api-design

Prüfen · 59
Im Registry indexiert

Design and review predictable public APIs for TypeScript, JavaScript, React, and React Native libraries. Use when shaping exported functions, classes, hooks, options objects, event and listener APIs, error behavior, naming, cross-platform abstractions, or JS-only packages. Pair w

Verified installs0
Stars161
Version1.0.0
Qualität63/100 · Vielversprechend
Vertrauen59/100 · Do not auto-install
Audit74/100 · Prüfung nötig

Asset-Profil

Design und kreative Produktion

Design assets, images, video, audio, multimodal media, presentation, and creative production skills.

Bereich ansehen

Szenario

Design und Kreativität

I need my agent to produce design assets, UI directions, presentations, or creative media workflows.

Agent-Fit

Claude Code + CLI + Codex

Geeignet für Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI oder benutzerdefinierte Agents.

Installieren

Bereit

npx skills add margelo/react-native-skills --skill api-design

Wartung

Aktuell

1 Tage seit dem letzten Push

Risiko

Prüfung nötig

Lizenz ist unklar

GitHub-Qualität

161

63/100 Qualität · 67/100 Vertrauen

Abdeckungs-Tags

DesignDesign und KreativitätDesign und Kreativitätagent-skill

Review-Notizen

Lizenz ist unklar · Permission surface may require sandboxing

Agent-Adoptionskarte

Vertrauen, Audit und Installationsbereitschaft auf einen Blick

Diese Werte kombinieren öffentliche Repository-Metadaten, OpenAgentSkill-Reviewsignale, Wartungsaktualität und Installationsbereitschaft. Sie helfen bei der Vorauswahl, ersetzen aber keine menschliche Prüfung.

Qualität

Vielversprechend
63

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

Vertrauen

Do not auto-install
59

Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.

Audit

Prüfung nötig
74

Maschinenlesbare Prüfung von Installationsbereitschaft, Sicherheitsmetadaten, Wartung und Akzeptanzrisiko.

OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5

Menschliche Prüfung vor Installation

Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLI

Stars

161 GitHub-Stars

Repository-Aktivität

161 Stars und 7 Forks

Wartung

1 Tage seit dem letzten Push

Lizenz

Unbekannt

Installieren

npx skills add margelo/react-native-skills --skill api-design

Installationssicherheit

Standard-Paket- oder Laufzeit-Installationspfad

Berechtigungsfläche

shell or command execution, filesystem or document access

Agent-Ergebnisse

Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten

Dokumentation

Starker README/SKILL.md-Kontext

Risikoübersicht

Vor Produktion prüfen

  • Repository license is detected as 'Unknown', raising compliance concerns about reuse and redistribution.
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • Lizenz ist unklar
  • Quality score needs review

Installationsbereitschaft

Installationspfad verfügbar

  • Installationspfad ist verfügbar
  • Repository-Belege sind verfügbar
  • Lizenz ist unklar
  • Noch keine Agent-Proven-Ergebnisbelege

Agent-lesbare Metadaten

Maschinenlesbare Entscheidungsdaten für diesen Skill.

Nutze diesen Block oder das eingebettete JSON, um zu entscheiden, ob ein Agent diesen Skill installieren, eine Alternative wählen oder zuerst menschliche Prüfung anfordern soll.

JSON öffnen

Geeignete Aufgaben

  • GitHub automation-Workflows
  • Claude-Code-Teams
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects
  • Inspect repository metadata

Geeignete Agents

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLICLI

Installationsentscheidung

Befehl
npx skills add margelo/react-native-skills --skill api-design
Richtlinie
Prüfen
Menschliche Prüfung
Ja

Vertrauen und Risiko

Vertrauen
59/100
Audit
74/100
Risikoebene
Prüfung nötig

Ergebnis-Loop

Endpoint
/api/agent/outcome
Event-ID
resolve
Ergebnisse
5

Installationsbefehl

npx skills add margelo/react-native-skills --skill api-design

Nicht verwenden, wenn

  • Teams, die ein vom Anbieter unterstütztes SLA benötigen
  • production agents without a repository review
  • Repository license is detected as 'Unknown', raising compliance concerns about reuse and redistribution.
  • Hinweise auf Hochrisiko-Berechtigungen: Shell- oder Befehlsausführung
  • Lizenz ist unklar

Agent-Sicherheit v2

42/100 · Automatische Installation vermeiden

ExperimentellPrüfen

Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.

Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.

Per API auflösen

Hoch

Shell- oder Befehlsausführung

Die Skill-Metadaten verweisen auf Terminal-, CLI-, Shell-, Subprozess- oder Befehlsausführungs-Workflows.

Mittel

Browser automation

Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.

Mittel

Netzwerkzugriff

Die Skill ruft wahrscheinlich Remote-Seiten, APIs, Repositories oder externe Dienste ab.

Mittel

Dateisystemzugriff

Die Skill kann Projektdateien, Dokumente, generierte Artefakte oder den lokalen Arbeitsbereich lesen oder schreiben.

  • Hinweise auf Hochrisiko-Berechtigungen: Shell- oder Befehlsausführung
  • Lizenz ist unklar

Installationsziele

Diesen Skill im Agent-Workflow installieren

Über den öffentlichen Endpunkt erhältst du Befehl, Sicherheitscheckliste, Ziel-Prompts und kanonische Links.

skill install

OpenAgentSkill CLI

Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.

$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install margelo-api-design

Agent-Auflösungsplan

Lass einen Agent die Eignung vor der Installation prüfen.

Die Resolve API liefert die beste Skill, Alternativen, Sicherheitsrichtlinien, Auditnotizen, Installationsziel und einen direkt nutzbaren Prompt.

Textplan öffnen

Agent sollte prüfen

  • Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
  • Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
  • Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.

Prompt kopieren

Task: Use api-design in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20api-design%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/margelo-api-design/install
Install command: npx skills add margelo/react-native-skills --skill api-design
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.

Agent-Übergabe

Gib dem Agent den Installationspfad, nicht noch ein Verzeichnis.

Über den öffentlichen Endpunkt erhältst du Befehl, Sicherheitscheckliste, Ziel-Prompts und kanonische Links.

Installations-API öffnen

Agent-Prompt

Use api-design for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/margelo-api-design/install, then install with: npx skills add margelo/react-native-skills --skill api-design

Registry-Metadaten

Agent-lesbares Profil für die automatische Skill-Auswahl.

Die Registry API stellt Entscheidungs-, Vertrauens-, Audit-, Use-Case- und Installationssignale ohne UI-Scraping bereit.

Manifest öffnen

Agent-Fit

63/100

GitHub automation

Plattformen

Claude Code

Audit-Bericht

Prüfung nötig · 74/100

Maschinenlesbare Prüfung von Installationsbereitschaft, Sicherheitsmetadaten, Wartung und Akzeptanzrisiko.

Audit-Bericht ansehenEval-Bericht ansehen

Agent-Entscheidungspanel

Fallback candidate for GitHub automation

Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.

63
Bereitschaft
Prototyp
Phase

Rolle im Stack

Fallback-Kandidat

Primäre Eignung

GitHub automation

Vertrauenslabel

Zuerst prototypisieren

Installationspfad

Befehl bereit

Verwenden wenn

  • GitHub automation-Workflows
  • Claude-Code-Teams
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects

Evidenz

  • recent repository activity
  • install command or GitHub repo available
  • Qualitätsprofil 63/100
  • 2 OpenAgentSkill-Interaktionen

zuerst prüfen

  • Repository license is detected as 'Unknown', raising compliance concerns about reuse and redistribution.

Implementierungspfad

  1. 1Installieren Sie es in einem Sandbox-Agent und führen Sie eine GitHub automation-Aufgabe vollständig aus.
  2. 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
  3. 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.

Vertrauensprofil

Do not auto-install

Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.

59
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score

GitHub-Akzeptanz

Info

161 GitHub-Stars

Star-/Fork-Aktivität

Prüfen

161 Stars und 7 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbar

Aktuelle Wartung

Bestanden

1 Tage seit dem letzten Push

Lizenzklarheit

Prüfen

Unbekannt

Positive Signale

  • KI-Prüfung genehmigt
  • Installationspfad ist verfügbar
  • Repository-Belege sind verfügbar
  • Kürzlich gewartetes Repository
  • Der Installationsbefehl weist kein offensichtliches Hochrisikomuster auf
  • Ergebniszyklus ist bereit, benötigt aber den ersten echten Agent-Lauf

Vor Installation prüfen

  • Repository license is detected as 'Unknown', raising compliance concerns about reuse and redistribution.
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • Lizenz ist unklar
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
  • Stars/forks activity: 161 stars, 7 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
  • License clarity: Unknown
  • Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
  • Noch keine echten Agent-Ergebnisberichte
  • Vor unbeaufsichtigter Installation ist menschliche Prüfung erforderlich

Empfohlene Aktion

Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.

Qualitätsprofil

Vielversprechend Kandidat für Agent-Workflows

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

63
GitHub-Stars
161
Aktualität
vor 1 Tagen
Installationsbereit
Ja
Lizenz
Unbekannt
Vor Installation prüfen: Repository license is detected as 'Unknown', raising compliance concerns about reuse and redistribution.

Workflow-Eignung

Diese Skill in diesen Szenarien nutzen

Workflow-Eignung

Zum vollständigen Workflow hinzufügen

Alternativen-Shortlist

Vor Installation vergleichen

Similar skills that may fit this task.

Alle vergleichen

Übersicht

--- name: api-design description: Design and review predictable public APIs for TypeScript, JavaScript, React, and React Native libraries. Use when shaping exported functions, classes, hooks, options objects, event and listener APIs, error behavior, naming, cross-platform abstractions, or JS-only packages. Pair with build-nitro-modules when the library is backed by Nitro. ---

# API Design

Use this skill before implementation or when reviewing a public API surface. Target explicit types, stable semantics, and no irrelevant internals in the public contract.

If the library is a Nitro Module, use this skill for the public TypeScript and React API shape first, then use `build-nitro-modules` for Nitro-specific spec, native-state, and binding constraints. If the library is JS-only, React-only, or React Native JS-only, stay in this skill.

## Workflow

1. Sketch the user-facing TypeScript API before implementing internals. 2. Write 2-3 realistic call-site examples, including error and cleanup paths. 3. Check the surface against the rules below. 4. Verify the exported TypeScript with the repo's typecheck/lint/docs tooling before treating the API as done. 5. Implement only after the public shape is coherent and verified.

## API Freshness

Before choosing public API shape, dependency APIs, platform capabilities, or implementation strategy, verify current official sources instead of relying on trained memory. Library, React, React Native, platform, and tooling APIs evolve quickly.

- Prefer official docs, source repositories, release notes, changelogs, package READMEs, and current package metadata. - Look for `llms.txt` or `llms-full.txt` on official docs sites when available, and use those as compact current context. - Treat remembered API details as a starting hypothesis only. If current docs or source disagree, follow the current docs/source and mention the change when relevant. - Avoid designing against stale blog posts, old snippets, or outdated trained assumptions when an official current source is available.

## API Shape Rules

- Prefer a single source of truth. Do not split related state across booleans and dependent values when one typed value can express the state. Prefer `timeoutMs?: number` over `enableTimeout: boolean` plus `timeoutMs?: number`. - Use option objects or named structs once a function has 3 or more parameters, parameters of the same primitive type, or values that are likely to grow. - Keep APIs specific instead of accepting every possible input shape. A millisecond timeout should be a `number`, not `number | string | bigint | object | null`. - Avoid giant "does everything" objects. Split by domain or lifecycle when responsibilities differ. - Before simplifying or redesigning an API, inventory the workflows the feature is supposed to support. Do not silently drop a workflow, such as a live session API, because a one-shot path is easier to implement. Split workflows into separate APIs when needed. - Prefer literal unions, discriminated unions, interfaces, and typed option groups when the valid states are known. In TypeScript libraries, prefer string literal unions over runtime `enum`s unless consumers need a runtime value. - Avoid untyped dictionaries, boolean clusters, stringly typed commands, and loosely shaped events when the valid states are known. - Do not model a binary option as an optional two-case string union such as `'enabled' | 'disabled'`. If omitted means "use the default" and provided means true/false, use an optional boolean and document the default. - Do not represent multiple object states as one interface full of optional fields. Use a discriminated union, inheritance, or separate variant interfaces so impossible field combinations are unrepresentable. - Keep related fields together on the variant where they are required. If `barcode` and `barcodeType` only make sense together, both should be nonoptional on `ScannedBarcode`, not optional on a generic `ScannedData`. - If you create variant interfaces, use them in the actual public type. Do not define `RecognizedTextDataType` and `RecognizedBarcodeDataType` but keep `recognizedDataTypes: RecognizedDataType[]` where `RecognizedDataType` still contains every variant field as optional. - Use `undefined` or optional fields for absence. Use `null` only when "explicit none" means something different from "not provided". - Prefer discriminated unions for state machines, loading states, and result variants. - Model user intent separately from resolved state when negotiation is involved. For example, an ordered array of constraint objects can express priorities, while a resolved config object reports what the platform actually selected. - For complex negotiation, prefer ranked constraints or preference objects over exposing a combinatorial support matrix. Let callers describe intent, resolve the closest working configuration internally, and expose the resolved configuration through a return value, callback, or explicit resolver method. - Expose common presets as `as const satisfies Record<string, Type>` objects. Keep the accepted type structural so users can provide their own values. - Do not expose ambient facts the caller already knows, such as a `platform` field that only repeats `Platform.OS`, unless the API can return data produced by a different platform than the current runtime. - Do not freeze today's platform support matrix into the type shape. Prefer runtime capability fields such as `availableTextTypes: []` or `supportedFormats: []` over separate platform-specific types or static exclusions. This lets newer native capabilities become available without redesigning the JS API. - Prefer one unified options object. Avoid `ios`/`android` option bags and platform-prefixed methods unless the concepts are genuinely platform-only and cannot be described as a cross-platform capability or no-op. - Classify configuration fields as either requirements or preferences. Throw when a requirement cannot be met. Treat preferences as best-effort when the feature can still perform its core job, such as quality, guidance UI, high-frame-rate tracking, auto-zoom, or a wider scan area. Document best-effort fields and expose capabilities or resolved configuration when callers need to know what was applied. - Split by stable semantic capability when capabilities have different options, results, or futures. For example, barcode scanning and text scanning may deserve separate `BarcodeScanner` and `TextScanner` APIs even when one native API happens to implement both today. A platform that lacks text scanning should fail `createTextScanner()` or report `isTextScannerAvailable: false`, not force text-specific fields to be nullable on a generic scanner used for barcode scanning. - Runtime availability should describe whether a stable capability exists today, not permanently restrict the API shape to the current platform matrix. If Android gains text scanning later, the existing `TextScanner` capability should become available without changing barcode APIs or broadening nullable result types. - Keep capability discovery separate from object contracts. Use capability fields to decide whether a workflow can be created or which optional preferences may apply. Once a factory returns a specific session/resource object, its baseline methods should be guaranteed by construction; otherwise return a narrower type or fail creation instead of making callers check `can*` before every normal method. - Splitting workflows should reduce runtime capability checks. Do not keep broad capability flags only to compensate for one oversized object. For example, a one-shot scanner and an app-owned live scanner can be separate APIs; if the live scanner implementation guarantees zoom, photo capture, or region control, those can be part of the live scanner contract instead of nullable properties plus `can*` checks inherited from a one-shot backend. - Encode lifecycle transitions in the API object graph. If commands are valid only after `configure`, `connect`, `start`, or another lifecycle transition, expose those commands on a handle returned by that transition, not on the parent object with "maybe active" checks. For example, `session.configure(device, outputs)` can return a `Controller` that owns `setZoom(...)` and `focusTo(...)`; the `Session` owns graph configuration and start/stop. - Avoid stale-state APIs. If reconfiguration changes the native resource a command targets, return a new handle and invalidate or dispose the old one. Callers should not be able to accidentally call a command on a parent object that no longer knows which configured device/output it applies to. - Use callbacks or returned resolved objects for post-negotiation facts. If an output, controller, or session config becomes meaningful only after connection, provide `onConfigured`, a returned controller/config, or an explicit `resolve...(...)` method rather than forcing callers to poll nullable properties. - For Nitro-backed imperative APIs, treat the public HybridObject as the API by default. Do not add JS wrappers that pre-parse inputs, translate enum/string shapes, normalize one public format into another, or otherwise make JS call a different API than the generated Nitro spec. Put the intended public shape directly in the Nitro spec and native implementation. - When "all" is a meaningful requested value, model it explicitly instead of using `undefined` as a hidden command. For example, prefer `targetFormats: 'all' | BarcodeFormat[]` or `TargetBarcodeFormat = BarcodeFormat | 'all'` when the implementation benefits from a concrete value. - Do not return half-initialized objects that require a separate `prepare()`, `initialize()`, or `load()` call before normal use. If setup is required, make the factory async and resolve with a ready object. Keep lifecycle methods for real repeatable transitions such as `start()`/`stop()`, not construction readiness. - For larger libraries, expose one small public root or factory that creates stateful domain objects. Keep object construction, async setup, I/O, and validation behind factory methods instead of forcing callers through static functions or half-ready instances. - Return `undefined` only for normal domain absence, and document exactly when it occurs. Do not use optional returns as an unstated error path; throw or reject when an operation fails. - Decide whether returned data is a plain value or a resource. Use plain structs/interfaces for small immutable data whose fields are cheap and semantically complete. Use classes/objects/resources when the value owns native state, needs lazy expensive access, can grow behavior, or should expose methods later. - Choose data representations by semantics first, then performance. Use `string` for decoded text payloads. Use `ArrayBuffer` or byte-oriented objects for raw binary, opaque bytes, media, or large data where zero-copy access is part of the contract.

### Variant Example

Avoid nullable clusters when an object can be in several distinct states:

```typescript interface ScannedData { position: Point text?: string barcode?: string barcodeType?: BarcodeType face?: Rect } ```

Prefer a base type plus variants with nonoptional state-specific fields:

```typescript interface ScannedData { position: Point }

interface ScannedText extends ScannedData { text: string }

interface ScannedBarcode extends ScannedData { barcode: string barcodeType: BarcodeType }

interface ScannedFace extends ScannedData { face: Rect }

type ScannedResult = ScannedText | ScannedBarcode | ScannedFace ```

## Public API Organization

- Split public surfaces into focused files or modules and re-export them from a clear package entry point. Do not create catch-all files that contain a feature's main object plus every enum, option, result, event, and helper type. - Default to one exported public type per file. Group multiple exported types in one file only when they form one tightly coupled log

Technische Details

Version
1.0.0
Lizenz
Unknown
Letzte Aktualisierung
21. Aug. 2026
Veröffentlicht
21. Aug. 2026

Entscheidungsübersicht

Fallback-Kandidat

63
Bereit
Prototyp
Phase

recent repository activity

Audit

Installationsprüfung

Installations- und Adoptionsprüfung

74
Prüfung nötig
Sicherheit
71/100
Wartung
100/100
Installieren
92/100
Vollständiges Audit öffnenEval-Bericht ansehen

Von Agent belegte Evidenz

Von Agent belegte Evidenz

Ergebnisberichte nach Resolve, Prüfung, Installation und einem begrenzten Lauf.

0
Belegt
Needs first agent runAuto-Installation: zuerst prüfenLetzter: Unbekannt
Erfolgsrate
Letzter Fehler
Ergebnisse
0
Ausgabequalität
Fehlgeschlagen
0
Nicht relevant
0
Installationen
0
Durch Risiko blockiert
0
Einrichtung erforderlich
0
Produktion
0

Noch keine Agent-Ergebnisdaten. Der erste Lauf kann Erfolg, Einrichtungsbedarf, Risikoblockaden, Fehler oder Irrelevanz über /api/agent/outcome melden.

Installieren

Zum Agent-Workflow hinzufügen

Kostenlos und Open Source. Bericht vor der Installation in Produktions-Agents prüfen.

Wachstums-Loop

Share-Kit

X

Szenariobasierter Entwurf für api-design, bereit für einen manuellen X-Post.

Kuratorenhinweis
A practical pick for design or creative work:

api-design: Design and review predictable public APIs for TypeScript, JavaScript, React, and React Native libraries. Use when shaping e...

161 stars

https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/margelo-api-design?ref=x
X-Entwurf öffnen
Optionale Antwort mit Installationsbefehl
Listing + install path for api-design:
https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/margelo-api-design?ref=x

Install: npx skills add margelo/react-native-skills --skill api-design
Antwortentwurf öffnen

Quelle des Eintrags

Registry-indexiert

Beanspruchbar

Dieser Eintrag wurde aus öffentlichen Quellen indexiert und ist erst nach Genehmigung eines Maintainer-Anspruchs offiziell.

Ersteller
margelo
Indexiert von
OpenAgentSkill Community-Index

Die Zuordnung verlinkt auf das öffentliche Repository oder Creator-Profil. Creator können den Eintrag beanspruchen, um Eigentümersignale zu aktualisieren.

Diesen Skill beanspruchen

Eigentümeranspruch

Diesen Skill-Eintrag beanspruchen

Dieser Registry-indexiert-Eintrag wird margelo zugeschrieben, ist aber noch nicht offiziell markiert. Beanspruche ihn, um ein verifiziertes Eigentümersignal hinzuzufügen und künftige Launch-, Installations- und Audit-Updates vertrauenswürdiger zu machen.

Creator-Backlink-Kit

Evidenz-Badges in deine README einfügen

Zeige den kanonischen Eintrag, aktuelle Vertrauens- und Audit-Signale sowie echte Agent-Proven-Evidenz dort, wo Entwickler das Repository bewerten.

[![Listed on OpenAgentSkill](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/margelo-api-design?metric=listed&label=Listed)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/margelo-api-design)
[![OpenAgentSkill Trust](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/margelo-api-design?metric=trust&label=Trust)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/margelo-api-design)
[![OpenAgentSkill Audit](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/margelo-api-design?metric=audit&label=Audit)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/margelo-api-design/audit)
[![Agent Proven](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/margelo-api-design?metric=proven&label=Agent%20Proven)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/margelo-api-design)

Autor

M

margelo

@margelo

Plattform-Fit

Gesundheitssignale

GitHub-Stars
161
Qualitätswert
38/100
Letzter GitHub-Push
21. Aug. 2026
Framework-Hinweise
Unbekannt
OpenAgentSkill-Aufrufe
2
Installationskopien
0
Externe Klicks
0

Community-Signal

Teile mit, ob dieser Skill für deinen Agent-Workflow nützlich ist. Zusammengefasstes Feedback verbessert das Ranking im Laufe der Zeit.

Vertrauen & Sicherheit

Do not auto-install

59
  • GitHub-Akzeptanz161 GitHub-StarsInfo
  • Star-/Fork-Aktivität161 Stars und 7 Forks; Issue-Aktivität ist in den aktuellen Metadaten nicht verfügbarPrüfen
  • Aktuelle Wartung1 Tage seit dem letzten PushBestanden
  • LizenzklarheitUnbekanntPrüfen
  • README/SKILL.md-VollständigkeitMetadaten enthalten ausreichend Nutzungs- und Workflow-KontextBestanden
  • Abhängigkeits-/Laufzeitrisikonetwork or browser surfaceBestanden