Pre-install eval
trip-planner Eval report.
A machine-readable install decision for agents: task fit, Trust Score, Audit Score, install safety, permission surface, and a concrete validation plan before this skill touches a workspace.
do not auto install
Install path: No install command or repository handoff is available.
Required gates
Checks an agent must pass before install
Task fit
94
Task wording matches this skill metadata.
- Evaluate trip-planner before installing it in an agent workflow
- automation
- Workflow automation workflows; Claude Code teams; builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Install path
20
No install command or repository handoff is available.
Install command safety
92
standard package or runtime install path
Trust score
69
Potentially useful, but at least one trust signal needs human inspection.
- Manual review
- 37 GitHub stars
- MIT
Audit score
73
Risky
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
Agent safety gate
53
This skill should not be selected by an agent without explicit human security review.
- Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.
- Audit risk exceeds the requested agent policy
License clarity
86
MIT
- MIT
Permission surface
72
filesystem or document access, network or browser access
- Browser automation: medium
- Network access: medium
- Filesystem access: medium
Validation plan
What the agent should do next
- 1Inspect repository, README/SKILL.md, license, and recent commits before production use.
- 2Install in an isolated workspace or sandbox with no production secrets available.
- 3Run the smallest representative task and record files touched, commands run, network access, and outputs.
- 4Compare the selected skill against at least one alternative when the eval status is review or failed.
- 5Promote only after the agent reports a successful verification result and unresolved warnings are accepted.
Do not use when
Conditions that require another skill
- teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
- production agents without a repository review
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- The SKILL.md is extremely long and dense, which might be overwhelming for some agents, but it is well-structured.
- Audit risk risky exceeds max_risk=medium
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
Supporting checks
Trust signals behind the decision
README/SKILL.md completeness
pass86
Metadata includes enough usage and workflow context
Recent maintenance
pass88
1mo since push
Alternatives available
pass82
Alternative skills are available for comparison.