Creator · Masriyan
Last updated · Sep 5, 2026
IR playbook execution, evidence collection, forensic timeline analysis, memory forensics, and post-incident reporting following NIST SP 800-61 and SANS PICERL methodology
Creator · Masriyan
Last updated · Sep 5, 2026
IR playbook execution, evidence collection, forensic timeline analysis, memory forensics, and post-incident reporting following NIST SP 800-61 and SANS PICERL methodology
Creator · Masriyan
Last updated · Sep 5, 2026
IR playbook execution, evidence collection, forensic timeline analysis, memory forensics, and post-incident reporting following NIST SP 800-61 and SANS PICERL methodology
Creator · Masriyan
Last updated · Sep 5, 2026
IR playbook execution, evidence collection, forensic timeline analysis, memory forensics, and post-incident reporting following NIST SP 800-61 and SANS PICERL methodology
Do not auto-install
Install targets
Codex install prompt
Install the "Incident Response & Digital Forensics" agent skill from https://github.com/Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill/tree/main/skills/07-incident-response. Read its SKILL.md or equivalent instructions first, install only the files needed for this workspace, and summarize any required setup before using it. Skill purpose: IR playbook execution, evidence collection, forensic timeline analysis, memory forensics, and post-incident reporting following NIST SP 800-61 and SANS PICERL methodology After the install attempt, report the result to https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome with POST JSON {"event_id":"install_<unique-id>","skill_slug":"masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics","task":"Install Incident Response & Digital Forensics","agent":"codex","outcome":"success","install_used":true}. Replace event_id with a unique value and outcome with success or failed. Report success only after the skill is installed and a minimal verification passes.Supply asset profile
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Scenario
RAG and knowledge
I need my agent to build a RAG workflow over documents and retrieve reliable context.
Agent fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill Incident Response & Digital Forensics
Maintenance
fresh
2d since push
Risk
Risky
Dependency or permission surface needs review
GitHub quality
397
77/100 Quality · 65/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
Dependency or permission surface needs review · Permission surface may require sandboxing
Agent adoption scorecard
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
StrongSolid option that is likely worth shortlisting for production workflows.
Trust
Do not auto-installTrust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Audit
RiskyA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Stars
397 GitHub stars
Repo activity
397 stars, 75 forks
Maintenance
2d since push
License
MIT
Install
npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill Incident Response & Digital Forensics
Install safety
Agent-readable metadata
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
Suited agents
Install decision
Trust and risk
Outcome loop
Install command
npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill Incident Response & Digital ForensicsDo not use when
Agent safety v2
This skill should not be selected by an agent without explicit human security review.
Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.
high
Skill metadata references terminal, CLI, shell, subprocess, or command execution workflows.
medium
Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.
medium
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.
Agent resolve plan
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20Incident%20Response%20%26%20Digital%20Forensics%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20Incident%20Response%20%26%20Digital%20Forensics%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics/install
Agent should check
Copy prompt
Task: Use Incident Response & Digital Forensics in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20Incident%20Response%20%26%20Digital%20Forensics%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics/install
Install command: npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill Incident Response & Digital Forensics
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=Incident%20Response%20%26%20Digital%20Forensics&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use Incident Response & Digital Forensics for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics/install, then install with: npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill Incident Response & Digital ForensicsRegistry metadata
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20Incident%20Response%20%26%20Digital%20Forensics%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Workflow automation
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code
Audit report
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Shortlist this skill and compare it with close alternatives before production adoption.
Role in stack
Companion skill
Primary fit
Workflow automation
Trust label
Strong shortlist
Install path
Command ready
Use when
Evidence
review first
Implementation path
Trust profile
Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
GitHub adoption
INFO397 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
INFO397 stars, 75 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS2d since push
License clarity
PASSMIT
Good signals
Review before install
Recommended action
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Quality profile
Solid option that is likely worth shortlisting for production workflows.
Workflow fit
Automate repeated work
I need my agent to automate a repeated workflow across tools and files.
Operate local tools
I need my agent to operate local files and desktop apps in a repeatable workflow.
Search private knowledge
I need my agent to build a RAG workflow over documents and retrieve reliable context.
Workflow fit
Turn skills into distribution
A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.
Ingest, retrieve, and cite
A workflow for document-heavy agents that ingest files, create searchable knowledge, retrieve relevant context, and answer with grounded sources.
Find, compare, and synthesize
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Alternative shortlist
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Run multimodal agents that operate desktop interfaces
Connect agents to hundreds of workflow automations
利用AI大模型,一键生成高清短视频 Generate short videos with one click using AI LLM.
Alternative firmware for ESP8266 and ESP32 based devices with easy configuration using webUI, OTA updates, automation using timers or rules, expandability and entirely local control over MQTT, HTTP, Serial or KNX. Full documentation at
--- name: Incident Response & Digital Forensics description: IR playbook execution, evidence collection, forensic timeline analysis, memory forensics, and post-incident reporting following NIST SP 800-61 and SANS PICERL methodology version: 3.0.0 author: Masriyan tags: [cybersecurity, incident-response, forensics, dfir, evidence, timeline, picerl, nist] ---
# Incident Response & Digital Forensics
## Purpose
Enable Claude to assist with structured incident response operations following NIST SP 800-61 and the SANS PICERL framework. Claude generates IR playbooks, guides evidence collection with chain of custody, constructs forensic timelines, interprets memory forensics output, and produces post-incident reports.
---
## Activation Triggers
This skill activates when the user asks about: - Creating an incident response playbook (ransomware, phishing, breach, etc.) - Evidence collection and chain of custody procedures - Forensic timeline construction from logs or artifacts - Memory forensics using Volatility - Post-incident report generation - DFIR (Digital Forensics and Incident Response) procedures - Containment and eradication strategies - Root cause analysis for security incidents - IR metrics, SLA tracking, or reporting for management
---
## Prerequisites
```bash pip install pyyaml jinja2 pandas python-dateutil ```
**Recommended DFIR tools:** - `Volatility 3` — Memory forensics framework - `Autopsy / Sleuth Kit` — Disk forensics - `plaso / log2timeline` — Supertimeline generation - `KAPE` — Evidence collection (Windows) - `Velociraptor` — Enterprise-scale endpoint forensics - `FTK Imager` — Forensic imaging (Windows) - `dd / dcfldd / dc3dd` — Disk imaging (Linux)
---
## PICERL Framework Overview
Every IR engagement follows the PICERL lifecycle:
| Phase | Key Actions | Skill Outputs | |-------|------------|---------------| | **P**reparation | Verify tools, comms, access | Readiness checklist | | **I**dentification | Confirm incident, scope, severity | Incident classification | | **C**ontainment | Isolate systems, stop spread | Containment actions list | | **E**radication | Remove threat, close access | Eradication checklist | | **R**ecovery | Restore systems, verify integrity | Recovery runbook | | **L**essons Learned | Post-incident review | IR report + improvements |
---
## Core Capabilities
### 1. IR Playbook Creation
**When the user asks to create a playbook for a specific incident type:**
Claude generates detailed, role-assigned playbooks in this structure:
**Ransomware Response Playbook (Example):**
```markdown # IR Playbook: Ransomware Attack Version: 2.0 | Owner: SOC Manager | Review: Quarterly
## Trigger Conditions - Multiple encrypted files discovered (ransom extension detected) - Ransom note found on file shares or desktop - EDR alert for mass file modification activity - User reports files inaccessible with unfamiliar extensions
## Severity Classification - CRITICAL: Domain controller / backup infrastructure affected - HIGH: Production servers / business-critical data affected - MEDIUM: Isolated workstation, contained environment
---
## Phase 1: Identification (Target: 15 minutes) **IR Lead:** - [ ] Confirm incident is ransomware (verify encrypted files + ransom note) - [ ] Determine initial infection vector (phishing? RDP? Supply chain?) - [ ] Identify Patient Zero — first encrypted system - [ ] Assess scope: How many systems? Which business units? - [ ] Declare incident severity and notify stakeholders - [ ] Open incident ticket and begin documentation
**Forensics:** - [ ] DO NOT REBOOT infected systems (preserve volatile evidence) - [ ] Capture memory dump: `winpmem_mini_x64_rc2.exe output.raw` - [ ] Collect running processes: `tasklist /v > processes.txt` - [ ] Collect network connections: `netstat -ano > netstat.txt`
## Phase 2: Containment (Target: 30 minutes) **Network Team:** - [ ] Isolate affected systems (pull network cable or quarantine in VLAN) - [ ] Block identified C2 IPs/domains at perimeter firewall - [ ] Disable RDP externally if RDP was the initial vector - [ ] Preserve network capture if encryption is still occurring
**Active Directory:** - [ ] Identify all accounts used by the ransomware (service accounts, domain accounts) - [ ] Reset passwords for all potentially compromised accounts - [ ] Revoke active sessions for affected accounts - [ ] Check for newly created privileged accounts
## Phase 3: Eradication - [ ] Identify all persistence mechanisms (registry, services, scheduled tasks) - [ ] Remove all malicious artifacts - [ ] Verify no backdoors remain (check with Autoruns, process scanning) - [ ] Patch the exploited vulnerability if one was used
## Phase 4: Recovery - [ ] Restore from clean backup (verified pre-infection) - [ ] Validate backup integrity before restoration - [ ] Rebuild from gold image if backup compromised - [ ] Verify data integrity after restoration - [ ] Phased return to production
## Phase 5: Lessons Learned (Within 2 weeks) - [ ] Full incident timeline documented - [ ] Root cause identified and remediated - [ ] Detection gaps addressed - [ ] CSOC playbook updated - [ ] Management report delivered ```
**Other supported playbook types:** - Phishing Campaign Response - Data Breach / Exfiltration - Business Email Compromise (BEC) - Insider Threat - DDoS Attack - Account Compromise / Credential Stuffing - Supply Chain Compromise - Cloud Misconfiguration / Breach
### 2. Evidence Collection & Chain of Custody
**When the user asks to collect forensic evidence:**
**Order of Volatility (most volatile → least volatile):** ``` 1. CPU registers and cache 2. Routing tables, ARP cache, process table 3. Memory (RAM) — ALWAYS capture first 4. Temporary file systems, swap space 5. Running processes and open files 6. Network connections and open ports 7. Disk images 8. Log files (local + remote SIEM) 9. Physical media ```
**Evidence Collection Commands:**
```bash # Windows — Live acquisition winpmem_mini_x64_rc2.exe memory.raw # Memory dump tasklist /svc > processes.txt # Running processes netstat -ano > connections.txt # Network connections wmic process get caption,processid,parentprocessid,commandline > process_full.txt reg export HKLM reg_hklm.reg # Registry dir /s /a "C:\Users\*\AppData\Roaming\*" > appdata.txt
# Linux — Live acquisition sudo avml /tmp/memory.lime # Memory dump (avml) ps auxf > processes.txt # Process tree netstat -tulnap > connections.txt # Network connections cat /proc/*/cmdline | strings > process_cmdlines.txt ls -la /tmp/ /var/tmp/ /dev/shm/ > temp_dirs.txt crontab -l -u root > crontabs.txt find / -mtime -7 -type f > recently_modified.txt # Modified in last 7 days ```
**Chain of Custody Template:** ```markdown ## Evidence Chain of Custody Form
| Field | Value | |-------|-------| | Evidence ID | IR-2025-001-E01 | | Incident ID | IR-2025-001 | | Description | Memory dump from HOSTNAME (192.168.1.100) | | Collected by | [Analyst Name] | | Collection time | 2025-05-28 14:30 UTC | | Collection method | winpmem_mini_x64_rc2.exe | | MD5 hash | [hash of evidence file] | | SHA256 hash | [hash of evidence file] | | Storage location | \nas\ir\IR-2025-001\evidence\ | | Chain of custody | Analyst → Evidence Locker → Lab |
**Access Log:** | Date/Time | Person | Purpose | Signature | |-----------|--------|---------|-----------| | 2025-05-28 14:30 | [Analyst] | Initial collection | [Sig] | ```
### 3. Forensic Timeline Analysis
**When the user asks to build an incident timeline:**
1. **Collect timestamps from all available sources:** - Windows Event Logs (Security, System, Application, PowerShell) - Web server access logs - Firewall / proxy logs - Email server logs (delivery, read receipts) - File system timestamps (Modified, Accessed, Changed, Born) - Registry LastWrite timestamps - Prefetch timestamps (evidence of execution)
2. **Normalize to UTC** — Confirm system timezone before conversion
3. **Generate supertimeline:** ```bash python scripts/timeline_builder.py --logs ./collected_logs/ --output timeline.csv python scripts/timeline_builder.py --logs ./logs/ --format html --start "2025-05-20" --end "2025-05-28" ```
4. **Identify the kill chain progression:**
```markdown ## Incident Timeline — [Incident ID]
[T-72h] 2025-05-25 09:15 UTC — DELIVERY Phishing email received: "Invoice_May2025.pdf.exe" from spoofed sender Mail log: SMTP delivery to user@victim.com from 185.x.x.x
[T-48h] 2025-05-26 14:22 UTC — EXECUTION User executed attachment: Event 4688 (process creation) Parent: outlook.exe → Child: powershell.exe -enc [base64]
[T-48h] 2025-05-26 14:22 UTC — C2 ESTABLISHED Outbound connection: 203.x.x.x:443 (beacon_interval: 60s) DNS query: malicious-c2.evil.com → 203.x.x.x
[T-24h] 2025-05-27 02:00 UTC — LATERAL MOVEMENT PsExec from WORKSTATION01 to SERVER02 (admin$) Event 4624 (login type 3) on SERVER02 from WORKSTATION01
[T-2h] 2025-05-27 12:30 UTC — DATA EXFILTRATION Large POST request (450MB) to dropbox-like service
[T-0h] 2025-05-28 14:00 UTC — DETECTION SOC analyst detected anomalous outbound transfer ```
### 4. Memory Forensics
**When the user shares Volatility output or asks about memory forensics:**
**Essential Volatility 3 Commands:** ```bash # Process listing python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.pslist python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.pstree # Show parent-child python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.psscan # Find hidden processes
# Network connections python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.netscan python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.netstat
# DLL and module analysis python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.dlllist --pid [PID] python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.modscan # All loaded modules
# Malware detection python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.malfind # Injected code python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.hollowfind # Process hollowing
# Registry from memory python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.registry.hivelist python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.registry.printkey --key "SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run"
# File artifacts python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.filescan python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.dumpfiles --physaddr [addr] ```
**Suspicious Memory Indicators:** - Process without corresponding disk file (process hollowing) - `explorer.exe` or `svchost.exe` with unusual parent - Network connections from system processes (lsass.exe, csrss.exe) - Executable memory regions flagged by `windows.malfind` - Stacked THREADS in injected shellcode regions
### 5. Post-Incident Report
**When the user asks for an IR report for management or compliance:**
```markdown # Post-Incident Report — [Incident ID]
**Classification:** CONFIDENTIAL **Incident Type:** [Ransomware / Data Breach / etc.] **Severity:** [Critical / High / Medium] **Incident Window:** [Start] to [End] UTC **Systems Affected:** [Count and names] **Data Impact:** [Data at risk / confirmed exfiltrated] **Report Date:** [Date] **Report Author:** [IR Lead]
---
## 1. Executive Summary [3-4 sentences: what happened, how it happened, impact, and current status]
## 2. Incident Timeline [Key events table with timestamps]
## 3. Root Cause Analysis **Initial Vector:** [Phishing / Unpatched service / Credential theft / etc.] **Root Cause:** [Specific technical cause] **Contributing Factors:** - [Factor 1: e.g., no MFA on VPN] - [Factor 2: e.g., delayed patch deployment]
## 4. Impact Assessment - **Systems Compromised:** [List] - **Data Accessed/Exfiltrated:** [Description + quantity] - **Business Impact:** [Downtime hours, revenue impact, regulatory] - **Customer/Partner Impact:** [If applicable]
## 5. Containment & Remediation Actions [Chronological list of actions taken]
## 6. Compliance Notification Requirements - **GDPR:** [Required if EU personal data — 72-hour
Source provenance
Decision snapshot
recent repository activity
Audit
Install and adoption review
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Scenario-led draft for Incident Response & Digital Forensics, ready for a manual X post.
Incident Response & Digital Forensics: IR playbook execution, evidence collection, forensic timeline analysis, memory forensics, and... 397 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics?ref=x
Listing + install path for Incident Response & Digital Forensics: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics?ref=x Install: npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill Incident Response...
Listing source
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to Masriyan but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)Masriyan
@masriyan
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Do not auto-install
UI-TARS Desktop
Run multimodal agents that operate desktop interfaces
37.0K Starsn8n
Connect agents to hundreds of workflow automations
194.1K StarsMoneyPrinterTurbo
利用AI大模型,一键生成高清短视频 Generate short videos with one click using AI LLM.
88.5K StarsTasmota
Alternative firmware for ESP8266 and ESP32 based devices with easy configuration using webUI, OTA updates, automation using timers or rules, expandability and entirely local control over MQTT, HTTP, Serial or KNX. Full documentation at
24.7K StarsDo not auto-install
Install targets
Codex install prompt
Install the "Incident Response & Digital Forensics" agent skill from https://github.com/Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill/tree/main/skills/07-incident-response. Read its SKILL.md or equivalent instructions first, install only the files needed for this workspace, and summarize any required setup before using it. Skill purpose: IR playbook execution, evidence collection, forensic timeline analysis, memory forensics, and post-incident reporting following NIST SP 800-61 and SANS PICERL methodology After the install attempt, report the result to https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome with POST JSON {"event_id":"install_<unique-id>","skill_slug":"masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics","task":"Install Incident Response & Digital Forensics","agent":"codex","outcome":"success","install_used":true}. Replace event_id with a unique value and outcome with success or failed. Report success only after the skill is installed and a minimal verification passes.Supply asset profile
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Scenario
RAG and knowledge
I need my agent to build a RAG workflow over documents and retrieve reliable context.
Agent fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill Incident Response & Digital Forensics
Maintenance
fresh
2d since push
Risk
Risky
Dependency or permission surface needs review
GitHub quality
397
77/100 Quality · 65/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
Dependency or permission surface needs review · Permission surface may require sandboxing
Agent adoption scorecard
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
StrongSolid option that is likely worth shortlisting for production workflows.
Trust
Do not auto-installTrust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Audit
RiskyA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Stars
397 GitHub stars
Repo activity
397 stars, 75 forks
Maintenance
2d since push
License
MIT
Install
npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill Incident Response & Digital Forensics
Install safety
Agent-readable metadata
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
Suited agents
Install decision
Trust and risk
Outcome loop
Install command
npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill Incident Response & Digital ForensicsDo not use when
Agent safety v2
This skill should not be selected by an agent without explicit human security review.
Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.
high
Skill metadata references terminal, CLI, shell, subprocess, or command execution workflows.
medium
Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.
medium
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.
Agent resolve plan
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20Incident%20Response%20%26%20Digital%20Forensics%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20Incident%20Response%20%26%20Digital%20Forensics%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics/install
Agent should check
Copy prompt
Task: Use Incident Response & Digital Forensics in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20Incident%20Response%20%26%20Digital%20Forensics%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics/install
Install command: npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill Incident Response & Digital Forensics
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=Incident%20Response%20%26%20Digital%20Forensics&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use Incident Response & Digital Forensics for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics/install, then install with: npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill Incident Response & Digital ForensicsRegistry metadata
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20Incident%20Response%20%26%20Digital%20Forensics%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Workflow automation
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code
Audit report
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Shortlist this skill and compare it with close alternatives before production adoption.
Role in stack
Companion skill
Primary fit
Workflow automation
Trust label
Strong shortlist
Install path
Command ready
Use when
Evidence
review first
Implementation path
Trust profile
Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
GitHub adoption
INFO397 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
INFO397 stars, 75 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS2d since push
License clarity
PASSMIT
Good signals
Review before install
Recommended action
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Quality profile
Solid option that is likely worth shortlisting for production workflows.
Workflow fit
Automate repeated work
I need my agent to automate a repeated workflow across tools and files.
Operate local tools
I need my agent to operate local files and desktop apps in a repeatable workflow.
Search private knowledge
I need my agent to build a RAG workflow over documents and retrieve reliable context.
Workflow fit
Turn skills into distribution
A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.
Ingest, retrieve, and cite
A workflow for document-heavy agents that ingest files, create searchable knowledge, retrieve relevant context, and answer with grounded sources.
Find, compare, and synthesize
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Alternative shortlist
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Run multimodal agents that operate desktop interfaces
Connect agents to hundreds of workflow automations
利用AI大模型,一键生成高清短视频 Generate short videos with one click using AI LLM.
Alternative firmware for ESP8266 and ESP32 based devices with easy configuration using webUI, OTA updates, automation using timers or rules, expandability and entirely local control over MQTT, HTTP, Serial or KNX. Full documentation at
--- name: Incident Response & Digital Forensics description: IR playbook execution, evidence collection, forensic timeline analysis, memory forensics, and post-incident reporting following NIST SP 800-61 and SANS PICERL methodology version: 3.0.0 author: Masriyan tags: [cybersecurity, incident-response, forensics, dfir, evidence, timeline, picerl, nist] ---
# Incident Response & Digital Forensics
## Purpose
Enable Claude to assist with structured incident response operations following NIST SP 800-61 and the SANS PICERL framework. Claude generates IR playbooks, guides evidence collection with chain of custody, constructs forensic timelines, interprets memory forensics output, and produces post-incident reports.
---
## Activation Triggers
This skill activates when the user asks about: - Creating an incident response playbook (ransomware, phishing, breach, etc.) - Evidence collection and chain of custody procedures - Forensic timeline construction from logs or artifacts - Memory forensics using Volatility - Post-incident report generation - DFIR (Digital Forensics and Incident Response) procedures - Containment and eradication strategies - Root cause analysis for security incidents - IR metrics, SLA tracking, or reporting for management
---
## Prerequisites
```bash pip install pyyaml jinja2 pandas python-dateutil ```
**Recommended DFIR tools:** - `Volatility 3` — Memory forensics framework - `Autopsy / Sleuth Kit` — Disk forensics - `plaso / log2timeline` — Supertimeline generation - `KAPE` — Evidence collection (Windows) - `Velociraptor` — Enterprise-scale endpoint forensics - `FTK Imager` — Forensic imaging (Windows) - `dd / dcfldd / dc3dd` — Disk imaging (Linux)
---
## PICERL Framework Overview
Every IR engagement follows the PICERL lifecycle:
| Phase | Key Actions | Skill Outputs | |-------|------------|---------------| | **P**reparation | Verify tools, comms, access | Readiness checklist | | **I**dentification | Confirm incident, scope, severity | Incident classification | | **C**ontainment | Isolate systems, stop spread | Containment actions list | | **E**radication | Remove threat, close access | Eradication checklist | | **R**ecovery | Restore systems, verify integrity | Recovery runbook | | **L**essons Learned | Post-incident review | IR report + improvements |
---
## Core Capabilities
### 1. IR Playbook Creation
**When the user asks to create a playbook for a specific incident type:**
Claude generates detailed, role-assigned playbooks in this structure:
**Ransomware Response Playbook (Example):**
```markdown # IR Playbook: Ransomware Attack Version: 2.0 | Owner: SOC Manager | Review: Quarterly
## Trigger Conditions - Multiple encrypted files discovered (ransom extension detected) - Ransom note found on file shares or desktop - EDR alert for mass file modification activity - User reports files inaccessible with unfamiliar extensions
## Severity Classification - CRITICAL: Domain controller / backup infrastructure affected - HIGH: Production servers / business-critical data affected - MEDIUM: Isolated workstation, contained environment
---
## Phase 1: Identification (Target: 15 minutes) **IR Lead:** - [ ] Confirm incident is ransomware (verify encrypted files + ransom note) - [ ] Determine initial infection vector (phishing? RDP? Supply chain?) - [ ] Identify Patient Zero — first encrypted system - [ ] Assess scope: How many systems? Which business units? - [ ] Declare incident severity and notify stakeholders - [ ] Open incident ticket and begin documentation
**Forensics:** - [ ] DO NOT REBOOT infected systems (preserve volatile evidence) - [ ] Capture memory dump: `winpmem_mini_x64_rc2.exe output.raw` - [ ] Collect running processes: `tasklist /v > processes.txt` - [ ] Collect network connections: `netstat -ano > netstat.txt`
## Phase 2: Containment (Target: 30 minutes) **Network Team:** - [ ] Isolate affected systems (pull network cable or quarantine in VLAN) - [ ] Block identified C2 IPs/domains at perimeter firewall - [ ] Disable RDP externally if RDP was the initial vector - [ ] Preserve network capture if encryption is still occurring
**Active Directory:** - [ ] Identify all accounts used by the ransomware (service accounts, domain accounts) - [ ] Reset passwords for all potentially compromised accounts - [ ] Revoke active sessions for affected accounts - [ ] Check for newly created privileged accounts
## Phase 3: Eradication - [ ] Identify all persistence mechanisms (registry, services, scheduled tasks) - [ ] Remove all malicious artifacts - [ ] Verify no backdoors remain (check with Autoruns, process scanning) - [ ] Patch the exploited vulnerability if one was used
## Phase 4: Recovery - [ ] Restore from clean backup (verified pre-infection) - [ ] Validate backup integrity before restoration - [ ] Rebuild from gold image if backup compromised - [ ] Verify data integrity after restoration - [ ] Phased return to production
## Phase 5: Lessons Learned (Within 2 weeks) - [ ] Full incident timeline documented - [ ] Root cause identified and remediated - [ ] Detection gaps addressed - [ ] CSOC playbook updated - [ ] Management report delivered ```
**Other supported playbook types:** - Phishing Campaign Response - Data Breach / Exfiltration - Business Email Compromise (BEC) - Insider Threat - DDoS Attack - Account Compromise / Credential Stuffing - Supply Chain Compromise - Cloud Misconfiguration / Breach
### 2. Evidence Collection & Chain of Custody
**When the user asks to collect forensic evidence:**
**Order of Volatility (most volatile → least volatile):** ``` 1. CPU registers and cache 2. Routing tables, ARP cache, process table 3. Memory (RAM) — ALWAYS capture first 4. Temporary file systems, swap space 5. Running processes and open files 6. Network connections and open ports 7. Disk images 8. Log files (local + remote SIEM) 9. Physical media ```
**Evidence Collection Commands:**
```bash # Windows — Live acquisition winpmem_mini_x64_rc2.exe memory.raw # Memory dump tasklist /svc > processes.txt # Running processes netstat -ano > connections.txt # Network connections wmic process get caption,processid,parentprocessid,commandline > process_full.txt reg export HKLM reg_hklm.reg # Registry dir /s /a "C:\Users\*\AppData\Roaming\*" > appdata.txt
# Linux — Live acquisition sudo avml /tmp/memory.lime # Memory dump (avml) ps auxf > processes.txt # Process tree netstat -tulnap > connections.txt # Network connections cat /proc/*/cmdline | strings > process_cmdlines.txt ls -la /tmp/ /var/tmp/ /dev/shm/ > temp_dirs.txt crontab -l -u root > crontabs.txt find / -mtime -7 -type f > recently_modified.txt # Modified in last 7 days ```
**Chain of Custody Template:** ```markdown ## Evidence Chain of Custody Form
| Field | Value | |-------|-------| | Evidence ID | IR-2025-001-E01 | | Incident ID | IR-2025-001 | | Description | Memory dump from HOSTNAME (192.168.1.100) | | Collected by | [Analyst Name] | | Collection time | 2025-05-28 14:30 UTC | | Collection method | winpmem_mini_x64_rc2.exe | | MD5 hash | [hash of evidence file] | | SHA256 hash | [hash of evidence file] | | Storage location | \nas\ir\IR-2025-001\evidence\ | | Chain of custody | Analyst → Evidence Locker → Lab |
**Access Log:** | Date/Time | Person | Purpose | Signature | |-----------|--------|---------|-----------| | 2025-05-28 14:30 | [Analyst] | Initial collection | [Sig] | ```
### 3. Forensic Timeline Analysis
**When the user asks to build an incident timeline:**
1. **Collect timestamps from all available sources:** - Windows Event Logs (Security, System, Application, PowerShell) - Web server access logs - Firewall / proxy logs - Email server logs (delivery, read receipts) - File system timestamps (Modified, Accessed, Changed, Born) - Registry LastWrite timestamps - Prefetch timestamps (evidence of execution)
2. **Normalize to UTC** — Confirm system timezone before conversion
3. **Generate supertimeline:** ```bash python scripts/timeline_builder.py --logs ./collected_logs/ --output timeline.csv python scripts/timeline_builder.py --logs ./logs/ --format html --start "2025-05-20" --end "2025-05-28" ```
4. **Identify the kill chain progression:**
```markdown ## Incident Timeline — [Incident ID]
[T-72h] 2025-05-25 09:15 UTC — DELIVERY Phishing email received: "Invoice_May2025.pdf.exe" from spoofed sender Mail log: SMTP delivery to user@victim.com from 185.x.x.x
[T-48h] 2025-05-26 14:22 UTC — EXECUTION User executed attachment: Event 4688 (process creation) Parent: outlook.exe → Child: powershell.exe -enc [base64]
[T-48h] 2025-05-26 14:22 UTC — C2 ESTABLISHED Outbound connection: 203.x.x.x:443 (beacon_interval: 60s) DNS query: malicious-c2.evil.com → 203.x.x.x
[T-24h] 2025-05-27 02:00 UTC — LATERAL MOVEMENT PsExec from WORKSTATION01 to SERVER02 (admin$) Event 4624 (login type 3) on SERVER02 from WORKSTATION01
[T-2h] 2025-05-27 12:30 UTC — DATA EXFILTRATION Large POST request (450MB) to dropbox-like service
[T-0h] 2025-05-28 14:00 UTC — DETECTION SOC analyst detected anomalous outbound transfer ```
### 4. Memory Forensics
**When the user shares Volatility output or asks about memory forensics:**
**Essential Volatility 3 Commands:** ```bash # Process listing python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.pslist python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.pstree # Show parent-child python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.psscan # Find hidden processes
# Network connections python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.netscan python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.netstat
# DLL and module analysis python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.dlllist --pid [PID] python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.modscan # All loaded modules
# Malware detection python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.malfind # Injected code python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.hollowfind # Process hollowing
# Registry from memory python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.registry.hivelist python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.registry.printkey --key "SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run"
# File artifacts python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.filescan python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.dumpfiles --physaddr [addr] ```
**Suspicious Memory Indicators:** - Process without corresponding disk file (process hollowing) - `explorer.exe` or `svchost.exe` with unusual parent - Network connections from system processes (lsass.exe, csrss.exe) - Executable memory regions flagged by `windows.malfind` - Stacked THREADS in injected shellcode regions
### 5. Post-Incident Report
**When the user asks for an IR report for management or compliance:**
```markdown # Post-Incident Report — [Incident ID]
**Classification:** CONFIDENTIAL **Incident Type:** [Ransomware / Data Breach / etc.] **Severity:** [Critical / High / Medium] **Incident Window:** [Start] to [End] UTC **Systems Affected:** [Count and names] **Data Impact:** [Data at risk / confirmed exfiltrated] **Report Date:** [Date] **Report Author:** [IR Lead]
---
## 1. Executive Summary [3-4 sentences: what happened, how it happened, impact, and current status]
## 2. Incident Timeline [Key events table with timestamps]
## 3. Root Cause Analysis **Initial Vector:** [Phishing / Unpatched service / Credential theft / etc.] **Root Cause:** [Specific technical cause] **Contributing Factors:** - [Factor 1: e.g., no MFA on VPN] - [Factor 2: e.g., delayed patch deployment]
## 4. Impact Assessment - **Systems Compromised:** [List] - **Data Accessed/Exfiltrated:** [Description + quantity] - **Business Impact:** [Downtime hours, revenue impact, regulatory] - **Customer/Partner Impact:** [If applicable]
## 5. Containment & Remediation Actions [Chronological list of actions taken]
## 6. Compliance Notification Requirements - **GDPR:** [Required if EU personal data — 72-hour
Source provenance
Decision snapshot
recent repository activity
Audit
Install and adoption review
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Scenario-led draft for Incident Response & Digital Forensics, ready for a manual X post.
Incident Response & Digital Forensics: IR playbook execution, evidence collection, forensic timeline analysis, memory forensics, and... 397 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics?ref=x
Listing + install path for Incident Response & Digital Forensics: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics?ref=x Install: npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill Incident Response...
Listing source
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to Masriyan but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)Masriyan
@masriyan
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Do not auto-install
UI-TARS Desktop
Run multimodal agents that operate desktop interfaces
37.0K Starsn8n
Connect agents to hundreds of workflow automations
194.1K StarsMoneyPrinterTurbo
利用AI大模型,一键生成高清短视频 Generate short videos with one click using AI LLM.
88.5K StarsTasmota
Alternative firmware for ESP8266 and ESP32 based devices with easy configuration using webUI, OTA updates, automation using timers or rules, expandability and entirely local control over MQTT, HTTP, Serial or KNX. Full documentation at
24.7K StarsDo not auto-install
Install targets
Codex install prompt
Install the "Incident Response & Digital Forensics" agent skill from https://github.com/Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill/tree/main/skills/07-incident-response. Read its SKILL.md or equivalent instructions first, install only the files needed for this workspace, and summarize any required setup before using it. Skill purpose: IR playbook execution, evidence collection, forensic timeline analysis, memory forensics, and post-incident reporting following NIST SP 800-61 and SANS PICERL methodology After the install attempt, report the result to https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome with POST JSON {"event_id":"install_<unique-id>","skill_slug":"masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics","task":"Install Incident Response & Digital Forensics","agent":"codex","outcome":"success","install_used":true}. Replace event_id with a unique value and outcome with success or failed. Report success only after the skill is installed and a minimal verification passes.Supply asset profile
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Scenario
RAG and knowledge
I need my agent to build a RAG workflow over documents and retrieve reliable context.
Agent fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill Incident Response & Digital Forensics
Maintenance
fresh
2d since push
Risk
Risky
Dependency or permission surface needs review
GitHub quality
397
77/100 Quality · 65/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
Dependency or permission surface needs review · Permission surface may require sandboxing
Agent adoption scorecard
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
StrongSolid option that is likely worth shortlisting for production workflows.
Trust
Do not auto-installTrust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Audit
RiskyA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Stars
397 GitHub stars
Repo activity
397 stars, 75 forks
Maintenance
2d since push
License
MIT
Install
npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill Incident Response & Digital Forensics
Install safety
Agent-readable metadata
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
Suited agents
Install decision
Trust and risk
Outcome loop
Install command
npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill Incident Response & Digital ForensicsDo not use when
Agent safety v2
This skill should not be selected by an agent without explicit human security review.
Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.
high
Skill metadata references terminal, CLI, shell, subprocess, or command execution workflows.
medium
Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.
medium
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.
Agent resolve plan
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20Incident%20Response%20%26%20Digital%20Forensics%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20Incident%20Response%20%26%20Digital%20Forensics%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics/install
Agent should check
Copy prompt
Task: Use Incident Response & Digital Forensics in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20Incident%20Response%20%26%20Digital%20Forensics%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics/install
Install command: npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill Incident Response & Digital Forensics
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=Incident%20Response%20%26%20Digital%20Forensics&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use Incident Response & Digital Forensics for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics/install, then install with: npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill Incident Response & Digital ForensicsRegistry metadata
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20Incident%20Response%20%26%20Digital%20Forensics%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Workflow automation
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code
Audit report
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Shortlist this skill and compare it with close alternatives before production adoption.
Role in stack
Companion skill
Primary fit
Workflow automation
Trust label
Strong shortlist
Install path
Command ready
Use when
Evidence
review first
Implementation path
Trust profile
Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
GitHub adoption
INFO397 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
INFO397 stars, 75 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS2d since push
License clarity
PASSMIT
Good signals
Review before install
Recommended action
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Quality profile
Solid option that is likely worth shortlisting for production workflows.
Workflow fit
Automate repeated work
I need my agent to automate a repeated workflow across tools and files.
Operate local tools
I need my agent to operate local files and desktop apps in a repeatable workflow.
Search private knowledge
I need my agent to build a RAG workflow over documents and retrieve reliable context.
Workflow fit
Turn skills into distribution
A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.
Ingest, retrieve, and cite
A workflow for document-heavy agents that ingest files, create searchable knowledge, retrieve relevant context, and answer with grounded sources.
Find, compare, and synthesize
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Alternative shortlist
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Run multimodal agents that operate desktop interfaces
Connect agents to hundreds of workflow automations
利用AI大模型,一键生成高清短视频 Generate short videos with one click using AI LLM.
Alternative firmware for ESP8266 and ESP32 based devices with easy configuration using webUI, OTA updates, automation using timers or rules, expandability and entirely local control over MQTT, HTTP, Serial or KNX. Full documentation at
--- name: Incident Response & Digital Forensics description: IR playbook execution, evidence collection, forensic timeline analysis, memory forensics, and post-incident reporting following NIST SP 800-61 and SANS PICERL methodology version: 3.0.0 author: Masriyan tags: [cybersecurity, incident-response, forensics, dfir, evidence, timeline, picerl, nist] ---
# Incident Response & Digital Forensics
## Purpose
Enable Claude to assist with structured incident response operations following NIST SP 800-61 and the SANS PICERL framework. Claude generates IR playbooks, guides evidence collection with chain of custody, constructs forensic timelines, interprets memory forensics output, and produces post-incident reports.
---
## Activation Triggers
This skill activates when the user asks about: - Creating an incident response playbook (ransomware, phishing, breach, etc.) - Evidence collection and chain of custody procedures - Forensic timeline construction from logs or artifacts - Memory forensics using Volatility - Post-incident report generation - DFIR (Digital Forensics and Incident Response) procedures - Containment and eradication strategies - Root cause analysis for security incidents - IR metrics, SLA tracking, or reporting for management
---
## Prerequisites
```bash pip install pyyaml jinja2 pandas python-dateutil ```
**Recommended DFIR tools:** - `Volatility 3` — Memory forensics framework - `Autopsy / Sleuth Kit` — Disk forensics - `plaso / log2timeline` — Supertimeline generation - `KAPE` — Evidence collection (Windows) - `Velociraptor` — Enterprise-scale endpoint forensics - `FTK Imager` — Forensic imaging (Windows) - `dd / dcfldd / dc3dd` — Disk imaging (Linux)
---
## PICERL Framework Overview
Every IR engagement follows the PICERL lifecycle:
| Phase | Key Actions | Skill Outputs | |-------|------------|---------------| | **P**reparation | Verify tools, comms, access | Readiness checklist | | **I**dentification | Confirm incident, scope, severity | Incident classification | | **C**ontainment | Isolate systems, stop spread | Containment actions list | | **E**radication | Remove threat, close access | Eradication checklist | | **R**ecovery | Restore systems, verify integrity | Recovery runbook | | **L**essons Learned | Post-incident review | IR report + improvements |
---
## Core Capabilities
### 1. IR Playbook Creation
**When the user asks to create a playbook for a specific incident type:**
Claude generates detailed, role-assigned playbooks in this structure:
**Ransomware Response Playbook (Example):**
```markdown # IR Playbook: Ransomware Attack Version: 2.0 | Owner: SOC Manager | Review: Quarterly
## Trigger Conditions - Multiple encrypted files discovered (ransom extension detected) - Ransom note found on file shares or desktop - EDR alert for mass file modification activity - User reports files inaccessible with unfamiliar extensions
## Severity Classification - CRITICAL: Domain controller / backup infrastructure affected - HIGH: Production servers / business-critical data affected - MEDIUM: Isolated workstation, contained environment
---
## Phase 1: Identification (Target: 15 minutes) **IR Lead:** - [ ] Confirm incident is ransomware (verify encrypted files + ransom note) - [ ] Determine initial infection vector (phishing? RDP? Supply chain?) - [ ] Identify Patient Zero — first encrypted system - [ ] Assess scope: How many systems? Which business units? - [ ] Declare incident severity and notify stakeholders - [ ] Open incident ticket and begin documentation
**Forensics:** - [ ] DO NOT REBOOT infected systems (preserve volatile evidence) - [ ] Capture memory dump: `winpmem_mini_x64_rc2.exe output.raw` - [ ] Collect running processes: `tasklist /v > processes.txt` - [ ] Collect network connections: `netstat -ano > netstat.txt`
## Phase 2: Containment (Target: 30 minutes) **Network Team:** - [ ] Isolate affected systems (pull network cable or quarantine in VLAN) - [ ] Block identified C2 IPs/domains at perimeter firewall - [ ] Disable RDP externally if RDP was the initial vector - [ ] Preserve network capture if encryption is still occurring
**Active Directory:** - [ ] Identify all accounts used by the ransomware (service accounts, domain accounts) - [ ] Reset passwords for all potentially compromised accounts - [ ] Revoke active sessions for affected accounts - [ ] Check for newly created privileged accounts
## Phase 3: Eradication - [ ] Identify all persistence mechanisms (registry, services, scheduled tasks) - [ ] Remove all malicious artifacts - [ ] Verify no backdoors remain (check with Autoruns, process scanning) - [ ] Patch the exploited vulnerability if one was used
## Phase 4: Recovery - [ ] Restore from clean backup (verified pre-infection) - [ ] Validate backup integrity before restoration - [ ] Rebuild from gold image if backup compromised - [ ] Verify data integrity after restoration - [ ] Phased return to production
## Phase 5: Lessons Learned (Within 2 weeks) - [ ] Full incident timeline documented - [ ] Root cause identified and remediated - [ ] Detection gaps addressed - [ ] CSOC playbook updated - [ ] Management report delivered ```
**Other supported playbook types:** - Phishing Campaign Response - Data Breach / Exfiltration - Business Email Compromise (BEC) - Insider Threat - DDoS Attack - Account Compromise / Credential Stuffing - Supply Chain Compromise - Cloud Misconfiguration / Breach
### 2. Evidence Collection & Chain of Custody
**When the user asks to collect forensic evidence:**
**Order of Volatility (most volatile → least volatile):** ``` 1. CPU registers and cache 2. Routing tables, ARP cache, process table 3. Memory (RAM) — ALWAYS capture first 4. Temporary file systems, swap space 5. Running processes and open files 6. Network connections and open ports 7. Disk images 8. Log files (local + remote SIEM) 9. Physical media ```
**Evidence Collection Commands:**
```bash # Windows — Live acquisition winpmem_mini_x64_rc2.exe memory.raw # Memory dump tasklist /svc > processes.txt # Running processes netstat -ano > connections.txt # Network connections wmic process get caption,processid,parentprocessid,commandline > process_full.txt reg export HKLM reg_hklm.reg # Registry dir /s /a "C:\Users\*\AppData\Roaming\*" > appdata.txt
# Linux — Live acquisition sudo avml /tmp/memory.lime # Memory dump (avml) ps auxf > processes.txt # Process tree netstat -tulnap > connections.txt # Network connections cat /proc/*/cmdline | strings > process_cmdlines.txt ls -la /tmp/ /var/tmp/ /dev/shm/ > temp_dirs.txt crontab -l -u root > crontabs.txt find / -mtime -7 -type f > recently_modified.txt # Modified in last 7 days ```
**Chain of Custody Template:** ```markdown ## Evidence Chain of Custody Form
| Field | Value | |-------|-------| | Evidence ID | IR-2025-001-E01 | | Incident ID | IR-2025-001 | | Description | Memory dump from HOSTNAME (192.168.1.100) | | Collected by | [Analyst Name] | | Collection time | 2025-05-28 14:30 UTC | | Collection method | winpmem_mini_x64_rc2.exe | | MD5 hash | [hash of evidence file] | | SHA256 hash | [hash of evidence file] | | Storage location | \nas\ir\IR-2025-001\evidence\ | | Chain of custody | Analyst → Evidence Locker → Lab |
**Access Log:** | Date/Time | Person | Purpose | Signature | |-----------|--------|---------|-----------| | 2025-05-28 14:30 | [Analyst] | Initial collection | [Sig] | ```
### 3. Forensic Timeline Analysis
**When the user asks to build an incident timeline:**
1. **Collect timestamps from all available sources:** - Windows Event Logs (Security, System, Application, PowerShell) - Web server access logs - Firewall / proxy logs - Email server logs (delivery, read receipts) - File system timestamps (Modified, Accessed, Changed, Born) - Registry LastWrite timestamps - Prefetch timestamps (evidence of execution)
2. **Normalize to UTC** — Confirm system timezone before conversion
3. **Generate supertimeline:** ```bash python scripts/timeline_builder.py --logs ./collected_logs/ --output timeline.csv python scripts/timeline_builder.py --logs ./logs/ --format html --start "2025-05-20" --end "2025-05-28" ```
4. **Identify the kill chain progression:**
```markdown ## Incident Timeline — [Incident ID]
[T-72h] 2025-05-25 09:15 UTC — DELIVERY Phishing email received: "Invoice_May2025.pdf.exe" from spoofed sender Mail log: SMTP delivery to user@victim.com from 185.x.x.x
[T-48h] 2025-05-26 14:22 UTC — EXECUTION User executed attachment: Event 4688 (process creation) Parent: outlook.exe → Child: powershell.exe -enc [base64]
[T-48h] 2025-05-26 14:22 UTC — C2 ESTABLISHED Outbound connection: 203.x.x.x:443 (beacon_interval: 60s) DNS query: malicious-c2.evil.com → 203.x.x.x
[T-24h] 2025-05-27 02:00 UTC — LATERAL MOVEMENT PsExec from WORKSTATION01 to SERVER02 (admin$) Event 4624 (login type 3) on SERVER02 from WORKSTATION01
[T-2h] 2025-05-27 12:30 UTC — DATA EXFILTRATION Large POST request (450MB) to dropbox-like service
[T-0h] 2025-05-28 14:00 UTC — DETECTION SOC analyst detected anomalous outbound transfer ```
### 4. Memory Forensics
**When the user shares Volatility output or asks about memory forensics:**
**Essential Volatility 3 Commands:** ```bash # Process listing python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.pslist python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.pstree # Show parent-child python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.psscan # Find hidden processes
# Network connections python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.netscan python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.netstat
# DLL and module analysis python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.dlllist --pid [PID] python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.modscan # All loaded modules
# Malware detection python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.malfind # Injected code python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.hollowfind # Process hollowing
# Registry from memory python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.registry.hivelist python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.registry.printkey --key "SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run"
# File artifacts python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.filescan python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.dumpfiles --physaddr [addr] ```
**Suspicious Memory Indicators:** - Process without corresponding disk file (process hollowing) - `explorer.exe` or `svchost.exe` with unusual parent - Network connections from system processes (lsass.exe, csrss.exe) - Executable memory regions flagged by `windows.malfind` - Stacked THREADS in injected shellcode regions
### 5. Post-Incident Report
**When the user asks for an IR report for management or compliance:**
```markdown # Post-Incident Report — [Incident ID]
**Classification:** CONFIDENTIAL **Incident Type:** [Ransomware / Data Breach / etc.] **Severity:** [Critical / High / Medium] **Incident Window:** [Start] to [End] UTC **Systems Affected:** [Count and names] **Data Impact:** [Data at risk / confirmed exfiltrated] **Report Date:** [Date] **Report Author:** [IR Lead]
---
## 1. Executive Summary [3-4 sentences: what happened, how it happened, impact, and current status]
## 2. Incident Timeline [Key events table with timestamps]
## 3. Root Cause Analysis **Initial Vector:** [Phishing / Unpatched service / Credential theft / etc.] **Root Cause:** [Specific technical cause] **Contributing Factors:** - [Factor 1: e.g., no MFA on VPN] - [Factor 2: e.g., delayed patch deployment]
## 4. Impact Assessment - **Systems Compromised:** [List] - **Data Accessed/Exfiltrated:** [Description + quantity] - **Business Impact:** [Downtime hours, revenue impact, regulatory] - **Customer/Partner Impact:** [If applicable]
## 5. Containment & Remediation Actions [Chronological list of actions taken]
## 6. Compliance Notification Requirements - **GDPR:** [Required if EU personal data — 72-hour
Source provenance
Decision snapshot
recent repository activity
Audit
Install and adoption review
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Scenario-led draft for Incident Response & Digital Forensics, ready for a manual X post.
Incident Response & Digital Forensics: IR playbook execution, evidence collection, forensic timeline analysis, memory forensics, and... 397 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics?ref=x
Listing + install path for Incident Response & Digital Forensics: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics?ref=x Install: npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill Incident Response...
Listing source
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to Masriyan but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)Masriyan
@masriyan
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Do not auto-install
UI-TARS Desktop
Run multimodal agents that operate desktop interfaces
37.0K Starsn8n
Connect agents to hundreds of workflow automations
194.1K StarsMoneyPrinterTurbo
利用AI大模型,一键生成高清短视频 Generate short videos with one click using AI LLM.
88.5K StarsTasmota
Alternative firmware for ESP8266 and ESP32 based devices with easy configuration using webUI, OTA updates, automation using timers or rules, expandability and entirely local control over MQTT, HTTP, Serial or KNX. Full documentation at
24.7K StarsDo not auto-install
Install targets
Codex install prompt
Install the "Incident Response & Digital Forensics" agent skill from https://github.com/Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill/tree/main/skills/07-incident-response. Read its SKILL.md or equivalent instructions first, install only the files needed for this workspace, and summarize any required setup before using it. Skill purpose: IR playbook execution, evidence collection, forensic timeline analysis, memory forensics, and post-incident reporting following NIST SP 800-61 and SANS PICERL methodology After the install attempt, report the result to https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome with POST JSON {"event_id":"install_<unique-id>","skill_slug":"masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics","task":"Install Incident Response & Digital Forensics","agent":"codex","outcome":"success","install_used":true}. Replace event_id with a unique value and outcome with success or failed. Report success only after the skill is installed and a minimal verification passes.Supply asset profile
Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.
Scenario
RAG and knowledge
I need my agent to build a RAG workflow over documents and retrieve reliable context.
Agent fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill Incident Response & Digital Forensics
Maintenance
fresh
2d since push
Risk
Risky
Dependency or permission surface needs review
GitHub quality
397
77/100 Quality · 65/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
Dependency or permission surface needs review · Permission surface may require sandboxing
Agent adoption scorecard
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
StrongSolid option that is likely worth shortlisting for production workflows.
Trust
Do not auto-installTrust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
Audit
RiskyA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Stars
397 GitHub stars
Repo activity
397 stars, 75 forks
Maintenance
2d since push
License
MIT
Install
npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill Incident Response & Digital Forensics
Install safety
Agent-readable metadata
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
Suited agents
Install decision
Trust and risk
Outcome loop
Install command
npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill Incident Response & Digital ForensicsDo not use when
Agent safety v2
This skill should not be selected by an agent without explicit human security review.
Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.
high
Skill metadata references terminal, CLI, shell, subprocess, or command execution workflows.
medium
Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.
medium
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.
Agent resolve plan
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20Incident%20Response%20%26%20Digital%20Forensics%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20Incident%20Response%20%26%20Digital%20Forensics%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics/install
Agent should check
Copy prompt
Task: Use Incident Response & Digital Forensics in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20Incident%20Response%20%26%20Digital%20Forensics%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics/install
Install command: npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill Incident Response & Digital Forensics
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=Incident%20Response%20%26%20Digital%20Forensics&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use Incident Response & Digital Forensics for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics/install, then install with: npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill Incident Response & Digital ForensicsRegistry metadata
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20Incident%20Response%20%26%20Digital%20Forensics%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Workflow automation
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code
Audit report
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Shortlist this skill and compare it with close alternatives before production adoption.
Role in stack
Companion skill
Primary fit
Workflow automation
Trust label
Strong shortlist
Install path
Command ready
Use when
Evidence
review first
Implementation path
Trust profile
Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.
GitHub adoption
INFO397 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
INFO397 stars, 75 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS2d since push
License clarity
PASSMIT
Good signals
Review before install
Recommended action
Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.
Quality profile
Solid option that is likely worth shortlisting for production workflows.
Workflow fit
Automate repeated work
I need my agent to automate a repeated workflow across tools and files.
Operate local tools
I need my agent to operate local files and desktop apps in a repeatable workflow.
Search private knowledge
I need my agent to build a RAG workflow over documents and retrieve reliable context.
Workflow fit
Turn skills into distribution
A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.
Ingest, retrieve, and cite
A workflow for document-heavy agents that ingest files, create searchable knowledge, retrieve relevant context, and answer with grounded sources.
Find, compare, and synthesize
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Alternative shortlist
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Run multimodal agents that operate desktop interfaces
Connect agents to hundreds of workflow automations
利用AI大模型,一键生成高清短视频 Generate short videos with one click using AI LLM.
Alternative firmware for ESP8266 and ESP32 based devices with easy configuration using webUI, OTA updates, automation using timers or rules, expandability and entirely local control over MQTT, HTTP, Serial or KNX. Full documentation at
--- name: Incident Response & Digital Forensics description: IR playbook execution, evidence collection, forensic timeline analysis, memory forensics, and post-incident reporting following NIST SP 800-61 and SANS PICERL methodology version: 3.0.0 author: Masriyan tags: [cybersecurity, incident-response, forensics, dfir, evidence, timeline, picerl, nist] ---
# Incident Response & Digital Forensics
## Purpose
Enable Claude to assist with structured incident response operations following NIST SP 800-61 and the SANS PICERL framework. Claude generates IR playbooks, guides evidence collection with chain of custody, constructs forensic timelines, interprets memory forensics output, and produces post-incident reports.
---
## Activation Triggers
This skill activates when the user asks about: - Creating an incident response playbook (ransomware, phishing, breach, etc.) - Evidence collection and chain of custody procedures - Forensic timeline construction from logs or artifacts - Memory forensics using Volatility - Post-incident report generation - DFIR (Digital Forensics and Incident Response) procedures - Containment and eradication strategies - Root cause analysis for security incidents - IR metrics, SLA tracking, or reporting for management
---
## Prerequisites
```bash pip install pyyaml jinja2 pandas python-dateutil ```
**Recommended DFIR tools:** - `Volatility 3` — Memory forensics framework - `Autopsy / Sleuth Kit` — Disk forensics - `plaso / log2timeline` — Supertimeline generation - `KAPE` — Evidence collection (Windows) - `Velociraptor` — Enterprise-scale endpoint forensics - `FTK Imager` — Forensic imaging (Windows) - `dd / dcfldd / dc3dd` — Disk imaging (Linux)
---
## PICERL Framework Overview
Every IR engagement follows the PICERL lifecycle:
| Phase | Key Actions | Skill Outputs | |-------|------------|---------------| | **P**reparation | Verify tools, comms, access | Readiness checklist | | **I**dentification | Confirm incident, scope, severity | Incident classification | | **C**ontainment | Isolate systems, stop spread | Containment actions list | | **E**radication | Remove threat, close access | Eradication checklist | | **R**ecovery | Restore systems, verify integrity | Recovery runbook | | **L**essons Learned | Post-incident review | IR report + improvements |
---
## Core Capabilities
### 1. IR Playbook Creation
**When the user asks to create a playbook for a specific incident type:**
Claude generates detailed, role-assigned playbooks in this structure:
**Ransomware Response Playbook (Example):**
```markdown # IR Playbook: Ransomware Attack Version: 2.0 | Owner: SOC Manager | Review: Quarterly
## Trigger Conditions - Multiple encrypted files discovered (ransom extension detected) - Ransom note found on file shares or desktop - EDR alert for mass file modification activity - User reports files inaccessible with unfamiliar extensions
## Severity Classification - CRITICAL: Domain controller / backup infrastructure affected - HIGH: Production servers / business-critical data affected - MEDIUM: Isolated workstation, contained environment
---
## Phase 1: Identification (Target: 15 minutes) **IR Lead:** - [ ] Confirm incident is ransomware (verify encrypted files + ransom note) - [ ] Determine initial infection vector (phishing? RDP? Supply chain?) - [ ] Identify Patient Zero — first encrypted system - [ ] Assess scope: How many systems? Which business units? - [ ] Declare incident severity and notify stakeholders - [ ] Open incident ticket and begin documentation
**Forensics:** - [ ] DO NOT REBOOT infected systems (preserve volatile evidence) - [ ] Capture memory dump: `winpmem_mini_x64_rc2.exe output.raw` - [ ] Collect running processes: `tasklist /v > processes.txt` - [ ] Collect network connections: `netstat -ano > netstat.txt`
## Phase 2: Containment (Target: 30 minutes) **Network Team:** - [ ] Isolate affected systems (pull network cable or quarantine in VLAN) - [ ] Block identified C2 IPs/domains at perimeter firewall - [ ] Disable RDP externally if RDP was the initial vector - [ ] Preserve network capture if encryption is still occurring
**Active Directory:** - [ ] Identify all accounts used by the ransomware (service accounts, domain accounts) - [ ] Reset passwords for all potentially compromised accounts - [ ] Revoke active sessions for affected accounts - [ ] Check for newly created privileged accounts
## Phase 3: Eradication - [ ] Identify all persistence mechanisms (registry, services, scheduled tasks) - [ ] Remove all malicious artifacts - [ ] Verify no backdoors remain (check with Autoruns, process scanning) - [ ] Patch the exploited vulnerability if one was used
## Phase 4: Recovery - [ ] Restore from clean backup (verified pre-infection) - [ ] Validate backup integrity before restoration - [ ] Rebuild from gold image if backup compromised - [ ] Verify data integrity after restoration - [ ] Phased return to production
## Phase 5: Lessons Learned (Within 2 weeks) - [ ] Full incident timeline documented - [ ] Root cause identified and remediated - [ ] Detection gaps addressed - [ ] CSOC playbook updated - [ ] Management report delivered ```
**Other supported playbook types:** - Phishing Campaign Response - Data Breach / Exfiltration - Business Email Compromise (BEC) - Insider Threat - DDoS Attack - Account Compromise / Credential Stuffing - Supply Chain Compromise - Cloud Misconfiguration / Breach
### 2. Evidence Collection & Chain of Custody
**When the user asks to collect forensic evidence:**
**Order of Volatility (most volatile → least volatile):** ``` 1. CPU registers and cache 2. Routing tables, ARP cache, process table 3. Memory (RAM) — ALWAYS capture first 4. Temporary file systems, swap space 5. Running processes and open files 6. Network connections and open ports 7. Disk images 8. Log files (local + remote SIEM) 9. Physical media ```
**Evidence Collection Commands:**
```bash # Windows — Live acquisition winpmem_mini_x64_rc2.exe memory.raw # Memory dump tasklist /svc > processes.txt # Running processes netstat -ano > connections.txt # Network connections wmic process get caption,processid,parentprocessid,commandline > process_full.txt reg export HKLM reg_hklm.reg # Registry dir /s /a "C:\Users\*\AppData\Roaming\*" > appdata.txt
# Linux — Live acquisition sudo avml /tmp/memory.lime # Memory dump (avml) ps auxf > processes.txt # Process tree netstat -tulnap > connections.txt # Network connections cat /proc/*/cmdline | strings > process_cmdlines.txt ls -la /tmp/ /var/tmp/ /dev/shm/ > temp_dirs.txt crontab -l -u root > crontabs.txt find / -mtime -7 -type f > recently_modified.txt # Modified in last 7 days ```
**Chain of Custody Template:** ```markdown ## Evidence Chain of Custody Form
| Field | Value | |-------|-------| | Evidence ID | IR-2025-001-E01 | | Incident ID | IR-2025-001 | | Description | Memory dump from HOSTNAME (192.168.1.100) | | Collected by | [Analyst Name] | | Collection time | 2025-05-28 14:30 UTC | | Collection method | winpmem_mini_x64_rc2.exe | | MD5 hash | [hash of evidence file] | | SHA256 hash | [hash of evidence file] | | Storage location | \nas\ir\IR-2025-001\evidence\ | | Chain of custody | Analyst → Evidence Locker → Lab |
**Access Log:** | Date/Time | Person | Purpose | Signature | |-----------|--------|---------|-----------| | 2025-05-28 14:30 | [Analyst] | Initial collection | [Sig] | ```
### 3. Forensic Timeline Analysis
**When the user asks to build an incident timeline:**
1. **Collect timestamps from all available sources:** - Windows Event Logs (Security, System, Application, PowerShell) - Web server access logs - Firewall / proxy logs - Email server logs (delivery, read receipts) - File system timestamps (Modified, Accessed, Changed, Born) - Registry LastWrite timestamps - Prefetch timestamps (evidence of execution)
2. **Normalize to UTC** — Confirm system timezone before conversion
3. **Generate supertimeline:** ```bash python scripts/timeline_builder.py --logs ./collected_logs/ --output timeline.csv python scripts/timeline_builder.py --logs ./logs/ --format html --start "2025-05-20" --end "2025-05-28" ```
4. **Identify the kill chain progression:**
```markdown ## Incident Timeline — [Incident ID]
[T-72h] 2025-05-25 09:15 UTC — DELIVERY Phishing email received: "Invoice_May2025.pdf.exe" from spoofed sender Mail log: SMTP delivery to user@victim.com from 185.x.x.x
[T-48h] 2025-05-26 14:22 UTC — EXECUTION User executed attachment: Event 4688 (process creation) Parent: outlook.exe → Child: powershell.exe -enc [base64]
[T-48h] 2025-05-26 14:22 UTC — C2 ESTABLISHED Outbound connection: 203.x.x.x:443 (beacon_interval: 60s) DNS query: malicious-c2.evil.com → 203.x.x.x
[T-24h] 2025-05-27 02:00 UTC — LATERAL MOVEMENT PsExec from WORKSTATION01 to SERVER02 (admin$) Event 4624 (login type 3) on SERVER02 from WORKSTATION01
[T-2h] 2025-05-27 12:30 UTC — DATA EXFILTRATION Large POST request (450MB) to dropbox-like service
[T-0h] 2025-05-28 14:00 UTC — DETECTION SOC analyst detected anomalous outbound transfer ```
### 4. Memory Forensics
**When the user shares Volatility output or asks about memory forensics:**
**Essential Volatility 3 Commands:** ```bash # Process listing python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.pslist python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.pstree # Show parent-child python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.psscan # Find hidden processes
# Network connections python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.netscan python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.netstat
# DLL and module analysis python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.dlllist --pid [PID] python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.modscan # All loaded modules
# Malware detection python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.malfind # Injected code python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.hollowfind # Process hollowing
# Registry from memory python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.registry.hivelist python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.registry.printkey --key "SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run"
# File artifacts python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.filescan python vol.py -f memory.raw windows.dumpfiles --physaddr [addr] ```
**Suspicious Memory Indicators:** - Process without corresponding disk file (process hollowing) - `explorer.exe` or `svchost.exe` with unusual parent - Network connections from system processes (lsass.exe, csrss.exe) - Executable memory regions flagged by `windows.malfind` - Stacked THREADS in injected shellcode regions
### 5. Post-Incident Report
**When the user asks for an IR report for management or compliance:**
```markdown # Post-Incident Report — [Incident ID]
**Classification:** CONFIDENTIAL **Incident Type:** [Ransomware / Data Breach / etc.] **Severity:** [Critical / High / Medium] **Incident Window:** [Start] to [End] UTC **Systems Affected:** [Count and names] **Data Impact:** [Data at risk / confirmed exfiltrated] **Report Date:** [Date] **Report Author:** [IR Lead]
---
## 1. Executive Summary [3-4 sentences: what happened, how it happened, impact, and current status]
## 2. Incident Timeline [Key events table with timestamps]
## 3. Root Cause Analysis **Initial Vector:** [Phishing / Unpatched service / Credential theft / etc.] **Root Cause:** [Specific technical cause] **Contributing Factors:** - [Factor 1: e.g., no MFA on VPN] - [Factor 2: e.g., delayed patch deployment]
## 4. Impact Assessment - **Systems Compromised:** [List] - **Data Accessed/Exfiltrated:** [Description + quantity] - **Business Impact:** [Downtime hours, revenue impact, regulatory] - **Customer/Partner Impact:** [If applicable]
## 5. Containment & Remediation Actions [Chronological list of actions taken]
## 6. Compliance Notification Requirements - **GDPR:** [Required if EU personal data — 72-hour
Source provenance
Decision snapshot
recent repository activity
Audit
Install and adoption review
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Scenario-led draft for Incident Response & Digital Forensics, ready for a manual X post.
Incident Response & Digital Forensics: IR playbook execution, evidence collection, forensic timeline analysis, memory forensics, and... 397 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics?ref=x
Listing + install path for Incident Response & Digital Forensics: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics?ref=x Install: npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill Incident Response...
Listing source
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to Masriyan but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/masriyan-incident-response-digital-forensics?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)Masriyan
@masriyan
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Do not auto-install
UI-TARS Desktop
Run multimodal agents that operate desktop interfaces
37.0K Starsn8n
Connect agents to hundreds of workflow automations
194.1K StarsMoneyPrinterTurbo
利用AI大模型,一键生成高清短视频 Generate short videos with one click using AI LLM.
88.5K StarsTasmota
Alternative firmware for ESP8266 and ESP32 based devices with easy configuration using webUI, OTA updates, automation using timers or rules, expandability and entirely local control over MQTT, HTTP, Serial or KNX. Full documentation at
24.7K StarsPermission surface
secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Strong README/SKILL.md context
Risk summary
Install readiness
Permission surface
secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Strong README/SKILL.md context
Risk summary
Install readiness
Permission surface
secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Strong README/SKILL.md context
Risk summary
Install readiness
Permission surface
secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Strong README/SKILL.md context
Risk summary
Install readiness