Skill audit report
wp-spec-to-goal Audit report.
Convert a WordPress plugin or feature idea (even a vague one) into a Codex /goal-ready bundle — GOAL.md, VERIFY.md, PROGRESS.md inside goals/<slug>/ — with wp-env + playwright-cli + wp-eval verification baked in. Asks clarifying questions in focused batches (each with options + recommendation + reasoning), reaches 95% confidence, optionally scaffolds a missing plugin folder + .wp-env.json + package.json + AGENTS.md, and emits a tailored /goal command. For new WP plugin or feature work, not bug fixes or non-WordPress projects.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score
The Trust Score helps an agent decide whether a skill is safe enough to shortlist before installation.
GitHub adoption
FAIL30
20 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
FAIL32
20 stars, 4 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS100
23d since push
License clarity
PASS86
MIT
README/SKILL.md completeness
PASS86
Metadata includes enough usage and workflow context
Dependency/runtime risk
FAIL28
command execution surface, credential or environment access
Install availability
PASS92
npx skills add nathanonn/agent-skills --skill wp-spec-to-goal
Install command safety
PASS92
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
FAIL18
secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
Repository evidence
PASS86
https://github.com/nathanonn/agent-skills/tree/main/plugins/wp-spec-to-goal/skills/wp-spec-to-goal
Review status
WARN46
AI review approval is missing
Agent Proven outcomes
INFO54
No agent outcome data yet
Checks
Install and adoption review
Install path
92
npx skills add nathanonn/agent-skills --skill wp-spec-to-goal
Repository
88
https://github.com/nathanonn/agent-skills/tree/main/plugins/wp-spec-to-goal/skills/wp-spec-to-goal
License
86
MIT
Maintenance
100
23d since push
AI review
55
Review approval is missing
README/SKILL.md completeness
86
Usable description available
Dependency risk
28
command execution surface, credential or environment access
Install command safety
92
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
18
secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
Stars/forks activity
32
20 stars, 4 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Adoption
42
20 GitHub stars
Financial decision safety
58
Research-only use: do not treat output as financial advice or execute a position without human approval.
Warnings
- Dependency or permission surface needs review
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- AI review approval is missing
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
- GitHub adoption: 20 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 20 stars, 4 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- Dependency/runtime risk: command execution surface, credential or environment access
- Permission surface: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
Method
This report combines public metadata, AI review output, repository freshness, install readiness, OpenAgentSkill events, quality scoring, trust checks, and the agent safety gate. It is not a full source-code security review.
Compare nearby options
Related skills to audit next
Code Review
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
169K Stars · Audit report
Appsmith
Platform to build admin panels, internal tools, and dashboards. Integrates with 25+ databases and any API.
41K Stars · Audit report
Implement
Implement work from an approved spec or ticket set, run focused and full tests, invoke code review, and commit the result to the current branch.
176K Stars · Audit report