ton-vulnerability-scanner Rapport d’audit.

Avertissements

• Dependency or permission surface needs review
• Permission surface may require sandboxing
• Potential broker, wallet, exchange, or real-money execution surface; sandbox and explicit approval are required
• Inconsistency between the description (mentions integer-as-boolean misuse, fake Jetton contracts, forward TON without gas checks) and the SKILL.md pattern summary (Missing Sender Check, Integer Overflow, Improper Gas Handling). The detailed patterns file includes 'Integer as Boolean' but not 'fake Jetton' or 'forward TON without gas checks' explicitly.
• The SKILL.md pattern summary lists three different patterns than the description, which may confuse users about what the skill actually checks.
• This skill may touch real-money trading, broker, wallet, or exchange operations; use only in a sandbox with explicit approval.
• Quality score needs review
• Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
• Dependency/runtime risk: command execution surface, credential or environment access
• Permission surface: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution

Méthode

This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.