Evaluación previa a la instalación
craft-garnish Informe de evaluación.
Una decisión de instalación legible por máquina para Agents: afinidad con la tarea, Trust Score, Audit Score, seguridad de instalación, superficie de permisos y un plan de validación concreto antes de tocar el espacio de trabajo.
Revisión manual
Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
Controles obligatorios
Comprobaciones que un Agent debe superar antes de instalar
Ajuste de tarea
84
Task wording matches this skill metadata.
- Evaluate craft-garnish before installing it in an agent workflow
- Diseño y creatividad
- Design and creative workflows; Claude Code teams; builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Ruta de instalación
92
Install handoff is available.
- npx skills add michtio/craftcms-claude-skills --skill craft-garnish
Seguridad del comando de instalación
92
Ruta estándar de paquete o instalación en tiempo de ejecución
- npx skills add michtio/craftcms-claude-skills --skill craft-garnish
Puntuación de confianza
69
Potentially useful, but at least one trust signal needs human inspection.
- Revisión manual
- 78 estrellas de GitHub
- MIT
Puntuación de auditoría
74
Requiere revisión
- The description trigger list is extremely long and may cause the skill to be loaded in borderline cases; organizing triggers into clear categories in the description could reduce over-triggering and improve scannability.
Control de seguridad de Agent
54
Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
- Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
- The description trigger list is extremely long and may cause the skill to be loaded in borderline cases; organizing triggers into clear categories in the description could reduce over-triggering and improve scannability.
Claridad de licencia
86
MIT
- MIT
Superficie de permisos
72
filesystem or document access, network or browser access
- Browser automation: medium
- Network access: medium
- Filesystem access: medium
Plan de validación
Qué debe hacer el Agent después
- 1Inspect repository, README/SKILL.md, license, and recent commits before production use.
- 2Install in an isolated workspace or sandbox with no production secrets available.
- 3Run the smallest representative task and record files touched, commands run, network access, and outputs.
- 4Compare the selected skill against at least one alternative when the eval status is review or failed.
- 5Promote only after the agent reports a successful verification result and unresolved warnings are accepted.
No usar cuando
Condiciones que requieren otra skill
- Equipos que necesitan un SLA con soporte del proveedor
- production agents without a repository review
- The description trigger list is extremely long and may cause the skill to be loaded in borderline cases; organizing triggers into clear categories in the description could reduce over-triggering and improve scannability.
- The SKILL.md excerpt ends with an incomplete 'Task examples:' section. If the actual file is truncated, the missing examples should be completed to preserve the skill's practical guidance.
- Quality score needs review
- GitHub adoption: 78 GitHub stars
Comprobaciones de apoyo
Señales de confianza detrás de la decisión
Completitud de README/SKILL.md
Aprobado86
Los metadatos incluyen suficiente contexto de uso y flujo de trabajo
Mantenimiento reciente
Aprobado88
1 meses desde el último push
Alternativas disponibles
Aprobado82
Alternative skills are available for comparison.