delivery-discipline

Revisar · 59
Indexado en Registry

Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, skill file, wave spec, README section, summary document, CHANGELOG entry, or any markdown file declaring completion or pass/fail status). Applies before the write happens, not after. Without

Verified installs0
Estrellas16
Versión1.0.0
Calidad59/100 · Prometedor
Confianza59/100 · Do not auto-install
Auditoría74/100 · Requiere revisión

Perfil del activo

Investigación y trabajo de conocimiento

Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.

Ver categoría

Escenario

Agents de investigación

I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.

Afinidad con Agent

Claude Code + CLI + Codex

Funciona con Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI o Agents personalizados.

Instalar

Listo

npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline

Mantenimiento

Actual

3 días desde el último push

Riesgo

Requiere revisión

Permission surface may require sandboxing

Calidad de GitHub

16

59/100 Calidad · 67/100 Confianza

Etiquetas de cobertura

InvestigaciónAgents de investigaciónagent-skill

Notas de revisión

Permission surface may require sandboxing · The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.

Tarjeta de adopción del Agent

Confianza, auditoría y preparación de instalación de un vistazo

Estas puntuaciones combinan metadatos públicos del repositorio, señales de revisión de OpenAgentSkill, actualidad de mantenimiento y preparación de instalación. Sirven para preseleccionar; no sustituyen la revisión humana.

Calidad

Prometedor
59

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

Confianza

Do not auto-install
59

Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.

Auditoría

Requiere revisión
74

Revisión legible por máquina de la preparación de instalación, los metadatos de seguridad, el mantenimiento y el riesgo de adopción.

Trust Score de OpenAgentSkill v5

Revisión humana antes de instalar

Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLI

Estrellas

16 estrellas de GitHub

Actividad del repositorio

16 estrellas y 0 forks

Mantenimiento

3 días desde el último push

Licencia

Apache-2.0

Instalar

npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline

Seguridad de instalación

Ruta estándar de paquete o instalación en tiempo de ejecución

Superficie de permisos

filesystem or document access, network or browser access

Resultados del Agent

Aún no hay datos de resultados del Agent

Documentación

Contexto sólido de README/SKILL.md

Resumen de riesgo

Revisar antes de producción

  • The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: filesystem or document access, network or browser access

Preparación de instalación

Ruta de instalación disponible

  • La ruta de instalación está disponible
  • La evidencia del repositorio está disponible
  • La licencia está declarada
  • Aún no hay evidencia de resultados Agent-Proven

Metadatos legibles por Agent

Datos de decisión legibles por máquina para este skill.

Usa este bloque o el JSON integrado para decidir si un Agent debe instalar este skill, elegir una alternativa o pedir revisión humana primero.

Abrir JSON

Tareas adecuadas

  • Flujos de Agents de investigación
  • Equipos de Claude Code
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects
  • Fuentes de búsqueda

Agents adecuados

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLICLI

Decisión de instalación

Comando
npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
Política
Revisar
Revisión humana

Confianza y riesgo

Confianza
59/100
Auditoría
74/100
Nivel de riesgo
Requiere revisión

Ciclo de resultados

Endpoint
/api/agent/outcome
ID del evento
resolve
Resultados
5

Comando de instalación

npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline

No usar cuando

  • Equipos que necesitan un SLA con soporte del proveedor
  • production agents without a repository review
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
  • No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet

Seguridad de Agent v2

50/100 · Evitar instalación automática

ExperimentalRevisar

Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.

Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.

Resolver con API

Medio

Browser automation

Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.

Medio

Acceso a red

El skill probablemente consulta páginas remotas, API, repositorios o servicios externos.

Medio

Acceso al sistema de archivos

El skill puede leer o escribir archivos de proyecto, documentos, artefactos generados o estado local.

Medio

Acceso a base de datos

El skill puede inspeccionar esquemas, consultar bases de datos o trabajar con almacenes persistentes.

  • Permission surface may require sandboxing

Destinos de instalación

Instala este skill en tu flujo de Agent

Usa el endpoint público para obtener el comando, la lista de seguridad, prompts y enlaces canónicos.

skill install

OpenAgentSkill CLI

Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.

$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline

Plan de resolución de Agent

Deja que un Agent valide el ajuste antes de instalar.

La API Resolve devuelve la skill elegida, alternativas, política de seguridad, notas de auditoría, destino de instalación y un prompt listo para usar.

Abrir plan de texto

Agent debe revisar

  • Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
  • Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
  • Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.

Copiar prompt

Task: Use delivery-discipline in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20delivery-discipline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install
Install command: npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.

Traspaso de Agent

Da al Agent la ruta de instalación, no otro directorio.

Usa el endpoint público para obtener el comando, la lista de seguridad, prompts y enlaces canónicos.

Abrir API de instalación

Prompt de Agent

Use delivery-discipline for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install, then install with: npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline

Metadatos del Registry

Perfil legible por Agent para seleccionar skills automáticamente.

La API Registry expone señales de decisión, confianza, auditoría, casos de uso e instalación sin raspar la interfaz.

Abrir Manifest

Afinidad con Agent

58/100

Agents de investigación

Plataformas

Claude Code

Informe de auditoría

Requiere revisión · 74/100

Revisión legible por máquina de la preparación de instalación, los metadatos de seguridad, el mantenimiento y el riesgo de adopción.

Ver informe de auditoríaVer informe de evaluación

Panel de decisión de Agent

Fallback candidate for Research agents

Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.

58
Preparación
Prototipo
Etapa

Rol en la pila

Candidata de respaldo

Ajuste principal

Agents de investigación

Etiqueta de confianza

Prototipar primero

Ruta de instalación

Comando listo

Úsalo cuando

  • Flujos de Agents de investigación
  • Equipos de Claude Code
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects

Evidencia

  • recent repository activity
  • install command or GitHub repo available
  • perfil de calidad 59/100

revisar primero

  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
  • No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet

Ruta de implementación

  1. 1Instálalo en un Agent de sandbox y ejecuta una tarea de Agents de investigación de principio a fin.
  2. 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
  3. 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.

Perfil de confianza

Do not auto-install

Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.

59
Trust Score de OpenAgentSkill

Adopción en GitHub

Corregir

16 estrellas de GitHub

Actividad de stars/forks

Corregir

16 estrellas y 0 forks; la actividad de issues no está disponible en los metadatos actuales

Mantenimiento reciente

Aprobado

3 días desde el último push

Claridad de licencia

Aprobado

Apache-2.0

Señales positivas

  • Revisión de IA aprobada
  • La ruta de instalación está disponible
  • La evidencia del repositorio está disponible
  • Repositorio mantenido recientemente
  • El comando de instalación no muestra un patrón de alto riesgo evidente
  • El ciclo de resultados está listo, pero necesita la primera ejecución real de Agent

Revisar antes de instalar

  • The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: filesystem or document access, network or browser access
  • GitHub adoption: 16 GitHub stars
  • Stars/forks activity: 16 stars, 0 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
  • Permission surface: filesystem or document access, network or browser access
  • Aún no hay informes reales de resultados del Agent
  • Se requiere revisión humana antes de una instalación desatendida

Acción recomendada

Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.

Perfil de calidad

Prometedor candidato para flujos de Agent

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

59
Estrellas de GitHub
16
Actualidad
hace 3 días
Listo para instalar
Licencia
Apache-2.0
Revisar antes de instalar: Low GitHub adoption signal · The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.

Ajuste de flujo

Usa esta skill en estos escenarios

Ajuste de flujo

Añadir a un flujo completo

Lista de alternativas

Compara antes de instalar

Similar skills that may fit this task.

Comparar todo

Resumen

--- name: delivery-discipline description: Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, skill file, wave spec, README section, summary document, CHANGELOG entry, or any markdown file declaring completion or pass/fail status). Applies before the write happens, not after. Without this discipline, agents ship 60% deliverables and declare closure prematurely. ---

<!-- delivery-discipline: exempt --> <!-- This file DEFINES the delivery-discipline. It is documentation about the discipline, not a closeout declaration subject to it. The exemption is legitimate and is logged as `delivery_discipline_exemption_used` by Wave 4 so exemption usage remains auditable. Do not remove this comment unless you are replacing SKILL.md with a proper attestation block. -->

# Delivery Discipline

## Overview

**Agents trained to optimize for completion will ship 60% of what's needed and declare the work closed.** The pattern is reproducible. Scientific truth is protected by the existing hooks (confounder harness, R2 review gate, Salvagente Rule). **Delivery completeness is not.** This skill closes that gap.

You (the agent) must apply the 4 rules below BEFORE writing any deliverable that will declare anything CLOSED, PASS, DONE, SHIPPED, COMPLETE, FINALIZED, or READY in a commit-relevant markdown file. A PreToolUse hook will block your write if you skip the attestation block defined below. A CI validator will catch bypasses.

## When To Use

**Activate before writing:** - Any `*closeout*.md`, `*status*.md`, `*summary*.md`, `*verdict*.md` - Any `phase*-*.md`, `wave*-*.md`, `sprint*-*.md` - Any `skill*.md`, SKILL.md updates - Any `README.md` or `CHANGELOG.md` entry that declares a version/release/completion - Any document declaring a gate PASS, a phase CLOSED, a release SHIPPED

**Do NOT activate for:** - Normal prose that mentions "done" in casual context ("I closed the file") - Code files (`.js`, `.py`, etc.) — the skill governs deliverables, not source - Exploratory notes that do NOT declare closure

## The 4 Non-Negotiable Rules

### Rule 1 — Surface mapping before writing

Before you write a deliverable that will declare anything CLOSED / PASS / DONE / SHIPPED / COMPLETE, you MUST have a mechanical inventory of what should be covered.

- If the inventory was produced by a subagent (Explore, general-purpose, etc.), you **verify at least the critical claims directly** before trusting it. Read the actual files the subagent describes. API signatures, file paths, function exports get verified first-hand, not assumed. - Optimistic sampling is failure. "I covered the main cases" means you haven't looked at the edge cases.

### Rule 2 — Explicit scope cuts

Every deliverable MUST declare, in its own body, what was LEFT OUT and why.

- A scope-cut list of 0 items is suspicious by default. If your solution covers "everything", you probably haven't looked hard enough. - Force yourself to name at least one cut. If you genuinely cannot find one, state that explicitly and pass self-review (Rule 4) first.

### Rule 3 — Completeness proof by enumeration

When you declare closure, list the concrete items verified. Not "all tests pass" but "26 items in the surface map, 22 verified directly with Read tool, 4 delegated to subagent report and cross-checked". Enumeration beats summary.

### Rule 4 — Adversarial self-review before closure

Before you write "CLOSED" / "PASS" / "DONE", ask yourself: **"What would a skeptical reviewer attack?"** List at least 3 findings. If you find 0, assume you haven't looked hard enough and go back to Rule 1.

## The Attestation Block (MUST appear in every deliverable declaring closure)

Format: a `## Delivery Attestation` section (case-insensitive, `##` or `###`) containing a fenced `json` block. The hook extracts the first fenced json block under that heading and validates it against `skills/vibe/assets/schemas/delivery-attestation.schema.json`.

````markdown ## Delivery Attestation

```json { "covered": [ "Concrete item 1 verified (not a summary)", "Concrete item 2 verified", "..." ], "scope_cuts": [ { "item": "Thing left out of this deliverable", "reason": "Why it is outside this deliverable (not 'no time')" } ], "self_review_findings": [ "Adversarial finding 1 (a skeptical reviewer would attack X because...)", "Adversarial finding 2", "Adversarial finding 3" ], "external_review_status": "pending" } ``` ````

**Field semantics:** - `covered`: array of strings, ≥1 item, each ≥3 chars. Concrete items, not summaries. - `scope_cuts`: array of `{item, reason}` objects. Empty array allowed but suspicious. - `self_review_findings`: array of strings, **≥3 items required**, each ≥20 chars. - `external_review_status`: enum `"pending" | "cleared" | "blocked"`.

## Quick Reference

| Intent | Action | |--------|--------| | Writing a phase closeout | Include the `## Delivery Attestation` section with filled JSON block | | Writing a skill file | Include attestation even if short skill — the skill itself is a deliverable | | Updating CHANGELOG | Attestation required when declaring a release / version | | Updating README status section | Attestation required when declaring pass/fail or coverage | | Exempting a file legitimately | Add `<!-- delivery-discipline: exempt -->` comment near the top. Wave 4 will log this as a `delivery_discipline_exemption_used` governance event; frequent use becomes an audit target at that point. |

## Rationalization Table — DO NOT fall for these

| Excuse | Counter | |--------|---------| | "This is just a small doc, discipline is overkill" | Small docs are where premature closure starts. The attestation takes 60 seconds. | | "I don't have time for scope cuts" | The cut list takes 30 seconds. Skipping it costs 30 minutes when user pushes back. | | "Self-review feels self-indulgent" | It's the cheap version of R2. Skip it and you pay in R2 corrections later. | | "The block only triggers on 'CLOSED' — I'll say 'finalized' instead" | The regex covers synonyms: CLOSED, DONE, PASS/PASSED, SHIPPED, COMPLETE/COMPLETED, FINALIZED, READY, and the failure/partial forms FAIL/FAILED, BLOCKED, PARTIAL, FALSE-POSITIVE, and the review-verdict forms ACCEPTED, REJECTED. Wave 4 will log attempted evasions as governance events; until then, the block itself is the sanction. | | "I'll put my closure claim below the legacy-boundary marker in CHANGELOG/README" | The legacy-boundary marker grandfathers pre-Phase-8 content ONLY while its `hash=<sha256-hex>` attribute matches the LF-normalized below-marker content. Appending any new closure below the marker changes the hash, the boundary becomes invalid, and the whole file is re-subjected to enforcement. To legitimately re-bless the legacy region you must update the hash in a reviewed commit (git diff shows both the new content and the hash change side-by-side). Bare markers without `hash=` are rejected outright. | | "I verified with a subagent, that's enough" | Subagents sample too. Spot-check critical items with Read tool before trusting. | | "External review status: cleared" (without actually running review) | Lying about `external_review_status` is still traceable — when R2 / R3 runs later, it produces `external-review-record` entries that do NOT match, and the inconsistency surfaces at the next audit. The Wave 3 CI validator checks schema shape (enum + required fields); full governance-event cross-referencing is Phase 8.1 scope, not Wave 3. Don't rely on "nobody will notice" — the record trail is public. | | "I'll add the attestation at the end, after writing everything" | Writing the attestation FORCES you to enumerate. Skipping that step defeats the whole point. Write it as you go, not as an afterthought. |

## Red Flags — STOP and apply the skill

- About to write a deliverable containing "CLOSED", "PASS", "DONE", "SHIPPED", "COMPLETE", or synonyms in declarative context - About to mark a TodoWrite task `completed` after a large deliverable - About to stop the session with a "here's what I did" summary - About to commit a markdown file whose name matches `*closeout*`, `*status*`, `*summary*`, `*verdict*`, `*phase*`, `*wave*`, `*skill*`, `readme`, `changelog` - About to declare a release or version bump

**All of these mean: stop, map the surface, declare scope cuts, write the attestation block, then continue.**

## Common Mistakes

- **Fake attestation**: filling fields with generic strings ("looked at everything"). Wave 2 hook enforces minLength + minItems on the attestation block at write time. Wave 3 CI validator will re-enforce schema shape on tracked markdown at commit time. Full audit-log cross-reference (checking whether `external_review_status: "cleared"` matches a real R2/R3 review record in `governance_events`) is Phase 8.1 scope, not Wave 3. Don't assume the current enforcement catches semantic lies — it catches structural ones. - **Skipping scope_cuts because "nothing was cut"**: if you genuinely cut nothing, you probably didn't look hard enough. Use the self-review step to find a scope cut. - **Putting attestation in a comment or footer**: it must be in a `## Delivery Attestation` section with a fenced json block. Other placements won't be parsed. - **Writing attestation as YAML or markdown list**: must be fenced `json` block. Other formats fail schema validation. - **Adding exemption comment to bypass**: exemptions ARE allowed and don't block. Wave 4 will log each use as a `delivery_discipline_exemption_used` governance event; frequent use becomes an audit target once that logging is live. Strict mode (`VIBE_SCIENCE_STRICT=1`) additionally refuses to allow any bypass path (including exemption) when the governance DB cannot be opened or when the `governance_events` table is missing — i.e. when the Wave 4 audit trail would silently drop records. The strict-mode probe actually opens the DB and checks the schema, not just whether the module imports.

## Why This Exists

vibe-science v7.0 protects scientific truth (confounder harness, R2 gate, Salvagente Rule). It did NOT protect delivery completeness — agents could still ship 60% skills, declare phases closed prematurely, sample the surface optimistically.

The pattern was observed repeatedly: Phase 6.1 "closed" but re-retracted when fresh-eyes review found P1s. Phase 7 Wave 1 shipped at 60%. The initial Phase 8 skill was missing 40% of the surface.

This skill (Wave 1) + the PreToolUse hook (Wave 2) + the CI validator (Wave 3) + the governance event log (Wave 4) **together force the same discipline on delivery that the existing hooks force on scientific claims**. Wave 2 enforcement is active today: a hook that blocks the write, not a review that catches the failure after the fact. Waves 3-4 add CI-time scanning and audit-trail logging so bypass attempts become tracked events rather than silent drift.

## When in Doubt

Apply the rules. The cost is 60-120 seconds per deliverable. The cost of skipping is the "user pushes back → retract → patch" cycle we've seen multiple times.

Default: write the attestation. It's cheaper than the correction loop.

Detalles técnicos

Versión
1.0.0
Licencia
Apache-2.0
Última actualización
20 ago 2026
Publicado
20 ago 2026

Resumen de decisión

Candidata de respaldo

58
Listo
Prototipo
Etapa

recent repository activity

Auditoría

Revisión de instalación

Revisión de instalación y adopción

74
Requiere revisión
Seguridad
77/100
Mantenimiento
100/100
Instalar
92/100
Abrir auditoría completaVer informe de evaluación

Evidencia probada por Agent

Evidencia probada por Agent

Informes de resultados tras resolver, revisar, instalar y una ejecución limitada.

0
Probado
Needs first agent runAuto-instalación: revisar primeroÚltimo: Desconocido
Tasa de éxito
Fallo reciente
Resultados
0
Calidad de salida
Fallidos
0
No relevante
0
Instalaciones
0
Bloqueado por riesgo
0
Configuración necesaria
0
Producción
0

Aún no hay datos de resultados de Agent. La primera ejecución puede informar éxito, configuración necesaria, bloqueos de riesgo, fallo o irrelevancia mediante /api/agent/outcome.

Instalar

Añadir al flujo de Agent

Gratis y de código abierto. Revisa el informe antes de instalar en Agents de producción.

Bucle de crecimiento

Kit para compartir

X

Borrador basado en un caso para delivery-discipline, listo para publicar manualmente en X.

Nota del curador
delivery-discipline: Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, ski...

16 stars

https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?ref=x
Abrir borrador de X
Respuesta opcional con comando de instalación
Listing + install path for delivery-discipline:
https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?ref=x

Install: npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline

Fuente de la ficha

Indexado por Registry

Reclamable

Esta ficha se indexó desde fuentes públicas y no está marcada como oficial hasta que se apruebe una reclamación de mantenedor.

Indexado por
Índice comunitario de OpenAgentSkill

La atribución enlaza al repositorio público o al perfil del creador. Los creadores pueden reclamar la ficha para actualizar las señales de propiedad.

Reclamar este skill

Reclamación del propietario

Reclamar esta ficha de skill

Esta ficha Indexado por Registry se atribuye a th3vib3coder, pero aún no está marcada como oficial. Reclámala para añadir una señal de propietario verificado y hacer más fiables futuras actualizaciones de lanzamiento, instalación y auditoría.

Kit de enlaces para creadores

Añade las insignias de evidencia a tu README

Muestra la ficha canónica, las señales actuales de confianza y auditoría, y evidencia real de Agent-Proven donde los desarrolladores evalúan el repositorio.

[![Listed on OpenAgentSkill](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?metric=listed&label=Listed)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline)
[![OpenAgentSkill Trust](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?metric=trust&label=Trust)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline)
[![OpenAgentSkill Audit](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?metric=audit&label=Audit)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/audit)
[![Agent Proven](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?metric=proven&label=Agent%20Proven)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline)

Autor

T

th3vib3coder

@th3vib3coder

Etiquetas

Afinidad con plataforma

Señales de salud

Estrellas de GitHub
16
Puntuación de calidad
32/100
Último push de GitHub
19 ago 2026
Pistas del framework
Desconocido
Vistas de OpenAgentSkill
0
Copias de instalación
0
Clics externos
0

Señal de comunidad

Comparte si este skill resulta útil para tu flujo de Agent. Los comentarios agregados mejoran la clasificación con el tiempo.

Confianza y seguridad

Do not auto-install

59
  • Adopción en GitHub16 estrellas de GitHubCorregir
  • Actividad de stars/forks16 estrellas y 0 forks; la actividad de issues no está disponible en los metadatos actualesCorregir
  • Mantenimiento reciente3 días desde el último pushAprobado
  • Claridad de licenciaApache-2.0Aprobado
  • Completitud de README/SKILL.mdLos metadatos incluyen suficiente contexto de uso y flujo de trabajoAprobado
  • Riesgo de dependencias/runtimenetwork or browser surfaceAprobado