge. Reply to and resolve any bot threads either way. - Confirm each push landed and the commit contains only kendex files. - **While propagation PRs are open, sweep each consumer with `GH_REPO=vanillagreencom/<repo> pr-watch.sh --heal` every cycle** — the writer's event triggers occasionally miss a bot review (observed 2026-08-11: hyprtrade-io#43 sat gate-pending ~10 min on a delivered review until the cron floor), and `--heal` converges a stale gate in seconds instead of waiting out the */15 cron (which itself can slip to ~25 min). Same sweep surfaces thread and disarm states on YOUR propagation PRs; other PRs' findings route to that repo's overseer. 4. **New skills don't propagate via refresh** — refresh reinstalls only locked items. A new skill needs a one-time `kendex add --skill <name> -y` per consumer (always `-y`; the interactive prompt dies in non-interactive shells), and the `kendex.toml` entry it writes committed through the repo's queue where that file is tracked. 5. **Review-bot findings on propagation PRs**: a real defect in vendored content is fixed upstream first — issue → fix → merge → refresh on the PR branch → resolve threads citing the fix. Stale-doc nits on the PR's own payload may be fixed directly on the branch. 6. **Capability changes need repo-side wiring.** A change consumers must recognize in their own CI or branch protection
Technische Details
- Version
- 1.0.0
- Lizenz
- MIT
- Letzte Aktualisierung
- 23. Aug. 2026
- Veröffentlicht
- 23. Aug. 2026
Entscheidungsübersicht
Fallback-Kandidat
recent repository activity
Audit
Installationsprüfung
Installations- und Adoptionsprüfung
- Sicherheit
- 80/100
- Wartung
- 100/100
- Installieren
- 92/100
Von Agent belegte Evidenz
Von Agent belegte Evidenz
Ergebnisberichte nach Resolve, Prüfung, Installation und einem begrenzten Lauf.
- Erfolgsrate
- —
- Letzter Fehler
- —
- Ergebnisse
- 0
- Ausgabequalität
- —
- Fehlgeschlagen
- 0
- Nicht relevant
- 0
- Installationen
- 0
- Durch Risiko blockiert
- 0
- Einrichtung erforderlich
- 0
- Produktion
- 0
Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten. Der erste Lauf kann Erfolg, Einrichtungsbedarf, Risikoblockaden, Fehler oder Irrelevanz über /api/agent/outcome melden.
Installieren
Zum Agent-Workflow hinzufügen
Kostenlos und Open Source. Bericht vor der Installation in Produktions-Agents prüfen.
Wachstums-Loop
Share-Kit
Szenariobasierter Entwurf für kendex-issues, bereit für einen manuellen X-Post.
kendex-issues: Steward the vanillagreencom/kendex issue queue (Linear team KEN is the poll surface; GitHub s... 63 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues?ref=x
Optionale Antwort mit Installationsbefehl
Listing + install path for kendex-issues: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues?ref=x Install: npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues
Quelle des Eintrags
Registry-indexiert
Dieser Eintrag wurde aus öffentlichen Quellen indexiert und ist erst nach Genehmigung eines Maintainer-Anspruchs offiziell.
- Ersteller
- vanillagreencom
- Quelle
- vanillagreencom/kendex
- Indexiert von
- OpenAgentSkill Community-Index
Die Zuordnung verlinkt auf das öffentliche Repository oder Creator-Profil. Creator können den Eintrag beanspruchen, um Eigentümersignale zu aktualisieren.
Diesen Skill beanspruchenEigentümeranspruch
Diesen Skill-Eintrag beanspruchen
Dieser Registry-indexiert-Eintrag wird vanillagreencom zugeschrieben, ist aber noch nicht offiziell markiert. Beanspruche ihn, um ein verifiziertes Eigentümersignal hinzuzufügen und künftige Launch-, Installations- und Audit-Updates vertrauenswürdiger zu machen.
Creator-Backlink-Kit
Evidenz-Badges in deine README einfügen
Zeige den kanonischen Eintrag, aktuelle Vertrauens- und Audit-Signale sowie echte Agent-Proven-Evidenz dort, wo Entwickler das Repository bewerten.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues)Autor
vanillagreencom
@vanillagreencom
Tags
Plattform-Fit
Gesundheitssignale
- GitHub-Stars
- 63
- Qualitätswert
- 36/100
- Letzter GitHub-Push
- 23. Aug. 2026
- Framework-Hinweise
- Unbekannt
- OpenAgentSkill-Aufrufe
- 1
- Installationskopien
- 0
- Externe Klicks
- 0
Community-Signal
Teile mit, ob dieser Skill für deinen Agent-Workflow nützlich ist. Zusammengefasstes Feedback verbessert das Ranking im Laufe der Zeit.
Vertrauen & Sicherheit
Nur Sandbox
- GitHub-Akzeptanz63 GitHub-StarsPrüfen
- Star-/Fork-Aktivität63 Stars und 23 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbarPrüfen
- Aktuelle WartungHeute gepushtBestanden
- LizenzklarheitMITBestanden
- README/SKILL.md-VollständigkeitMetadaten enthalten ausreichend Nutzungs- und Workflow-KontextBestanden
- Abhängigkeits-/Laufzeitrisikocommand execution surface, network or browser surfaceInfo
Ähnliche Skills
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
53.5K StarsAcademic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
38.4K StarsGPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
28.0K StarsDeepResearch
Tongyi Deep Research, the Leading Open-source Deep Research Agent
19.8K Stars