Pre-install eval

competitive-teardown Eval report.

A machine-readable install decision for agents: task fit, Trust Score, Audit Score, install safety, permission surface, and a concrete validation plan before this skill touches a workspace.

Needs reviewMedium riskREVIEW Policy
79
Eval report
78
Trust
85
Audit
69
Agent safety

manual review

Require human approval before installing into a real workspace.

Required gates

Checks an agent must pass before install

Open JSON

Task fit

70

warn

Task fit is weak; compare alternatives before selecting.

  • Evaluate competitive-teardown before installing it in an agent workflow
  • doc
  • Web scraping workflows; Claude Code teams; teams that value GitHub adoption signals

Install path

92

pass

Install handoff is available.

  • npx skills add nexu-io/html-anything --skill competitive-teardown

Install command safety

92

pass

standard package or runtime install path

  • npx skills add nexu-io/html-anything --skill competitive-teardown

Trust score

78

warn

Good trust signals with a few areas worth checking before rollout.

  • Strong shortlist
  • 8.6K GitHub stars
  • Apache-2.0

Audit score

85

warn

Needs review

  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision

Agent safety gate

69

warn

Usable candidate, but the agent should surface permission and audit notes before installation.

  • Require human approval before installing into a real workspace.
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision

License clarity

86

pass

Apache-2.0

  • Apache-2.0

Permission surface

100

pass

no high-risk permission surface in public metadata

  • Network access: medium
  • Filesystem access: medium

Validation plan

What the agent should do next

  1. 1Inspect repository, README/SKILL.md, license, and recent commits before production use.
  2. 2Install in an isolated workspace or sandbox with no production secrets available.
  3. 3Run the smallest representative task and record files touched, commands run, network access, and outputs.
  4. 4Compare the selected skill against at least one alternative when the eval status is review or failed.
  5. 5Promote only after the agent reports a successful verification result and unresolved warnings are accepted.

Do not use when

Conditions that require another skill

  • teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
  • production agents without a repository review
  • The SKILL.md references three asset templates (war-room-grid.html, radar-map.html, analyst-dossier.html) but the submitted excerpt does not include these files. If they are missing from the repository, the skill's design guidance cannot be fully applied.
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
  • The skill does not explicitly define how to handle user input that is not in the expected format (e.g., unstructured notes). It assumes the user provides competitive data, but does not specify a fallback or parsing strategy.
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.

Supporting checks

Trust signals behind the decision

README/SKILL.md completeness

warn

78

Public metadata needs stronger README/SKILL.md context

Recent maintenance

pass

88

3mo since push

Alternatives available

info

55

No close alternatives were found in the current shortlist.