Informe de auditoría del skill
plan-readiness-review Informe de auditoría.
Adversarial senior/staff-engineer review of a PRD, plan, spec, RFC, design doc, or implementation plan to decide whether it is implementation-ready — detailed enough that a different senior engineer could build it without inventing requirements, architecture, schemas, API contracts, error handling, or acceptance criteria. Produces a requirement inventory with stable IDs, a per-requirement readiness verdict backed by document anchors, an unresolved-assumption register, and a counted READY / NOT READY decision. Use this whenever someone asks to review a plan, PRD, spec, RFC, design, or ticket before build; says "is this ready to implement", "is this spec complete", "review my plan", "poke holes in this", "will an engineer know what to build", "plan readiness", or "sign this off"; or hands over planning artefacts and asks whether work can start. Use it even when they only say "have a look at this spec". If working code already exists and the question is whether it ships, use production-re
Trust Score de OpenAgentSkill
Trust Score de OpenAgentSkill
The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.
Adopción en GitHub
Advertencia48
70 estrellas de GitHub
Actividad de stars/forks
Advertencia43
70 estrellas y 9 forks; la actividad de issues no está disponible en los metadatos actuales
Mantenimiento reciente
Aprobado88
1 meses desde el último push
Claridad de licencia
Aprobado86
MIT
Completitud de README/SKILL.md
Info76
Los metadatos públicos necesitan más contexto de README/SKILL.md
Riesgo de dependencias/runtime
Advertencia56
credential or environment access, network or browser surface
Disponibilidad de instalación
Aprobado92
npx skills add Security-Phoenix-demo/security-skills-claude-code --skill plan-readiness-review
Seguridad del comando de instalación
Aprobado92
Ruta estándar de paquete o instalación en tiempo de ejecución
Superficie de permisos
Fallido34
secrets or environment access, filesystem or document access
Evidencia del repositorio
Aprobado86
https://github.com/Security-Phoenix-demo/security-skills-claude-code/tree/main/plugins/phoenix-readiness-reviews/skills/plan-readiness-review
Estado de revisión
Advertencia46
Falta aprobación de revisión por IA
Resultados comprobados por Agent
Info54
Aún no hay datos de resultados del Agent
Comprobaciones
Revisión de instalación y adopción
Ruta de instalación
92
npx skills add Security-Phoenix-demo/security-skills-claude-code --skill plan-readiness-review
Repositorio
88
https://github.com/Security-Phoenix-demo/security-skills-claude-code/tree/main/plugins/phoenix-readiness-reviews/skills/plan-readiness-review
Licencia
86
MIT
Mantenimiento
88
1 meses desde el último push
Revisión por IA
55
Review approval is missing
Completitud de README/SKILL.md
84
Usable description available
Riesgo de dependencias
56
credential or environment access, network or browser surface
Seguridad del comando de instalación
92
Ruta estándar de paquete o instalación en tiempo de ejecución
Superficie de permisos
34
secrets or environment access, filesystem or document access
Actividad de stars/forks
43
70 estrellas y 9 forks; la actividad de issues no está disponible en los metadatos actuales
Adopción
68
70 estrellas de GitHub
Advertencias
- Dependency or permission surface needs review
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
- Falta aprobación de revisión por IA
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, filesystem or document access
- GitHub adoption: 70 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 70 stars, 9 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- Dependency/runtime risk: credential or environment access, network or browser surface
- Permission surface: secrets or environment access, filesystem or document access
- Review status: AI review approval is missing
Método
This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.
Comparar opciones cercanas
Skills relacionados para auditar después
mono-color
Generate original one-ink or controlled two-ink editorial images from any theme, sentence, article idea, object, or reference photo. Always use this skill when the user asks for 单色海报、双色印刷、单色调视觉、蓝色/绿色孔版印刷、risograph、网点照片、复古或当代编辑排版、zine poster, monochrome editorial poster, duotone print, or asks to use the mono-color style. It uses an adaptive white, gray, or pale-beige substrate, no more than two printing inks, active negative space, terse human language, and strong serif/grotesk/mono typography without making retro styling the default or copying a source composition, wording, logo, or artwork. Produce both the final generation prompt and the generated raster image unless the user explicitly asks for prompt only.
1.9K Estrellas · Informe de auditoría
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
64K Estrellas · Informe de auditoría
Academic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
38K Estrellas · Informe de auditoría