gza-explore-summarize
Summarize an explore task, extract the important findings, and suggest concrete next steps
Supply asset profile
Research and knowledge work
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Scenario
Research agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Agent fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add mhawthorne/gza --skill gza-explore-summarize
Maintenance
fresh
Pushed today
Risk
Needs review
SKILL.md contains an unrelated scoring rubric section ('Score each dimension from 0 to 10...') that appears to be a copy‑paste error and does not belong in the skill documentation. This could confuse agents executing the skill.
GitHub quality
11
57/100 Quality · 69/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
SKILL.md contains an unrelated scoring rubric section ('Score each dimension from 0 to 10...') that appears to be a copy‑paste error and does not belong in the skill documentation. This could confuse agents executing the skill. · Low GitHub adoption signal
Agent adoption scorecard
Trust, audit, and install readiness at a glance
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
PromisingUseful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Trust
Sandbox onlyUseful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
Audit
Needs reviewA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Human review before install
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Stars
11 GitHub stars
Repo activity
11 stars, 1 forks
Maintenance
Pushed today
License
MIT
Install
npx skills add mhawthorne/gza --skill gza-explore-summarize
Install safety
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Strong README/SKILL.md context
Risk summary
Review before production
- SKILL.md contains an unrelated scoring rubric section ('Score each dimension from 0 to 10...') that appears to be a copy‑paste error and does not belong in the skill documentation. This could confuse agents executing the skill.
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- GitHub adoption: 11 GitHub stars
Install readiness
Install path available
- Install path is available
- Repository evidence is available
- License is declared
- No Agent Proven outcome evidence yet
Agent-readable metadata
Machine-readable decision data for this skill.
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
- Research agents workflows
- Claude Code teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
- Search sources
Suited agents
Install decision
- Command
- npx skills add mhawthorne/gza --skill gza-explore-summarize
- Policy
- review
- Human review
- yes
Trust and risk
- Trust
- 61/100
- Audit
- 74/100
- Risk level
- Needs review
Outcome loop
- Endpoint
- /api/agent/outcome
- Event ID
- resolve
- Outcomes
- 5
Install command
npx skills add mhawthorne/gza --skill gza-explore-summarizeDo not use when
- teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
- production agents without a repository review
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- SKILL.md contains an unrelated scoring rubric section ('Score each dimension from 0 to 10...') that appears to be a copy‑paste error and does not belong in the skill documentation. This could confuse agents executing the skill.
- High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution
Alternative
Last30days Skill
53.5K Stars
npx skills add mvanhorn/last30days-skill -g
Alternative
Academic Research Skills
38.4K Stars
npx skills add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Alternative
GPT Researcher
28.0K Stars
npx skills add assafelovic/gpt-researcher
Alternative
DeepResearch
19.8K Stars
npx skills add Alibaba-NLP/DeepResearch
Agent safety v2
46/100 · Avoid automatic install
Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
high
Shell or command execution
Skill metadata references terminal, CLI, shell, subprocess, or command execution workflows.
medium
Network access
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Filesystem access
Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.
- High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution
- SKILL.md contains an unrelated scoring rubric section ('Score each dimension from 0 to 10...') that appears to be a copy‑paste error and does not belong in the skill documentation. This could confuse agents executing the skill.
Install targets
Install this skill in your agent workflow
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install mhawthorne-gza-explore-summarizeAgent resolve plan
Let an agent verify fit before installing.
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20gza-explore-summarize%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20gza-explore-summarize%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/mhawthorne-gza-explore-summarize/install
Agent should check
- Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
- Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
- Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.
Copy prompt
Task: Use gza-explore-summarize in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20gza-explore-summarize%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/mhawthorne-gza-explore-summarize/install
Install command: npx skills add mhawthorne/gza --skill gza-explore-summarize
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Give an agent the install path, not another directory page.
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/mhawthorne-gza-explore-summarize/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/mhawthorne-gza-explore-summarize/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=gza-explore-summarize&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use gza-explore-summarize for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/mhawthorne-gza-explore-summarize/install, then install with: npx skills add mhawthorne/gza --skill gza-explore-summarizeRegistry metadata
Agent-readable profile for automatic skill selection.
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/mhawthorne-gza-explore-summarize
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/mhawthorne-gza-explore-summarize?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/mhawthorne-gza-explore-summarize
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20gza-explore-summarize%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Research agents
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code
Audit report
Needs review · 74/100
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Needs validation for Research agents
Do a manual repository review before adding this to an agent workflow.
Role in stack
Needs validation
Primary fit
Research agents
Trust label
Needs manual review
Install path
Command ready
Use when
- Research agents workflows
- Claude Code teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Evidence
- recent repository activity
- install command or GitHub repo available
- 57/100 quality profile
- 1 OpenAgentSkill engagement events
review first
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- SKILL.md contains an unrelated scoring rubric section ('Score each dimension from 0 to 10...') that appears to be a copy‑paste error and does not belong in the skill documentation. This could confuse agents executing the skill.
Implementation path
- 1Install it in a sandbox agent and run one Research agents task end to end.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
Trust profile
Sandbox only
Useful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
GitHub adoption
FIX11 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
FIX11 stars, 1 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASSPushed today
License clarity
PASSMIT
Good signals
- AI review approved
- Install path is available
- Repository evidence is available
- Recently maintained repository
- Install command has no obvious high-risk pattern
- Outcome loop is ready but needs first real agent run
Review before install
- SKILL.md contains an unrelated scoring rubric section ('Score each dimension from 0 to 10...') that appears to be a copy‑paste error and does not belong in the skill documentation. This could confuse agents executing the skill.
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- GitHub adoption: 11 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 11 stars, 1 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- No real agent outcome reports yet
- Human review required before unattended installation
Recommended action
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Quality profile
Promising candidate for agent workflows
Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.
Workflow fit
Use this skill in these scenarios
Investigate faster
Research agents
I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.
Publish consistently
Content automation
I need my agent to turn research and product updates into useful content drafts.
Manage repositories
GitHub automation
I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.
Workflow fit
Add it to a complete workflow
Find, compare, and synthesize
Research report agent
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Turn skills into distribution
Content growth agent
A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.
Operate and verify web apps
Browser QA agent
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Alternative shortlist
Compare before you install
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
Academic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
GPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
DeepResearch
Tongyi Deep Research, the Leading Open-source Deep Research Agent
Overview
--- name: gza-explore-summarize description: Summarize an explore task, extract the important findings, and suggest concrete next steps allowed-tools: Read, Bash(uv run gza show:*), Bash(uv run gza log:*), AskUserQuestion version: 1.0.0 public: true ---
# Gza Explore Summarize
Summarize a completed explore task and turn its output into concrete next-step guidance. Use this when an explore task produced useful markdown or notes, but the user wants a faster handoff into planning, implementation, or a narrower follow-up exploration.
## Inputs
- Required: full prefixed explore task ID (for example, `gza-1234`) - Optional: context about what decision the user is trying to make next
If the user did not provide a full prefixed task ID, ask for it before proceeding.
Use the full prefixed task ID for all `gza` commands.
## Goal
Produce a concise operator-facing synthesis:
- what the explore task found - what matters most - what remains uncertain - what the best next steps are
This skill is not a raw inspection dump. Prefer synthesis and recommended actions over repeating the whole report.
## Process
### Step 1: Inspect the task
Run:
```bash uv run gza show <TASK_ID> uv run gza log <TASK_ID> ```
Use the output to verify: - task exists - task type is `explore` - current status - report or output content - any execution/log context that changes how confident the findings are
If the task is not found or is not an `explore` task, stop and explain the mismatch.
### Step 2: Read the exploration output
Use the report content from `gza show` or the report file it references.
Extract: - main findings - evidence or examples that support those findings - recommendations already present in the report - unresolved unknowns, risks, or missing context
If the output is thin, ambiguous, or clearly incomplete, use AskUserQuestion to clarify what decision the user is trying to make from this research.
### Step 3: Synthesize what matters
Summarize the exploration in a compact, decision-oriented way.
Focus on: - 3 to 7 findings at most - the implications of those findings - any disagreements, tradeoffs, or uncertainty that still affect the next step
Do not simply restate the report section by section.
### Step 4: Recommend next actions
Suggest the most appropriate next step based on the exploration output:
- create a `plan` task if the explore task narrowed the problem but design work is still needed - create an `implement` task if the path is already clear enough to execute - create another `explore` task if one key unknown still blocks good planning or implementation - create a `review` or docs-oriented follow-up only if the exploration clearly points there
When helpful, recommend concrete gza commands using the current task as lineage:
```bash uv run gza add --type plan --based-on <TASK_ID> "..." uv run gza add --type implement --based-on <TASK_ID> "..." uv run gza add --type explore --based-on <TASK_ID> "..." ```
Prefer one recommended path plus one fallback, rather than a long menu of possibilities.
### Step 5: Output format
Use this structure:
```text Explore Summary: Task <TASK_ID>
Task Context - Status: <status> - Prompt: <prompt>
Key Findings - <finding> - <finding> - <finding>
What Matters - <implication or decision-relevant takeaway>
Open Questions - <remaining uncertainty>
Suggested Next Steps 1. <recommended next action> 2. <optional fallback or follow-up action>
Recommended Commands - <command> - <command> ```
Keep it concise. The goal is to help the user decide what to do next without rereading the whole exploration report.
## Important notes
- Use the explore output as primary evidence; do not invent conclusions the report did not support. - If the report contains clear recommendations, preserve them, but rewrite them more sharply when useful. - If the exploration does not support a confident implementation path, prefer recommending a `plan` task over jumping straight to `implement`. - If the user mainly wants raw task details, prefer `/gza-task-info`. - If the user wants a queue-level overview across many tasks, prefer `/gza-summary`.
Technical details
- Version
- 1.0.0
- License
- MIT
- Last updated
- Aug 21, 2026
- Published
- Aug 21, 2026
Decision snapshot
Needs validation
recent repository activity
Audit
Install review
Install and adoption review
- Security
- 76/100
- Maintenance
- 100/100
- Install
- 92/100
Agent-proven evidence
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
- Success rate
- —
- Recent failure
- —
- Outcomes
- 0
- Output quality
- —
- Failed
- 0
- Not relevant
- 0
- Installs
- 0
- Risk blocked
- 0
- Setup needed
- 0
- Production
- 0
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Add to agent workflow
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Share kit
Scenario-led draft for gza-explore-summarize, ready for a manual X post.
gza-explore-summarize: Summarize an explore task, extract the important findings, and suggest concrete next steps 11 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/mhawthorne-gza-explore-summarize?ref=x
Optional reply with install command
Listing + install path for gza-explore-summarize: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/mhawthorne-gza-explore-summarize?ref=x Install: npx skills add mhawthorne/gza --skill gza-explore-summarize
Listing source
Registry indexed
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
- Creator
- mhawthorne
- Source
- mhawthorne/gza
- Indexed by
- OpenAgentSkill community index
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
Claim this skill listing
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to mhawthorne but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Add the evidence badges to your README
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/mhawthorne-gza-explore-summarize)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/mhawthorne-gza-explore-summarize)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/mhawthorne-gza-explore-summarize/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/mhawthorne-gza-explore-summarize)Author
mhawthorne
@mhawthorne
Tags
Platform fit
Health signals
- GitHub stars
- 11
- Quality score
- 31/100
- Last GitHub push
- Aug 21, 2026
- Framework hints
- Unknown
- OpenAgentSkill views
- 1
- Install copies
- 0
- Outbound clicks
- 0
Community signal
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Trust & safety
Sandbox only
- GitHub adoption11 GitHub starsFIX
- Stars/forks activity11 stars, 1 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadataFIX
- Recent maintenancePushed todayPASS
- License clarityMITPASS
- README/SKILL.md completenessMetadata includes enough usage and workflow contextPASS
- Dependency/runtime riskcommand execution surfaceINFO
Related skills
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
53.5K StarsAcademic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
38.4K StarsGPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
28.0K StarsDeepResearch
Tongyi Deep Research, the Leading Open-source Deep Research Agent
19.8K Stars