Informe de auditoría del skill

define-problem-statement Informe de auditoría.

Creates a clear problem framing document with user impact, business context, and success criteria. Use when starting a new initiative, realigning a drifted project, or communicating up to leadership.

Revisado · RevisarRequiere revisiónGenerado 12 oct 2026Auditoría heurística de metadatos
79
Auditoría
75
Confianza
72
Calidad
83
Seguridad
88
Maintain
92
Instalar

Trust Score de OpenAgentSkill

75
Lista sólida

Trust Score de OpenAgentSkill

The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.

Adopción en GitHub

Info

76

643 estrellas de GitHub

Actividad de stars/forks

Info

71

643 estrellas y 81 forks; la actividad de issues no está disponible en los metadatos actuales

Mantenimiento reciente

Aprobado

88

1 meses desde el último push

Claridad de licencia

Aprobado

86

Apache-2.0

Completitud de README/SKILL.md

Aprobado

86

Los metadatos incluyen suficiente contexto de uso y flujo de trabajo

Riesgo de dependencias/runtime

Aprobado

90

No hay indicios importantes de riesgo de dependencias en los metadatos públicos

Disponibilidad de instalación

Aprobado

92

npx skills add product-on-purpose/pm-skills --skill define-problem-statement

Seguridad del comando de instalación

Aprobado

92

Ruta estándar de paquete o instalación en tiempo de ejecución

Superficie de permisos

Aprobado

86

Acceso a archivos o documentos

Evidencia del repositorio

Aprobado

86

https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills/tree/main/skills/define-problem-statement

Estado de revisión

Info

66

Hay datos de revisión por IA disponibles

Resultados comprobados por Agent

Info

54

Aún no hay datos de resultados del Agent

Comprobaciones

Revisión de instalación y adopción

9 Aprobado · 5 Requiere revisión

Ruta de instalación

92

Aprobado

npx skills add product-on-purpose/pm-skills --skill define-problem-statement

Repositorio

88

Aprobado

https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills/tree/main/skills/define-problem-statement

Licencia

86

Aprobado

Apache-2.0

Mantenimiento

88

Aprobado

1 meses desde el último push

Revisión por IA

55

Revisar

Parsed SKILL.md metadata shows empty tags and frameworks, likely because they are nested under metadata rather than top-level frontmatter; this may reduce discoverability.

Completitud de README/SKILL.md

86

Aprobado

Usable description available

Riesgo de dependencias

90

Aprobado

No hay indicios importantes de riesgo de dependencias en los metadatos públicos

Seguridad del comando de instalación

92

Aprobado

Ruta estándar de paquete o instalación en tiempo de ejecución

Superficie de permisos

86

Aprobado

Acceso a archivos o documentos

Actividad de stars/forks

71

Revisar

643 estrellas y 81 forks; la actividad de issues no está disponible en los metadatos actuales

Adopción

88

Aprobado

643 estrellas de GitHub

Advertencias

  • Parsed SKILL.md metadata shows empty tags and frameworks, likely because they are nested under metadata rather than top-level frontmatter; this may reduce discoverability.
  • No critical security concerns found; the skill only produces documents and does not execute commands or access external resources.
  • Quality score needs review

Método

This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.

Comparar opciones cercanas

Skills relacionados para auditar después

copywriting

When the user wants to write, rewrite, or improve marketing copy for any page — including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, about pages, or product pages. Also use when the user says "write copy for," "improve this copy," "rewrite this page," "marketing copy," "headline help," "CTA copy," "value proposition," "tagline," "subheadline," "hero section copy," "above the fold," "this copy is weak," "make this more compelling," or "help me describe my product." Use this whenever someone is working on website text that needs to persuade or convert. For email copy, see emails. For popup copy, see popups. For editing existing copy, see copy-editing. For the offer underneath the copy (bonuses, guarantees, value framing), see offers.

47K Estrellas · Informe de auditoría

cro

When the user wants to optimize, improve, or increase conversions on any marketing page or form — including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, lead capture forms, or contact forms. Also use when the user says 'CRO,' 'conversion rate optimization,' 'this page isn't converting,' 'improve conversions,' 'why isn't this page working,' 'my landing page sucks,' 'form abandonment,' 'nobody's converting,' 'low conversion rate,' or 'this page needs work.' Use this even if the user just shares a URL and asks for feedback. For signup/registration flows, see signup. For post-signup activation, see onboarding. For popups/modals, see popups.

47K Estrellas · Informe de auditoría

marketing-psychology

When the user wants to apply psychological principles, mental models, or behavioral science to marketing. Also use when the user mentions 'psychology,' 'mental models,' 'cognitive bias,' 'persuasion,' 'behavioral science,' 'why people buy,' 'decision-making,' 'consumer behavior,' 'anchoring,' 'social proof,' 'scarcity,' 'loss aversion,' 'framing,' or 'nudge.' Use this whenever someone wants to understand or leverage how people think and make decisions in a marketing context. For applying psychology to specific pages, see cro; for pricing tactics, see pricing; for copy framing, see copywriting.

54K Estrellas · Informe de auditoría