Creator · owainlewis
Last updated · Sep 3, 2026
Proves that a code change meets its acceptance criteria. Uses focused automated checks and a real browser for browser-facing work. Use to test or verify a diff, branch, PR, URL, or user flow.
Sandbox only
Install targets
Codex install prompt
Install the "test" agent skill from https://github.com/owainlewis/blueprint/tree/main/skills/test. Read its SKILL.md or equivalent instructions first, install only the files needed for this workspace, and summarize any required setup before using it. Skill purpose: Proves that a code change meets its acceptance criteria. Uses focused automated checks and a real browser for browser-facing work. Use to test or verify a diff, branch, PR, URL, or user flow. After the install attempt, report the result to https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome with POST JSON {"event_id":"install_<unique-id>","skill_slug":"owainlewis-test","task":"Install test","agent":"codex","outcome":"success","install_used":true}. Replace event_id with a unique value and outcome with success or failed. Report success only after the skill is installed and a minimal verification passes.Supply asset profile
Code review, repo analysis, testing, CI, GitHub, DevOps, and developer workflow skills.
Scenario
Coding agents
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Agent fit
Claude Code + Browser agents + CLI
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add owainlewis/blueprint --skill test
Maintenance
fresh
10d since push
Risk
Needs review
Permission surface may require sandboxing
GitHub quality
375
72/100 Quality · 77/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
Permission surface may require sandboxing · Quality score needs review
Agent adoption scorecard
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
StrongSolid option that is likely worth shortlisting for production workflows.
Trust
Sandbox onlyUseful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
Audit
Needs reviewA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Stars
375 GitHub stars
Repo activity
375 stars, 66 forks
Maintenance
10d since push
License
MIT
Install
npx skills add owainlewis/blueprint --skill test
Install safety
Agent-readable metadata
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
Suited agents
Install decision
Trust and risk
Outcome loop
Install command
npx skills add owainlewis/blueprint --skill testDo not use when
Alternative
168.6K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill code-review
Alternative
40.8K Stars
npx skills add appsmithorg/appsmith
Alternative
175.7K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill implement
Alternative
30.9K Stars
npx skills add vercel-labs/agent-skills --skill vercel-react-best-practices
Agent safety v2
Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
high
Skill metadata references terminal, CLI, shell, subprocess, or command execution workflows.
medium
Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.
medium
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.
Agent resolve plan
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20test%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20test%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/owainlewis-test/install
Agent should check
Copy prompt
Task: Use test in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20test%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/owainlewis-test/install
Install command: npx skills add owainlewis/blueprint --skill test
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/owainlewis-test/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/owainlewis-test/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=test&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use test for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/owainlewis-test/install, then install with: npx skills add owainlewis/blueprint --skill testRegistry metadata
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/owainlewis-test
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/owainlewis-test?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/owainlewis-test
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20test%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Coding agents
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code, Browser agents
Audit report
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.
Role in stack
Fallback candidate
Primary fit
Coding agents
Trust label
Prototype first
Install path
Command ready
Use when
Evidence
review first
Implementation path
Trust profile
Useful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
GitHub adoption
INFO375 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
INFO375 stars, 66 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS10d since push
License clarity
PASSMIT
Good signals
Review before install
Recommended action
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Quality profile
Solid option that is likely worth shortlisting for production workflows.
Workflow fit
Build and ship code
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Operate web apps
I need my agent to control a browser, fill forms, and verify web app workflows.
Manage repositories
I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.
Workflow fit
Operate and verify web apps
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Inspect, patch, and verify code
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
Design, build, test, and ship interfaces
A practical workflow for agents that turn product briefs or Figma designs into polished frontend code, review the result, test it in a browser, and prepare a safe deployment.
Alternative shortlist
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
Platform to build admin panels, internal tools, and dashboards. Integrates with 25+ databases and any API.
Implement work from an approved spec or ticket set, run focused and full tests, invoke code review, and commit the result to the current branch.
React and Next.js performance guidance for writing, reviewing, and refactoring production UI code.
--- name: test description: "Proves that a code change meets its acceptance criteria. Uses focused automated checks and a real browser for browser-facing work. Use to test or verify a diff, branch, PR, URL, or user flow." user-invocable: true argument-hint: "<task, acceptance criteria, diff, branch, PR, URL, or flow>" ---
# Test
Prove the behavior that matters. A passing build or a source-code reading can support the proof, but neither proves a user-visible flow.
## Process
1. Read the task, its source design when present, changed code, existing tests, and repository instructions. Acceptance criteria come from the task or approved design. Preserve their wording and `AC-n` or `INV-n` IDs. Never rewrite criteria to match the code. 2. Map every acceptance criterion, cited invariant, and affected failure path to proof by ID. Test changed behavior and behavior a refactor must preserve. 3. If automated tests cannot exercise the affected behavior, explain why and give other evidence. 4. Add or update focused tests where proof is missing. Assertions should fail when the changed behavior breaks. 5. Assert behavior a user or caller can observe unless the test targets a documented internal contract. Keep setup and assertions no more complex than the scenario. 6. Run the narrowest checks that exercise the changed behavior and affected interfaces. Run wider checks when shared behavior or interfaces changed. 7. When browser-rendered behavior changes, start the documented app and check the required flows and affected failures in a real browser. - Check desktop and mobile when layout or responsive styles changed. - Check keyboard use when interactions changed. - Check console errors and failed requests during every flow. - Capture evidence. Reading source is not browser proof. 8. Report each `AC-n`, `INV-n`, or task criterion as pass, fail, or unverified. Include the command, browser flow, or other evidence.
## Return
Report each criterion in this shape:
```text Criterion: <ID or exact wording> Result: Pass / Fail / Unverified Evidence: <command, browser flow, or artifact> Gap: <what remains unknown, or None> ```
Lead with failures and unverified criteria. Do not hide them below passing checks.
## Boundaries
- Do not weaken assertions to make a change pass. - Do not fix unrelated failures. - If required browser tooling is unavailable, report the check as blocked unless the user explicitly accepts a manual exception.
Source provenance
Decision snapshot
recent repository activity
Audit
Install and adoption review
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Scenario-led draft for test, ready for a manual X post.
A practical pick for a web workflow: test: Proves that a code change meets its acceptance criteria. Uses focused automated checks and a real browser for browser-facin... 375 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/owainlewis-test?ref=x
Listing + install path for test: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/owainlewis-test?ref=x Install: npx skills add owainlewis/blueprint --skill test
Listing source
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to owainlewis but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/owainlewis-test?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/owainlewis-test?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/owainlewis-test/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/owainlewis-test?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)owainlewis
@owainlewis
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Sandbox only
Code Review
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
168.6K StarsAppsmith
Platform to build admin panels, internal tools, and dashboards. Integrates with 25+ databases and any API.
40.8K StarsImplement
Implement work from an approved spec or ticket set, run focused and full tests, invoke code review, and commit the result to the current branch.
175.7K StarsVercel React Best Practices
React and Next.js performance guidance for writing, reviewing, and refactoring production UI code.
30.9K StarsPermission surface
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Usable metadata, review docs
Risk summary
Install readiness