kendex-issues
Steward the vanillagreencom/kendex issue queue (Linear team KEN is the poll surface; GitHub stays the PR/code surface) on a self-paced loop: watch open PRs, poll, triage (dedupe; close non-kendex issues and repost project-local ones to their owning repo; fix genuine defects in ke
Supply asset profile
Research and knowledge work
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Scenario
Research agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Agent fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues
Maintenance
fresh
Pushed today
Risk
Needs review
Permission surface may require sandboxing
GitHub quality
63
65/100 Quality · 74/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
Permission surface may require sandboxing · Quality score needs review
Agent adoption scorecard
Trust, audit, and install readiness at a glance
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
PromisingUseful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Trust
Sandbox onlyUseful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
Audit
Needs reviewA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Human review before install
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Stars
63 GitHub stars
Repo activity
63 stars, 23 forks
Maintenance
Pushed today
License
MIT
Install
npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues
Install safety
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Strong README/SKILL.md context
Risk summary
Review before production
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- GitHub adoption: 63 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 63 stars, 23 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Install readiness
Install path available
- Install path is available
- Repository evidence is available
- License is declared
- No Agent Proven outcome evidence yet
Agent-readable metadata
Machine-readable decision data for this skill.
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
- Workflow automation workflows
- Claude Code teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
- Move data between tools
Suited agents
Install decision
- Command
- npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues
- Policy
- review
- Human review
- yes
Trust and risk
- Trust
- 66/100
- Audit
- 78/100
- Risk level
- Needs review
Outcome loop
- Endpoint
- /api/agent/outcome
- Event ID
- resolve
- Outcomes
- 5
Install command
npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issuesDo not use when
- teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
- high-compliance environments without internal security review
- No major risk signals from current metadata
- High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
Alternative
Last30days Skill
53.5K Stars
npx skills add mvanhorn/last30days-skill -g
Alternative
Academic Research Skills
38.4K Stars
npx skills add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Alternative
GPT Researcher
28.0K Stars
npx skills add assafelovic/gpt-researcher
Alternative
DeepResearch
19.8K Stars
npx skills add Alibaba-NLP/DeepResearch
Agent safety v2
50/100 · Avoid automatic install
Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
high
Shell or command execution
Skill metadata references terminal, CLI, shell, subprocess, or command execution workflows.
medium
Network access
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Filesystem access
Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.
- High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
Install targets
Install this skill in your agent workflow
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install vanillagreencom-kendex-issuesAgent resolve plan
Let an agent verify fit before installing.
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20kendex-issues%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20kendex-issues%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/install
Agent should check
- Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
- Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
- Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.
Copy prompt
Task: Use kendex-issues in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20kendex-issues%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/install
Install command: npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Give an agent the install path, not another directory page.
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=kendex-issues&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use kendex-issues for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/install, then install with: npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issuesRegistry metadata
Agent-readable profile for automatic skill selection.
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20kendex-issues%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Workflow automation
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code
Audit report
Needs review · 78/100
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Fallback candidate for Workflow automation
Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.
Role in stack
Fallback candidate
Primary fit
Workflow automation
Trust label
Prototype first
Install path
Command ready
Use when
- Workflow automation workflows
- Claude Code teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Evidence
- recent repository activity
- install command or GitHub repo available
- 65/100 quality profile
- 1 OpenAgentSkill engagement events
review first
- No major risk signals from current metadata
Implementation path
- 1Install it in a sandbox agent and run one Workflow automation task end to end.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
Trust profile
Sandbox only
Useful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
GitHub adoption
CHECK63 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
CHECK63 stars, 23 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASSPushed today
License clarity
PASSMIT
Good signals
- AI review approved
- Install path is available
- Repository evidence is available
- Recently maintained repository
- Install command has no obvious high-risk pattern
- Outcome loop is ready but needs first real agent run
Review before install
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- GitHub adoption: 63 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 63 stars, 23 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- No real agent outcome reports yet
- Human review required before unattended installation
Recommended action
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Quality profile
Promising candidate for agent workflows
Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Workflow fit
Use this skill in these scenarios
Automate repeated work
Workflow automation
I need my agent to automate a repeated workflow across tools and files.
Manage repositories
GitHub automation
I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.
Operate local tools
Local desktop
I need my agent to operate local files and desktop apps in a repeatable workflow.
Workflow fit
Add it to a complete workflow
Turn skills into distribution
Content growth agent
A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.
Find, compare, and synthesize
Research report agent
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Inspect, patch, and verify code
Coding review agent
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
Alternative shortlist
Compare before you install
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
Academic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
GPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
DeepResearch
Tongyi Deep Research, the Leading Open-source Deep Research Agent
Overview
--- name: kendex-issues description: > Steward the vanillagreencom/kendex issue queue (Linear team KEN is the poll surface; GitHub stays the PR/code surface) on a self-paced loop: watch open PRs, poll, triage (dedupe; close non-kendex issues and repost project-local ones to their owning repo; fix genuine defects in kendex's skills/agents/hooks/pi-extensions or the Rust CLI), run each fix through the orch skill, merge, propagate via kendex refresh, then reschedule. A thin wrapper: fix cycles belong to orch, PR mechanics to the github skill, PR monitoring to review-gate's pr-watch, Linear ops to the linear skill — this skill carries only the kendex-specific stewardship knowledge. Use when asked to monitor kendex's issues continuously or to run one fix-and-propagate cycle. ---
> **Never edit this file directly.** To make additions or modifications, edit the appropriate section in the managing project's kendex config — `kendex.toml` at the kendex project root, or `kendex-local.toml` in a source-catalog checkout. Then run `kendex refresh`.
# kendex Issue Steward
Keep the vanillagreencom/kendex issue queue clean and its consumers in sync: watch → poll → triage → fix → merge → propagate → repeat. One cycle per turn, then reschedule.
**This skill is a thin wrapper.** The mechanics live in four owning skills, and every cycle uses them instead of hand-rolling:
| Concern | Owning skill | Load when | |---------|--------------|-----------| | Fix cycle (prepare → delegate → review → submit → merge) | **orch** | every fix, before creating the worktree | | PR threads / replies / reviews / merges / CI logs | **github** | any PR mutation or read | | Watching open PRs across the loop | **review-gate** (`pr-watch.sh`) | first action, every cycle | | Linear reads and writes | **linear** | any Linear operation |
A session driven by this skill should load those naturally at each step and produce zero hand-rolled PR mechanics (raw `gh api` GraphQL where a `github.sh` command exists is the failure smell).
## Loop (one turn)
1. **PR watch first** — `GH_REPO=vanillagreencom/kendex .agents/skills/review-gate/scripts/pr-watch.sh`. Silence + exit 0 means no open PR needs you. Attention lines (threads-open, changes-requested, gate-stale, disarmed, awaiting-stale) → act through the github skill. NEVER hand-roll a PR monitor: pr-watch is the monitoring primitive for every open-PR concern except queue ejection, which it cannot see — after any gate-green, additionally check `isInMergeQueue` + `autoMergeRequest` (GraphQL; `gh pr view --json` lacks queue membership). Ejection is SILENT and discards the auto-merge arm: re-arm once; a second ejection means a flaky required suite — quarantine/escalate rather than re-arm loops. 2. **Poll Linear** — creation sync is ONE-WAY GitHub→Linear (owner reverted the 2026-08-09 two-way experiment), so Linear (team KEN) is the only complete queue: Linear-native issues never appear in `gh issue list`. Refresh the cache first, then read open issues: `linear.sh sync --reconcile`, then `linear.sh cache issues list --state "Triage,Backlog,Todo,In Progress" --max`. GH-synced issues arrive in **Triage** — omitting it hides the entire synced queue (bit the 2026-08-03 campaign: 14 pending issues invisible). Then cross-check GitHub: `gh issue list --repo vanillagreencom/kendex --state open` — cheap, and history earned it (2026-08-09: nine stray open GH issues over eight "empty" cycles while both a generate-on-merge automation and two-way creation sync were briefly on; both are off now, but pre-revert GH copies of Linear issues still exist and can stick open). An open GH issue whose Linear mirror is DONE is residue — close it with the diagnosis. An open GH issue with NO Linear mirror means the GH→Linear sync broke — triage it from GitHub directly and flag the sync. Zero attention lines and zero open on both surfaces → reschedule, stop. 3. **Triage** each issue; run the **Fix cycle** for each valid defect. Mutate on the issue's home surface: a GH-mirrored issue (its Linear body links the GitHub issue) is closed/commented on GitHub and sync updates Linear; a Linear-native issue (no GH link) is updated with the linear skill (`issues update` / `comments create` / `issues complete`). PRs, branches, and CI stay on GitHub either way. The PR body carries BOTH references when the issue has a GitHub mirror — `Closes KEN-<n>` for the tracker and `Closes #<n>` for the mirror — so GitHub links the PR on the issue and closes it with that reference at merge; a Linear-native issue gets `Closes KEN-<n>` alone. Never close a mirror by hand without naming the PR in the closing comment. 4. After any merge, **Propagate + Sync**. 5. **Schedule the next wakeup** (see Cadence). Stop only if the user asked.
## Triage (per issue)
Read body + comments, then classify:
- **Duplicate** → close, referencing the canonical issue. - **Not a kendex asset** → verify by grepping the kendex repo; ownership comes from the asset's own SKILL.md frontmatter (`source: kendex`), never from its install location. Close with a specific rationale. Project-local assets: repost to the owning repo, cross-link both ways, and notify that repo's overseer (tmux tab 1: `memsira:1`, `drovr:1`, `hyprtrade:1`) that the fix is theirs. The steward never fixes a consuming repo's own defect, however easy it looks. - **Speculative / one-project architecture** → close with reasoning; offer a scoped proposal only if it generalizes. - **Genuine kendex defect** (skills/, agents/, hooks/, pi-extensions/, cli/) → Fix cycle. A guidance gap is fixable even when the root trigger is a harness limitation; note the harness part upstream. - **Unfindable references** → check history (`git log -S '<name>' --all`) before assuming a rename or regression. A name that never existed in any version is a recorded typo: close with that evidence; never ship a compatibility shim for it. - **Empty-body issues** → don't guess the defect from the title. Comment asking for the concrete repro, note what your sweep found, leave open.
## Fix cycle (per valid defect) — load orch
The whole cycle is orch's domain: prepare → delegate → review → submit → merge. Load the orch skill and follow its workflows; do not re-implement any step here. kendex-specific parameters orch can't know:
- **Agent fit for delegation**: `generalist` (shell/docs/skills), `rust` (cli/), `iced` (iced-rs). Require tests and the relevant suite green (`bash skills/orch/tests/run-all.sh`, per-skill `tests/*.test.sh`, or `cd cli && cargo test`). - **Fix direction rides in every delegation** when the issue touches skills or tooling: determinism and tooling first — a deletion, a short-circuit, or a tool; added prose is the last resort. Skills are instructions, not explanations (AGENTS.md § Rules, "Engineer over patch"). - **Review the diff yourself** before submit — confirm the actual root cause, not a plausible guess. If a delegate stalls, inspect its worktree and nudge once. - A clearly-coupled real defect found along the way → file a tracking issue and fix it too. - Disjoint files → run issues in parallel; same file → sequence or bundle. - A flaked required check reporting "cannot be rerun" gets a fresh head (`git commit --amend --no-edit` + `push --force-with-lease` — only on never-shared heads; never amend a pushed commit others may have seen), never a force-merge past red.
PR reads and mutations inside the cycle (threads, replies, resolution, merge, CI logs) go through the github skill: `pr-data --actionable`, `post-reply`, `resolve-thread`, `pr-merge`, `ci-logs`, `await-mergeable`.
## Propagate + Sync
**BATCH trains (owner directive 2026-08-12): before opening consumer refresh PRs, scan the open queue (Todo/Triage/in-flight PRs) for items that touch VENDORED assets — if any would force another re-vendor soon, HOLD propagation until those land, then run ONE train carrying everything.** Per-merge trains cost a review round in every consumer each time; the fail-closed direction of vendored fixes makes the wait safe (consumers sit at most one train behind, failing loud, never open). Exceptions worth an immediate train anyway: a fix for a fail-OPEN defect in a consumer-enforced gate, or an owner ask.
**Only after the upstream change is MERGED and on `origin/main`.** A PR that is approved, queued, or mid-merge-queue has not propagated anything: merges can take a while, and refreshing a consumer from an unmerged or mid-queue state vendors bytes main may never contain. Before any consumer refresh, verify the source being read (the cache, or the recorded remote clone) sits at the `origin/main` tip that contains the merge commit — never propagate from a feature branch, a local unpushed main, or a stale cache.
After merges:
1. Sync local main (`checkout main && pull --ff-only`) and fast-forward the cache (`git -C ~/.kendex/cache/vanillagreencom_kendex pull --ff-only`) — some consumers source from the cache, and a stale one silently no-ops their refresh. Confirm the cache tip equals `origin/main` tip before refreshing any consumer. 2. Skill/agent/hook changes → `kendex refresh` (default all scopes) + `kendex verify` in each consumer that vendors the asset. Never narrow to `--scope project`: Pi packages install at global scope, so a project-scoped refresh leaves them drifted and only `kendex verify` catches it (bit the 2026-08-09 batch: pi-task-panel stayed at the old version through a project-scoped refresh in all five consumers). CLI-only changes need a binary rebuild instead, not a skill refresh. 3. Committing in a consumer: - Probe first: `git check-ignore -q <refreshed path>` → ignored means a local-only install mirror with nothing to commit. The probe is authoritative over any remembered per-repo list. - Stage only kendex paths (scoped `git add`, never `-A`). Revert no-op `.kendex-refreshed` churn and template-default churn on tracked `kendex.settings.toml`/`kendex.toml` unless a key change is the payload. - Merge-queue repos: branch → PR → `gh pr merge --auto` (no strategy flag). Force-merge (`--admin --squash`) is pre-authorized only for kendex-only refresh PRs with `kendex verify` green and the required CI check green or unaffected; it cannot override a failing required check — there, arm `--auto` and let the normal flow merge. Reply to and resolve any bot threads either way. - Confirm each push landed and the commit contains only kendex files. - **While propagation PRs are open, sweep each consumer with `GH_REPO=vanillagreencom/<repo> pr-watch.sh --heal` every cycle** — the writer's event triggers occasionally miss a bot review (observed 2026-08-11: hyprtrade-io#43 sat gate-pending ~10 min on a delivered review until the cron floor), and `--heal` converges a stale gate in seconds instead of waiting out the */15 cron (which itself can slip to ~25 min). Same sweep surfaces thread and disarm states on YOUR propagation PRs; other PRs' findings route to that repo's overseer. 4. **New skills don't propagate via refresh** — refresh reinstalls only locked items. A new skill needs a one-time `kendex add --skill <name> -y` per consumer (always `-y`; the interactive prompt dies in non-interactive shells), and the `kendex.toml` entry it writes committed through the repo's queue where that file is tracked. 5. **Review-bot findings on propagation PRs**: a real defect in vendored content is fixed upstream first — issue → fix → merge → refresh on the PR branch → resolve threads citing the fix. Stale-doc nits on the PR's own payload may be fixed directly on the branch. 6. **Capability changes need repo-side wiring.** A change consumers must recognize in their own CI or branch protection
Technical details
- Version
- 1.0.0
- License
- MIT
- Last updated
- Aug 23, 2026
- Published
- Aug 23, 2026
Decision snapshot
Fallback candidate
recent repository activity
Audit
Install review
Install and adoption review
- Security
- 80/100
- Maintenance
- 100/100
- Install
- 92/100
Agent-proven evidence
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
- Success rate
- —
- Recent failure
- —
- Outcomes
- 0
- Output quality
- —
- Failed
- 0
- Not relevant
- 0
- Installs
- 0
- Risk blocked
- 0
- Setup needed
- 0
- Production
- 0
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Add to agent workflow
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Share kit
Scenario-led draft for kendex-issues, ready for a manual X post.
kendex-issues: Steward the vanillagreencom/kendex issue queue (Linear team KEN is the poll surface; GitHub s... 63 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues?ref=x
Optional reply with install command
Listing + install path for kendex-issues: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues?ref=x Install: npx skills add vanillagreencom/kendex --skill kendex-issues
Listing source
Registry indexed
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
- Creator
- vanillagreencom
- Source
- vanillagreencom/kendex
- Indexed by
- OpenAgentSkill community index
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
Claim this skill listing
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to vanillagreencom but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Add the evidence badges to your README
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/vanillagreencom-kendex-issues)Author
vanillagreencom
@vanillagreencom
Tags
Platform fit
Health signals
- GitHub stars
- 63
- Quality score
- 36/100
- Last GitHub push
- Aug 23, 2026
- Framework hints
- Unknown
- OpenAgentSkill views
- 1
- Install copies
- 0
- Outbound clicks
- 0
Community signal
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Trust & safety
Sandbox only
- GitHub adoption63 GitHub starsCHECK
- Stars/forks activity63 stars, 23 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadataCHECK
- Recent maintenancePushed todayPASS
- License clarityMITPASS
- README/SKILL.md completenessMetadata includes enough usage and workflow contextPASS
- Dependency/runtime riskcommand execution surface, network or browser surfaceINFO
Related skills
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
53.5K StarsAcademic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
38.4K StarsGPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
28.0K StarsDeepResearch
Tongyi Deep Research, the Leading Open-source Deep Research Agent
19.8K Stars