golang-code-style
Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See `sa
Supply asset profile
Coding and developer agents
Code review, repo analysis, testing, CI, GitHub, DevOps, and developer workflow skills.
Scenario
Coding agents
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Agent fit
Claude Code + OpenAI Agents + CLI
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-code-style
Maintenance
fresh
2d since push
Risk
Needs review
Dependency or permission surface needs review
GitHub quality
3.0K
82/100 Quality · 72/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
Dependency or permission surface needs review · Permission surface may require sandboxing
Agent adoption scorecard
Trust, audit, and install readiness at a glance
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
StrongSolid option that is likely worth shortlisting for production workflows.
Trust
Sandbox onlyUseful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
Audit
Needs reviewA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Human review before install
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Stars
3.0K GitHub stars
Repo activity
3.0K stars, 197 forks
Maintenance
2d since push
License
MIT
Install
npx skills add samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-code-style
Install safety
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Strong README/SKILL.md context
Risk summary
Review before production
- The SKILL.md excerpt references a 'Parallelizing Code Style Reviews' section that is not visible in the provided excerpt; ensure it exists in the full file to avoid broken references.
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Install readiness
Install path available
- Install path is available
- Repository evidence is available
- License is declared
- No Agent Proven outcome evidence yet
Agent-readable metadata
Machine-readable decision data for this skill.
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
- Coding agents workflows
- Claude Code teams
- teams that value GitHub adoption signals
- Inspect source files
Suited agents
Install decision
- Command
- npx skills add samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-code-style
- Policy
- review
- Human review
- yes
Trust and risk
- Trust
- 64/100
- Audit
- 81/100
- Risk level
- Needs review
Outcome loop
- Endpoint
- /api/agent/outcome
- Event ID
- resolve
- Outcomes
- 5
Install command
npx skills add samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-code-styleDo not use when
- teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
- production agents without a repository review
- The SKILL.md excerpt references a 'Parallelizing Code Style Reviews' section that is not visible in the provided excerpt; ensure it exists in the full file to avoid broken references.
- High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution
- Dependency or permission surface needs review
Alternative
Code Review
168.6K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill code-review
Alternative
Grill With Docs
164.7K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill grill-with-docs
Alternative
To Spec
164.7K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill to-spec
Alternative
To Tickets
176.7K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill to-tickets
Agent safety v2
45/100 · Avoid automatic install
Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
high
Shell or command execution
Skill metadata references terminal, CLI, shell, subprocess, or command execution workflows.
medium
Browser automation
Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.
medium
Network access
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Filesystem access
Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.
- High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution
- Dependency or permission surface needs review
Install targets
Install this skill in your agent workflow
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install samber-golang-code-styleAgent resolve plan
Let an agent verify fit before installing.
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20golang-code-style%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20golang-code-style%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/samber-golang-code-style/install
Agent should check
- Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
- Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
- Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.
Copy prompt
Task: Use golang-code-style in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20golang-code-style%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/samber-golang-code-style/install
Install command: npx skills add samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-code-style
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Give an agent the install path, not another directory page.
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/samber-golang-code-style/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/samber-golang-code-style/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=golang-code-style&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use golang-code-style for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/samber-golang-code-style/install, then install with: npx skills add samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-code-styleRegistry metadata
Agent-readable profile for automatic skill selection.
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/samber-golang-code-style
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/samber-golang-code-style?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/samber-golang-code-style
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20golang-code-style%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Coding agents
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code, OpenAI Agents
Audit report
Needs review · 81/100
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Primary pick for Coding agents
Use this as a leading candidate, then validate the README and install path in your own agent stack.
Role in stack
Primary pick
Primary fit
Coding agents
Trust label
Production-ready
Install path
Command ready
Use when
- Coding agents workflows
- Claude Code teams
- teams that value GitHub adoption signals
Evidence
- 3,010 GitHub stars
- recent repository activity
- install command or GitHub repo available
- 82/100 quality profile
- 4 OpenAgentSkill engagement events
review first
- The SKILL.md excerpt references a 'Parallelizing Code Style Reviews' section that is not visible in the provided excerpt; ensure it exists in the full file to avoid broken references.
Implementation path
- 1Install it in a sandbox agent and run one Coding agents task end to end.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
Trust profile
Sandbox only
Useful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
GitHub adoption
PASS3.0K GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
INFO3.0K stars, 197 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS2d since push
License clarity
PASSMIT
Good signals
- AI review approved
- Install path is available
- Repository evidence is available
- Recently maintained repository
- Meaningful GitHub adoption signal
- Install command has no obvious high-risk pattern
- Outcome loop is ready but needs first real agent run
Review before install
- The SKILL.md excerpt references a 'Parallelizing Code Style Reviews' section that is not visible in the provided excerpt; ensure it exists in the full file to avoid broken references.
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- Dependency/runtime risk: command execution surface, network or browser surface
- Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- No real agent outcome reports yet
- Human review required before unattended installation
Recommended action
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Quality profile
Strong candidate for agent workflows
Solid option that is likely worth shortlisting for production workflows.
Workflow fit
Use this skill in these scenarios
Build and ship code
Coding agents
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Parse messy files
Document processing
I need my agent to read PDFs, extract tables, and turn documents into structured data.
Manage repositories
GitHub automation
I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.
Workflow fit
Add it to a complete workflow
Inspect, patch, and verify code
Coding review agent
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
Operate and verify web apps
Browser QA agent
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Design, build, test, and ship interfaces
Frontend and UI
A practical workflow for agents that turn product briefs or Figma designs into polished frontend code, review the result, test it in a browser, and prepare a safe deployment.
Alternative shortlist
Compare before you install
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Code Review
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
Grill With Docs
A relentless interview that pressure-tests a plan against the codebase, sharpens domain language, and updates CONTEXT.md and ADRs when decisions become durable.
To Spec
Turn the current conversation and codebase context into a structured implementation spec, then publish it to the configured project issue tracker.
To Tickets
Break a plan, spec, or conversation into independently actionable tracer-bullet tickets with explicit blocking relationships.
Overview
--- name: golang-code-style description: "Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill), linter configuration (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill), or doc comments (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation` skill)." user-invocable: true license: MIT compatibility: Designed for Claude Code, Codex or similar harness, and for projects using Golang. metadata: author: samber version: "1.3.0" openclaw: emoji: "🎨" homepage: https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang requires: bins: - go install: [] allowed-tools: Read Edit Write Glob Grep Bash(go:*) Bash(golangci-lint:*) Bash(git:*) Agent paths: - "**/*.go" ---
**Orchestration mode:** Fan out the sub-agents described in the "Parallelizing Code Style Reviews" section, each covering an independent style concern, when reviewing code style across a large codebase, and merge their findings. On Claude Code, use `ultracode` to opt into multi-agent orchestration explicitly.
> **Community default.** A company skill that explicitly supersedes `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-code-style` skill takes precedence.
# Go Code Style
Style rules that require human judgment — linters handle formatting, this skill handles clarity. For naming see `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill; for design patterns see `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-design-patterns` skill; for struct/interface design see `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-structs-interfaces` skill.
> "Clear is better than clever." — Go Proverbs
When ignoring a rule, add a comment to the code.
## Line Length & Breaking
No rigid line limit, but lines beyond ~120 characters MUST be broken. Break at **semantic boundaries**, not arbitrary column counts. Function calls with 4+ arguments MUST use one argument per line — even when the prompt asks for single-line code:
```go // Good — each argument on its own line, closing paren separate mux.HandleFunc("/api/users", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) { handleUsers( w, r, serviceName, cfg, logger, authMiddleware, ) }) ```
When a function signature is too long, the real fix is often **fewer parameters** (use an options struct) rather than better line wrapping. For multi-line signatures, put each parameter on its own line.
## Variable Declarations
SHOULD use `:=` for non-zero values, `var` for zero-value initialization. The form signals intent: `var` means "this starts at zero."
```go var count int // zero value, set later name := "default" // non-zero, := is appropriate var buf bytes.Buffer // zero value is ready to use ```
### Slice & Map Initialization
Slices and maps MUST be initialized explicitly, never nil. Nil maps panic on write; nil slices serialize to `null` in JSON (vs `[]` for empty slices), surprising API consumers.
```go users := []User{} // always initialized m := map[string]int{} // always initialized users := make([]User, 0, len(ids)) // preallocate when capacity is known m := make(map[string]int, len(items)) // preallocate when size is known ```
Do not preallocate speculatively — `make([]T, 0, 1000)` wastes memory when the common case is 10 items.
### Composite Literals
Composite literals MUST use field names — positional fields break when the type adds or reorders fields:
```go srv := &http.Server{ Addr: ":8080", ReadTimeout: 5 * time.Second, WriteTimeout: 10 * time.Second, } ```
## Control Flow
### Reduce Nesting
Errors and edge cases MUST be handled first (early return). Keep the happy path at minimal indentation:
```go func process(data []byte) (*Result, error) { if len(data) == 0 { return nil, errors.New("empty data") }
parsed, err := parse(data) if err != nil { return nil, fmt.Errorf("parsing: %w", err) }
return transform(parsed), nil } ```
### Eliminate Unnecessary `else`
When the `if` body ends with `return`/`break`/`continue`, the `else` MUST be dropped. Use default-then-override for simple assignments — assign a default, then override with independent conditions or a `switch`:
```go // Good — default-then-override with switch (cleanest for mutually exclusive overrides) level := slog.LevelInfo switch { case debug: level = slog.LevelDebug case verbose: level = slog.LevelWarn }
// Bad — else-if chain hides that there's a default if debug { level = slog.LevelDebug } else if verbose { level = slog.LevelWarn } else { level = slog.LevelInfo } ```
### Complex Conditions & Init Scope
When an `if` condition has 3+ operands, MUST extract into named booleans — a wall of `||` is unreadable and hides business logic. Keep expensive checks inline for short-circuit benefit. [Details](./references/details.md)
```go // Good — named booleans make intent clear isAdmin := user.Role == RoleAdmin isOwner := resource.OwnerID == user.ID isPublicVerified := resource.IsPublic && user.IsVerified if isAdmin || isOwner || isPublicVerified || permissions.Contains(PermOverride) { allow() } ```
Scope variables to `if` blocks when only needed for the check:
```go if err := validate(input); err != nil { return err } ```
### Switch Over If-Else Chains
When comparing the same variable multiple times, prefer `switch`:
```go switch status { case StatusActive: activate() case StatusInactive: deactivate() default: panic(fmt.Sprintf("unexpected status: %d", status)) } ```
## Function Design
- Functions SHOULD be **short and focused** — one function, one job. - Functions SHOULD have **≤4 parameters**. Beyond that, use an options struct (see `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-design-patterns` skill). - **Parameter order**: `context.Context` first, then inputs, then output destinations. - Naked returns help in very short functions (1-3 lines) where return values are obvious, but become confusing when readers must scroll to find what's returned — name returns explicitly in longer functions.
```go func FetchUser(ctx context.Context, id string) (*User, error) func SendEmail(ctx context.Context, msg EmailMessage) error // grouped into struct ```
### Prefer `range` for Iteration
SHOULD use `range` over index-based loops. Use `range n` (Go 1.22+) for simple counting.
```go for _, user := range users { process(user) } ```
## Value vs Pointer Arguments
Pass small types (`string`, `int`, `bool`, `time.Time`) by value. Use pointers when mutating, for large structs (~128+ bytes), or when nil is meaningful. [Details](./references/details.md)
## Code Organization Within Files
- **Group related declarations**: type, constructor, methods together - **Order**: package doc, imports, constants, types, constructors, methods, helpers - **One primary type per file** when it has significant methods - **Blank imports** (`_ "pkg"`) register side effects (init functions). Restricting them to `main` and test packages makes side effects visible at the application root, not hidden in library code - **Dot imports** pollute the namespace and make it impossible to tell where a name comes from — never use in library code - **Unexport aggressively** — you can always export later; unexporting is a breaking change. → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-gopls` skill to unexport safely — its rename updates every call site atomically and refuses the change when lowercasing a method would break interface satisfaction, a breakage grep/sed silently ships.
## String Handling
Use `strconv` for simple conversions (faster), `fmt.Sprintf` for complex formatting. Use `%q` in error messages to make string boundaries visible. Use `strings.Builder` for loops, `+` for simple concatenation.
## Type Conversions
Prefer explicit, narrow conversions. Use generics over `any` when a concrete type will do:
```go func Contains[T comparable](slice []T, target T) bool // not []any ```
## Philosophy
- **"A little copying is better than a little dependency"** - **Use `slices` and `maps` standard packages**; for filter/group-by/chunk, use `github.com/samber/lo` - **"Reflection is never clear"** — avoid `reflect` unless necessary - **Don't abstract prematurely** — extract when the pattern is stable - **Minimize public surface** — every exported name is a commitment
## Parallelizing Code Style Reviews
When reviewing code style across a large codebase, use up to 5 parallel sub-agents, each targeting an independent style concern (e.g. control flow, function design, variable declarations, string handling, code organization).
## Enforce with Linters
Many rules are enforced automatically: `gofmt`, `gofumpt`, `goimports`, `gocritic`, `revive`, `wsl_v5`. → See the `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill.
## Cross-References
- → See the `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill for identifier naming conventions - → See the `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-structs-interfaces` skill for pointer vs value receivers, interface design - → See the `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-design-patterns` skill for functional options, builders, constructors - → See the `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill for automated formatting enforcement - → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-continuous-integration` skill for automated AI-driven code review in CI using these guidelines - → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-refactoring` skill for mechanically applying guard-clause conversion, function extraction, and options-struct migration safely across many call sites once a review surfaces violations at scale
Technical details
- Version
- 1.0.0
- License
- MIT
- Last updated
- Aug 20, 2026
- Published
- Aug 20, 2026
Decision snapshot
Primary pick
3,010 GitHub stars
Audit
Install review
Install and adoption review
- Security
- 74/100
- Maintenance
- 100/100
- Install
- 92/100
Agent-proven evidence
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
- Success rate
- —
- Recent failure
- —
- Outcomes
- 0
- Output quality
- —
- Failed
- 0
- Not relevant
- 0
- Installs
- 0
- Risk blocked
- 0
- Setup needed
- 0
- Production
- 0
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Add to agent workflow
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Share kit
Scenario-led draft for golang-code-style, ready for a manual X post.
golang-code-style: Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow... 3.0K stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/samber-golang-code-style?ref=x
Optional reply with install command
Listing + install path for golang-code-style: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/samber-golang-code-style?ref=x Install: npx skills add samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-code-style
Listing source
Registry indexed
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
- Creator
- samber
- Source
- samber/cc-skills-golang
- Indexed by
- OpenAgentSkill community index
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
Claim this skill listing
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to samber but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Add the evidence badges to your README
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/samber-golang-code-style)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/samber-golang-code-style)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/samber-golang-code-style/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/samber-golang-code-style)Author
samber
@samber
Tags
Platform fit
Health signals
- GitHub stars
- 3.0K
- Quality score
- 48/100
- Last GitHub push
- Aug 20, 2026
- Framework hints
- Unknown
- OpenAgentSkill views
- 4
- Install copies
- 0
- Outbound clicks
- 0
Community signal
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Trust & safety
Sandbox only
- GitHub adoption3.0K GitHub starsPASS
- Stars/forks activity3.0K stars, 197 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadataINFO
- Recent maintenance2d since pushPASS
- License clarityMITPASS
- README/SKILL.md completenessMetadata includes enough usage and workflow contextPASS
- Dependency/runtime riskcommand execution surface, network or browser surfaceCHECK
Related skills
Code Review
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
168.6K StarsGrill With Docs
A relentless interview that pressure-tests a plan against the codebase, sharpens domain language, and updates CONTEXT.md and ADRs when decisions become durable.
164.7K StarsTo Spec
Turn the current conversation and codebase context into a structured implementation spec, then publish it to the configured project issue tracker.
164.7K StarsTo Tickets
Break a plan, spec, or conversation into independently actionable tracer-bullet tickets with explicit blocking relationships.
176.7K Stars