pdf-parser Informe de auditoría.

Advertencias

• Dependency or permission surface needs review
• Permission surface may require sandboxing
• No input validation for PDF file paths; could allow path traversal if user provides malicious paths.
• Image paths from API response are not sanitized; could write outside output directory if API returns malicious paths.
• The script writes failed_files.txt in the current working directory, which may be unexpected if the user runs from a different location.
• Low GitHub adoption signal
• Quality score needs review
• Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
• GitHub adoption: 21 GitHub stars
• Stars/forks activity: 21 stars, 0 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
• Dependency/runtime risk: command execution surface, credential or environment access
• Permission surface: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution

Método

This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.