Rapport d’audit du skill
create-skill Rapport d’audit.
Create or update Claude Code skills following Anthropic's official skill standard. Use when user says "create a skill", "new skill", "write a skill", "update a skill", "skill standard", or any time a new SKILL.md file needs to be created. Also use when reviewing existing skills for standards compliance.
Trust Score OpenAgentSkill
Trust Score OpenAgentSkill
The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.
Adoption GitHub
Échoué30
20 stars GitHub
Activité stars/forks
Échoué32
20 stars et 3 forks; l’activité des issues n’est pas disponible dans les métadonnées actuelles
Maintenance récente
Validé88
1 mois depuis le dernier push
Clarté de licence
Validé86
MIT
Complétude README/SKILL.md
Validé86
Les métadonnées incluent suffisamment de contexte d’usage et de workflow
Risque dépendances/runtime
Info72
Surface d’exécution de commandes
Disponibilité de l’installation
Validé92
npx skills add qa-aman/claude-skills --skill create-skill
Sécurité de la commande d’installation
Validé92
Chemin d’installation standard de package ou runtime
Surface de permissions
Avertissement48
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Preuve du dépôt
Validé86
https://github.com/qa-aman/claude-skills/tree/main/.claude/skills/create-skill
État de revue
Avertissement46
L’approbation de revue IA est absente
Résultats prouvés par Agent
Info54
Pas encore de données de résultats Agent
Vérifications
Revue d’installation et d’adoption
Chemin d’installation
92
npx skills add qa-aman/claude-skills --skill create-skill
Dépôt
88
https://github.com/qa-aman/claude-skills/tree/main/.claude/skills/create-skill
Licence
86
MIT
Maintenance
88
1 mois depuis le dernier push
Revue IA
55
Review approval is missing
Complétude README/SKILL.md
86
Usable description available
Risque de dépendances
72
Surface d’exécution de commandes
Sécurité de la commande d’installation
92
Chemin d’installation standard de package ou runtime
Surface de permissions
48
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Activité stars/forks
32
20 stars et 3 forks; l’activité des issues n’est pas disponible dans les métadonnées actuelles
Adoption
42
20 stars GitHub
Avertissements
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- L’approbation de revue IA est absente
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- GitHub adoption: 20 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 20 stars, 3 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- Review status: AI review approval is missing
Méthode
This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.
Comparer les options proches
Skills associés à auditer ensuite
gh-create-pr
Create or update GitHub pull requests using the repository-required workflow and template compliance. Use when asked to create/open/update a PR so the assistant reads `.github/pull_request_template.md`, fills every template section, preserves markdown structure exactly, and marks missing data as N/A or None instead of skipping sections.
52K Stars · Rapport d’audit
anti-defensive-writing
Reduce defensive writing in drafts and revisions by removing unnecessary caveats, disclaimers, hedges, apology-like framing, negative self-limiting statements, and over-explanations while preserving necessary scope, accuracy, safety, legal, ethical, and methodological limits. Use when drafting or revising academic writing, papers, essays, abstracts, introductions, contribution statements, discussions, conclusions, technical explanations, grant writing, product writing, policy writing, professional reports, or any text the user wants to be clearer, stronger, more direct, more concise, more confident, less verbose, less caveated, less apologetic, or less defensive.
904 Stars · Rapport d’audit
opensource-guide-coach
Use when a user wants guidance on starting, contributing to, growing, governing, funding, securing, or sustaining an open source project, or asks about contributor onboarding, community health, maintainer burnout, code of conduct, metrics, legal basics, or open source project adoption.
73 Stars · Rapport d’audit