Pre-install eval
mock-lab Eval report.
A machine-readable install decision for agents: task fit, Trust Score, Audit Score, install safety, permission surface, and a concrete validation plan before this skill touches a workspace.
manual review
Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
Required gates
Checks an agent must pass before install
Task fit
94
Task wording matches this skill metadata.
- Evaluate mock-lab before installing it in an agent workflow
- automation
- Browser automation workflows; Claude Code teams; builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Install path
92
Install handoff is available.
- npx skills add riwonswain-ovo/OfferLoop --skill mock-lab
Install command safety
92
standard package or runtime install path
- npx skills add riwonswain-ovo/OfferLoop --skill mock-lab
Trust score
64
Potentially useful, but at least one trust signal needs human inspection.
- Manual review
- 13 GitHub stars
- MIT
Audit score
70
Needs review
- The skill reads and processes user-supplied materials such as JD, resume, and Feishu documents, but SKILL.md does not explicitly instruct the model to treat those materials as untrusted data and ignore any embedded instructions. This creates a prompt-injection risk.
Agent safety gate
50
Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
- Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
- The skill reads and processes user-supplied materials such as JD, resume, and Feishu documents, but SKILL.md does not explicitly instruct the model to treat those materials as untrusted data and ignore any embedded instructions. This creates a prompt-injection risk.
License clarity
86
MIT
- MIT
Permission surface
74
network or browser access, database access
- Network access: medium
- Filesystem access: medium
- Database access: medium
Validation plan
What the agent should do next
- 1Inspect repository, README/SKILL.md, license, and recent commits before production use.
- 2Install in an isolated workspace or sandbox with no production secrets available.
- 3Run the smallest representative task and record files touched, commands run, network access, and outputs.
- 4Compare the selected skill against at least one alternative when the eval status is review or failed.
- 5Promote only after the agent reports a successful verification result and unresolved warnings are accepted.
Do not use when
Conditions that require another skill
- teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
- production agents without a repository review
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- The skill reads and processes user-supplied materials such as JD, resume, and Feishu documents, but SKILL.md does not explicitly instruct the model to treat those materials as untrusted data and ignore any embedded instructions. This creates a prompt-injection risk.
- SKILL.md instructs running `../.offerloop-runtime/scripts/artifact_contract.py` without documenting what the script does, pinning its content, or verifying it is safe. If that script is not part of the reviewed skill directory, it is also a supply-chain risk.
- The skill depends on `../.offerloop-runtime/...` and several referenced `references/...` files that are not all present in the submitted excerpt. If those dependencies are missing in the actual repository, the skill will fail during startup.
Supporting checks
Trust signals behind the decision
README/SKILL.md completeness
pass86
Metadata includes enough usage and workflow context
Recent maintenance
pass88
2mo since push
Alternatives available
pass82
Alternative skills are available for comparison.