Pre-install eval
Swapper Toolkit Eval report.
A machine-readable install decision for agents: task fit, Trust Score, Audit Score, install safety, permission surface, and a concrete validation plan before this skill touches a workspace.
do not auto install
Install path: No install command or repository handoff is available.
Required gates
Checks an agent must pass before install
Task fit
84
Task wording matches this skill metadata.
- Evaluate Swapper Toolkit before installing it in an agent workflow
- agent-frameworks
- Coding agents workflows; Claude Code teams; teams that value GitHub adoption signals
Install path
20
No install command or repository handoff is available.
Install command safety
92
standard package or runtime install path
Trust score
80
Good trust signals with a few areas worth checking before rollout.
- Strong shortlist
- 827 GitHub stars
- MIT
Audit score
78
Risky
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
Agent safety gate
66
This skill should not be selected by an agent without explicit human security review.
- Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.
- Audit risk exceeds the requested agent policy
License clarity
86
MIT
- MIT
Permission surface
100
no high-risk permission surface in public metadata
- Network access: medium
Validation plan
What the agent should do next
- 1Inspect repository, README/SKILL.md, license, and recent commits before production use.
- 2Install in an isolated workspace or sandbox with no production secrets available.
- 3Run the smallest representative task and record files touched, commands run, network access, and outputs.
- 4Compare the selected skill against at least one alternative when the eval status is review or failed.
- 5Promote only after the agent reports a successful verification result and unresolved warnings are accepted.
Do not use when
Conditions that require another skill
- teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
- high-compliance environments without internal security review
- No major risk signals from current metadata
- Audit risk risky exceeds max_risk=medium
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
- Potential broker, wallet, exchange, or real-money execution surface; sandbox and explicit approval are required
Supporting checks
Trust signals behind the decision
README/SKILL.md completeness
pass90
Metadata includes enough usage and workflow context
Recent maintenance
warn62
6mo since push
Alternatives available
pass82
Alternative skills are available for comparison.