Skill audit report
copywriting-prose-creator Audit report.
Codifies how a person or brand writes — lexicon, syntax, rhythm, structure, signature moves — into a PROSE.md guide, independent of emotional tone. Builds from SOUL.md and TONE.md, ports a guide to another channel, or reverse-engineers prose patterns from a corpus. Trigger on PROSE.md, writing style guide, prose guide, house style, ghostwriter style, writing playbook, banned words, sentence-length targets, or multi-writer consistency in a content factory. Do NOT use for writing actual content — use samber/cc-skills@linkedin-ghostwriting or samber/cc-skills@technical-article-writer instead. Not for tone decisions (samber/cc-skills@copywriting-tone-of-voice-creator), hooks, or CTAs.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score
The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.
GitHub adoption
INFO62
228 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
WARN57
228 stars, 17 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS88
1mo since push
License clarity
PASS86
MIT
README/SKILL.md completeness
PASS86
Metadata includes enough usage and workflow context
Dependency/runtime risk
PASS90
no major dependency risk hints in public metadata
Install availability
PASS92
npx skills add samber/cc-skills --skill copywriting-prose-creator
Install command safety
PASS92
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
PASS100
no high-risk permission surface in public metadata
Repository evidence
PASS86
https://github.com/samber/cc-skills/tree/main/skills/copywriting-prose-creator
Review status
WARN46
AI review approval is missing
Agent Proven outcomes
INFO54
No agent outcome data yet
Checks
Install and adoption review
Install path
92
npx skills add samber/cc-skills --skill copywriting-prose-creator
Repository
88
https://github.com/samber/cc-skills/tree/main/skills/copywriting-prose-creator
License
86
MIT
Maintenance
88
1mo since push
AI review
55
Review approval is missing
README/SKILL.md completeness
86
Usable description available
Dependency risk
90
no major dependency risk hints in public metadata
Install command safety
92
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
100
no high-risk permission surface in public metadata
Stars/forks activity
57
228 stars, 17 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Adoption
68
228 GitHub stars
Financial decision safety
58
Research-only use: do not treat output as financial advice or execute a position without human approval.
Warnings
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
- AI review approval is missing
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Quality score needs review
- Stars/forks activity: 228 stars, 17 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- Review status: AI review approval is missing
Method
This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.
Compare nearby options
Related skills to audit next
link-building
When the user wants to earn backlinks or third-party mentions that lift rankings and AI citations. Also use when the user mentions 'link building,' 'linkbuilding,' 'backlinks,' 'get more backlinks,' 'link prospecting,' 'link gap,' 'competitor backlinks,' 'unlinked mentions,' 'link reclamation,' 'broken link building,' 'resource pages,' 'guest posting,' 'get into best-of lists,' 'listicle outreach,' 'domain rating,' 'referring domains,' 'anchor text,' or 'is this link vendor safe.' Use this whenever rankings stall on authority or someone wants off-site mentions that AI engines cite. Never recommend buying links that pass ranking credit: paid or exchanged placements get rel=sponsored or nofollow. For press coverage and journalist requests, see public-relations. For directories, see directory-submissions. For reviews, see referrals. For Reddit and communities, see community-marketing. For on-site AI citation work, see ai-seo.
56K Stars · Audit report
marketing-loops
When the user wants to set up a recurring, self-running marketing workflow — a repeatable loop an AI agent runs on a cadence (weekly, daily, on a trigger) rather than a one-off task. Also use when the user mentions 'marketing loop,' 'recurring marketing workflow,' 'automate my marketing,' 'marketing on autopilot,' 'weekly marketing review,' 'ad fatigue check,' 'weekly ads check,' 'content refresh loop,' 'churn watch,' 'ranking drop alert,' 'run my SEO,' 'SEO operator,' 'daily SEO agent,' 'run my outbound,' 'AI SDR,' 'reply triage,' 'always-on marketing,' 'marketing automation workflow,' or 'run this every week.' Use this to pick, adapt, and schedule an ongoing marketing loop that orchestrates the other marketing skills. For one-off marketing ideas, see marketing-ideas. For the experimentation loop specifically, see ab-testing.
55K Stars · Audit report
copy-editing
When the user wants to edit, review, or improve existing marketing copy, or refresh outdated content. Also use when the user mentions 'edit this copy,' 'review my copy,' 'copy feedback,' 'proofread,' 'polish this,' 'make this better,' 'copy sweep,' 'tighten this up,' 'this reads awkwardly,' 'clean up this text,' 'too wordy,' 'sharpen the messaging,' 'refresh this content,' 'update this page,' 'this content is outdated,' or 'content audit,' 'this sounds like AI,' 'AI slop,' 'de-slop this,' or 'make it sound human.' Use this when the user already has copy and wants it improved or refreshed rather than rewritten from scratch. Every edit removes AI tells such as 'it's not X, it's Y' reveals, 'no X, no Y, no Z' lists, and sentences that trail into extra comma clauses. A request to fix one line gets a point edit that changes only that line. For writing new copy, see copywriting.
55K Stars · Audit report