Pre-install eval
gza-code-review-full Eval report.
A machine-readable install decision for agents: task fit, Trust Score, Audit Score, install safety, permission surface, and a concrete validation plan before this skill touches a workspace.
do not auto install
Trust score: Potentially useful, but at least one trust signal needs human inspection.
Required gates
Checks an agent must pass before install
Task fit
94
Task wording matches this skill metadata.
- Evaluate gza-code-review-full before installing it in an agent workflow
- coding-agents
- GitHub automation workflows; Claude Code teams; builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Install path
92
Install handoff is available.
- npx skills add mhawthorne/gza --skill gza-code-review-full
Install command safety
92
standard package or runtime install path
- npx skills add mhawthorne/gza --skill gza-code-review-full
Trust score
58
Potentially useful, but at least one trust signal needs human inspection.
- Manual review
- 11 GitHub stars
- MIT
Audit score
69
Needs review
- Dependency or permission surface needs review
Agent safety gate
25
This skill should not be selected by an agent without explicit human security review.
- Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.
- Metadata combines secrets access with shell or command execution
License clarity
86
MIT
- MIT
Permission surface
18
secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
- Shell or command execution: high
- Network access: medium
- Filesystem access: medium
Validation plan
What the agent should do next
- 1Inspect repository, README/SKILL.md, license, and recent commits before production use.
- 2Install in an isolated workspace or sandbox with no production secrets available.
- 3Run the smallest representative task and record files touched, commands run, network access, and outputs.
- 4Compare the selected skill against at least one alternative when the eval status is review or failed.
- 5Promote only after the agent reports a successful verification result and unresolved warnings are accepted.
Do not use when
Conditions that require another skill
- teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
- production agents without a repository review
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Skill is highly specific to the gza codebase, limiting reusability for other projects.
- High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution, Secrets or environment access
- Dependency or permission surface needs review
Supporting checks
Trust signals behind the decision
README/SKILL.md completeness
pass86
Metadata includes enough usage and workflow context
Recent maintenance
pass100
Pushed today
Alternatives available
pass82
Alternative skills are available for comparison.