OpenAgentSkill
GitHub200+

Évaluation avant installation

craft-garnish Rapport d’évaluation.

Une décision d’installation lisible par machine pour les Agents : adéquation à la tâche, Trust Score, Audit Score, sécurité d’installation, surface de permissions et plan de validation concret avant de toucher l’espace de travail.

Revue nécessaireRisque moyenRevoir Politique
67
Rapport d’évaluation
69
Confiance
74
Audit
54
Sécurité Agent

Revue manuelle

Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.

Gates requis

Vérifications qu’un Agent doit réussir avant installation

Ouvrir JSON

Adéquation à la tâche

84

Validé

Task wording matches this skill metadata.

  • Evaluate craft-garnish before installing it in an agent workflow
  • Design et création
  • Design and creative workflows; Claude Code teams; builders willing to evaluate younger projects

Chemin d’installation

92

Validé

Install handoff is available.

  • npx skills add michtio/craftcms-claude-skills --skill craft-garnish

Sécurité de la commande d’installation

92

Validé

Chemin d’installation standard de package ou runtime

  • npx skills add michtio/craftcms-claude-skills --skill craft-garnish

Score de confiance

69

Avertissement

Potentially useful, but at least one trust signal needs human inspection.

  • Revue manuelle
  • 78 stars GitHub
  • MIT

Score d’audit

74

Avertissement

Revue nécessaire

  • The description trigger list is extremely long and may cause the skill to be loaded in borderline cases; organizing triggers into clear categories in the description could reduce over-triggering and improve scannability.

Contrôle de sécurité Agent

54

Avertissement

Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.

  • Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
  • The description trigger list is extremely long and may cause the skill to be loaded in borderline cases; organizing triggers into clear categories in the description could reduce over-triggering and improve scannability.

Clarté de licence

86

Validé

MIT

  • MIT

Surface de permissions

72

Avertissement

filesystem or document access, network or browser access

  • Browser automation: medium
  • Network access: medium
  • Filesystem access: medium

Plan de validation

Ce que l’Agent doit faire ensuite

  1. 1Inspect repository, README/SKILL.md, license, and recent commits before production use.
  2. 2Install in an isolated workspace or sandbox with no production secrets available.
  3. 3Run the smallest representative task and record files touched, commands run, network access, and outputs.
  4. 4Compare the selected skill against at least one alternative when the eval status is review or failed.
  5. 5Promote only after the agent reports a successful verification result and unresolved warnings are accepted.

Ne pas utiliser quand

Conditions exigeant une autre skill

  • Équipes qui nécessitent un SLA soutenu par le fournisseur
  • production agents without a repository review
  • The description trigger list is extremely long and may cause the skill to be loaded in borderline cases; organizing triggers into clear categories in the description could reduce over-triggering and improve scannability.
  • The SKILL.md excerpt ends with an incomplete 'Task examples:' section. If the actual file is truncated, the missing examples should be completed to preserve the skill's practical guidance.
  • Quality score needs review
  • GitHub adoption: 78 GitHub stars

Vérifications complémentaires

Signaux de confiance derrière la décision

Complétude README/SKILL.md

Validé

86

Les métadonnées incluent suffisamment de contexte d’usage et de workflow

Maintenance récente

Validé

88

1 mois depuis le dernier push

Alternatives disponibles

Validé

82

Alternative skills are available for comparison.