Star200+

mneme

REVIEW · 65
Registry indexed

Architectural governance for this project. Use this skill when the user asks about project decisions, architectural constraints, or wants to enforce / record / review decisions. Also use whenever Claude Code is about to make a non-trivial edit and the project has a `.mneme/` dire

Verified installs0
Stars17
Version1.0.0
Quality59/100 · Promising
Trust65/100 · Sandbox only
Audit76/100 · Needs review

Supply asset profile

Coding and developer agents

Code review, repo analysis, testing, CI, GitHub, DevOps, and developer workflow skills.

Browse track

Scenario

Coding agents

I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.

Agent fit

Claude Code + CLI + Codex

Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.

Install

Ready

npx skills add MnemeHQ/mneme --skill mneme

Maintenance

fresh

1d since push

Risk

Needs review

Low GitHub adoption signal

GitHub quality

17

59/100 Quality · 73/100 Trust

Coverage tags

CodingCoding agentscoding-agentsagent-skill

Review notes

Low GitHub adoption signal · Quality score needs review

Agent adoption scorecard

Trust, audit, and install readiness at a glance

These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.

Quality

Promising
59

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

Trust

Sandbox only
65

Useful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.

Audit

Needs review
76

A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.

OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5

Human review before install

Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLI

Stars

17 GitHub stars

Repo activity

17 stars, 2 forks

Maintenance

1d since push

License

MIT

Install

npx skills add MnemeHQ/mneme --skill mneme

Install safety

standard package or runtime install path

Permission surface

shell or command execution, filesystem or document access

Agent outcomes

No agent outcome data yet

Docs

Strong README/SKILL.md context

Risk summary

Review before production

  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • GitHub adoption: 17 GitHub stars
  • Stars/forks activity: 17 stars, 2 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata

Install readiness

Install path available

  • Install path is available
  • Repository evidence is available
  • License is declared
  • No Agent Proven outcome evidence yet

Agent-readable metadata

Machine-readable decision data for this skill.

Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.

Open JSON

Suited tasks

  • Coding agents workflows
  • Claude Code teams
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects
  • Inspect source files

Suited agents

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLICLI

Install decision

Command
npx skills add MnemeHQ/mneme --skill mneme
Policy
block
Human review
yes

Trust and risk

Trust
65/100
Audit
76/100
Risk level
Needs review

Outcome loop

Endpoint
/api/agent/outcome
Event ID
resolve
Outcomes
5

Install command

npx skills add MnemeHQ/mneme --skill mneme
Public auditEval reportResolve APIInstall handoff

Do not use when

  • teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
  • production agents without a repository review
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution, Secrets or environment access
  • Quality score needs review

Alternative

Code Review

168.6K Stars

npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill code-review

Alternative

Grill With Docs

164.7K Stars

npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill grill-with-docs

Alternative

To Spec

164.7K Stars

npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill to-spec

Alternative

To Tickets

176.7K Stars

npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill to-tickets

Agent safety v2

32/100 · Avoid automatic install

Blocked for auto-installblock

This skill should not be selected by an agent without explicit human security review.

Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.

Resolve via API

high

Shell or command execution

Skill metadata references terminal, CLI, shell, subprocess, or command execution workflows.

medium

Network access

Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.

medium

Filesystem access

Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.

high

Secrets or environment access

Skill metadata references credentials, tokens, environment variables, or secret-bearing workflows.

  • High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution, Secrets or environment access
  • Low GitHub adoption signal

Install targets

Install this skill in your agent workflow

Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.

skill install

OpenAgentSkill CLI

Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.

$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install mnemehq-mneme

Agent resolve plan

Let an agent verify fit before installing.

The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.

Open text plan

Open JSON

/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20mneme%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium

Resolve text

/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20mneme%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text

Install handoff

/api/skills/mnemehq-mneme/install

Agent should check

  • Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
  • Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
  • Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.

Copy prompt

Task: Use mneme in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20mneme%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/mnemehq-mneme/install
Install command: npx skills add MnemeHQ/mneme --skill mneme
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.

Agent handoff

Give an agent the install path, not another directory page.

Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.

Open install API

Install handoff

/api/skills/mnemehq-mneme/install

LLM text format

/api/skills/mnemehq-mneme/install?format=text

Find alternatives

/api/skills/search?q=mneme&limit=3

Agent prompt

Use mneme for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/mnemehq-mneme/install, then install with: npx skills add MnemeHQ/mneme --skill mneme

Registry metadata

Agent-readable profile for automatic skill selection.

This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.

Open manifest

Manifest

/api/registry/manifest/mnemehq-mneme

LLM text

/api/registry/manifest/mnemehq-mneme?format=text

Install alias

/api/registry/install/mnemehq-mneme

Recommend

/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20mneme%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3

Agent fit

58/100

Coding agents

Use-case tags

Coding agentsWorkflow automationRAG and knowledge

Platforms

Claude Code

Audit report

Needs review · 76/100

A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.

View audit reportView eval report

Agent decision cockpit

Fallback candidate for Coding agents

Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.

58
Readiness
Prototype
Stage

Role in stack

Fallback candidate

Primary fit

Coding agents

Trust label

Prototype first

Install path

Command ready

Use when

  • Coding agents workflows
  • Claude Code teams
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects

Evidence

  • recent repository activity
  • install command or GitHub repo available
  • 59/100 quality profile
  • 1 OpenAgentSkill engagement events

review first

  • Low GitHub adoption signal

Implementation path

  1. 1Install it in a sandbox agent and run one Coding agents task end to end.
  2. 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
  3. 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.

Trust profile

Sandbox only

Useful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.

65
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score

GitHub adoption

FIX

17 GitHub stars

Stars/forks activity

FIX

17 stars, 2 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata

Recent maintenance

PASS

1d since push

License clarity

PASS

MIT

Good signals

  • AI review approved
  • Install path is available
  • Repository evidence is available
  • Recently maintained repository
  • Install command has no obvious high-risk pattern
  • Outcome loop is ready but needs first real agent run

Review before install

  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • GitHub adoption: 17 GitHub stars
  • Stars/forks activity: 17 stars, 2 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
  • No real agent outcome reports yet
  • Human review required before unattended installation

Recommended action

Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.

Quality profile

Promising candidate for agent workflows

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

59
GitHub stars
17
Freshness
1d ago
Install ready
Yes
License
MIT
Review before install: Low GitHub adoption signal

Workflow fit

Use this skill in these scenarios

Build and ship code

Coding agents

I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.

Automate repeated work

Workflow automation

I need my agent to automate a repeated workflow across tools and files.

Search private knowledge

RAG and knowledge

I need my agent to build a RAG workflow over documents and retrieve reliable context.

Workflow fit

Add it to a complete workflow

Inspect, patch, and verify code

Coding review agent

A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.

Turn skills into distribution

Content growth agent

A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.

Ingest, retrieve, and cite

RAG knowledge base

A workflow for document-heavy agents that ingest files, create searchable knowledge, retrieve relevant context, and answer with grounded sources.

Alternative shortlist

Compare before you install

Similar skills that may fit this task.

Compare all

Code Review

Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.

Adopt
Ready100
Quality100
Stars168.6K

Grill With Docs

A relentless interview that pressure-tests a plan against the codebase, sharpens domain language, and updates CONTEXT.md and ADRs when decisions become durable.

Adopt
Ready100
Quality100
Stars164.7K

To Spec

Turn the current conversation and codebase context into a structured implementation spec, then publish it to the configured project issue tracker.

Adopt
Ready100
Quality100
Stars164.7K

To Tickets

Break a plan, spec, or conversation into independently actionable tracer-bullet tickets with explicit blocking relationships.

Adopt
Ready100
Quality100
Stars176.7K

Overview

--- name: mneme description: | Architectural governance for this project. Use this skill when the user asks about project decisions, architectural constraints, or wants to enforce / record / review decisions. Also use whenever Claude Code is about to make a non-trivial edit and the project has a `.mneme/` directory — check relevant decisions first. ---

# Mneme — project memory & governance

This project uses Mneme to enforce architectural decisions.

## When this skill activates

- User mentions "ADR", "decision", "constraint", "anti-pattern", "architecture". - A `.mneme/project_memory.json` file exists in the repo. - About to make a non-trivial edit in an area that may be governed by recorded decisions.

## How to use it

1. **Before non-trivial edits** — run `/mneme-context` with a descriptive task phrase (e.g. "storage layer changes", "auth middleware refactor"). Use domain language, not just the file name — retrieval is keyword-based and the query must overlap with decision scope fields to surface relevant decisions.

2. **To gate a draft** — run `/mneme-check` against the proposed content, again with a descriptive `--query`.

3. **To record a new decision** — run `/mneme-record`. When choosing `scope` keywords, pick terms that will appear in file names or task descriptions where this decision applies, so the hook can retrieve it automatically.

4. **To audit pending changes** — run `/mneme-review`.

## Hook enforcement

A `PreToolUse` hook (`mneme-hook`) runs automatically on Edit / Write / MultiEdit. It reconstructs the full post-edit file content, then calls `mneme check` with the query `"edit to <file_path>"`. Decisions whose scope or text share tokens with the file name are retrieved and checked.

**Retrieval caveat:** The automatic hook query is derived from the file path, so decisions with scope keywords that don't appear in file names may not be retrieved automatically. Use `/mneme-context` before large edits to confirm coverage.

If the proposed change violates a decision in strict mode, Claude Code is blocked and the violated decision id is surfaced in the error.

To switch to warn-only mode: `export MNEME_HOOK_MODE=warn`

## Related

- Project memory: `.mneme/project_memory.json` - CLI reference: `mneme --help` - Integration docs: `integrations/claude-code/README.md`

Technical details

Version
1.0.0
License
MIT
Last updated
Aug 21, 2026
Published
Aug 21, 2026

Decision snapshot

Fallback candidate

58
Ready
Prototype
Stage

recent repository activity

Audit

Install review

Install and adoption review

76
Needs review
Security
81/100
Maintenance
100/100
Install
92/100
Open full auditView eval report

Agent-proven evidence

Agent-proven evidence

Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.

0
Proven
Needs first agent runAuto-install: review firstLast: Unknown
Success rate
—
Recent failure
—
Outcomes
0
Output quality
—
Failed
0
Not relevant
0
Installs
0
Risk blocked
0
Setup needed
0
Production
0

No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.

Agent-Proven rankingOutcome contract

Install

Add to agent workflow

Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.

Compare AlternativesAuto-resolve PlanView on GitHubDocumentation

Growth loop

Share kit

X

Scenario-led draft for mneme, ready for a manual X post.

Curator note
A practical pick for the next repo task:

mneme: Architectural governance for this project. Use this skill when the user asks about project decisions, architectural constra...

17 stars

https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/mnemehq-mneme?ref=x
Open X draft
Optional reply with install command
Listing + install path for mneme:
https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/mnemehq-mneme?ref=x

Install: npx skills add MnemeHQ/mneme --skill mneme
Open reply draft

Listing source

Registry indexed

Claimable

This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.

Creator
MnemeHQ
Indexed by
OpenAgentSkill community index

Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.

Claim this skill

Owner claim

Claim this skill listing

This Registry indexed listing is attributed to MnemeHQ but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.

Creator backlink kit

Add the evidence badges to your README

Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.

[![Listed on OpenAgentSkill](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/mnemehq-mneme?metric=listed&label=Listed)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/mnemehq-mneme)
[![OpenAgentSkill Trust](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/mnemehq-mneme?metric=trust&label=Trust)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/mnemehq-mneme)
[![OpenAgentSkill Audit](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/mnemehq-mneme?metric=audit&label=Audit)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/mnemehq-mneme/audit)
[![Agent Proven](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/mnemehq-mneme?metric=proven&label=Agent%20Proven)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/mnemehq-mneme)
Preview badge Open audit Creator kit

Author

M

MnemeHQ

@mnemehq

Tags

agent-skill

Platform fit

Claude Code

Health signals

GitHub stars
17
Quality score
32/100
Last GitHub push
Aug 21, 2026
Framework hints
Unknown
OpenAgentSkill views
1
Install copies
0
Outbound clicks
0

Community signal

Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.

Trust & safety

Sandbox only

65
  • GitHub adoption17 GitHub starsFIX
  • Stars/forks activity17 stars, 2 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadataFIX
  • Recent maintenance1d since pushPASS
  • License clarityMITPASS
  • README/SKILL.md completenessMetadata includes enough usage and workflow contextPASS
  • Dependency/runtime riskcommand execution surfaceINFO

Related skills

Code Review

Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.

168.6K Stars

Grill With Docs

A relentless interview that pressure-tests a plan against the codebase, sharpens domain language, and updates CONTEXT.md and ADRs when decisions become durable.

164.7K Stars

To Spec

Turn the current conversation and codebase context into a structured implementation spec, then publish it to the configured project issue tracker.

164.7K Stars

To Tickets

Break a plan, spec, or conversation into independently actionable tracer-bullet tickets with explicit blocking relationships.

176.7K Stars
InstallView on GitHub