delivery-discipline
Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, skill file, wave spec, README section, summary document, CHANGELOG entry, or any markdown file declaring completion or pass/fail status). Applies before the write happens, not after. Without
Profil aset
Riset dan pekerjaan pengetahuan
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Skenario
Agent riset
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Kecocokan Agent
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Cocok untuk Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, atau Agent khusus.
Pasang
Siap
npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
Pemeliharaan
Terkini
4 hari sejak push
Risiko
Perlu ditinjau
Permission surface may require sandboxing
Kualitas GitHub
16
59/100 Kualitas · 67/100 Kepercayaan
Tag cakupan
Catatan ulasan
Permission surface may require sandboxing · The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
Kartu adopsi Agent
Kepercayaan, audit, dan kesiapan pemasangan dalam sekali lihat
Skor ini menggabungkan metadata repositori publik, sinyal ulasan OpenAgentSkill, kebaruan pemeliharaan, dan kesiapan pemasangan. Ini adalah sinyal shortlist, bukan pengganti peninjauan manusia.
Kualitas
MenjanjikanUseful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Kepercayaan
Do not auto-installTrust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Audit
Perlu ditinjauTinjauan yang dapat dibaca mesin tentang kesiapan pemasangan, metadata keamanan, pemeliharaan, dan risiko adopsi.
Trust Score OpenAgentSkill v5
Tinjauan manusia sebelum pemasangan
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Star
16 star GitHub
Aktivitas repositori
16 star dan 0 fork
Pemeliharaan
4 hari sejak push
Lisensi
Apache-2.0
Pasang
npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
Keamanan pemasangan
Jalur pemasangan paket atau runtime standar
Cakupan izin
filesystem or document access, network or browser access
Hasil Agent
Belum ada data hasil Agent
Dokumentasi
Konteks README/SKILL.md kuat
Ringkasan risiko
Tinjau sebelum produksi
- The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: filesystem or document access, network or browser access
Kesiapan pemasangan
Jalur pemasangan tersedia
- Jalur pemasangan tersedia
- Bukti repositori tersedia
- Lisensi dinyatakan
- Belum ada bukti hasil Agent-Proven
Metadata yang dapat dibaca Agent
Data keputusan yang dapat dibaca mesin untuk skill ini.
Gunakan blok ini atau JSON tersemat untuk memutuskan apakah Agent perlu memasang skill ini, memilih alternatif, atau meminta tinjauan manusia terlebih dahulu.
Tugas yang sesuai
- Alur kerja Agent riset
- Tim Claude Code
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
- Sumber pencarian
Agent yang sesuai
Keputusan pemasangan
- Perintah
- npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
- Kebijakan
- Tinjau
- Tinjauan manusia
- Ya
Kepercayaan dan risiko
- Kepercayaan
- 59/100
- Audit
- 74/100
- Tingkat risiko
- Perlu ditinjau
Lingkar hasil
- Endpoint
- /api/agent/outcome
- ID event
- resolve
- Hasil
- 5
Perintah pemasangan
npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-disciplineJangan gunakan ketika
- Tim yang membutuhkan SLA dengan dukungan vendor
- production agents without a repository review
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
Skill alternatif
Last30days Skill
53.5K Star
npx skills add mvanhorn/last30days-skill -g
Skill alternatif
Academic Research Skills
38.4K Star
npx skills add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Skill alternatif
GPT Researcher
28.0K Star
npx skills add assafelovic/gpt-researcher
Skill alternatif
DeepResearch
19.8K Star
npx skills add Alibaba-NLP/DeepResearch
Keamanan Agent v2
50/100 · Hindari pemasangan otomatis
Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
Sedang
Browser automation
Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.
Sedang
Akses jaringan
Skill kemungkinan mengambil halaman jarak jauh, API, repositori, atau layanan eksternal.
Sedang
Akses sistem file
Skill dapat membaca atau menulis file proyek, dokumen, artefak yang dihasilkan, atau status workspace lokal.
Sedang
Akses database
Skill dapat memeriksa skema, mengkueri database, atau bekerja dengan penyimpanan persisten.
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
Target pemasangan
Pasang skill ini di alur Agent Anda
Gunakan endpoint publik untuk mengambil perintah, checklist keamanan, prompt target, dan tautan kanonis.
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install th3vib3coder-delivery-disciplineRencana resolusi Agent
Biarkan Agent memverifikasi kecocokan sebelum memasang.
API Resolve mengembalikan skill utama, alternatif, kebijakan keamanan, catatan audit, target pemasangan, dan prompt siap pakai.
Buka JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20delivery-discipline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Teks Resolve
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20delivery-discipline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Serah-terima pemasangan
/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install
Agent harus memeriksa
- Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
- Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
- Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.
Salin prompt
Task: Use delivery-discipline in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20delivery-discipline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install
Install command: npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Serah-terima Agent
Berikan jalur pemasangan kepada Agent, bukan direktori lain.
Gunakan endpoint publik untuk mengambil perintah, checklist keamanan, prompt target, dan tautan kanonis.
Serah-terima pemasangan
/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install
Format teks LLM
/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install?format=text
Cari alternatif
/api/skills/search?q=delivery-discipline&limit=3
Prompt Agent
Use delivery-discipline for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install, then install with: npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-disciplineMetadata Registry
Profil yang dapat dibaca Agent untuk pemilihan skill otomatis.
API Registry menyediakan sinyal keputusan, kepercayaan, audit, use case, dan pemasangan tanpa mengikis UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline
Teks LLM
/api/registry/manifest/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?format=text
Alias pemasangan
/api/registry/install/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline
Rekomendasikan
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20delivery-discipline%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Kecocokan Agent
Agent riset
Tag use case
Platform
Claude Code
Laporan audit
Perlu ditinjau · 74/100
Tinjauan yang dapat dibaca mesin tentang kesiapan pemasangan, metadata keamanan, pemeliharaan, dan risiko adopsi.
Panel keputusan Agent
Fallback candidate for Research agents
Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.
Peran di stack
Kandidat cadangan
Kecocokan utama
Agent riset
Label kepercayaan
Buat prototipe dulu
Jalur pemasangan
Perintah siap
Gunakan saat
- Alur kerja Agent riset
- Tim Claude Code
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Bukti
- recent repository activity
- install command or GitHub repo available
- profil kualitas 59/100
- 1 event interaksi OpenAgentSkill
tinjau dulu
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
Jalur implementasi
- 1Pasang di Agent sandbox dan jalankan satu tugas Agent riset dari awal hingga akhir.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
Profil kepercayaan
Do not auto-install
Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Adopsi GitHub
Perbaiki16 star GitHub
Aktivitas star/fork
Perbaiki16 star dan 0 fork; aktivitas issue tidak tersedia dalam metadata saat ini
Pemeliharaan terbaru
Lulus4 hari sejak push
Kejelasan lisensi
LulusApache-2.0
Sinyal positif
- Tinjauan AI disetujui
- Jalur pemasangan tersedia
- Bukti repositori tersedia
- Repositori yang baru dipelihara
- Perintah pemasangan tidak memiliki pola berisiko tinggi yang jelas
- Loop hasil siap tetapi membutuhkan eksekusi Agent nyata pertama
Tinjau sebelum memasang
- The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: filesystem or document access, network or browser access
- GitHub adoption: 16 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 16 stars, 0 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- Permission surface: filesystem or document access, network or browser access
- Belum ada laporan hasil Agent nyata
- Tinjauan manusia diperlukan sebelum pemasangan tanpa pengawasan
Tindakan yang disarankan
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Profil kualitas
Menjanjikan kandidat untuk alur kerja Agent
Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Kecocokan alur kerja
Gunakan skill ini pada skenario berikut
Investigate faster
Research agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Parse messy files
Document processing
I need my agent to read PDFs, extract tables, and turn documents into structured data.
Manage repositories
GitHub automation
I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.
Kecocokan alur kerja
Tambahkan ke alur kerja lengkap
Find, compare, and synthesize
Research report agent
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Ingest, retrieve, and cite
RAG knowledge base
A workflow for document-heavy agents that ingest files, create searchable knowledge, retrieve relevant context, and answer with grounded sources.
Operate and verify web apps
Browser QA agent
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Daftar alternatif
Bandingkan sebelum memasang
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
Academic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
GPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
DeepResearch
Tongyi Deep Research, the Leading Open-source Deep Research Agent
Ringkasan
--- name: delivery-discipline description: Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, skill file, wave spec, README section, summary document, CHANGELOG entry, or any markdown file declaring completion or pass/fail status). Applies before the write happens, not after. Without this discipline, agents ship 60% deliverables and declare closure prematurely. ---
<!-- delivery-discipline: exempt --> <!-- This file DEFINES the delivery-discipline. It is documentation about the discipline, not a closeout declaration subject to it. The exemption is legitimate and is logged as `delivery_discipline_exemption_used` by Wave 4 so exemption usage remains auditable. Do not remove this comment unless you are replacing SKILL.md with a proper attestation block. -->
# Delivery Discipline
## Overview
**Agents trained to optimize for completion will ship 60% of what's needed and declare the work closed.** The pattern is reproducible. Scientific truth is protected by the existing hooks (confounder harness, R2 review gate, Salvagente Rule). **Delivery completeness is not.** This skill closes that gap.
You (the agent) must apply the 4 rules below BEFORE writing any deliverable that will declare anything CLOSED, PASS, DONE, SHIPPED, COMPLETE, FINALIZED, or READY in a commit-relevant markdown file. A PreToolUse hook will block your write if you skip the attestation block defined below. A CI validator will catch bypasses.
## When To Use
**Activate before writing:** - Any `*closeout*.md`, `*status*.md`, `*summary*.md`, `*verdict*.md` - Any `phase*-*.md`, `wave*-*.md`, `sprint*-*.md` - Any `skill*.md`, SKILL.md updates - Any `README.md` or `CHANGELOG.md` entry that declares a version/release/completion - Any document declaring a gate PASS, a phase CLOSED, a release SHIPPED
**Do NOT activate for:** - Normal prose that mentions "done" in casual context ("I closed the file") - Code files (`.js`, `.py`, etc.) — the skill governs deliverables, not source - Exploratory notes that do NOT declare closure
## The 4 Non-Negotiable Rules
### Rule 1 — Surface mapping before writing
Before you write a deliverable that will declare anything CLOSED / PASS / DONE / SHIPPED / COMPLETE, you MUST have a mechanical inventory of what should be covered.
- If the inventory was produced by a subagent (Explore, general-purpose, etc.), you **verify at least the critical claims directly** before trusting it. Read the actual files the subagent describes. API signatures, file paths, function exports get verified first-hand, not assumed. - Optimistic sampling is failure. "I covered the main cases" means you haven't looked at the edge cases.
### Rule 2 — Explicit scope cuts
Every deliverable MUST declare, in its own body, what was LEFT OUT and why.
- A scope-cut list of 0 items is suspicious by default. If your solution covers "everything", you probably haven't looked hard enough. - Force yourself to name at least one cut. If you genuinely cannot find one, state that explicitly and pass self-review (Rule 4) first.
### Rule 3 — Completeness proof by enumeration
When you declare closure, list the concrete items verified. Not "all tests pass" but "26 items in the surface map, 22 verified directly with Read tool, 4 delegated to subagent report and cross-checked". Enumeration beats summary.
### Rule 4 — Adversarial self-review before closure
Before you write "CLOSED" / "PASS" / "DONE", ask yourself: **"What would a skeptical reviewer attack?"** List at least 3 findings. If you find 0, assume you haven't looked hard enough and go back to Rule 1.
## The Attestation Block (MUST appear in every deliverable declaring closure)
Format: a `## Delivery Attestation` section (case-insensitive, `##` or `###`) containing a fenced `json` block. The hook extracts the first fenced json block under that heading and validates it against `skills/vibe/assets/schemas/delivery-attestation.schema.json`.
````markdown ## Delivery Attestation
```json { "covered": [ "Concrete item 1 verified (not a summary)", "Concrete item 2 verified", "..." ], "scope_cuts": [ { "item": "Thing left out of this deliverable", "reason": "Why it is outside this deliverable (not 'no time')" } ], "self_review_findings": [ "Adversarial finding 1 (a skeptical reviewer would attack X because...)", "Adversarial finding 2", "Adversarial finding 3" ], "external_review_status": "pending" } ``` ````
**Field semantics:** - `covered`: array of strings, ≥1 item, each ≥3 chars. Concrete items, not summaries. - `scope_cuts`: array of `{item, reason}` objects. Empty array allowed but suspicious. - `self_review_findings`: array of strings, **≥3 items required**, each ≥20 chars. - `external_review_status`: enum `"pending" | "cleared" | "blocked"`.
## Quick Reference
| Intent | Action | |--------|--------| | Writing a phase closeout | Include the `## Delivery Attestation` section with filled JSON block | | Writing a skill file | Include attestation even if short skill — the skill itself is a deliverable | | Updating CHANGELOG | Attestation required when declaring a release / version | | Updating README status section | Attestation required when declaring pass/fail or coverage | | Exempting a file legitimately | Add `<!-- delivery-discipline: exempt -->` comment near the top. Wave 4 will log this as a `delivery_discipline_exemption_used` governance event; frequent use becomes an audit target at that point. |
## Rationalization Table — DO NOT fall for these
| Excuse | Counter | |--------|---------| | "This is just a small doc, discipline is overkill" | Small docs are where premature closure starts. The attestation takes 60 seconds. | | "I don't have time for scope cuts" | The cut list takes 30 seconds. Skipping it costs 30 minutes when user pushes back. | | "Self-review feels self-indulgent" | It's the cheap version of R2. Skip it and you pay in R2 corrections later. | | "The block only triggers on 'CLOSED' — I'll say 'finalized' instead" | The regex covers synonyms: CLOSED, DONE, PASS/PASSED, SHIPPED, COMPLETE/COMPLETED, FINALIZED, READY, and the failure/partial forms FAIL/FAILED, BLOCKED, PARTIAL, FALSE-POSITIVE, and the review-verdict forms ACCEPTED, REJECTED. Wave 4 will log attempted evasions as governance events; until then, the block itself is the sanction. | | "I'll put my closure claim below the legacy-boundary marker in CHANGELOG/README" | The legacy-boundary marker grandfathers pre-Phase-8 content ONLY while its `hash=<sha256-hex>` attribute matches the LF-normalized below-marker content. Appending any new closure below the marker changes the hash, the boundary becomes invalid, and the whole file is re-subjected to enforcement. To legitimately re-bless the legacy region you must update the hash in a reviewed commit (git diff shows both the new content and the hash change side-by-side). Bare markers without `hash=` are rejected outright. | | "I verified with a subagent, that's enough" | Subagents sample too. Spot-check critical items with Read tool before trusting. | | "External review status: cleared" (without actually running review) | Lying about `external_review_status` is still traceable — when R2 / R3 runs later, it produces `external-review-record` entries that do NOT match, and the inconsistency surfaces at the next audit. The Wave 3 CI validator checks schema shape (enum + required fields); full governance-event cross-referencing is Phase 8.1 scope, not Wave 3. Don't rely on "nobody will notice" — the record trail is public. | | "I'll add the attestation at the end, after writing everything" | Writing the attestation FORCES you to enumerate. Skipping that step defeats the whole point. Write it as you go, not as an afterthought. |
## Red Flags — STOP and apply the skill
- About to write a deliverable containing "CLOSED", "PASS", "DONE", "SHIPPED", "COMPLETE", or synonyms in declarative context - About to mark a TodoWrite task `completed` after a large deliverable - About to stop the session with a "here's what I did" summary - About to commit a markdown file whose name matches `*closeout*`, `*status*`, `*summary*`, `*verdict*`, `*phase*`, `*wave*`, `*skill*`, `readme`, `changelog` - About to declare a release or version bump
**All of these mean: stop, map the surface, declare scope cuts, write the attestation block, then continue.**
## Common Mistakes
- **Fake attestation**: filling fields with generic strings ("looked at everything"). Wave 2 hook enforces minLength + minItems on the attestation block at write time. Wave 3 CI validator will re-enforce schema shape on tracked markdown at commit time. Full audit-log cross-reference (checking whether `external_review_status: "cleared"` matches a real R2/R3 review record in `governance_events`) is Phase 8.1 scope, not Wave 3. Don't assume the current enforcement catches semantic lies — it catches structural ones. - **Skipping scope_cuts because "nothing was cut"**: if you genuinely cut nothing, you probably didn't look hard enough. Use the self-review step to find a scope cut. - **Putting attestation in a comment or footer**: it must be in a `## Delivery Attestation` section with a fenced json block. Other placements won't be parsed. - **Writing attestation as YAML or markdown list**: must be fenced `json` block. Other formats fail schema validation. - **Adding exemption comment to bypass**: exemptions ARE allowed and don't block. Wave 4 will log each use as a `delivery_discipline_exemption_used` governance event; frequent use becomes an audit target once that logging is live. Strict mode (`VIBE_SCIENCE_STRICT=1`) additionally refuses to allow any bypass path (including exemption) when the governance DB cannot be opened or when the `governance_events` table is missing — i.e. when the Wave 4 audit trail would silently drop records. The strict-mode probe actually opens the DB and checks the schema, not just whether the module imports.
## Why This Exists
vibe-science v7.0 protects scientific truth (confounder harness, R2 gate, Salvagente Rule). It did NOT protect delivery completeness — agents could still ship 60% skills, declare phases closed prematurely, sample the surface optimistically.
The pattern was observed repeatedly: Phase 6.1 "closed" but re-retracted when fresh-eyes review found P1s. Phase 7 Wave 1 shipped at 60%. The initial Phase 8 skill was missing 40% of the surface.
This skill (Wave 1) + the PreToolUse hook (Wave 2) + the CI validator (Wave 3) + the governance event log (Wave 4) **together force the same discipline on delivery that the existing hooks force on scientific claims**. Wave 2 enforcement is active today: a hook that blocks the write, not a review that catches the failure after the fact. Waves 3-4 add CI-time scanning and audit-trail logging so bypass attempts become tracked events rather than silent drift.
## When in Doubt
Apply the rules. The cost is 60-120 seconds per deliverable. The cost of skipping is the "user pushes back → retract → patch" cycle we've seen multiple times.
Default: write the attestation. It's cheaper than the correction loop.
Detail teknis
- Versi
- 1.0.0
- Lisensi
- Apache-2.0
- Pembaruan terakhir
- 20 Agu 2026
- Diterbitkan
- 20 Agu 2026
Ringkasan keputusan
Kandidat cadangan
recent repository activity
Audit
Tinjauan pemasangan
Tinjauan pemasangan dan adopsi
- Keamanan
- 77/100
- Pemeliharaan
- 100/100
- Pasang
- 92/100
Bukti tervalidasi Agent
Bukti tervalidasi Agent
Laporan hasil setelah resolve, tinjau, pasang, dan satu eksekusi terbatas.
- Tingkat sukses
- —
- Kegagalan terbaru
- —
- Hasil
- 0
- Kualitas output
- —
- Gagal
- 0
- Tidak relevan
- 0
- Pemasangan
- 0
- Diblokir risiko
- 0
- Perlu penyiapan
- 0
- Produksi
- 0
Belum ada data hasil Agent. Eksekusi pertama dapat melaporkan keberhasilan, kebutuhan setup, blok risiko, kegagalan, atau tidak relevan melalui /api/agent/outcome.
Pasang
Tambahkan ke alur Agent
Gratis dan sumber terbuka. Tinjau laporan sebelum memasang pada Agent produksi.
Siklus pertumbuhan
Kit berbagi
Draf berbasis skenario untuk delivery-discipline, siap untuk posting manual di X.
delivery-discipline: Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, ski... 16 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?ref=x
Balasan opsional dengan perintah pemasangan
Listing + install path for delivery-discipline: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?ref=x Install: npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
Sumber listing
Diindeks Registry
Listing ini diindeks dari sumber publik dan belum ditandai resmi hingga klaim pemelihara disetujui.
- Kreator
- th3vib3coder
- Diindeks oleh
- Indeks komunitas OpenAgentSkill
Atribusi menautkan ke repositori publik atau profil kreator. Kreator dapat mengklaim listing untuk memperbarui sinyal kepemilikan.
Klaim skill iniKlaim pemilik
Klaim listing skill ini
Listing Diindeks Registry ini dikaitkan dengan th3vib3coder, tetapi belum ditandai resmi. Klaim untuk menambahkan sinyal pemilik terverifikasi dan membuat pembaruan peluncuran, pemasangan, serta audit berikutnya lebih tepercaya.
Kit backlink kreator
Tambahkan badge bukti ke README Anda
Tampilkan listing kanonis, sinyal kepercayaan dan audit saat ini, serta bukti Agent-Proven nyata di tempat pengembang mengevaluasi repositori.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline)Penulis
th3vib3coder
@th3vib3coder
Tag
Kecocokan platform
Sinyal kesehatan
- Star GitHub
- 16
- Skor kualitas
- 32/100
- Push GitHub terakhir
- 19 Agu 2026
- Petunjuk framework
- Tidak diketahui
- Tampilan OpenAgentSkill
- 1
- Salinan pemasangan
- 0
- Klik keluar
- 0
Sinyal komunitas
Bagikan apakah skill ini bermanfaat untuk alur kerja Agent Anda. Masukan gabungan meningkatkan peringkat dari waktu ke waktu.
Kepercayaan & keamanan
Do not auto-install
- Adopsi GitHub16 star GitHubPerbaiki
- Aktivitas star/fork16 star dan 0 fork; aktivitas issue tidak tersedia dalam metadata saat iniPerbaiki
- Pemeliharaan terbaru4 hari sejak pushLulus
- Kejelasan lisensiApache-2.0Lulus
- Kelengkapan README/SKILL.mdMetadata memuat konteks penggunaan dan alur kerja yang cukupLulus
- Risiko dependensi/runtimenetwork or browser surfaceLulus
Skill terkait
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
53.5K StarAcademic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
38.4K StarGPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
28.0K StarDeepResearch
Tongyi Deep Research, the Leading Open-source Deep Research Agent
19.8K Star