Rapport d’audit du skill

task-management Rapport d’audit.

Simple task management using a shared TASKS.md file. Reference this when the user asks about their tasks, wants to add/complete tasks, or needs help tracking commitments.

Expérimental · RevoirRevue nécessaireGénéré 11 oct. 2026Audit heuristique des métadonnées
75
Audit
76
Confiance
60
Qualité
79
Sécurité
88
Maintain
92
Installer

Trust Score OpenAgentSkill

76
Liste solide

Trust Score OpenAgentSkill

The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.

Adoption GitHub

Info

62

141 stars GitHub

Activité stars/forks

Avertissement

57

141 stars et 11 forks; l’activité des issues n’est pas disponible dans les métadonnées actuelles

Maintenance récente

Validé

88

1 mois depuis le dernier push

Clarté de licence

Validé

86

Apache-2.0

Complétude README/SKILL.md

Validé

86

Les métadonnées incluent suffisamment de contexte d’usage et de workflow

Risque dépendances/runtime

Validé

82

network or browser surface

Disponibilité de l’installation

Validé

92

npx skills add sandbaseai/sandbase-skills --skill task-management

Sécurité de la commande d’installation

Validé

92

Chemin d’installation standard de package ou runtime

Surface de permissions

Avertissement

60

filesystem or document access, network or browser access

Preuve du dépôt

Validé

86

https://github.com/sandbaseai/sandbase-skills/tree/main/marketing/task-management

État de revue

Avertissement

46

L’approbation de revue IA est absente

Résultats prouvés par Agent

Info

54

Pas encore de données de résultats Agent

Vérifications

Revue d’installation et d’adoption

7 Validé · 10 Revue nécessaire

Chemin d’installation

92

Validé

npx skills add sandbaseai/sandbase-skills --skill task-management

Dépôt

88

Validé

https://github.com/sandbaseai/sandbase-skills/tree/main/marketing/task-management

Licence

86

Validé

Apache-2.0

Maintenance

88

Validé

1 mois depuis le dernier push

Revue IA

55

Vérifier

Review approval is missing

Complétude README/SKILL.md

86

Validé

Usable description available

Risque de dépendances

82

Validé

network or browser surface

Sécurité de la commande d’installation

92

Validé

Chemin d’installation standard de package ou runtime

Surface de permissions

60

Vérifier

filesystem or document access, network or browser access

Activité stars/forks

57

Corriger

141 stars et 11 forks; l’activité des issues n’est pas disponible dans les métadonnées actuelles

Adoption

68

Info

141 stars GitHub

Avertissements

  • Permission surface may require sandboxing
  • L’approbation de revue IA est absente
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: filesystem or document access, network or browser access
  • Stars/forks activity: 141 stars, 11 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
  • Permission surface: filesystem or document access, network or browser access
  • Review status: AI review approval is missing

Méthode

This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.

Comparer les options proches

Skills associés à auditer ensuite

copywriting

When the user wants to write, rewrite, or improve marketing copy for any page — including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, about pages, or product pages. Also use when the user says "write copy for," "improve this copy," "rewrite this page," "marketing copy," "headline help," "CTA copy," "value proposition," "tagline," "subheadline," "hero section copy," "above the fold," "this copy is weak," "make this more compelling," or "help me describe my product." Use this whenever someone is working on website text that needs to persuade or convert. For email copy, see emails. For popup copy, see popups. For editing existing copy, see copy-editing. For the offer underneath the copy (bonuses, guarantees, value framing), see offers.

47K Stars · Rapport d’audit

cro

When the user wants to optimize, improve, or increase conversions on any marketing page or form — including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, lead capture forms, or contact forms. Also use when the user says 'CRO,' 'conversion rate optimization,' 'this page isn't converting,' 'improve conversions,' 'why isn't this page working,' 'my landing page sucks,' 'form abandonment,' 'nobody's converting,' 'low conversion rate,' or 'this page needs work.' Use this even if the user just shares a URL and asks for feedback. For signup/registration flows, see signup. For post-signup activation, see onboarding. For popups/modals, see popups.

47K Stars · Rapport d’audit

marketing-psychology

When the user wants to apply psychological principles, mental models, or behavioral science to marketing. Also use when the user mentions 'psychology,' 'mental models,' 'cognitive bias,' 'persuasion,' 'behavioral science,' 'why people buy,' 'decision-making,' 'consumer behavior,' 'anchoring,' 'social proof,' 'scarcity,' 'loss aversion,' 'framing,' or 'nudge.' Use this whenever someone wants to understand or leverage how people think and make decisions in a marketing context. For applying psychology to specific pages, see cro; for pricing tactics, see pricing; for copy framing, see copywriting.

54K Stars · Rapport d’audit