Informe de auditoría del skill
rstack-eco-ci-debug Informe de auditoría.
Debug Rstack ecosystem CI failures for Rspack, Rsbuild, Rslib, Rspress, Rstest, and Rsdoctor, then attribute the real source PR or downstream change. Always use this skill when the user mentions Rstack eco-ci, rstack-ecosystem-ci, a suite turning red, a downstream regression, a green-to-red pivot, canary bisect, or daily eco-ci triage — even if they only ask "why is this suite failing", "which PR broke it", or "is this upstream project's fault". Use it to avoid over-blaming the first upstream commit that appears red in status data.
Trust Score de OpenAgentSkill
Trust Score de OpenAgentSkill
The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.
Adopción en GitHub
Advertencia48
93 estrellas de GitHub
Actividad de stars/forks
Advertencia43
93 estrellas y 4 forks; la actividad de issues no está disponible en los metadatos actuales
Mantenimiento reciente
Aprobado88
1 meses desde el último push
Claridad de licencia
Aprobado86
MIT
Completitud de README/SKILL.md
Aprobado86
Los metadatos incluyen suficiente contexto de uso y flujo de trabajo
Riesgo de dependencias/runtime
Info64
command execution surface, network or browser surface
Disponibilidad de instalación
Aprobado92
npx skills add rstackjs/agent-skills --skill rstack-eco-ci-debug
Seguridad del comando de instalación
Aprobado92
Ruta estándar de paquete o instalación en tiempo de ejecución
Superficie de permisos
Advertencia48
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Evidencia del repositorio
Aprobado86
https://github.com/rstackjs/agent-skills/tree/main/.agents/skills/rstack-eco-ci-debug
Estado de revisión
Info66
Hay datos de revisión por IA disponibles
Resultados comprobados por Agent
Info54
Aún no hay datos de resultados del Agent
Comprobaciones
Revisión de instalación y adopción
Ruta de instalación
92
npx skills add rstackjs/agent-skills --skill rstack-eco-ci-debug
Repositorio
88
https://github.com/rstackjs/agent-skills/tree/main/.agents/skills/rstack-eco-ci-debug
Licencia
86
MIT
Mantenimiento
88
1 meses desde el último push
Revisión por IA
55
The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided prompt, so the full content could not be reviewed. However, the visible portions are well-structured and complete enough for assessment.
Completitud de README/SKILL.md
86
Usable description available
Riesgo de dependencias
64
command execution surface, network or browser surface
Seguridad del comando de instalación
92
Ruta estándar de paquete o instalación en tiempo de ejecución
Superficie de permisos
48
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Actividad de stars/forks
43
93 estrellas y 4 forks; la actividad de issues no está disponible en los metadatos actuales
Adopción
68
93 estrellas de GitHub
Financial decision safety
58
Research-only use: do not treat output as financial advice or execute a position without human approval.
Advertencias
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
- The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated in the provided prompt, so the full content could not be reviewed. However, the visible portions are well-structured and complete enough for assessment.
- The skill relies on local checkouts and user-provided paths; it correctly asks for them rather than assuming, which is good, but it could be more explicit about verifying the authenticity of those paths to avoid accidental misuse.
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- GitHub adoption: 93 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 93 stars, 4 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Método
This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.
Comparar opciones cercanas
Skills relacionados para auditar después
mono-color
Generate original one-ink or controlled two-ink editorial images from any theme, sentence, article idea, object, or reference photo. Always use this skill when the user asks for 单色海报、双色印刷、单色调视觉、蓝色/绿色孔版印刷、risograph、网点照片、复古或当代编辑排版、zine poster, monochrome editorial poster, duotone print, or asks to use the mono-color style. It uses an adaptive white, gray, or pale-beige substrate, no more than two printing inks, active negative space, terse human language, and strong serif/grotesk/mono typography without making retro styling the default or copying a source composition, wording, logo, or artwork. Produce both the final generation prompt and the generated raster image unless the user explicitly asks for prompt only.
1.9K Estrellas · Informe de auditoría
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
64K Estrellas · Informe de auditoría
Academic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
38K Estrellas · Informe de auditoría