delivery-discipline

REVIEW · 59
Registry indexed

Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, skill file, wave spec, README section, summary document, CHANGELOG entry, or any markdown file declaring completion or pass/fail status). Applies before the write happens, not after. Without

Verified installs0
Stars16
Version1.0.0
Quality59/100 · Promising
Trust59/100 · Do not auto-install
Audit74/100 · Needs review

Supply asset profile

Research and knowledge work

Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.

Browse track

Scenario

Research agents

I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.

Agent fit

Claude Code + CLI + Codex

Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.

Install

Ready

npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline

Maintenance

fresh

3d since push

Risk

Needs review

Permission surface may require sandboxing

GitHub quality

16

59/100 Quality · 67/100 Trust

Coverage tags

ResearchResearch agentsagent-skill

Review notes

Permission surface may require sandboxing · The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.

Agent adoption scorecard

Trust, audit, and install readiness at a glance

These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.

Quality

Promising
59

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

Trust

Do not auto-install
59

Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.

Audit

Needs review
74

A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.

OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5

Human review before install

Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLI

Stars

16 GitHub stars

Repo activity

16 stars, 0 forks

Maintenance

3d since push

License

Apache-2.0

Install

npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline

Install safety

standard package or runtime install path

Permission surface

filesystem or document access, network or browser access

Agent outcomes

No agent outcome data yet

Docs

Strong README/SKILL.md context

Risk summary

Review before production

  • The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: filesystem or document access, network or browser access

Install readiness

Install path available

  • Install path is available
  • Repository evidence is available
  • License is declared
  • No Agent Proven outcome evidence yet

Agent-readable metadata

Machine-readable decision data for this skill.

Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.

Open JSON

Suited tasks

  • Research agents workflows
  • Claude Code teams
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects
  • Search sources

Suited agents

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLICLI

Install decision

Command
npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
Policy
review
Human review
yes

Trust and risk

Trust
59/100
Audit
74/100
Risk level
Needs review

Outcome loop

Endpoint
/api/agent/outcome
Event ID
resolve
Outcomes
5

Install command

npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline

Do not use when

  • teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
  • production agents without a repository review
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
  • No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet

Agent safety v2

50/100 · Avoid automatic install

Experimentalreview

Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.

Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.

Resolve via API

medium

Browser automation

Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.

medium

Network access

Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.

medium

Filesystem access

Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.

medium

Database access

Skill may inspect schemas, query databases, or work with persistent stores.

  • Permission surface may require sandboxing

Install targets

Install this skill in your agent workflow

Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.

skill install

OpenAgentSkill CLI

Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.

$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline

Agent resolve plan

Let an agent verify fit before installing.

The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.

Open text plan

Agent should check

  • Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
  • Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
  • Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.

Copy prompt

Task: Use delivery-discipline in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20delivery-discipline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install
Install command: npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.

Agent handoff

Give an agent the install path, not another directory page.

Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.

Open install API

Agent prompt

Use delivery-discipline for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install, then install with: npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline

Registry metadata

Agent-readable profile for automatic skill selection.

This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.

Open manifest

Agent fit

58/100

Research agents

Platforms

Claude Code

Audit report

Needs review · 74/100

A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.

View audit reportView eval report

Agent decision cockpit

Fallback candidate for Research agents

Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.

58
Readiness
Prototype
Stage

Role in stack

Fallback candidate

Primary fit

Research agents

Trust label

Prototype first

Install path

Command ready

Use when

  • Research agents workflows
  • Claude Code teams
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects

Evidence

  • recent repository activity
  • install command or GitHub repo available
  • 59/100 quality profile

review first

  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
  • No OpenAgentSkill engagement data yet

Implementation path

  1. 1Install it in a sandbox agent and run one Research agents task end to end.
  2. 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
  3. 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.

Trust profile

Do not auto-install

Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.

59
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score

GitHub adoption

FIX

16 GitHub stars

Stars/forks activity

FIX

16 stars, 0 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata

Recent maintenance

PASS

3d since push

License clarity

PASS

Apache-2.0

Good signals

  • AI review approved
  • Install path is available
  • Repository evidence is available
  • Recently maintained repository
  • Install command has no obvious high-risk pattern
  • Outcome loop is ready but needs first real agent run

Review before install

  • The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: filesystem or document access, network or browser access
  • GitHub adoption: 16 GitHub stars
  • Stars/forks activity: 16 stars, 0 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
  • Permission surface: filesystem or document access, network or browser access
  • No real agent outcome reports yet
  • Human review required before unattended installation

Recommended action

Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.

Quality profile

Promising candidate for agent workflows

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

59
GitHub stars
16
Freshness
3d ago
Install ready
Yes
License
Apache-2.0
Review before install: Low GitHub adoption signal · The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.

Workflow fit

Use this skill in these scenarios

Workflow fit

Add it to a complete workflow

Alternative shortlist

Compare before you install

Similar skills that may fit this task.

Compare all

Overview

--- name: delivery-discipline description: Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, skill file, wave spec, README section, summary document, CHANGELOG entry, or any markdown file declaring completion or pass/fail status). Applies before the write happens, not after. Without this discipline, agents ship 60% deliverables and declare closure prematurely. ---

<!-- delivery-discipline: exempt --> <!-- This file DEFINES the delivery-discipline. It is documentation about the discipline, not a closeout declaration subject to it. The exemption is legitimate and is logged as `delivery_discipline_exemption_used` by Wave 4 so exemption usage remains auditable. Do not remove this comment unless you are replacing SKILL.md with a proper attestation block. -->

# Delivery Discipline

## Overview

**Agents trained to optimize for completion will ship 60% of what's needed and declare the work closed.** The pattern is reproducible. Scientific truth is protected by the existing hooks (confounder harness, R2 review gate, Salvagente Rule). **Delivery completeness is not.** This skill closes that gap.

You (the agent) must apply the 4 rules below BEFORE writing any deliverable that will declare anything CLOSED, PASS, DONE, SHIPPED, COMPLETE, FINALIZED, or READY in a commit-relevant markdown file. A PreToolUse hook will block your write if you skip the attestation block defined below. A CI validator will catch bypasses.

## When To Use

**Activate before writing:** - Any `*closeout*.md`, `*status*.md`, `*summary*.md`, `*verdict*.md` - Any `phase*-*.md`, `wave*-*.md`, `sprint*-*.md` - Any `skill*.md`, SKILL.md updates - Any `README.md` or `CHANGELOG.md` entry that declares a version/release/completion - Any document declaring a gate PASS, a phase CLOSED, a release SHIPPED

**Do NOT activate for:** - Normal prose that mentions "done" in casual context ("I closed the file") - Code files (`.js`, `.py`, etc.) — the skill governs deliverables, not source - Exploratory notes that do NOT declare closure

## The 4 Non-Negotiable Rules

### Rule 1 — Surface mapping before writing

Before you write a deliverable that will declare anything CLOSED / PASS / DONE / SHIPPED / COMPLETE, you MUST have a mechanical inventory of what should be covered.

- If the inventory was produced by a subagent (Explore, general-purpose, etc.), you **verify at least the critical claims directly** before trusting it. Read the actual files the subagent describes. API signatures, file paths, function exports get verified first-hand, not assumed. - Optimistic sampling is failure. "I covered the main cases" means you haven't looked at the edge cases.

### Rule 2 — Explicit scope cuts

Every deliverable MUST declare, in its own body, what was LEFT OUT and why.

- A scope-cut list of 0 items is suspicious by default. If your solution covers "everything", you probably haven't looked hard enough. - Force yourself to name at least one cut. If you genuinely cannot find one, state that explicitly and pass self-review (Rule 4) first.

### Rule 3 — Completeness proof by enumeration

When you declare closure, list the concrete items verified. Not "all tests pass" but "26 items in the surface map, 22 verified directly with Read tool, 4 delegated to subagent report and cross-checked". Enumeration beats summary.

### Rule 4 — Adversarial self-review before closure

Before you write "CLOSED" / "PASS" / "DONE", ask yourself: **"What would a skeptical reviewer attack?"** List at least 3 findings. If you find 0, assume you haven't looked hard enough and go back to Rule 1.

## The Attestation Block (MUST appear in every deliverable declaring closure)

Format: a `## Delivery Attestation` section (case-insensitive, `##` or `###`) containing a fenced `json` block. The hook extracts the first fenced json block under that heading and validates it against `skills/vibe/assets/schemas/delivery-attestation.schema.json`.

````markdown ## Delivery Attestation

```json { "covered": [ "Concrete item 1 verified (not a summary)", "Concrete item 2 verified", "..." ], "scope_cuts": [ { "item": "Thing left out of this deliverable", "reason": "Why it is outside this deliverable (not 'no time')" } ], "self_review_findings": [ "Adversarial finding 1 (a skeptical reviewer would attack X because...)", "Adversarial finding 2", "Adversarial finding 3" ], "external_review_status": "pending" } ``` ````

**Field semantics:** - `covered`: array of strings, ≥1 item, each ≥3 chars. Concrete items, not summaries. - `scope_cuts`: array of `{item, reason}` objects. Empty array allowed but suspicious. - `self_review_findings`: array of strings, **≥3 items required**, each ≥20 chars. - `external_review_status`: enum `"pending" | "cleared" | "blocked"`.

## Quick Reference

| Intent | Action | |--------|--------| | Writing a phase closeout | Include the `## Delivery Attestation` section with filled JSON block | | Writing a skill file | Include attestation even if short skill — the skill itself is a deliverable | | Updating CHANGELOG | Attestation required when declaring a release / version | | Updating README status section | Attestation required when declaring pass/fail or coverage | | Exempting a file legitimately | Add `<!-- delivery-discipline: exempt -->` comment near the top. Wave 4 will log this as a `delivery_discipline_exemption_used` governance event; frequent use becomes an audit target at that point. |

## Rationalization Table — DO NOT fall for these

| Excuse | Counter | |--------|---------| | "This is just a small doc, discipline is overkill" | Small docs are where premature closure starts. The attestation takes 60 seconds. | | "I don't have time for scope cuts" | The cut list takes 30 seconds. Skipping it costs 30 minutes when user pushes back. | | "Self-review feels self-indulgent" | It's the cheap version of R2. Skip it and you pay in R2 corrections later. | | "The block only triggers on 'CLOSED' — I'll say 'finalized' instead" | The regex covers synonyms: CLOSED, DONE, PASS/PASSED, SHIPPED, COMPLETE/COMPLETED, FINALIZED, READY, and the failure/partial forms FAIL/FAILED, BLOCKED, PARTIAL, FALSE-POSITIVE, and the review-verdict forms ACCEPTED, REJECTED. Wave 4 will log attempted evasions as governance events; until then, the block itself is the sanction. | | "I'll put my closure claim below the legacy-boundary marker in CHANGELOG/README" | The legacy-boundary marker grandfathers pre-Phase-8 content ONLY while its `hash=<sha256-hex>` attribute matches the LF-normalized below-marker content. Appending any new closure below the marker changes the hash, the boundary becomes invalid, and the whole file is re-subjected to enforcement. To legitimately re-bless the legacy region you must update the hash in a reviewed commit (git diff shows both the new content and the hash change side-by-side). Bare markers without `hash=` are rejected outright. | | "I verified with a subagent, that's enough" | Subagents sample too. Spot-check critical items with Read tool before trusting. | | "External review status: cleared" (without actually running review) | Lying about `external_review_status` is still traceable — when R2 / R3 runs later, it produces `external-review-record` entries that do NOT match, and the inconsistency surfaces at the next audit. The Wave 3 CI validator checks schema shape (enum + required fields); full governance-event cross-referencing is Phase 8.1 scope, not Wave 3. Don't rely on "nobody will notice" — the record trail is public. | | "I'll add the attestation at the end, after writing everything" | Writing the attestation FORCES you to enumerate. Skipping that step defeats the whole point. Write it as you go, not as an afterthought. |

## Red Flags — STOP and apply the skill

- About to write a deliverable containing "CLOSED", "PASS", "DONE", "SHIPPED", "COMPLETE", or synonyms in declarative context - About to mark a TodoWrite task `completed` after a large deliverable - About to stop the session with a "here's what I did" summary - About to commit a markdown file whose name matches `*closeout*`, `*status*`, `*summary*`, `*verdict*`, `*phase*`, `*wave*`, `*skill*`, `readme`, `changelog` - About to declare a release or version bump

**All of these mean: stop, map the surface, declare scope cuts, write the attestation block, then continue.**

## Common Mistakes

- **Fake attestation**: filling fields with generic strings ("looked at everything"). Wave 2 hook enforces minLength + minItems on the attestation block at write time. Wave 3 CI validator will re-enforce schema shape on tracked markdown at commit time. Full audit-log cross-reference (checking whether `external_review_status: "cleared"` matches a real R2/R3 review record in `governance_events`) is Phase 8.1 scope, not Wave 3. Don't assume the current enforcement catches semantic lies — it catches structural ones. - **Skipping scope_cuts because "nothing was cut"**: if you genuinely cut nothing, you probably didn't look hard enough. Use the self-review step to find a scope cut. - **Putting attestation in a comment or footer**: it must be in a `## Delivery Attestation` section with a fenced json block. Other placements won't be parsed. - **Writing attestation as YAML or markdown list**: must be fenced `json` block. Other formats fail schema validation. - **Adding exemption comment to bypass**: exemptions ARE allowed and don't block. Wave 4 will log each use as a `delivery_discipline_exemption_used` governance event; frequent use becomes an audit target once that logging is live. Strict mode (`VIBE_SCIENCE_STRICT=1`) additionally refuses to allow any bypass path (including exemption) when the governance DB cannot be opened or when the `governance_events` table is missing — i.e. when the Wave 4 audit trail would silently drop records. The strict-mode probe actually opens the DB and checks the schema, not just whether the module imports.

## Why This Exists

vibe-science v7.0 protects scientific truth (confounder harness, R2 gate, Salvagente Rule). It did NOT protect delivery completeness — agents could still ship 60% skills, declare phases closed prematurely, sample the surface optimistically.

The pattern was observed repeatedly: Phase 6.1 "closed" but re-retracted when fresh-eyes review found P1s. Phase 7 Wave 1 shipped at 60%. The initial Phase 8 skill was missing 40% of the surface.

This skill (Wave 1) + the PreToolUse hook (Wave 2) + the CI validator (Wave 3) + the governance event log (Wave 4) **together force the same discipline on delivery that the existing hooks force on scientific claims**. Wave 2 enforcement is active today: a hook that blocks the write, not a review that catches the failure after the fact. Waves 3-4 add CI-time scanning and audit-trail logging so bypass attempts become tracked events rather than silent drift.

## When in Doubt

Apply the rules. The cost is 60-120 seconds per deliverable. The cost of skipping is the "user pushes back → retract → patch" cycle we've seen multiple times.

Default: write the attestation. It's cheaper than the correction loop.

Technical details

Version
1.0.0
License
Apache-2.0
Last updated
Aug 20, 2026
Published
Aug 20, 2026

Decision snapshot

Fallback candidate

58
Ready
Prototype
Stage

recent repository activity

Audit

Install review

Install and adoption review

74
Needs review
Security
77/100
Maintenance
100/100
Install
92/100
Open full auditView eval report

Agent-proven evidence

Agent-proven evidence

Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.

0
Proven
Needs first agent runAuto-install: review firstLast: Unknown
Success rate
Recent failure
Outcomes
0
Output quality
Failed
0
Not relevant
0
Installs
0
Risk blocked
0
Setup needed
0
Production
0

No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.

Install

Add to agent workflow

Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.

Growth loop

Share kit

X

Scenario-led draft for delivery-discipline, ready for a manual X post.

Curator note
delivery-discipline: Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, ski...

16 stars

https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?ref=x
Open X draft
Optional reply with install command
Listing + install path for delivery-discipline:
https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?ref=x

Install: npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline

Listing source

Registry indexed

Claimable

This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.

Indexed by
OpenAgentSkill community index

Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.

Claim this skill

Owner claim

Claim this skill listing

This Registry indexed listing is attributed to th3vib3coder but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.

Creator backlink kit

Add the evidence badges to your README

Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.

[![Listed on OpenAgentSkill](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?metric=listed&label=Listed)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline)
[![OpenAgentSkill Trust](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?metric=trust&label=Trust)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline)
[![OpenAgentSkill Audit](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?metric=audit&label=Audit)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/audit)
[![Agent Proven](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?metric=proven&label=Agent%20Proven)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline)

Author

T

th3vib3coder

@th3vib3coder

Platform fit

Health signals

GitHub stars
16
Quality score
32/100
Last GitHub push
Aug 19, 2026
Framework hints
Unknown
OpenAgentSkill views
0
Install copies
0
Outbound clicks
0

Community signal

Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.

Trust & safety

Do not auto-install

59
  • GitHub adoption16 GitHub starsFIX
  • Stars/forks activity16 stars, 0 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadataFIX
  • Recent maintenance3d since pushPASS
  • License clarityApache-2.0PASS
  • README/SKILL.md completenessMetadata includes enough usage and workflow contextPASS
  • Dependency/runtime risknetwork or browser surfacePASS