Skill audit report
一个会拷问创业者的 AI 业务诊断官。当用户想诊断自己的创业项目、一人公司或小微业务卡在哪里时使用——尤其是用户描述了某个具体卡点(没人付费、卡住了、涨不上去、不知道方向对不对、转化低、留不住用户等)并想找到真正的病因和行动项时。触发场景包括:'诊断我的项目''我的产品卡住了''帮我看看问题在哪''为什么没人买''我该不该继续做''分析一下我的业务'等。它不给放之四海皆准的通用建议,而是像一个不留情面的诊断官,一层层追问,把症状追到病因。An AI diagnostician for solo founders and small businesses (OPC) stuck at any stage.
The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.
GitHub adoption
FAIL30
3 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
FAIL32
3 stars, 0 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS100
7d since push
License clarity
PASS86
MIT
README/SKILL.md completeness
PASS86
Metadata includes enough usage and workflow context
Dependency/runtime risk
PASS90
no major dependency risk hints in public metadata
Install availability
PASS92
npx skills add qrex102300-ui/opc-clinic --skill opc-clinic
Install command safety
PASS92
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
PASS100
no high-risk permission surface in public metadata
Repository evidence
PASS86
https://github.com/qrex102300-ui/opc-clinic/tree/main/skill
Review status
WARN46
AI review approval is missing
Agent Proven outcomes
INFO54
No agent outcome data yet
Checks
Install path
92
npx skills add qrex102300-ui/opc-clinic --skill opc-clinic
Repository
88
https://github.com/qrex102300-ui/opc-clinic/tree/main/skill
License
86
MIT
Maintenance
100
7d since push
AI review
55
Review approval is missing
README/SKILL.md completeness
86
Usable description available
Dependency risk
90
no major dependency risk hints in public metadata
Install command safety
92
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
100
no high-risk permission surface in public metadata
Stars/forks activity
32
3 stars, 0 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Adoption
42
3 GitHub stars
Warnings
Method
This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.
Compare nearby options
When the user wants to write, rewrite, or improve marketing copy for any page — including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, about pages, or product pages. Also use when the user says "write copy for," "improve this copy," "rewrite this page," "marketing copy," "headline help," "CTA copy," "value proposition," "tagline," "subheadline," "hero section copy," "above the fold," "this copy is weak," "make this more compelling," or "help me describe my product." Use this whenever someone is working on website text that needs to persuade or convert. For email copy, see emails. For popup copy, see popups. For editing existing copy, see copy-editing. For the offer underneath the copy (bonuses, guarantees, value framing), see offers.
47K Stars · Audit report
When the user wants to optimize, improve, or increase conversions on any marketing page or form — including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, lead capture forms, or contact forms. Also use when the user says 'CRO,' 'conversion rate optimization,' 'this page isn't converting,' 'improve conversions,' 'why isn't this page working,' 'my landing page sucks,' 'form abandonment,' 'nobody's converting,' 'low conversion rate,' or 'this page needs work.' Use this even if the user just shares a URL and asks for feedback. For signup/registration flows, see signup. For post-signup activation, see onboarding. For popups/modals, see popups.
47K Stars · Audit report
Transform an output-focused roadmap into an outcome-focused one that communicates strategic intent. Rewrites initiatives as outcome statements reflecting user and business impacts. Use when shifting to outcome roadmaps, making a roadmap more strategic, or rewriting feature lists as outcomes.
26K Stars · Audit report