Skill audit report
comment-mode Audit report.
Granular feedback on drafts without rewriting. Generates highlighted HTML with click-to-reveal inline comments. Use when user says "comment on this", "leave comments on", "give feedback on", or asks for feedback on a draft. Supports multiple lenses—editor feedback, POV simulation ("as brian would react"), or focused angles ("word choice only", "weak arguments"). A granular alternative to rewrites that lets users review feedback incrementally without losing their voice.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score
The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.
GitHub adoption
WARN48
33 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
WARN43
33 stars, 3 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS100
2d since push
License clarity
WARN42
Unknown
README/SKILL.md completeness
PASS86
Metadata includes enough usage and workflow context
Dependency/runtime risk
INFO64
command execution surface, network or browser surface
Install availability
PASS92
npx skills add shipshitdev/skills --skill comment-mode
Install command safety
PASS92
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
WARN48
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Repository evidence
PASS86
https://github.com/shipshitdev/skills/tree/master/bundles/ai-agents/skills/comment-mode
Review status
INFO66
AI review data available
Agent Proven outcomes
INFO54
No agent outcome data yet
Checks
Install and adoption review
Install path
92
npx skills add shipshitdev/skills --skill comment-mode
Repository
88
https://github.com/shipshitdev/skills/tree/master/bundles/ai-agents/skills/comment-mode
License
45
Unknown
Maintenance
100
2d since push
AI review
55
Repository license detected as Unknown, though plugin.json declares MIT. This mismatch may cause compliance ambiguity.
README/SKILL.md completeness
86
Usable description available
Dependency risk
64
command execution surface, network or browser surface
Install command safety
92
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
48
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Stars/forks activity
43
33 stars, 3 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Adoption
42
33 GitHub stars
Financial decision safety
58
Research-only use: do not treat output as financial advice or execute a position without human approval.
Warnings
- License is unclear
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
- Repository license detected as Unknown, though plugin.json declares MIT. This mismatch may cause compliance ambiguity.
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- GitHub adoption: 33 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 33 stars, 3 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- License clarity: Unknown
- Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Method
This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.
Compare nearby options
Related skills to audit next
Code Review
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
169K Stars · Audit report
Grill With Docs
A relentless interview that pressure-tests a plan against the codebase, sharpens domain language, and updates CONTEXT.md and ADRs when decisions become durable.
165K Stars · Audit report
To Spec
Turn the current conversation and codebase context into a structured implementation spec, then publish it to the configured project issue tracker.
165K Stars · Audit report