api-design

Revisar · 59
Indexado en Registry

Design and review predictable public APIs for TypeScript, JavaScript, React, and React Native libraries. Use when shaping exported functions, classes, hooks, options objects, event and listener APIs, error behavior, naming, cross-platform abstractions, or JS-only packages. Pair w

Verified installs0
Estrellas161
Versión1.0.0
Calidad63/100 · Prometedor
Confianza59/100 · Do not auto-install
Auditoría74/100 · Requiere revisión

Perfil del activo

Diseño y producción creativa

Design assets, images, video, audio, multimodal media, presentation, and creative production skills.

Ver categoría

Escenario

Diseño y creatividad

I need my agent to produce design assets, UI directions, presentations, or creative media workflows.

Afinidad con Agent

Claude Code + CLI + Codex

Funciona con Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI o Agents personalizados.

Instalar

Listo

npx skills add margelo/react-native-skills --skill api-design

Mantenimiento

Actual

1 días desde el último push

Riesgo

Requiere revisión

La licencia no está clara

Calidad de GitHub

161

63/100 Calidad · 67/100 Confianza

Etiquetas de cobertura

DiseñoDiseño y creatividadDiseño y creatividadagent-skill

Notas de revisión

La licencia no está clara · Permission surface may require sandboxing

Tarjeta de adopción del Agent

Confianza, auditoría y preparación de instalación de un vistazo

Estas puntuaciones combinan metadatos públicos del repositorio, señales de revisión de OpenAgentSkill, actualidad de mantenimiento y preparación de instalación. Sirven para preseleccionar; no sustituyen la revisión humana.

Calidad

Prometedor
63

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

Confianza

Do not auto-install
59

Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.

Auditoría

Requiere revisión
74

Revisión legible por máquina de la preparación de instalación, los metadatos de seguridad, el mantenimiento y el riesgo de adopción.

Trust Score de OpenAgentSkill v5

Revisión humana antes de instalar

Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLI

Estrellas

161 estrellas de GitHub

Actividad del repositorio

161 estrellas y 7 forks

Mantenimiento

1 días desde el último push

Licencia

Desconocido

Instalar

npx skills add margelo/react-native-skills --skill api-design

Seguridad de instalación

Ruta estándar de paquete o instalación en tiempo de ejecución

Superficie de permisos

shell or command execution, filesystem or document access

Resultados del Agent

Aún no hay datos de resultados del Agent

Documentación

Contexto sólido de README/SKILL.md

Resumen de riesgo

Revisar antes de producción

  • Repository license is detected as 'Unknown', raising compliance concerns about reuse and redistribution.
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • La licencia no está clara
  • Quality score needs review

Preparación de instalación

Ruta de instalación disponible

  • La ruta de instalación está disponible
  • La evidencia del repositorio está disponible
  • La licencia no está clara
  • Aún no hay evidencia de resultados Agent-Proven

Metadatos legibles por Agent

Datos de decisión legibles por máquina para este skill.

Usa este bloque o el JSON integrado para decidir si un Agent debe instalar este skill, elegir una alternativa o pedir revisión humana primero.

Abrir JSON

Tareas adecuadas

  • flujos de GitHub automation
  • Equipos de Claude Code
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects
  • Inspect repository metadata

Agents adecuados

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLICLI

Decisión de instalación

Comando
npx skills add margelo/react-native-skills --skill api-design
Política
Revisar
Revisión humana

Confianza y riesgo

Confianza
59/100
Auditoría
74/100
Nivel de riesgo
Requiere revisión

Ciclo de resultados

Endpoint
/api/agent/outcome
ID del evento
resolve
Resultados
5

Comando de instalación

npx skills add margelo/react-native-skills --skill api-design

No usar cuando

  • Equipos que necesitan un SLA con soporte del proveedor
  • production agents without a repository review
  • Repository license is detected as 'Unknown', raising compliance concerns about reuse and redistribution.
  • Indicios de permisos de alto riesgo: ejecución de shell o comandos
  • La licencia no está clara

Seguridad de Agent v2

42/100 · Evitar instalación automática

ExperimentalRevisar

Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.

Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.

Resolver con API

Alto

Ejecución de shell o comandos

Los metadatos del skill hacen referencia a terminal, CLI, shell, subprocesos o flujos de ejecución de comandos.

Medio

Browser automation

Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.

Medio

Acceso a red

El skill probablemente consulta páginas remotas, API, repositorios o servicios externos.

Medio

Acceso al sistema de archivos

El skill puede leer o escribir archivos de proyecto, documentos, artefactos generados o estado local.

  • Indicios de permisos de alto riesgo: ejecución de shell o comandos
  • La licencia no está clara

Destinos de instalación

Instala este skill en tu flujo de Agent

Usa el endpoint público para obtener el comando, la lista de seguridad, prompts y enlaces canónicos.

skill install

OpenAgentSkill CLI

Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.

$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install margelo-api-design

Plan de resolución de Agent

Deja que un Agent valide el ajuste antes de instalar.

La API Resolve devuelve la skill elegida, alternativas, política de seguridad, notas de auditoría, destino de instalación y un prompt listo para usar.

Abrir plan de texto

Agent debe revisar

  • Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
  • Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
  • Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.

Copiar prompt

Task: Use api-design in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20api-design%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/margelo-api-design/install
Install command: npx skills add margelo/react-native-skills --skill api-design
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.

Traspaso de Agent

Da al Agent la ruta de instalación, no otro directorio.

Usa el endpoint público para obtener el comando, la lista de seguridad, prompts y enlaces canónicos.

Abrir API de instalación

Prompt de Agent

Use api-design for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/margelo-api-design/install, then install with: npx skills add margelo/react-native-skills --skill api-design

Metadatos del Registry

Perfil legible por Agent para seleccionar skills automáticamente.

La API Registry expone señales de decisión, confianza, auditoría, casos de uso e instalación sin raspar la interfaz.

Abrir Manifest

Afinidad con Agent

63/100

GitHub automation

Plataformas

Claude Code

Informe de auditoría

Requiere revisión · 74/100

Revisión legible por máquina de la preparación de instalación, los metadatos de seguridad, el mantenimiento y el riesgo de adopción.

Ver informe de auditoríaVer informe de evaluación

Panel de decisión de Agent

Fallback candidate for GitHub automation

Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.

63
Preparación
Prototipo
Etapa

Rol en la pila

Candidata de respaldo

Ajuste principal

GitHub automation

Etiqueta de confianza

Prototipar primero

Ruta de instalación

Comando listo

Úsalo cuando

  • flujos de GitHub automation
  • Equipos de Claude Code
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects

Evidencia

  • recent repository activity
  • install command or GitHub repo available
  • perfil de calidad 63/100
  • 2 eventos de interacción de OpenAgentSkill

revisar primero

  • Repository license is detected as 'Unknown', raising compliance concerns about reuse and redistribution.

Ruta de implementación

  1. 1Instálalo en un Agent de sandbox y ejecuta una tarea de GitHub automation de principio a fin.
  2. 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
  3. 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.

Perfil de confianza

Do not auto-install

Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.

59
Trust Score de OpenAgentSkill

Adopción en GitHub

Info

161 estrellas de GitHub

Actividad de stars/forks

Revisar

161 estrellas y 7 forks; la actividad de issues no está disponible en los metadatos actuales

Mantenimiento reciente

Aprobado

1 días desde el último push

Claridad de licencia

Revisar

Desconocido

Señales positivas

  • Revisión de IA aprobada
  • La ruta de instalación está disponible
  • La evidencia del repositorio está disponible
  • Repositorio mantenido recientemente
  • El comando de instalación no muestra un patrón de alto riesgo evidente
  • El ciclo de resultados está listo, pero necesita la primera ejecución real de Agent

Revisar antes de instalar

  • Repository license is detected as 'Unknown', raising compliance concerns about reuse and redistribution.
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • La licencia no está clara
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
  • Stars/forks activity: 161 stars, 7 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
  • License clarity: Unknown
  • Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
  • Aún no hay informes reales de resultados del Agent
  • Se requiere revisión humana antes de una instalación desatendida

Acción recomendada

Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.

Perfil de calidad

Prometedor candidato para flujos de Agent

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

63
Estrellas de GitHub
161
Actualidad
hace 1 días
Listo para instalar
Licencia
Desconocido
Revisar antes de instalar: Repository license is detected as 'Unknown', raising compliance concerns about reuse and redistribution.

Ajuste de flujo

Usa esta skill en estos escenarios

Ajuste de flujo

Añadir a un flujo completo

Lista de alternativas

Compara antes de instalar

Similar skills that may fit this task.

Comparar todo

Resumen

--- name: api-design description: Design and review predictable public APIs for TypeScript, JavaScript, React, and React Native libraries. Use when shaping exported functions, classes, hooks, options objects, event and listener APIs, error behavior, naming, cross-platform abstractions, or JS-only packages. Pair with build-nitro-modules when the library is backed by Nitro. ---

# API Design

Use this skill before implementation or when reviewing a public API surface. Target explicit types, stable semantics, and no irrelevant internals in the public contract.

If the library is a Nitro Module, use this skill for the public TypeScript and React API shape first, then use `build-nitro-modules` for Nitro-specific spec, native-state, and binding constraints. If the library is JS-only, React-only, or React Native JS-only, stay in this skill.

## Workflow

1. Sketch the user-facing TypeScript API before implementing internals. 2. Write 2-3 realistic call-site examples, including error and cleanup paths. 3. Check the surface against the rules below. 4. Verify the exported TypeScript with the repo's typecheck/lint/docs tooling before treating the API as done. 5. Implement only after the public shape is coherent and verified.

## API Freshness

Before choosing public API shape, dependency APIs, platform capabilities, or implementation strategy, verify current official sources instead of relying on trained memory. Library, React, React Native, platform, and tooling APIs evolve quickly.

- Prefer official docs, source repositories, release notes, changelogs, package READMEs, and current package metadata. - Look for `llms.txt` or `llms-full.txt` on official docs sites when available, and use those as compact current context. - Treat remembered API details as a starting hypothesis only. If current docs or source disagree, follow the current docs/source and mention the change when relevant. - Avoid designing against stale blog posts, old snippets, or outdated trained assumptions when an official current source is available.

## API Shape Rules

- Prefer a single source of truth. Do not split related state across booleans and dependent values when one typed value can express the state. Prefer `timeoutMs?: number` over `enableTimeout: boolean` plus `timeoutMs?: number`. - Use option objects or named structs once a function has 3 or more parameters, parameters of the same primitive type, or values that are likely to grow. - Keep APIs specific instead of accepting every possible input shape. A millisecond timeout should be a `number`, not `number | string | bigint | object | null`. - Avoid giant "does everything" objects. Split by domain or lifecycle when responsibilities differ. - Before simplifying or redesigning an API, inventory the workflows the feature is supposed to support. Do not silently drop a workflow, such as a live session API, because a one-shot path is easier to implement. Split workflows into separate APIs when needed. - Prefer literal unions, discriminated unions, interfaces, and typed option groups when the valid states are known. In TypeScript libraries, prefer string literal unions over runtime `enum`s unless consumers need a runtime value. - Avoid untyped dictionaries, boolean clusters, stringly typed commands, and loosely shaped events when the valid states are known. - Do not model a binary option as an optional two-case string union such as `'enabled' | 'disabled'`. If omitted means "use the default" and provided means true/false, use an optional boolean and document the default. - Do not represent multiple object states as one interface full of optional fields. Use a discriminated union, inheritance, or separate variant interfaces so impossible field combinations are unrepresentable. - Keep related fields together on the variant where they are required. If `barcode` and `barcodeType` only make sense together, both should be nonoptional on `ScannedBarcode`, not optional on a generic `ScannedData`. - If you create variant interfaces, use them in the actual public type. Do not define `RecognizedTextDataType` and `RecognizedBarcodeDataType` but keep `recognizedDataTypes: RecognizedDataType[]` where `RecognizedDataType` still contains every variant field as optional. - Use `undefined` or optional fields for absence. Use `null` only when "explicit none" means something different from "not provided". - Prefer discriminated unions for state machines, loading states, and result variants. - Model user intent separately from resolved state when negotiation is involved. For example, an ordered array of constraint objects can express priorities, while a resolved config object reports what the platform actually selected. - For complex negotiation, prefer ranked constraints or preference objects over exposing a combinatorial support matrix. Let callers describe intent, resolve the closest working configuration internally, and expose the resolved configuration through a return value, callback, or explicit resolver method. - Expose common presets as `as const satisfies Record<string, Type>` objects. Keep the accepted type structural so users can provide their own values. - Do not expose ambient facts the caller already knows, such as a `platform` field that only repeats `Platform.OS`, unless the API can return data produced by a different platform than the current runtime. - Do not freeze today's platform support matrix into the type shape. Prefer runtime capability fields such as `availableTextTypes: []` or `supportedFormats: []` over separate platform-specific types or static exclusions. This lets newer native capabilities become available without redesigning the JS API. - Prefer one unified options object. Avoid `ios`/`android` option bags and platform-prefixed methods unless the concepts are genuinely platform-only and cannot be described as a cross-platform capability or no-op. - Classify configuration fields as either requirements or preferences. Throw when a requirement cannot be met. Treat preferences as best-effort when the feature can still perform its core job, such as quality, guidance UI, high-frame-rate tracking, auto-zoom, or a wider scan area. Document best-effort fields and expose capabilities or resolved configuration when callers need to know what was applied. - Split by stable semantic capability when capabilities have different options, results, or futures. For example, barcode scanning and text scanning may deserve separate `BarcodeScanner` and `TextScanner` APIs even when one native API happens to implement both today. A platform that lacks text scanning should fail `createTextScanner()` or report `isTextScannerAvailable: false`, not force text-specific fields to be nullable on a generic scanner used for barcode scanning. - Runtime availability should describe whether a stable capability exists today, not permanently restrict the API shape to the current platform matrix. If Android gains text scanning later, the existing `TextScanner` capability should become available without changing barcode APIs or broadening nullable result types. - Keep capability discovery separate from object contracts. Use capability fields to decide whether a workflow can be created or which optional preferences may apply. Once a factory returns a specific session/resource object, its baseline methods should be guaranteed by construction; otherwise return a narrower type or fail creation instead of making callers check `can*` before every normal method. - Splitting workflows should reduce runtime capability checks. Do not keep broad capability flags only to compensate for one oversized object. For example, a one-shot scanner and an app-owned live scanner can be separate APIs; if the live scanner implementation guarantees zoom, photo capture, or region control, those can be part of the live scanner contract instead of nullable properties plus `can*` checks inherited from a one-shot backend. - Encode lifecycle transitions in the API object graph. If commands are valid only after `configure`, `connect`, `start`, or another lifecycle transition, expose those commands on a handle returned by that transition, not on the parent object with "maybe active" checks. For example, `session.configure(device, outputs)` can return a `Controller` that owns `setZoom(...)` and `focusTo(...)`; the `Session` owns graph configuration and start/stop. - Avoid stale-state APIs. If reconfiguration changes the native resource a command targets, return a new handle and invalidate or dispose the old one. Callers should not be able to accidentally call a command on a parent object that no longer knows which configured device/output it applies to. - Use callbacks or returned resolved objects for post-negotiation facts. If an output, controller, or session config becomes meaningful only after connection, provide `onConfigured`, a returned controller/config, or an explicit `resolve...(...)` method rather than forcing callers to poll nullable properties. - For Nitro-backed imperative APIs, treat the public HybridObject as the API by default. Do not add JS wrappers that pre-parse inputs, translate enum/string shapes, normalize one public format into another, or otherwise make JS call a different API than the generated Nitro spec. Put the intended public shape directly in the Nitro spec and native implementation. - When "all" is a meaningful requested value, model it explicitly instead of using `undefined` as a hidden command. For example, prefer `targetFormats: 'all' | BarcodeFormat[]` or `TargetBarcodeFormat = BarcodeFormat | 'all'` when the implementation benefits from a concrete value. - Do not return half-initialized objects that require a separate `prepare()`, `initialize()`, or `load()` call before normal use. If setup is required, make the factory async and resolve with a ready object. Keep lifecycle methods for real repeatable transitions such as `start()`/`stop()`, not construction readiness. - For larger libraries, expose one small public root or factory that creates stateful domain objects. Keep object construction, async setup, I/O, and validation behind factory methods instead of forcing callers through static functions or half-ready instances. - Return `undefined` only for normal domain absence, and document exactly when it occurs. Do not use optional returns as an unstated error path; throw or reject when an operation fails. - Decide whether returned data is a plain value or a resource. Use plain structs/interfaces for small immutable data whose fields are cheap and semantically complete. Use classes/objects/resources when the value owns native state, needs lazy expensive access, can grow behavior, or should expose methods later. - Choose data representations by semantics first, then performance. Use `string` for decoded text payloads. Use `ArrayBuffer` or byte-oriented objects for raw binary, opaque bytes, media, or large data where zero-copy access is part of the contract.

### Variant Example

Avoid nullable clusters when an object can be in several distinct states:

```typescript interface ScannedData { position: Point text?: string barcode?: string barcodeType?: BarcodeType face?: Rect } ```

Prefer a base type plus variants with nonoptional state-specific fields:

```typescript interface ScannedData { position: Point }

interface ScannedText extends ScannedData { text: string }

interface ScannedBarcode extends ScannedData { barcode: string barcodeType: BarcodeType }

interface ScannedFace extends ScannedData { face: Rect }

type ScannedResult = ScannedText | ScannedBarcode | ScannedFace ```

## Public API Organization

- Split public surfaces into focused files or modules and re-export them from a clear package entry point. Do not create catch-all files that contain a feature's main object plus every enum, option, result, event, and helper type. - Default to one exported public type per file. Group multiple exported types in one file only when they form one tightly coupled log

Detalles técnicos

Versión
1.0.0
Licencia
Unknown
Última actualización
21 ago 2026
Publicado
21 ago 2026

Resumen de decisión

Candidata de respaldo

63
Listo
Prototipo
Etapa

recent repository activity

Auditoría

Revisión de instalación

Revisión de instalación y adopción

74
Requiere revisión
Seguridad
71/100
Mantenimiento
100/100
Instalar
92/100
Abrir auditoría completaVer informe de evaluación

Evidencia probada por Agent

Evidencia probada por Agent

Informes de resultados tras resolver, revisar, instalar y una ejecución limitada.

0
Probado
Needs first agent runAuto-instalación: revisar primeroÚltimo: Desconocido
Tasa de éxito
Fallo reciente
Resultados
0
Calidad de salida
Fallidos
0
No relevante
0
Instalaciones
0
Bloqueado por riesgo
0
Configuración necesaria
0
Producción
0

Aún no hay datos de resultados de Agent. La primera ejecución puede informar éxito, configuración necesaria, bloqueos de riesgo, fallo o irrelevancia mediante /api/agent/outcome.

Instalar

Añadir al flujo de Agent

Gratis y de código abierto. Revisa el informe antes de instalar en Agents de producción.

Bucle de crecimiento

Kit para compartir

X

Borrador basado en un caso para api-design, listo para publicar manualmente en X.

Nota del curador
A practical pick for design or creative work:

api-design: Design and review predictable public APIs for TypeScript, JavaScript, React, and React Native libraries. Use when shaping e...

161 stars

https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/margelo-api-design?ref=x
Abrir borrador de X
Respuesta opcional con comando de instalación
Listing + install path for api-design:
https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/margelo-api-design?ref=x

Install: npx skills add margelo/react-native-skills --skill api-design

Fuente de la ficha

Indexado por Registry

Reclamable

Esta ficha se indexó desde fuentes públicas y no está marcada como oficial hasta que se apruebe una reclamación de mantenedor.

Creador
margelo
Indexado por
Índice comunitario de OpenAgentSkill

La atribución enlaza al repositorio público o al perfil del creador. Los creadores pueden reclamar la ficha para actualizar las señales de propiedad.

Reclamar este skill

Reclamación del propietario

Reclamar esta ficha de skill

Esta ficha Indexado por Registry se atribuye a margelo, pero aún no está marcada como oficial. Reclámala para añadir una señal de propietario verificado y hacer más fiables futuras actualizaciones de lanzamiento, instalación y auditoría.

Kit de enlaces para creadores

Añade las insignias de evidencia a tu README

Muestra la ficha canónica, las señales actuales de confianza y auditoría, y evidencia real de Agent-Proven donde los desarrolladores evalúan el repositorio.

[![Listed on OpenAgentSkill](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/margelo-api-design?metric=listed&label=Listed)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/margelo-api-design)
[![OpenAgentSkill Trust](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/margelo-api-design?metric=trust&label=Trust)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/margelo-api-design)
[![OpenAgentSkill Audit](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/margelo-api-design?metric=audit&label=Audit)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/margelo-api-design/audit)
[![Agent Proven](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/margelo-api-design?metric=proven&label=Agent%20Proven)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/margelo-api-design)

Autor

M

margelo

@margelo

Etiquetas

Afinidad con plataforma

Señales de salud

Estrellas de GitHub
161
Puntuación de calidad
38/100
Último push de GitHub
21 ago 2026
Pistas del framework
Desconocido
Vistas de OpenAgentSkill
2
Copias de instalación
0
Clics externos
0

Señal de comunidad

Comparte si este skill resulta útil para tu flujo de Agent. Los comentarios agregados mejoran la clasificación con el tiempo.

Confianza y seguridad

Do not auto-install

59
  • Adopción en GitHub161 estrellas de GitHubInfo
  • Actividad de stars/forks161 estrellas y 7 forks; la actividad de issues no está disponible en los metadatos actualesRevisar
  • Mantenimiento reciente1 días desde el último pushAprobado
  • Claridad de licenciaDesconocidoRevisar
  • Completitud de README/SKILL.mdLos metadatos incluyen suficiente contexto de uso y flujo de trabajoAprobado
  • Riesgo de dependencias/runtimenetwork or browser surfaceAprobado